Title: Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI): How Do We Begin?
1Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)How Do We
Begin?
- Yonna Acuff, M.Ed., NBCT
- Giancarlo Anselmo M.S., S.S.P., NCSP
- Sandy Hamrick, M.A., NBCT
2Overview
- Who we are and where we have come from
- Current system for training
- Mistakes made along the way
- What RtI looks like in Cleveland County
3Two Major Things You Can Expect
- Number 1
- Starting a process that tries to match the
correct level of instruction with the level of
need for every child in your school - Number 2
Mistakes
4In the Beginning
- In 2005-2006, department heads from CCS began
research behind RtI - Reading Materials
- The RTI Guide Developing and Implementing a
Model in Your Schools, J.E. McCook , 2006 - RESPONSE to Intervention Policy Considerations
and Implementation, National Association of State
Directors of Special Education, Inc., 2006 - Site Visits
- Horry County Schools, SC
- New Hanover County Schools, NC
5In the Beginning cont
- Discussion with Susan Davis, SLD Consultant with
DPI - Two Day RtI Overview presentation by Dr. Tom
Jenkins - Met with all Principals and Selected EC and
Regular Ed personnel
6District Core Team
- After research was completed, the decision was
made to begin implementation - A five member, interdisciplinary team was
appointed - Regular Education Teacher
- School Counselor
- School Psychologist
- EC Program Specialist/Diagnostician
- Curriculum Coordinator
7District Core Team
- Attended the eight day training provided by NC
Department of Public Instruction - In conjunction with administrators from the 2
pilot schools, the team developed local paperwork
and a training protocol specific to Cleveland
County
8Overall Implementation and Expansion
- 2006/2007 RTI procedures were piloted in two
elementary schools - One large school (700 students) Springmore
Elementary - One small school (300 students) Casar Elementary
- 2007/2008 implementation expanded into two more
larger elementary schools - Fallston Elementary (600 students)
- Union Elementary (600 students)
- 2008/2009 we have expanded to two more schools
- -Jefferson Elementary (300 students)
- -Grover Elementary (500 students)
9Training Protocol
- Using NCDPIs training materials, as well as
additional resources, a four session training
series was created - Training Module 1, RtI Overview
- Training Module 2,Tier 1
- Training Module 3, Tier 2
- Training Module 2, Tier 3 Training for PST
Team members.
10Training cont.
- Training sessions were scheduled after school
during staff meetings from 300-430 pm. - Training Module 1 is held in the Spring prior to
Fall implementation. - Training Module 2 is held in August or Early
September. - Training Module 3 is held in October or Early
November. - Training Module 4 is conducted by two members
from the Core Team during a designated PST Team
meeting.
11RtI Overview Training
- Introduce staff members to the concept of
Response to Instruction, including changes within
IDEA Regulations. - Create awareness about the 4 Tier process the
school will be implementing the following school
year.
12Tier 1 Training
- Discuss the 7 Step Problem Solving Process
- Explain the Tier 1 of the 4 Tier Model in detail
- Review the use of Curriculum Based Measures and
how to enter a child in Tier 1 - Teach how to complete Tier 1 paperwork and the
processes involved - Provide examples and discuss possible outcomes
13Tier 2 Training
- Briefly review Tier 1
- Review the 7 Step Problem Solving Model
- Talk about what may necessitate a child moving
from Tier 1 to Tier 2 using Progress Monitoring
Data - Teach how to complete Tier 2 paperwork and the
processes involved - Provide examples for review and discussion
14Tier 3 Training
- Core Team Members meet with the schools Problem
Solving Team (PST) to discuss each team members
role - Coordinator
- Time Keeper
- Note taker
- Review the paperwork for Tier 3
- Discuss who will provide instruction for Tier 3
students
15What is the Best Way to Train a Problem Solving
Team
- First Year Training
-
- Consisted of training teams using PowerPoints
from state training - Trained teams from two schools at once
- Second Year Training
- Trainings consisted of sitting down with each PST
team and going over case studies - Cases from their own schools were used to help
them go through the process
MISTAKES
16How PST Team Changed
- Last Year
- Principal
- School psychologist
- EC teacher
- Diagnostician
- Teacher of student
- Regular ed teacher
- Title 1 reading specialist
- Counselor
- Social worker
- Parent
- This Year
- Principal
- School Psychologist
- Case Colleague
- Title 1/Interventionist
- Parent
- Teacher of student
- Diagnostician
- Others used as needed
MISTAKES
17School Wide Support For Process
- Showing how the Discrepancy model was probably
not the best model in order to catch students
early - Studies done at local level showing legitimacy of
Curriculum Based Data
18Correlation Studies looking at EOG and CBM
Assessments
- EOG and ORF correlation coefficients
- 3rd grade .69
- 4th grade .59
- 5th grade .53
- EOG and Maze Fluency correlation coefficients
- 3rd grade .61
- 4th grade .63
- 5th grade .63
19Correlation Studies Looking at District
Performance on EOG and CBM Assessments
- EOG and Skill Builder Word Problem probes
correlation coefficients - 3rd grade .64
- 4th grade .49
- 5th grade .60
20Cleveland County Schools EOG/CBM data 2007
211st Year Implementation
22Teacher Supports
- Teachers have been trained on all tiers of
process - CBM training provided by school psychologists
- Teachers each received intervention notebooks
- Intervention training
- Teachers are assigned case colleagues from the
Problem Solving Team to help with procedures,
paperwork, or interventions starting at Tier I
23Roles of Case Colleague
- Case colleague meets with teacher at the
beginning of Tier 1/Tier 2 to help with
paperwork, interventions, and answer any other
questions that arise - Case colleagues also meet with teachers every
other week to check in on progress - Case colleagues also meet with teachers at the
end of Tier 2 - Case colleagues are in charge of setting up PST
Team meeting if moving to Tier 3
24Teachers Teaching Teachers
- Intervention training done in the middle of the
year - 90 of training was done by teachers who had
shown great ability to run interventions in their
classrooms and differentiate instruction - Training went very well and most teachers were
very receptive to ideas from other teachers
25Students Entering Tier 1
- First Year
-
- K-2 Students entered Tier I in reading based on
DIBELS data - All other subject areas and grades 3-5 where
based on teacher discretion
- Second Year
- All Children K-5 went through screening process
at RtI schools
MISTAKES
26Screening All RTI Schools K-5th Grade
- All students are screened three times a year
using either DIBELS, Skill Builder probes, or
Aims Web Maze Fluency probes - Teachers have been shown data and given
recommendations on who needs to enter Tier 1 - Teachers have been shown what skill to teach and
what to use to progress monitor each child
27Curriculum Based Measurements
- Teachers have been taught to use CBMs for
progress monitoring - Training was done by school psychologists during
planning times broken up over several weeks - Nearly all instruction is tracked using CBM data
- Data is not graphed or charted until child enters
Tier 3, unless teacher chooses to graph data
28Timelines
- Beginning of the year benchmark assessment
- Targeted students enter Tier 1 based on
information from class and assessments - Plan is written with help of parent and usually
Case Colleague - Teachers intervene in specific area for 4-6 weeks
- Dialogue continues with Case Colleague
- Process will repeat with Tier 2 only more people
are generally involved
29Local Norm Project
- Hybrid between DIBELs and Skill Builder Probes
- Local norm sample consisted of 576 across 1st-5th
grades - More than 100 students per grade
- DIBELS data was from approximately 400 students
per grade K-2
30Sample From 1st and 2nd Grade
31School Approach to Interventions
- ONE OPTION
- Each grade level has an intervention period built
into the daily schedule - Fluid time when any student in that grade level
can go to another teacher to receive intervention - Students not on intervention plan receive
challenge enrichment activities gifted teacher
can consult with staff about activities - Can be hard to schedule but has great results and
great teacher feedback
32Fidelity and Integrity Checks
- Case Colleague meeting form
- Interventions are observed before a child moves
to a new tier - Intervention observation form is used
- Before placement is considered third party is
looking over Tier III process to make sure
everything has been done properly
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37Where is Cleveland County Going From Here?
- With the implementation of RtI in 6 Elementary
Schools, we are now going to proceed with adding
other Elementary Schools in addition to a Middle
School for 2009-10. There is also one High
School in our district that is interested in
pursuing RtI implementation. - In order to continue building capacity, we
recognize that an additional Core Training Team
would be beneficial to our process.
38Instruction/InterventionQuestions to Ask
- What is my schools core curriculum?
- Is my core curriculum research based?
- Florida center for reading research
- fcrr.org
39Interventions/InstructionQuestions to Ask
- What do you have available at your school?
- What programs do you have?
- What resources can teachers easily access?
- Are your supplemental programs research based
instruction? - Who can supply interventions if they need to be
supplied outside the classroom? - Who will do progress monitoring?
40Implementing RtI is Like Eating an Elephant
- You can start anywhere you like
- You have to eat the whole thing
- You arent going to eat it all in one sitting
- It is going to take a whole lot of
- friends to help get the job done
41- mail.clevelandcountyschools.org/ganselmo
- RTI/Intervention Resources Cleveland County
Schools
42Questions