Title: Social Learning Theory
1Social Learning Theory
- One difficulty with many learning theories is
their almost exclusive emphasis on the processes
of acquisition of behavior and performance, and
their almost total neglect of the content of
personality - Julian Rotter, 1972
2Radical Behaviorism Pros and Cons
- Pros Scientific
- Deals with observable, measurable phenomena
- Rigorous methodology
- Con Ignores the things that make humans human
- Cognitions
- Emotions
- Free Will
3Therefore.
- Albert Banduras (1960s ) Social Learning Theory
- aka Social Cognitive Theory
- Put the person back into personality
4Theoretical Foundations of Social Learning Theory
- Psychodynamic explanations of behavior are flawed
- They are based on inferred drives/needs/etc.,
which cannot be tested - They ignore conscious cognitions
- They ignore situational influences
- Radical behaviorism is flawed
- It ignores cognition and emotion (Rotters
content of personality) - e.g., Assumes that actual reinforcement is
necessary for learning to occur - e.g., Rejects free will
5Banduras Triadic Model of Reciprocal Determinism
6Beyond Reinforcement 1
- External reinforcement isnt the only way in
which behavior is acquired, maintained, or
altered - We can also learn by observing, reading, or
hearing about others behavior - We develop anticipated consequences for our
behaviors - Even for behaviors were never engaged in
- Our cognitive abilities give us the capability
for insight and foresight
7Beyond Reinforcement 2
- Banduras biggest contribution to learning
theory - New patterns of behavior can be acquired in the
absence of external reinforcement - We can pay attention to what others do, and
repeat their actions - i.e., We learn through observation, rather than
through direct reinforcement
8Self-Regulation and Cognition
- We can exercise control over our behavior through
self-regulation - We are not slaves to environmental influences
- We have free will
- Cognition allows us to use previous experiences,
rather than trial-and-error, to foresee probable
consequences of our acts, and behave accordingly - Self-regulation allows us to choose behaviors
that help us to avoid punishments and move
towards long-term goals
9Bandura et al., 1963
- Subjects
- 48 boys and 48 girls attending Stanford U Nursery
School - Mean age 4.3 years
- Ss are matched across experimental groups for
degree of aggressive behavior shown in nursery
school interaction
- Exposure to an
- aggressive model
- (4 conditions)
- Observe an adult model behave aggressive
- Observe same adult model and same behaviors, but
on film - Observe same behaviors performed by a cartoon
character - Control group (no observations)
10- Response measures
- Total aggression
- Imitative aggression
- Partially imitative responses
- Mallet aggression
- Sitting on the Bobo doll
- Nonimitative aggression
- Aggressive gun play
11Bandura et al. Results 1Total Aggression
12Bandura et al. Results 2Imitative Aggression
Girls
Boys
Female
Male
Female
Male
Cartoon
Control
Real life model
Film model
13Bandura et al. Results 3Partially Imitative
Responses
14(No Transcript)
15Implications Eron Heusmann, 1985
50
Males
Females
40
30
20
10
0
Low
Med
Med
High
High
Low
Frequency of TV Viewing at Age 8
DV Seriousness of Criminal Act by Age 30
16Modeling
- We learn much of what we do through observing and
speaking with others (models), rather than
through personal experience - We form a cognitive image of how to perform
certain behaviors through modeling, and use this
image as a guide for later behaviors
17Basic Processes of Observational Learning 1
1. Attentional Processes (attend to and
accurately perceive models behavior)
2. Retention Processes (remember the models
behavior)
18Basic Processes of Observational Learning 2
3. Motor Reproduction Processes (translate
symbolically coded memories of the models
behavior into new response patterns)
4. Motivational Processes (if positive
reinforcement is potentially available, enact
the modeled behavior)
19Reinforcement in Observational Learning
- Types of Reinforcement
- Vicarious reinforcement
- Vicarious positive reinforcement
- Vicarious punishment
- Self-reinforcement
- Reward or punish self for meeting or failing to
meet own standards
20Empirical Evidence of Observational Learning
- Children who see an adult behave aggressively
might view that aggressive behavior as a positive
thing (i.e., expect positive reinforcement of
some type for that behavior), and therefore might
imitate that aggressive behavior - Bandura Huston, 1961
- Children imitate a models aggressive behavior in
the presence of the model - Bandura, Ross, Ross, 1961
- Children imitate a models aggressive behavior in
a new setting, away from the model - Bandura, Ross, Ross, 1963
- Will children imitate a film-models aggressive
behavior?
21Performing the Right Behavior at the Right
TimeSelf-Regulation
- We learn all kinds of behaviors by observing
others -
- Why dont we all just run around imitating every
behavior we see?
22Recall the Triadic Model of Reciprocal
Determinism
23Self-Regulation
- An important personal factor is the ability to
self-regulate - Some people are pretty good at this, some people
arent so good - Self-regulation is probably domain-specific
(recall the environmental influences component
of the triad model) - Can regulate some things, but not others
24Delay of Gratification
- Children who are able to delay gratification at
age 5 are less likely to become alcoholics or
drug addicts later in life - Specific to appetitive rewards
25Summary
- We acquire, maintain, and modify behaviors that
we see others perform - We decide which behaviors to keep, and when to
use them, by using - symbolic thought (what are my long term goals?)
- emotion (damn that Bobo doll!!!)
- self-regulation (I really want to stab my prof,
but I need an A, so) - Bandura and other Social Learning Theorists put
the person back into personality by stressing
the interplay of personal factors, environmental
factors, and behavior