Augustine 354430ad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Augustine 354430ad

Description:

Returns to N. Africa & becomes bishop of Hippo. Writes extensively in philosophy and theology ... To know a language is to know the meaning of words in the language ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: dingoSbs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Augustine 354430ad


1
Augustine(354-430ad)
  • Born near Carthage (Algeria) in N. Africa
  • Christian mother (Monica)
  • Pagan father
  • Citizen of the Roman Empire
  • Christianity the official religion of the Empire
    since the edit of Constantine (313ad)

2
  • Educated in Carthage
  • masters rhetoric
  • rejects Christianity
  • embraces sensuality
  • Mistress Adeodatus
  • Accepts Manichæism
  • two opposed fundamental forces for good and evil
    (compare the four forces of contemporary physics
    weak strong electromagnetic gravity)
  • conflict manifested in all things, including
    inevitable human moral failing

3
  • Becomes noted rhetorician
  • Moves to Rome as a teacher in 384
  • Meets and studies w. Ambrose in Milan
  • rejects Manicheanism accepts (neo) platonism
  • after intellectual struggle adopts Christianity
    in 387

4
  • Returns to N. Africa becomes bishop of Hippo
  • Writes extensively in philosophy and theology
  • Recognized as a Father of the Church
  • Influenced much of medieval philosophy and
    anticipates important ideas in modern philosophy

5
Knowledge and Illumination
  • Distinguish knowledge of
  • sensible particular (contingent) objects
  • nonsensible laws of science (or platonic forms)
  • universality
  • necessity

6
  • Experience
  • limited by space and time
  • results in knowledge of the sensible, contingent
    particular
  • cannot produce knowledge of the universal and
    necessary
  • We do have knowledge of the universal and
    necessary. How?

7
An Example of Illumination
  • Trickster secretly tells Confederate the answers
    to questions that Confederate could not otherwise
    know
  • e.g. What are the four numbers written on the
    paper hidden in my desk?

8
  • Trickster Confederate publicly perform their
    trick for Witness
  • Trickster asks the question
  • Confederate miraculously answers correctly and
    amazes Witness
  • Witness concludes
  • Confederate could not have known the (hidden)
    answers through sensation
  • Trickster must have informed (illumined)
    Confederate
  • Thats the only way Confederate could have know
    the answers

9
Moral of the Story
  • Confederate has knowledge beyond the bounds of
    sensation
  • Only communication suffices to explain
    Confederates knowledge
  • Certainly, Confederates knowledge acquired not
    innate

10
Illumination
  • Thesis the only way to explain how people have
    knowledge of universal and necessary scientific
    laws/forms is to hypothesize that God informs or
    illuminates them
  • The process of illumination is unspecified

11
  • Illumination is not innate because
  • knowledge of laws/forms is differentially
    acquired during the course of life
  • different people learn different science/forms at
    different times
  • whereas innate knowledge is common to all and
    inherent in all throughout life

12
Arguments for Illumination
  • Argument from Hierarchy
  • The universe is hierarchically organized, with
    forms at the top and above people
  • Nothing can act upon anything higher in the
    hierarchy
  • So, people cannot act on forms

13
  • So, people cannot come to know the forms by
    acting upon the forms through study
  • Nevertheless, some people do come to know some
    forms
  • This knowledge must result from the action of
    something at least as high in the hierarchy as
    the forms
  • But nothing is higher than the forms

14
  • Hence, it is the action of the forms upon people
    that causes knowledge
  • Augustine holds that God the forms
  • So, knowledge of the forms is the result of Gods
    action illumination

15
Argument from Language
  • To know a language is to know the meaning of
    words in the language
  • Meaning distinguishes between co-extensive
    properties
  • contrast triangular trilateral
  • A language learner cannot distinguish
    co-extensive properties in experience by
    ostention
  • So, meaning language cannot be learned
    experientially

16
  • Since language is mastered differentially, it is
    not innate but rather taught
  • The only possible teacher is God it takes a
    miracle illumination (some nonsensory process)
    to explain the acquisition of language

17
Necessity and Universality(redundant)
  • Some people learn scientific laws or forms with
    full necessity and universality
  • Sensation alone cannot provide such knowledge
    since it pertains only to the particular
  • Sensation must be supplemented by the universal
    principle of induction authorizing inference from
    the particular to the general
  • Illumination must be the source of such knowledge
    of the principle of induction

18
Problems w. Illumination
  • If illumination is divine intervention,
  • why does learning require our effort and work?
  • why does God illumine evil people?
  • what is the exact process of illumination?
  • how do you know when youve been illumined rather
    than deceived?

19
Creation Ex Nihilo
  • The universe changes constantly
  • To change is to become something from what was
    not
  • e.g. if a leaf changes from green to red, it
    becomes red from what was not, i.e. what was not
    red
  • So, change requires that something come from
    nothing, i.e. that something comes from what was
    not.

20
  • It is impossible under purely natural processes
    that something come from nothing.
  • So, there must exist something God that never
    changes and miraculously creates each momentary
    stage of the changing universe from what was not
    nothing (ex nihilo).
  • To create ex nihilo is to create without using
    matter it is to create simply by decree, command
    or thought.

21
  • Since God creates the universe ex nihilo, God is
    responsible for everything in the universe both
    good and bad
  • In creating the universe, God foresees or knows
    the entire history of the universe in full detail
  • So God knows everything that each person does
    before he/she does it

22
Creation Ex Nihilo and Evil
  • (i) By hypothesis, God is perfect benevolent,
    omnipotent, and omniscient
  • (ii) Assume Evil exists
  • (iii) God created the universe ex nihilo
  • So, God is responsible for evil (assuming evil
    exists)

23
  • But if God is perfect, God could not be
    responsible for evil
  • Now we have a contradiction
  • God is is not responsible for evil
  • Contradictions are never true and arise in
    arguments resulting from one or more false
    assumptions
  • Hence, either (i), (ii), or (iii) must be false

24
  • Augustine rejects (ii) he asserts that what we
    take to be evil is really good
  • Evil is illusory
  • Recognition of evil is a fallible theoretical
    inference, not observation!
  • Recall Is perception top down?
  • Suffering is really a good thing
  • it appears evil to us as an inference from a
    false theory ignorance of Gods purpose in
    allowing it

25
  • Immorality results when people freely choose
    what, contrary to appearance, is actually good
    yet not as good as what they might otherwise have
    chosen
  • immorality is really the lesser of two goods, not
    the reality of evil

26
Freedom, Necessity Volition
  • The Problem
  • In creating ex nihilo, God knows the entire
    history of the universe
  • So, God knows every human action before it occurs
  • What God knows shall occur must occur

27
  • So, every human action that does occur must occur
  • What must occur is necessary
  • So, every human action is necessary
  • What is necessary is not free
  • So, no human action is free!

28
Fate for Atheists
  • All propositions are true or false
  • So, all propositions about the future are true or
    false
  • Consider all true propositions about the future
  • the ones about you your autobiography

29
  • These propositions now indicate what will happen
  • your autobiography indicates all that you will
    ever do
  • If the propositions about the future are now
    true, then what they indicate will happen must
    happen
  • So, what will happen, must happen
  • What must happen is necessary

30
  • So, whatever will happen is necessary
  • Hence everything that will happen according to
    your autobiography is necessary
  • Whatever is necessary is not free
  • So, nothing in your autobiography is free
  • Hence you are not free neither is anyone else
  • Human freedom is illusory

31
Augustine on Freedom
  • Divine providence is compatible with human
    freedom despite the contrary argument
  • Providence does imply the necessity of the future
  • However, freedom is compatible necessity
  • Human freedom is really the result of voluntary
    action

32
  • Voluntary action is action aimed at what an agent
    wants
  • Divine providence does entail that human action
    is necessary, but it may yet be voluntary
  • So, since freedom is really voluntary action,
    action may be necessary yet still free
  • Hence, divine providence is compatible with
    freedom

33
Whats Freedom?
  • Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action,
    even if the action is necessary
  • But, assume that youre imprisoned cannot leave
  • it is necessary that you stay
  • does your staying voluntarily make your staying
    free?

34
Necessary Volition
  • Augustine holds that freedom is voluntary action,
    even if the action is necessary
  • But, voluntary actions require volitions
  • Are volitions themselves necessary?
  • If volitions are necessary, are voluntary actions
    really free?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com