Title: STAT 6395
1Spring , 2008
- STAT 6395
- Special Topic in Statistics
- Epidemiology
Filardo and Ng, 2008
2(No Transcript)
3I. Epidemiology
- The study of the distribution and determinants of
health-related states or events in specified
populations and the translation of study results
to control health problems
4Distribution
- Persons affected
- Place
- Time
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
5Determinants
- All the physical, biological, social, cultural,
and behavioral factors that influence health
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
6Health-related states or events
- Diseases
- Mortality (death)
- Specific causes of death
- Injuries
- Disability
- Health-related behaviors
- Physiological measurements
- Results of preventive regimens
- Clinical outcomes
- Provision and use of health services
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
7Specified populations
- Residents of a defined geographic area
- Students who attend a specified school
- Persons who belong to a specified organization
- Workers at a specified workplace
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
8Translation
Scientific articles and presentations at meetings
Clinical guidelines
Prevention programs Quality of care improvement
programs Patient safety programs
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
9Control
- Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
adverse impact of the disease on the community - Prevention
- Cure
- Management
Epidemiology The study of the distribution and
determinants of health-related states or events
in specified populations and the translation of
study results to control of health problems
10Primary prevention
- An action taken to prevent the development of a
disease in a person who is well and does not have
the disease in question
Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
adverse impact of the disease on the community
1) Prevention 2) Cure 3) Management
11Secondary prevention (Cure and management)
- The identification and treatment of people who
have already developed a disease or precursors of
the disease, through screening, at an early
enough stage in the diseases natural history
(early detection) such that intervention will be
more effective than if the disease had been
discovered later
Operations or programs aimed at reducing the
adverse impact of the disease on the community
1) Prevention 2) Cure 3) Management
12II. Objectives of Epidemiology
- To describe the extent of disease in the
community - To identify risk factors (factors that influence
a persons risk of acquiring a disease) for
disease and the etiology or cause of disease - To study the natural history (course from onset
to resolution) and prognosis of disease - To evaluate both existing and new preventive and
therapeutic measures (including health care
delivery) - To provide the foundation for developing public
policy and regulatory decisions relating to
environmental problems
13bottom line, Epidemiology research requires a
multidisciplinary effort and statisticians play a
key role in
- Hypothesis development
- Study execution
14Hypothesis development
- Epidemiologists study the specific distribution
and determinants of specific diseases - Development of hypotheses to test in an
epidemiologic study requires in-depth knowledge
of the disease and determinants under study - Medical and biological sciences
- Social and behavioral sciences
Epidemiology Research ? hypothesis development
and study execution
15Study execution
- Statistics ------------gtBiostatistics
- Medical and biological sciences
- Social and behavioral sciences
Epidemiology Research ? hypothesis development
and study execution
16Biostatistics
- Separate chance observations from meaningful
observations - Sampling
- Sophisticated statistical analyses
Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
17Medical and biological sciences
- Microbiology, e.g., to identify infectious
agents - Clinical medicine and pathology, (e.g., to
identify cases of disease) - Molecular biology, (e.g., to identify genotype of
individuals) - Biochemistry, (e.g., to measure serum hormone
levels)
Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
18Social and behavioral science
- Design questionnaires for obtaining valid
information - Design effective interventions for lifestyle
changes
Epidemiology Research ? Biostatistics, medical
and biological sciences, social and
behavioral sciences
19Epidemiology Sub-disciplines
- Disease-specific subject matter
- Exposure-specific subject matter
- Health services research
20Disease-specific subject matter
- Infectious disease epidemiology
- HIV/AIDS epidemiology
- Malaria epidemiology
- Chronic disease epidemiology
- Cancer epidemiology
- Cardiovascular epidemiology
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Neuroepidemiology
- Psychiatric epidemiology
Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
21Determinant (exposure)-specific subject matter
- Environmental epidemiology
- Occupational epidemiology
- Pyschosocial epidemiology
- Genetic epidemiology
- Nutritional epidemiology
- Pharmacoepidemiology
Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
22Health services research
- Operations research the study of the placement
of health services in the community and the
optimum utilization of such services - Program evaluation
- Clinical epidemiology or outcomes research the
study of illness outcomes in persons seen by
providers of health care evaluation of medical
treatments
Epidemiology disciplines ? Disease-specific
subject matter, Exposure-specific subject
matter, Health services research
23Types of epidemiologic studies
- Experimental
- Observational (this course will focus on this
second type of studies)
24Experimental Studies
- Studies in which conditions are under the control
of the investigator(s). - The investigators assigns subjects to different
study groups. The effect of the treatment is
determined by comparing the outcome of interest
in these groups.
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
25Experimental studies (examples)
- Randomized clinical trial (unit of study is the
individual) - Community trial (unit of study is the community)
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
26Observational studies
- Studies in which the investigators does not
control conditions, but rather observe nature
taking its course by gathering information,
recording, classifying, counting, and analyzing
the collected data. - Exposure and disease outcomes would have occurred
whether or not the studies have been performed
because there were no a priori intervention(s)
on the part of the investigators.
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
27Observational studies (examples)
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
28Descriptive studies
- Studies aimed at describing the distribution of
disease or other health-related variables with
respect to person (age, gender, race,
socioeconomic status), place (census tract,
county, state, country, urban/rural), and time
(season, year)
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(descriptive)
29Descriptive studies
- Often use routinely-collected data
- Can define high-risk groups
- Can be used for hypothesis generation, but
generally not hypothesis testing
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(descriptive)
30Analytic studies
- Test specific etiologic hypotheses
- To generate new etiologic hypotheses
- To suggest mechanisms of causation
- To generate preventive hypotheses
- To suggest or identify potential methods for
disease prevention
In these studies, the epidemiologist observes the
relationship between an exposure and a disease or
other health outcome.
Type of studies ? Experimental, Observational
(analytic)
31Definition Exposure
- A potential causal agent or characteristic, such
as infectious agent, behavior, dietary factor,
medication, medical treatment, genetic makeup,
environmental agent, or physiologic state (e.g.,
serum level of a hormone or nutrient blood
pressure).
An exposure may be harmful or beneficial
Type of studies ? Observational ? Analytic
32Types of analytic studies
- Cohort studies
- Case-control studies
Type of studies ? Observational
33Cohort studies
- A study in which a group of persons exposed to a
factor of interest and a group of persons not
exposed are followed
and compared with respect to the incidence rate
of the disease or other condition of interest
Time
Type of studies ? Observational ? Cohort studies
34Cohort studies (study schema)
Type of studies ? Observational ? Cohort studies
35Case-Control studies
- Studies in which a group of persons with a
disease (cases) and a comparison group of persons
without the disease (controls) are compared with
respect to the history of past exposures to
factors of interest
Present
Past
Type of studies ? Observational ? Case-Control
36Case-Control studies (study schema)
Type of studies ? Observational ? Case-Control
37(No Transcript)
38Either descriptive or analytic studies
- Cross-sectional studies
- Ecologic studies
Type of studies ? Observational
39Cross-sectional studies
- Studies of the distribution of exposures and/or
disease in a defined population at one given
point in time
Type of studies ? Observational ? Cross-sectional
40(No Transcript)
41Ecologic studies
- Studies of the association between exposures and
disease in which the units of analysis are
populations or groups of people, rather than
individuals. - This involves the assessment of the correlation
of exposure rates and disease rates among
different groups or populations. - Causality, though???
Type of studies ? Observational ? Ecologic
42Types of Epidemiologic studies
43- Example involving several types of study designs
Ecologic study results
Case-Control study results
Cohort study results
Randomized controlled trial results
44Which type of study is the Gold Standard and/or
more common/feasible?
Observational Effectiveness
controlled setting (difficult to reproduce in
real life)
real life setting
45 Focus of this course is on observational
Epidemiologic research (research regarding the
direct study of disease in human populations)
46(No Transcript)
47Some triumphs of observational Epidemiology
- Smoking causes lung cancer
- Identification of cardiovascular disease risk
factors - Characterization of how HIV spreads through a
population - Identification of occupational hazards (e.g.,
asbestos)
48Three Eras of Epidemiology
- Sanitary (1800-1875)
- Infectious disease (1875-1950)
- Chronic disease (1950-present)
49Sanitary Era (1800-1875)
- Miasma theory of disease poisoning by foul
emanations (miasma) from the soil, water, and
air. - Created national vital statistics systems much
valuable descriptive epidemiology - Demonstrated clustering of disease in slums and
among the poor - Solutions sewage systems, drainage, clean water
supplies, garbage collection, decent housing - Incorrect miasma theory, but solutions were a
major contribution to public health
Lesson prevention doesnt necessarily require
understanding of cause
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
50Infectious disease Era (1875-1950)
- Germ theory single microscopic agents relate
one-to-one to specific diseases - Epidemiology took a back seat to laboratory
science, although in the1920s-30s, the germ
theory was broadened to accommodate the
interactive roles of host (immune and nutritional
status), environment, and agent in infectious
disease - Other epidemiologic contributions
- Occupational exposures as causes of cancer
- Specific vitamin deficiencies as causes of disease
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
51Chronic Disease (Modern) Era
- By end of World War II, infectious diseases were
under control in the developed countries
coronary heart disease and lung cancer were
epidemic - Multifactor causation of chronic disease
- Focus on identification and control of risk
factors at the individual level - Black box approach emphasis on risk factor
identification with only a secondary concern
about mechanism or pathogenesis
Most of the methodology we will cover in this
course was developed during this Modern Era.
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease
52New Era(???)
- Emerging infectious diseases (e.g., HIV)
- Continued burden of infectious diseases in
majority of world - Traditional chronic disease epidemiology has hit
a wall in its ability to discover important new
risk factors - Advances in molecular biology and genetics allow
the study of pathogenesis and causality at the
molecular and genetic levels using epidemiologic
approaches - The need to be concerned with causal pathways at
multiple levels, including the societal level, as
opposed to an exclusive focus on risk factors at
the individual level, has become apparent to many
Sanitary, Infectious disease, Chronic disease, ???
53Levels of causality
- Societal or population
- Individual
- Biochemical
- Cellular
- Molecular
54What causes lung cancer?
- Individual/societal Cigarette smoking (nicotine
addiction) - Biochemical Specific chemicals in cigarette
smoke that cause the mutations - Cellular Specific phenotypic changes in the
cells that result in loss of growth control - Molecular Mutations in DNA
55What causes AIDS?
- Societal
- Poverty
- Prostitution
- Individual/societal a. Multiple sexual partners
b. Intravenous drug use - Biochemical
- Cellular Infection -the HIV viruses
progressively destroy lymphocytes (a types of
white blood cells) - Molecular Mutations in DNA -the viral DNA is
incorporated into the DNA of the infected
lymphocyte
56On the mode of communication of cholera
- John Snow, M.D.
- London, 1855
57John Snow 1857
58Why study Snow?
- Appreciate those who came before us and paved the
way - Brilliant piece of work lucid and thorough
- Snows work on cholera illustrates a key
epidemiologic principle
the most important information to have about any
communicable disease is its mode of communication
59John Snow (1813-1858)
- Physician
- Pioneer in both epidemiology and anesthesiology
- Experiments in administration of anesthesia
himself may have contributed to his early death
60Snow administered chloroform to Queen Victoria
for the birth of Prince Leopold and Princess
Beatrice
61Cholera Acute Gastrointestinal Disease
- Incubation period 12-72 hours
- Sudden onset of severe vomiting
- Followed shortly by voluminous, watery,
non-bloody diarrhea, described as rice water
stool (white and opalescent) - Abdominal cramps
- Severe cases severe dehydration, circulatory
collapse, renal failure (death may occur within a
few hours of first symptoms) - Case fatality rate may range from 1-50,
depending on strain of Vibrio cholerae and
treatment
62In 1817, four years after John Snows birth,
cholera emerged from the Indian subcontinent,
where it had existed for centuries, to spread
across the world.
63Cholera Epidemics in Great Britain
- 1831-32
- 56,000 deaths
- 1848-49
- 125,000 deaths
- 1853-54
- Cholera returns to England
64Cholera Apparently contradictory facts in 1854
- Local spread with evidence of direct
communication from person to person - Failure to spread to many in close contact with
the sick - Cases occur without traceable relation to prior
cases - Highest rates in low-lying areas and in filthy
environments - Exceptions too numerous to
be disregarded - Unpredictability of its spread around the world
and its geographic distribution
65Cholera Miasma Theory
- Report of the London General Board of Health on
cholera epidemic of 1848-49 - it appears as if some organic matter, which
constitutes the essence of the epidemic, when
brought in contact with other organic matter
proceeding from living bodies, or from
decomposition, has the power of so changing the
condition of the latter as to impress it with
poisonous qualities of a peculiar kind similar to
its own.
66Cholera Elaborations of Miasma theory
- Localizing influences
- Predisposition
- Spontaneous generation of cholera poison
- Poison spread by diffusion through the
atmosphere vs. poison attached itself to solid
bodies - Poison communicated by an effluvium (contagion)
given off by the sick
67William Farr
68Farrs elaboration of Miasma theory
- Soil at low elevations, especially near the banks
of the Thames River, contained much organic
matter that produced deadly miasmata. - Miasmata diffused through the atmosphere in a
cloud or mist - Concentration of miasmata would be greater at
lower elevations than in higher elevations,
accounting for the geographic distribution in the
London epidemic of 1849.
Farrs theory did have some consistency with the
facts.
69John Snows Germ Theory
- Cholera caused by a germ cell, not yet identified
- 2 main modes of transmission of germ cell, which
was found in the evacuations of cholera
victims 1. Drinking water contaminated with
sewage 2. Contaminated food, bedding, or clothing
Snow was firmly convinced of his theory by start
of 1853-54 epidemic.
70Snows ecologic observations prior to the 1853-54
epidemic
Cholera has never appeared except where there
has been ample opportunity for it to be conveyed
by human connections.
- Epidemics of cholera followed major routes of
commerce and warfare. - Cholera always appeared first at seaports, when
extending to a new island or continent.
71Snows observations from case histories
- Cholera can be communicated from the sick to the
healthy. - Persons attending those with cholera do not
necessarily become afflicted. - Close contact with a cholera patient is not
necessary to become afflicted.
Snows conclusion cholera is communicated
from person to person, but not through the air
72When cholera returned to London in August 1853,
Snow had a definite hypothesis
cholera was spread by contaminated water.
73Water supply of south districts of London
Lambeth Water Company
- Until 1852, drew water from the Thames River in
London, contaminated with Londons sewage - In 1852, moved intake 22 miles up river and far
from the contaminated water
Southwark and Vauxhall Water Company
- Continued to draw water from the contaminated
Thames
74(No Transcript)
75Cholera Deaths in South Districts of London
76Cholera deaths (per 100,000) in south districts
of London
- District Water supply 1849
1853 - Bermondsey SV 1610
150 - St. Saviour SV, Lam 1530
146 - St. George SV, Lam 1640
143 - St. Olave SV 1810
134 - Rotherhithe SV, Kent 2050
112 - Newington SV, Lam 1440
57 - Wandsworth SV, others 1000
51 - Camberwell SV, Lam 970
40 - Lambeth Lam, SV
1200 34 - Notes 1. Lambeth was supplied mostly by
Lambeth Water Co. - 2. Rotherhithe supplied partly by Kent
in 1853
77Cholera Deaths in south districts of London,
1853, sub-district analysis
- Water Cholera Deaths/
- Supply Population Deaths
100,000 - SV 167,654 192
116 - Lambeth 14,632 0
0 - Both 301,149 182
60
How many cholera deaths would we expect in
sub-districts supplied by Lambeth if they had the
same death rate as those supplied by SV?
78Cholera Deaths in south districts of London,
1853, sub-district analysis
- Water Cholera Deaths/
- Supply Population Deaths
100,000 - SV 167,654 192
116 - Lambeth 14,632 0
0 - Both 301,149 182
60
Expected deaths for Lambeth (116/100,000)14,632
16
79Additional Observations on Sub-districts
- Among the sub-districts supplied by both
companies, those supplied mainly by Lambeth had a
low death rate, while those supplied mainly by
SV had a high death rate. - Two sub-districts supplied only by SV also
contained a number of pump-wells. These
sub-districts had a low death rate.
80By the return of cholera in July 1854, Snow
recognized the full significance of the
intermixing of the water supplies of the 2
companies
- in the sub-districts supplied by both
Companies, the mixing of the supply is of the
most intimate kind A few houses are supplied by
one Company and a few by the other, according to
the decision of the owner or occupier at that
time when the Water Companies were in active
competition
81By the return of cholera in July 1854, Snow
recognized the full significance of the
intermixing of the water supplies of the 2
companies
- in many cases a single house has a supply
different from that on either side. Each company
supplies both rich and poor, both large houses
and small there is no difference either in the
condition or occupation of the persons receiving
the water of the different Companies.
82An Experiment on the Grandest Scale
- no fewer than three hundred thousand people of
both sexes, of every age and occupation, and of
every rank and station, from gentlefolks down to
the very poor, were divided into two groups
without their choice
83An Experiment on the Grandest Scale
- one group being supplied with water containing
the sewage of London, - the other group having water quite free from
such impurity
84What type of study John Snow conducted?
85What type of study John Snow conducted?
86Cohort Study
- A study in which a group of persons exposed to a
factor of interest and a group of persons not
exposed are followed and compared with respect to
the incidence rate of the disease or other
condition of interest. - Exposed group persons using SV water supply
- Comparison group persons using Lambeth water
supply
Compared cholera mortality rates in the two groups
87Calculation of mortality rates required
numerators and denominators
- Mortality rate in exposed group
-
- (Cholera deaths among persons supplied with SV
water) / (Number of persons supplied with SV
water)
Mortality rate in comparison group (Cholera
deaths among persons supplied with Lambeth water)
/ (Number of persons supplied with Lambeth water)
To determine numerators and denominators, Snow
needed a way to classify each death and every
person in the population by water supply
88The Numerators
- For each cholera death in the relevant districts,
Snow obtained information on the water supply - The inquiry was necessarily attended with a good
deal of trouble. - Chemical test problematic because SV water had
40 times more NaCl than Lambeth
89The Denominators
a return had been made to Parliament of the
entire number of houses supplied with water by
each of the Water Companies, but ... the number
of houses which they supplied in particular
districts was not stated
- Therefore Snow had to include all the south
districts of London in his study, not just the
districts where the water supply was intermingled.
A daunting undertaking, so Snow obtained an
assistant (Mr. Whiting)
90Cholera deaths in south London districts during
first 4 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply
-
Deaths/ - Water Cholera
10,000 - Supply Deaths Houses Houses
- SV 286 40,046
71.4 - Lambeth 14 26,107
5.4 -
Relative risk 71.4/5.4 13.2 - Thames 22
- Pump-wells 4
- Ditches 4
- Unknown 4
- London 277 287,345
9.6 - (-SV)
- Note Houses, not persons, used in denominator
91More data
as the epidemic advanced, the disproportion
between the number of cases in houses supplied by
the Southwark and Vauxhall Company and those
supplied by the Lambeth Company, became not quite
so great, although it continued very striking
- Cholera likely was imported from Baltic Fleet to
Thames River, which was initially the primary
source of the epidemic - Later, cholera was also spread by other means,
diluting the water company effect
92Cholera deaths in south London districts during
first 7 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply
-
Deaths/ - Water Cholera
10,000 - Supply Deaths Houses Houses
- SV 1263 40,046
315 - Lambeth 98 26,107
37 -
Relative risk 315/37 8.5 - London 1422 256,423
59 - (-SV, Lambeth)
93Cholera deaths in south London districts during
last 7 weeks of 1854 Epidemic, by water supply
-
Deaths/ - Water Cholera
10,000 - Supply Deaths Houses Houses
- SV 2353 40,046
573 - Lambeth 302 26,107
115 - Relative risk 573/115 5
94Cholera deaths in south London districts during
the 1854 epidemic, by water supply
-
- Water Cholera Deaths/
- Supply Deaths Population 10,000
- SV 4,093 266,516
153 - Lambeth 461 173,748
26 -
Relative risk 153/26 5.9 - London 10,367 2,362,236
43 - Note
- populations supplied by water companies estimated
by Registrar General.
95Was the Use of Houses in the Denominators Valid?
- Water
Persons/ - Supply Population Houses
Household - SV 266,516 40,046
6.7 - Lambeth 173,748 26,107
6.7 - London 2,362,236 322,576
7.3
96Cholera Deaths in South Districts of London,
Sub-district Analysis, 1849 vs. 1854
- Water Cholera Deaths
- Supply 1849 1854
- SV 2261 2458
- Both 3905 2547
- Lambeth 1644 89
- Here we are back to ecologic analysis
97Cholera Outbreak in the Golden Square Area of
London, 8/31 - 9/9, 1854. Within 250 yards of the
intersection of Cambridge and Broad Streets,
there were more than 500 fatal cases
98Snow immediately suspected contamination of the
water of the much-used street pump on Broad
Street near Cambridge Street.
99Snow mapped the places of residence of cholera
decedents from August 31 - September 2 in the
broader neighborhoodand found that 73 of 83
deaths had taken place within a short distance of
the pump.
100(No Transcript)
101Snow investigated the water source of the 73
decedents who lived near Broad Street pump
- 61 -- drank water from the pump
- 6 -- did not
- 6 -- could get no information
10210 Deaths in houses located nearer to another
street pump
- 5 always used the Broad Street pump, as they
preferred its water - 3 (children) went to school near the Broad Street
pump
103Handle of the pump was removed on September 8
- Legend has it that the removal of the pump handle
caused the end of the epidemic - Snow himself wondered whether removing the pump
handle had a beneficial effect - Epidemic was already subsiding
- Much of the population in the neighborhood had
fled
it is impossible to decide whether the water
from the pump still contained the cholera poison
in an active state.
104Snows investigation of Golden Square Outbreak
workhouse near Broad St.
- Surrounded by houses in which deaths from cholera
occurred - Only 5 deaths among 535 inmates
- Workhouse had a pump-well on the premises
- Also received water from the Grand Junction Water
Works - Did not use Broad Street pump
- Would have expected more than 100 deaths based on
mortality in surrounding streets
105Snows investigation of Golden Square Outbreak
Brewery on Broad St.
- Located near the pump
- More than 70 workers
- None died of cholera
- Workers drank malt liquor, not water
- Deep well located in brewery
- Workers never obtained water from Broad Street
Pump
106Snows recommendations for prevention of cholera
during an epidemic
- Observe strictest cleanliness around the sick.
- Wash linens of patients as soon as they are
removed. - Boil water for drinking and preparing food
(unless known to come from clean source). - Wash or heat to 212F all food.
- Healthy should not live in same room as sick.
- Pit-men should work 4 hour shifts, and not eat in
mines. - Educate the people about communicability of
cholera.
107Snows recommendations for long-term prevention
of cholera
- Effect good and perfect drainage.
- Provide water supply free from contamination with
contents of sewers, cesspools, house-drains, and
refuse of people who navigate the rivers. - Provide model lodging-houses for the vagrant
class and sufficient house room for the poor in
general. - Teach habits of personal and domestic cleanliness
among the people. - Screen persons arriving from infected places.
108Medical establishment slow to catch on
- 1855 report of Scientific Committee for
Scientific Enquiries in Relation to the Cholera
Epidemic of 1854 on the whole of evidence, it
seems impossible to doubt that the influences,
which determine in mass the geographical
distribution of cholera in London, belong less to
the water than to the air. - 1856 Report on the last two cholera epidemics of
London as affected by the consumption of impure
water under the specific influence which
determines an epidemic period, fecalized
drinking-water and fecalized air equally may
breed and convey the poison.
109Sanitary movement eventually succeeded in spite
of its incorrect miasma theory
- Extensive improvements in several of Londons
water supplies, including Southwark and Vauxhall,
had already been ordered before the 1853-54
epidemic. - In next London epidemic (1866), William Farr
himself used epidemiology to show that the source
of the epidemic was impure water from the East
London Water Company.
110What We Know Now?
- Cholera caused by a bacterium (Vibrio cholerae
discovered in 1883 by Robert Koch) - Small intestine is primary site of infection
- Diarrhea caused by cholera toxin produced by
Vibrio cholerae - Treatment intravenous or oral fluid and
electrolytes, depending on severity of illness - Environmental reservoir for Vibrio cholerae in
the sea, where it lives on zooplankton and
shellfish
111Vibrio Cholerae
112(No Transcript)