Cognition and Perception - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 85
About This Presentation
Title:

Cognition and Perception

Description:

Cognition and Perception This is not a pipe. Just try stuffing tobacco in it! Rene Magritte, 1930 This is not a rose. Simple Cells Complex Cells What is a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:823
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 86
Provided by: sjsuEdupe3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognition and Perception


1
Cognition and Perception
This is not a pipe. Just try stuffing tobacco in
it! Rene Magritte, 1930
  • This is not a rose.

2
The myth of vision as a faithful record
       Concentric circles or continuous
spiral?        The pattern of light is of
concentric circles        Human vision sees a
continuous spiral
3
Gestalt
  • The whole is greater than the sum of its parts
  • Law of Pragnanz (good figure) We perceive
    things in the way that is simplest to organize
    them into cohesive and constant objects.

4
Gestalt Laws
  • Laws of Figure-Ground Segregation
  • 1. Convex region becomes figure
  • 2. Smaller region becomes figure
  • 3. Moving region becomes figure
  • 4. Symmetric ("good") region becomes figure
  • 5. Nearer region becomes figure (multiple depth
    cues apply)

5
Gestalt Laws
  • Laws of Grouping
  • 1. Proximity
  • 2. Similarity
  • 3. Common fate
  • 4. Good continuation
  • 5. Closure/ convexity
  • 6. Common region
  • 7. Connectedness
  • 8. Parse regions at deep concavities

6
(No Transcript)
7
  • Common Fate
  • http//dragon.uml.edu/psych/commfate.html

8
Figure 1. A Kanizsa figure. B Tses volumetric
worm. C Idesawas spiky sphere. D Tses sea
monster
9
Gestalt Laws
  • Laws of Grouping
  • Closure/ convexity

10
The Myth of vision as a passive process
  • The Grand illusion of complete perception
  • (1) Vision is not rich in detail
  • the size of a thumbnail at arms length is all
    that gets processed
  • (2) Attention is limited the law of ONEs
  • vision sees one object, one event, one location
  • These two factors are illustrated by
  • Impossible triangle
  • Escher drawings
  • Bistable images

11
Brains construct a well-behaved 3-D world so we
cannot experience a world that is not. Here we
see an ordinary triangle and building with normal
corners and angles instead of the shocking
reality. Why?
12
       A perceptually ambiguous wire
cube        How many different interpretations
can you see?
Go to
http//mindbluff.com/necker.htm
13
Figure 1.5. Subjective perceptions are not
necessarily arbitrary perceptions
Brains see two instead of all of these
interpretations? Why not? Humans bring shared
assumptions to the vision project, (1) that
objects are generally convex, (2) that straight
lines in a picture represent straight edges in an
object, and (3) that three-edge junctions are
generally right-angled corners.
14
Bi-stable Images
15
Bi-stable Images
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Law of One in Audition
  • Shepard Tone
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vDfJa3IC1txI
  • Each square in the figure indicates a tone, any
    set of squares in vertical alignment together
    making one Shepard tone. The color of each square
    indicates the loudness of the note, with purple
    being the quietest and green the loudest.
    Overlapping notes that play at the same time are
    exactly one octave apart, and each scale fades in
    and fades out so that hearing the beginning or
    end of any given scale is impossible.

21
Demos
  • Charlie Chaplin mask demo
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vQbKw0_v2clofeature
    related
  • Visual Illusions
  • http//www.michaelbach.de/ot/
  • Moving random dot stereogram
  • http//dragon.uml.edu/psych/commfate.html
  • Spinning silhouette
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vuBTvKboX84E
  • Gestalt Illusions
  • http//www.opprints.co.uk/gallery.php

22
Object Recognition
  • Mike the blind guy given sight
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vVVgfC_FV2hIfeature
    PlayListp32BC95C9D7E5959Cindex1

23
Object Recognition(Called Pattern Recognition in
Book)
  • How do you solve problem of Object Constancy?
  • How does the brain know the objects are the same
    despite change in perspective?

24
What letter are these, and how do you know?
  • A

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
25
Object Recognition
26
(No Transcript)
27
Receptive Fields of cortical neuronsPrimary
Visual cortex
  • 1. Simple Cells
  • --respond to points of light or bars of
    light in a particular orientation
  • 2. Complex cells
  • --respond to bars of light in a particular
    orientation moving in a specific direction.
  • 3. Hypercomplex Cells
  • respond to bars of light in a particular
    orientation, moving in a specific direction, of
    a specific line length.

28
What is the organization of the visual cortex?
  • Hubel Wiesel found that the visual cortex is
    organized into columns.
  • Location specific For each place on the retina
    there is a column of cells in cortex.
  • Two columns next to one another in the cortex
    respond to stimulation of two adjacent points on
    the retina.

29
Spatial Frequency
  • These grids are low to high spatial frequencies.
  • Many light bars / square High S.F.
  • Few light bars / square Low S.F.
  • Part of visions organization

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Spatial Frequency
  • By playing with spatial frequency, you can induce
    a the intense luminance perception of a bright
    sun.

33
Spatial Frequencies Work Together
  • Low S.F. give you outlines, High give you
    details.
  • Broad spectrum give you Local and Global features

34
Bottom-Up Processing
  • Perception comes from the stimuli in the
    environment
  • Parts are identified, put together, and then
    recognition occurs
  • Context does not matter

35
Gibsons Direct Perception (Bottom-Up)
  • All the information needed to form a perception
    is available in the environment
  • Perception is immediate and spontaneous
  • Affordances and attunements
  • Perception and action cannot be separated
  • Action defines the meaningful parameters of
    perception and provides new ways of perceiving

36
Top-down Processing
0
  • Perception is not automatic from raw stimuli
  • Context is needed to build perception
  • Meaning is constructed by making inferences,
    guessing from experience, and basing one
    perception on another

37
Template TheoryPerception as a Cookie Cutter
0
  • Basics of template theory
  • Multiple templates are held in memory
  • Compare stimuli to templates in memory for one
    with greatest overlap until a match is found

Search memory for a match
See stimuli
38
Template Theory
0
  • Weakness of theory
  • Problem of imperfect matches
  • Cannot account for the flexibility of pattern
    recognition system
  • More problems

Search for match in memory
See stimuli
No perfect match in memory
39
Template Theory
0
  • More Weaknesses of theory
  • Comparison requires identical orientation, size,
    position of template to stimuli
  • Does not explain how two patterns differ
  • e.g., theres something wrong with it this, but I
    cant put my finger on it AHA! I see!

40
Feature Theories
0
  • Recognize objects on the basis of a small number
    of characteristics (features)
  • Detect specific elements and assemble them into
    more complex forms
  • Brain cells that respond to specific features,
    such as lines and angles are referred to as
    feature detectors

41
Two Feature Theories of Object Recognition
  • Recognition By Components (Biederman Marr)
  • vs.
  • View-Based Recognition (Tarr Bülthoff)

42
Superquadratics (Pentland, 1986)
Geons (Biederman, 1987)
Generalized Cylinders (Binford, 1971 Marr, 1982)
43
  • Recognition By Components (Biederman)
  • Basic set of geometrical shape
  • Geons (geometric ions)
  • Distinguishable from almost any viewing angle
  • Recognizable even with occlusion
  • Grammatical relationship b/w parts
  • Part-whole hierarchies

44
Evidence of Geons
0
  • Beiderman (1987)
  • Can you identify these objects?

These objects have been rendered unidentifiable
because their geons are nonrecoverable
45
Evidence of Geons
0
  • Beiderman (1987)
  • Can you identify these objects?

These objects have had the same amount of the
object taken out but because the geons can still
be recreated, one can recover the objects
46
Testing Biederman
  • Objects are decomposed
  • Omitting Vertices
  • Retaining Vertices
  • In accordance with theory, easier to identify
    object with vertices

47
Object Recognition
  • Pros
  • Explains why it can be hard to recognize familiar
    objects from highly unusual perspectives
  • Cons
  • Absence of physiological evidence
  • Does not explain expert discriminations or quirks
    of facial recognition

48
Marrs Computational Approach
  • Primal Sketch 2-D description includes changes
    in light intensity, edges, contours, blobs
  • 2 ½ -D Sketch Includes information about depth,
    motion, shading. Representation is
    observer-centered
  • 3-D Representation A representation of objects
    and their relationships, observer-independent.

49
View-Based Recognition
  • Tarr Bulthoff
  • Multiple stored views of objects
  • Viewer-centered frame of reference
  • Specific views correspond to specific patterns of
    neural activation (possibly involves place
    neurons)
  • Match b/w current and stored pattern of
    activation
  • Interpolating (educated guessing or impletion)
    b/w seen and stored views

50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
The End
54
Opponent Process in a Movement Illusion
Waterfall Effect
  • http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid6294268981
    850523944eir5PRSNGPD6fcqAPS48y6Agqspiralvisua
    lillusionvtlfhlen
  • http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid-292742279
    6086500362vtlfhlen

55
Cognition and Perception
  • The finished files are the result of years of
    scientific study combined with the experience of
    many years.
  • The finished files are the result of years of
    scientific study combined with the experience of
    many years.

56
Two Visual SystemsWhat your hands see differs
from what the eyes see
  • Ventral What system
  • Dorsal Where/ How system
  • Brain lesions
  • Ventral lesions patients cannot name telephone
    but mime using it
  • Dorsal lesions can name it, but reach in wrong
    direction for it
  • Roelofs Effect

57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
X
X
X
62
X
X
X
63
Top-Down Bottom-Up
64
(No Transcript)
65
Orientation Ocular Dominance columns in Primary
Visual Cortex
66
Simple Cells
67
Complex Cells
68
What is a receptive field of retinal ganglion
cells?
  • The receptive field for these cells is the region
    of the retina that, when stimulated excites or
    inhibits the cells firing pattern.

69
The Visual cortex has a retinotopic map
  • Visual cortex has a map of the retinas surface.
  • More cortical neurons are devoted to fovea of
    retina.
  • As fovea only has cones, they are widely mapped
    on cortexs surface.
  • The reason cones allow us to see detail color.

70
Spatial Frequency in Action
  • http//www.metacafe.com/watch/1749277/animated_opt
    ical_illusions/

71
Top-down Processing Evidence
0
  • Context effects


72
Theories
  • Template Matching
  • Prototype
  • Feature Matching
  • Object-Based
  • Viewer-Based

73
Change Blindness
  • Counter experiment http//www.youtube.com/watch?v
    mAnKvo-fPs0
  • Campus Door Demo
  • http//viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/flashmovie/12.php
  • Construction door http//viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/f
    lashmovie/10.php
  • Gradual Change http//viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/fla
    shmovie/1.php

74
(No Transcript)
75
Prototype Theories
0
  • Modification of template matching (flexible
    templates)
  • Possesses the average of each individual
    characteristic
  • No match is perfect a criterion for matching is
    needed

76
Prototype Evidence
0
  • Franks Bransford (1971)
  • Presented objects based on prototypes
  • Prototype not shown
  • Yet participants are confident they had seen
    prototype
  • Suggests existence of prototypes

77
Prototype Evidence
0
  • Solso McCarthy (1981)
  • Participants were shown a series of faces
  • Later, a recognition test was given with some old
    faces, a prototype face, and some new faces that
    differed in degree from prototype

78
Solso McCarthy (1981) Results
0
  • The red arrow notes that participants were more
    confident they had seen the prototype than actual
    items they had seen

79
Research on Prototypes
0
  • Researchers have found that prototypical faces
    are found to be more attractive to participants
  • Halberstadt Rhodes (2000)
  • Examined the impact of prototypes of dogs,
    wristwatches, and birds on attractiveness of the
    stimuli
  • Results indicate a strong relationship between
    averageness and attractiveness of the dogs,
    birds, and wristwatches

80
Feature Evidence
0
  • Hubel Wiesel (1979) using single cell technique
  • Simple cells detect bars or edges of particular
    orientation in particular location
  • Complex cells detect bars or edges of particular
    orientation, exact location abstracted
  • Hypercomplex cells detect particular colors
    (simple and complex cells), bars, or edges of
    particular length or moving in a particular
    direction

81
  • Selfridges (1959) Pandemonium Model of visual
    word perception where R is the target letter.

82
  • Feature net model by Rumelhart and McClelland
    (1987), this is an Interactive Activation Model,
    which means lower and higher layers can both
    inhibit and excite each other, providing a
    mechanism for both top-down and bottom-up effects.

83
(No Transcript)
84
  • Biederman Stage 1, extract appropriate geon from
    image, and stage 2, match to similar
    representation stored in long-term memory.
  • Biederman proposed that certain properties of 2-D
    images are non-accidental, representing real
    properties in the world.

85
Viewer Based Recognition
  • Physiological evidence
  • Explains behavioral evidence
  • Does not explain how novel objects are learnt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com