Title: USA Regionals: What is KSBE Up To
1USA Regionals What is KSBE Up To?
- Dr. Alexa Posny
- August/September 2008
2(No Transcript)
3My fathers favorite bedtime story is Measures
of Academic Progress and Systematic Change.
4Number Tested ACT
5Five Year Trend Composite
6Five Year Trend Subjects
7Part I Academic Achievement
Part III
Part II
8Part I Academic Achievement
Part III
Part I
9An increase of 0.1
- 147 more students who are college-ready
- 36 more students who enroll in college
- 46 more students who persist into second year
- 25 fewer students taking remedial reading 39
fewer students taking remedial math - 39 more students who persist through four years
of college - 42 more students who complete a degree in five
years of less
10Kansas and Title I
- 94.5 of Title I schools made AYP
- 94 of Title I districts made AYP
- 4 schools came off the list
- USD 457 Bernadine Sitts Intermediate Center
- USD 457 Charles O Stones Intermediate Center
- USD 475 Junction Middle School
- USD 500 Douglass Elementary
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13KS Assessment Highlights Reading
14KS Assessment Highlights Math
15The class of 2011, born in 1993
- What Berlin wall?
- They never rolled down a car window.
- They never saw Johnny Carson live on TV.
- Theyre always texting 1 n other.
- Tiananmen Square is a 2008 Olympics venue, not
the scene of a massacre. - Al Gore has always been running for president or
thinking about it. - They were born the year Harvard Law Review Editor
Barack Obama announced he might run for office
some day.
16(No Transcript)
17KSBE 5 Steps to the Future
- Ensure that all students meet or exceed high
academic standards - --Multi-Tier System of Supports
- --Standards for 21st Century Schools
- --Integrating Accountability
- Redesigning the delivery system to meet our
students changing needs - Career Academies
- Individualized Career Plans
- Providing an effective educator in every
classroom - Teaching in Kansas Commission
- Ensuring a visionary and effective leader in
every school - Kansas Educational Leadership Commission
- Improving communication with all constituent
groups and policy partners - Kansas P20 Education Council
18(No Transcript)
19Redesigning High Schools
- Integrating Academics and Career and Technical
Education
20Why Finish High School
- Dropping out of high school is not a sudden act,
but a gradual process of disengagement (The
Silent Epidemic Perspectives of High School
Dropouts) - When students have the option to enroll in
career/technical programs, more of them stay in
school (2003 National Assessment of Vocational
Education Report) - Contextual learning and integrated academics in
technical courses are powerful tools for engaging
students in high school studies. (Lost in
Transition SREB)
21Why Finish High School
- The average annual earnings of workers 18 and
older with - No diploma 20,873
- Solely a high school diploma 31,071
- A bachelors degree 56,788
- An advanced degree 82,320
22Ready for College and Ready for Work Same or
Different?
- Whether planning to enter college or workforce
training, students need to be educated to a
comparable level of readiness in reading and
mathematics - Educating some students to a lesser standard than
others narrows their options to jobs that no
longer pay well enough to support a family of
four - Found concordance with the ACT College Readiness
benchmarks with WorkKeys Level 5
23Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
- What postsecondary instructors expect entering
college students to know is far more targeted and
specific than what high school teachers view as
important. - Remedial-course teachers ratings of mathematics
and reading skills tend to align more closely
with those of postsecondary instructors than with
those of high school teachers.
24Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
- While most high school teachers across subject
areas believe that meeting their states
standards prepares students for college-level
work, most postsecondary instructors disagree. - High school teachers believe that todays high
school graduates are less well prepared for
postsecondary education and work than graduates
in previous years, while postsecondary
instructors perceive no difference.
25Aligning Postsecondary Expectations and High
School Practice The Gap Defined
- There are specific differences between high
school instruction and postsecondary expectations
in every major curriculum area.
26Design 21
27Board Policy Initiatives
- Improve access to Career and Technical Education
(CTE) dual enrollment qualified admissions
promote partnerships - Implement integration of academics and CTE
standards integrated standards based on 16
career clusters gold standard assessments - Require career planning and awareness
personalized/individualized career plans of study
(ICPS) - Promote multiple strategies data reporting
across and through secondary and postsecondary
programs - Support funding at federal/state/local level
additional funding based on output
(results-based) versus input
28Teaching in Kansas
- Regulations, Initiatives and Survey Results
29KS 2008 Data Says
- 40 of our teachers leave the field after seven
years - 36 of our teachers can retire within 5 years
- 50 of reported personnel are over 45
36 are over 50 - 12 fewer students have gone into teaching over
the past six years - In 2007, there were 55 teacher biology licenses
in 2008 there were 82 - In 2007, there were 33 chemistry licenses in
2008 there were 35 - In 2007, there were 24 physics licenses in 2008
there were 28
30KS Teacher Vacancies
- In June 2008, there were 846 teacher vacancies
across the state - In August 2008, there are 375 teacher vacancies
that remain - Estimated
- In June 2007, there were 1144 teacher vacancies
across the state - In August 2007, there were 476 teacher vacancies
that remained
31Why Do Teachers Leave?
- Isolation from colleagues
- Assignments outside their area of training
- Lack of appreciation or respect
- Feeling discouraged
- Feeling frustrated
- Feeling left out of the decision-making
- Poor school management
- Lack of classroom resources specifically
- Too many regulations
- Lack of mentoring or induction programs
- Class size
- Not enough support from administration
- Undisciplined, poorly motivated students
- Uninvolved parents
- Unreasonable expectations
- Lack of resources
32Licensure Regulation Changes August 10, 2007
- Removed GPA (2.5) for conditional teaching
license - Offered a restricted school specialist license
- Recognized experienced Out-of-State (OoS) school
counselors without teaching background - Expanded provisional license options
- Offered a one-year nonrenewable without existing
offer of employment - Offered three additional options for added
endorsements - Scienceadditional science with content test
- 15 content credits plus test for middle level
- Secondary with 50 of program plus test
- Expanded innovative/experimental programs for
IHEs
33Licensure Regulation Changes July 18, 2008
- Changed conditional to initial license
- Created new licenses
- Transitional license
- Interim alternative license
- Enhanced access to professional license as the
initial Kansas license for veteran OoS educators - Offered reinstatement based on OoS experience
- Added endorsements
- OoS license with endorsements by meeting
specified coursework - Passing the content assessment
- Reduced renewal requirements for standard
substitute to 50 professional development points - Reinstated masters plus experience renewal
option - Emergency substitute renewed for two years
- Removed prohibition on compensation paid to
student teachers - Edited the issuance of restricted license for one
school year reissued with successful progress
report
34(No Transcript)
35KPA Transitional Performance Assessment
- Each conditionally licensed teacher must complete
a year-long, district-administered induction and
mentoring program to pass the teaching
performance assessment as a prerequisite to
receiving a professional teaching license. - During this transitional period, school districts
are expected to provide and supervise the
year-long induction mentoring program. - Districts will not be required to submit a
program plan for approval for this transitional
licensure requirement. - Over the course of the next year, the State Board
will consider permanent changes to the teaching
performance assessment as originally outlined in
the regulations.
36Transitional Performance Assessment Performance
Assessment
- Teacher Performance Assessments will occur at the
preservice level - There will be no prescribed teacher performance
assessment - A model is being developed by the IHEs
- The model will be voluntary
- The model covers the waterfront
- The model will change over time the model will
change teacher preparation programs over time
37(No Transcript)
38- Findings
- Perceptions of the presence of teaching
conditions in Kansas appear to have improved
since 2006 - Teaching conditions have an impact on teacher
employment plans. - Teachers and administrators view working
conditions differently. - Teachers perceptions of teaching and learning
conditions do not significantly vary by school
level and years of experience.
39Select Survey Questions
40School Leadership is Key to Teacher RetentionQ
Which aspect of your work environment MOST
affects your willingness to keep teaching in your
school?
41School Leadership Trends
- Almost 2/3rds (61) of teachers believe that the
school leadership in their building is effective. - A little more than 2/3rds (67) believe they work
in supportive environments. - 64 believe they can raise issues and concerns.
- 68 consistently get support when needed.
- 69 agree that school leadership communicates
clear expectations.
42Working Conditions Influence Teacher Employment
Decisions
43Remain in Teaching in Their School
- 89 or nine out of ten teachers want to remain in
their current school - 6 indicate that they want to continue teaching,
but in a different school or district - Only 5 want to leave classroom teaching
altogether
44Select Survey Questions
45Teachers Need Time to Plan and Collaborate
- Less than half (46) of educators believe the
non-instructional time (time without student
contact that could be used for planning,
meetings, etc.) that teachers receive is
sufficient. - Only 53 percent agree that teachers have time
available to collaborate with colleagues. - Only one-quarter (28) of Kansas educators report
receiving, on average, an hour per day of
non-instructional time. - Only 40 believe efforts are made to minimize the
amount of routine paperwork required of teachers.
46Professional Development
47(No Transcript)
48Teaching in KS Commission
- What is the Teaching in KS Commission?
- A commission formed to focus on the teacher
shortage including the preparation, recruitment,
and retention of teachers
49Teacher Summit
- 5 Common Concerns
- Working Conditions
- Training Programs
- Salary and Benefits
- Image and Promotion
- Regulations and Requirements
- Task Force Directives
50Educator Recruitment and Retention Summit
- Working conditions teacher planning time,
career-ladders - Teacher preparation consistency across
programs compensate student teachers - Salary and benefits salaries on a continuum
- Image and promotion statewide marketing
campaign grow your own - Regulations/requirements/data change transfer
credit rule set funding one year ahead
51Structured for ContinuousOpportunities
52Leadership for Learning
- Kansas Educational Leadership Commission
53Leadership Matters
- Leadership is the keystone element in school and
district success as defined in terms of student
achievement at the school level, it is
imperative - In difficult times, leadership matters even more
- In periods of significant organizational
transition, leadership is the major controllable
factor in explaining organizational performance - Instructionally focused and change-oriented
leadership are especially effective frames for
education - Team leadership seems to offer promise for
enhancing organizational performance
54KS Educational Leadership Commission
- What recommendations did the KS Educational
Leadership Commission make? - Add a 14th standard to the professional education
standards focusing on teacher leadership - Establish state policy that directs districts to
develop opportunities for teachers to engage in
collaborative work and create centers to helps
educators become teacher leaders - Establish a comprehensive review process to
direct the overhaul of programs that prepare
school leaders - Develop and implement a statewide framework for
the evaluation of school administrators - Develop and fund 12 district-based initiatives to
help school leaders find additional time and more
effectively use existing time to engage in
instructional-based leadership work
55KS Educational Leadership Commission
- What work groups will assist in this work?
- Teacher Leadership Regulation/Licensure (TLRL)
- Teacher Leadership Blueprint/Curriculum (TLBC)
- Higher Education Preparation Review and Induction
Redesign (HEPR/IR) - Administrative Evaluation (AE)
- Kansas Education Leadership Initiative (KELI)
56Kansas P20 Education Council
57P-20 Council Who?
- Janet Waugh, Region 1 State Board member
- Bill Wagnon, Chair, State Board of Education
- Two Board of Regents members
- Barry Downing, CEO of Northrock, Inc., Wichita,
as a member at-large - Terry Dunn, CEO of JE Dunn Construction, Kansas
City, as a member at-large - David Kerr, Secretary of the Kansas Department of
Commerce - Pam Robinson, representing the Kansas Association
of School Boards - Gail Kuehl, Owner/Operator of Kuehl Operations,
Hays, as a member at-large - Jan Long, representing the Kansas Parent Teacher
Association - Melissa Ness, representing the Kansas Childrens
Cabinet - Doug Penner, representing the Kansas Association
of Independent Colleges - Linda Robinson, President of USD 497 School
Board, Lawrence, as a member at-large - Dr. Brenda Dietrich, Superintendent, United
School Administrators of Kansas - Blake West, representing the Kansas Teachers
Association
58P-20 Council How?
- Develop a shared vision that reflects the needs
of the educational system - Develop a shared plan for reaching the states
vision with benchmarks for success - Establish policy coherence among KSDE, KBOR,
school districts, IHEs, businesses, foundations - Coordinate programs
- Align resources in the use of federal, state,
district and private funds - Evaluate and continuously refine the plan
- Report progress to constituents
59Kansas Sample
- Vision
- Charting a path to success for every child and
youth in Kansas. - Mission
- To create a collaborative, seamless system of
education in partnership with business and
industry that ensures students are prepared for
success from pre-school to graduate school and/or
to work in the 21st century.
60Kansas Sample
- Goals Develop a shared plan that--
- Aligns high academic standards for Pre-K-12
students with postsecondary education and with
business and industry standards. - Builds a statewide network for increased
collaboration, information sharing and
cooperation across all levels of education and
business and industry.
61Kansas Sample
- Strategies
- Alignment
- Engage higher education faculty, Pre-K-12
teachers and business and industry
representatives in aligning academic and work
force standards. - Develop a longitudinal database that allows the
sharing and use of student achievement data from
preschool through postsecondary. - Agree upon measures of student achievement that
are useful within and across all educational
levels and with business and industry.
62Kansas Sample
- Strategies
- Collaborative Network
- Clarify, focus and align existing policies,
priorities and programs. - Communicate consistently across all educational
levels and business and industry to ensure
coordinated action. - Align, leverage or redirect resources across the
systems and with business and industry.
63Kansas Sample
- Guiding Principles
- The Council believes in the need to be respectful
of different points of view and diverse opinions.
- The Council believes that it must stand ready to
initiate courageous conversations about difficult
topics. - The Council believes that regardless of race,
socioeconomic status, disability, or language
background, all students can be successful. - The Council believes that in order to succeed,
all programs that affect student achievement must
be considered.
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66Special Education Funding Task Force
An effective educational system mustestablish
placement-neutral funding formulas and
cost-effective strategies for meeting the needs
of children with disabilities (P.L. 105-17,
Sec. 651 (a)(6)(I)
67Federal Funding
- In 2000, the total spending to educate students
with disabilities in the US was 78.3 billion - Per pupil average spending was 12,639
- This is 90 percent more than general education
alone - The federal portion of the funding covers
approximately 12-18 of the total cost - 10.5 billion was provided by the federal
government as a formula grant to states (Part B)
68State Funding
- Comparable resources for comparable students
- Timely to plan for services
- Cost-effective yet allow for unique conditions
- Accountable for outcomes
- Reasonable in terms of reporting
- Linked to general education
69State Funding Formulas
- Pupil weights Aid allocated on a per student
basis - Flat grant Fixed funding amount per student
- Census-based Count of all students of which a
percentage is assumed to represent special
education students - Resource-based Allocation of specific education
resources such as teachers or classroom units - Percentage reimbursement Expenditures for the
services provided - Variable block grant Base year allocations,
expenditures, and/or enrollment
70Spending
- Average cost for a school-aged student served in
a program outside the public school is 26,440 - Average cost for a school-aged student served
within a public school is 5,709 - Central office administration cost amounts to
662 per pupil - Total spending on eligibility determination
activities is 6.7 billion, or 1,086 per pupil
71Spending
- 72 on school-aged programs, public and private
- 9 on preschool programs, public and private
- 2 on summer school, homebound
- 7 on transportation
- 10 on administration
72Students are volunteers, whether we want them to
be or not. Their attendance can be commanded, but
their attention must be earned. Their compliance
can be insisted on, but their commitment is under
their own control. Phillip Schlechty
Administrators who care know that
73(No Transcript)