ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS

Description:

But stock and bond returns sometimes ... CONSIDER FORD AND HONDA IN 2000. CORRELATIONS MAY HAVE CHANGED BECAUSE OF ... years later, Ford stock was down and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: Robert1128
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS


1
ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS
  • Robert Engle
  • Stern School of Business

2
Correlation
  • Correlations for Life
  • What is the correlation between thunder and rain?
  • What is the correlation between exercise and
    health?
  • What is the correlation between happiness and
    good food?

3
Correlations for Risk
  • Stock returns are correlated
  • Stocks in one country are correlated with stocks
    in another
  • Bond returns on one firm or country or maturity
    are generally correlated with returns on others
  • But stock and bond returns sometimes appear
    uncorrelated
  • The risk of a portfolio is greater if all the
    assets are highly correlated. It may go down (or
    up) further, if they all move together.

4
QUOTATIONS
  • It is not the biggest, the brightest or the best
    that will survive, but those who adapt the
    quickest. Charles Darwin
  • The secret of life is to be interested in one
    thing profoundly and a thousand things well.
    Henry Walpole
  • Studies of high school graduates rarely find any
    correlation between recognition in high school
    and recognition thereafter.

5
ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS
  • Can we anticipate future correlations?
  • How and why do correlations change over time?
  • How can we get the best estimates of correlations
    for financial decision making?

6
CORRELATIONS WHAT ARE THEY?
  • CORRELATIONS MEASURE THE DEGREE TO WHICH TWO
    SERIES MOVE TOGETHER
  • THEORETICAL DEFINITION

7
(No Transcript)
8
10 YEARS OF LARGE CAP STOCKS
AXP JPM INTC MSFT MRK
9
DAILY CORRELATIONS
AXP JPM INTC MSFT MRK AXP  1.000000  0.5
54172  0.285812  0.283375  0.224685 JPM  0.554172
 1.000000  0.318260  0.310113  0.228688 INTC  0.
285812  0.318260  1.000000  0.551379  0.130294 MS
FT  0.283375  0.310113  0.551379  1.000000  0.1860
04 MRK  0.224685  0.228688  0.130294  0.186004  1
.000000
10
(No Transcript)
11
WEEKLY EQUITY CORRELATIONS 1987-2002
12
WHY DO WE NEED CORRELATIONS?
13
WHY DO WE NEED CORRELATIONS?
  • CALCULATE PORTFOLIO RISK
  • FORM OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS
  • PRICE, HEDGE, AND TRADE DERIVATIVES

14
DIVERSIFICATION
  • Diversified portfolios have lower variance and
    risk because some assets go one direction while
    others go the opposite.
  • There are many thousands of possible stocks,
    bonds and other assets to invest in. Can we
    reduce the risk to zero?
  • Clearly not. Assets are not uncorrelated.

15
PORTFOLIO RISK
  • Portfolio risk depends upon the volatilities and
    correlations of all the components.
  • For weights w and covariance matrix Omega

16
FINDING THE OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO
  • Minimize portfolio variance subject to a required
    return. The Markowitz Problem

17
ARE CORRELATIONS TIME VARYING?
  • YES
  • WHY?
  • Because the business practice of the companies
    changes
  • Because shocks to the economy affect all
    businesses
  • Because shocks to one part of the economy will
    affect only some businesses

18
CONDITIONAL CORRELATIONS
  • DEFINE BOTH COVARIANCES AND VARIANCES CONDITIONAL
    ON CURRENT INFORMATION

19
ESTIMATION
  • HISTORICAL CORRELATIONS
  • Use a rolling window of N observations for both
    covariances and variances. We will use 100 days.
  • DYNAMIC CONDITIONAL CORRELATION or DCC
  • Estimates conditional correlations by first
    adjusting for differing variances and then
    updating correlations as new information is
    received.

20
100 day historical correlations between AXP and GE
21
GENERAL ELECTRIC PROFITS
22
CHANGING EXTERNAL EVENTS
  • CONSIDER FORD AND HONDA IN 2000
  • CORRELATIONS MAY HAVE CHANGED BECAUSE OF CHANGING
    ENERGY PRICES.

23
(No Transcript)
24
EXTEND GARCH CONFIDENCE INTERVALS
25
(No Transcript)
26
IMPLICATIONS
  • On Jan 1 2000 the market prices of Ford and Honda
    reflected the best analysis of the financial
    markets
  • What would happen to energy prices?
  • What would happen to the economy?
  • What choices would management make?
  • Five years later, Ford stock was down and Honda
    was up.
  • The market rewarded the company that was prepared
    for higher energy prices.

27
HISTORICAL CORRELATIONS
28
USE SOME KIND OF MODEL
  • ONE FACTOR MODEL
  • MANY FACTOR MODEL
  • MULTIVARIATE GARCH
  • DYNAMIC CONDITIONAL CORRELATION

29
MULTIVARIATE MODELS
30
Dynamic Conditional Correlation
  • DCC is a new type of multivariate GARCH model
    that is particularly convenient for big systems.
    See Engle(2002) or Engle(2005).

31
DYNAMIC CONDITIONAL CORRELATION OR DCC
  • Estimate volatilities for each asset and compute
    the standardized residuals or volatility adjusted
    returns.
  • Estimate the time varying covariances between
    these using a maximum likelihood criterion and
    one of several models for the correlations.
  • Form the correlation matrix and covariance
    matrix. They are guaranteed to be positive
    definite.

32
HOW IT WORKS
  • When two assets move in the same direction, the
    correlation is increased slightly.
  • This effect may be stronger in down markets
    (asymmetry in correlations).
  • When they move in the opposite direction it is
    decreased.
  • The correlations often are assumed to only
    temporarily deviate from a long run mean
  • UPDATING IS THE CENTRAL FEATURE

33
CORRELATIONS UPDATE LIKE GARCH
  • Approximately,

34
DCC Correlations AXP and GE
35
(No Transcript)
36
FACTOR MODELS
  • One or more factors influence all assets
  • Some assets are more affected by a particular
    factor than others
  • Sometimes the factors have little volatility and
    therefore have little influence

37
ONE FACTOR ARCH
  • One factor model such as CAPM
  • There is one market factor with fixed betas and
    constant variance idiosyncratic errors
    independent of the factor. The market has some
    type of ARCH with variance .
  • If the market has asymmetric volatility, then
    individual stocks will too.

38
MARKET VOLATILITY
39
CALCULATE DYNAMIC CORRELATIONS
  • When market volatility is high then correlations
    are high. The market/economy in general
    influences both stocks positively.

40
AXP AND GE AGAIN
41
CORRELATION OF EXTREMES
  • How correlated are extreme returns?
  • Bankruptcy is an extreme event and corresponds to
    an extremely large negative stock return over a
    period of time.
  • Are bankruptcies correlated?

42
CREDIT RISK APPLICATION
  • This one factor model is the basis of a new
    credit risk model that I have been developing
    with a graduate student and hedge fund quant.
  • How correlated are loan defaults?
  • When the aggregate market is very low, the
    probability of default is greater for all
    companies. When it is high, the probability of
    default is low for all companies. Hence defaults
    are correlated and the distribution of market
    returns tells how much.

43
ASYMMETRY IN MARKET RETURNS
  • Aggregate market returns have negative skewness,
    particularly for long horizon returns. Elsewhere
    I have shown that this is due to asymmetric
    volatility.
  • Negative skewness in market returns means that
    large declines can happen with the associated
    credit events.

44
EXAMINING THE ONE FACTOR MODEL OF CORRELATIONS
45
HOW WELL DOES THIS WORK?
  • Examine 18 large cap stocks in the US.
  • Calculate correlations either historically or
    with Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC)
  • Relate these correlations to the volatility of
    SP500.
  • Does High market volatility mean high correlation?

46
RESULTS
47
PLOT
  • About 30 Correlations of these large cap stocks
    on left axis
  • Estimated with DCC not using market data
  • Compare with a GARCH of the SP500 plotted on
    right axis

48
SP volatility
Correlations
49
MEAN CORRELATION AND MARKET VOLATILITY
50
REGRESSION
  • Dependent Variable MEANCOR9F
  • Method Least Squares
  • Date 09/10/06 Time 2000
  • Sample 1/04/1994 12/31/2004
  • Included observations 2770
  • Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic
  • C 0.176566 0.003343 52.81508
  • V9_SPRET 9.600815 0.296987 32.32740

51
REGRESSION IN DIFFERENCES
  • Dependent Variable D(MEANCOR9F)
  • Method Least Squares
  • Date 09/09/06 Time 1137
  • Sample (adjusted) 1/06/1994 12/31/2004
  • Included observations 2768 after
    adjustments
  • Convergence achieved after 4 iterations
  • Newey-West HAC Standard Errors Covariance (lag
    truncation8)
  • Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. 
     
  • C -2.57E-06 9.18E-05 -0.028054 0.9776
  • D(V9F_SPRET) 7.755417 0.612757 12.65660 0.0000
  • AR(1) 0.070129 0.023881 2.936653 0.0033

52
FINDINGS
  • MARKET VOLATILITY IS PART OF THE STORY
  • THE CURRENT DECLINE IN MARKET VOLATILITY HAS NOT
    LEAD TO THE EXPECTED DROP IN CORRELATIONS.

53
(No Transcript)
54
ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS
  • FORECASTING FACTOR VOLATILITIES IS PART OF THE
    ANSWER
  • HOW CAN WE MAKE THIS WORK BETTER?
  • Research Agenda!
  • Build DCC models on the residuals
  • Build Factor DCC models

55
HOW DO WE FORECAST FACTOR VOLATILITIES?
  • USE GARCH MODELS OR SIMILAR MODELS FOR SHORT RUN
    FORECASTS.
  • USE NEW MULTI-COUNTRY RESULTS USING THE SPLINE
    GARCH FOR LONG RUN MACRO BASED FORECASTS.

56
SPLINE GARCH FOR LOW FREQUENCY VOLATILITY AND ITS
MACROECONOMIC CAUSES
  • Engle and Rangel
  • Model the daily volatility of many country equity
    returns
  • Extract a low frequency component using the
    spline
  • Model how this component depends on the
    macroeconomy

57
(No Transcript)
58
MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS
59
ANTICIPATING CORRELATIONS
  • To forecast correlations, we must forecast the
    volatility of the factors that influence the
    companies.
  • When volatility is forecast to be high, then
    correlations will be high.
  • Inflation, slow growth, macroeconomic instability
    forecast high market volatility.
  • This does not work well when companies are
    changing their business. May need to update
    residual correlations using factor DCC.

60
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com