Property division at divorce - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Property division at divorce

Description:

( Idaho, TX, La, Wisconsin) California Pereira/Van Camp. Hypo: ... Herb wins the lottery in year 3. (takes the payments over 20 years) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:344
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: jeansan
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Property division at divorce


1
Property division at divorce
  • 9 states are community property states AZ, CA,
    ID, LA. NV, NM, TX, WA and maybe Wisconsin
  • 41 states are common law property states
    (including Minnesota)-

2
UMDA
  • Alternative A common law states
  • equitable apportion all property and assets
    belonging to either or both however and whenever
    acquired
  • Alternate B Separate property to the spouse it
    belongs to community property in just
    proportions.

3
M.S. 518.58, subd. 1
  • , the court shall make a just and equitable
    division of the marital property of the parties
    without regard to marital misconduct, after
    making findings regarding the division of the
    property.

4
M.S. 518.58, subd. 1
  • It shall be conclusively presumed that each
    spouse made a substantial contribution to the
    acquisition of income and property while they
    were living together as husband and wife.

5
Minn. Stat. 518.54, subd. 5 Marital
Property
  • All property acquired by either spouse
    subsequent to the marriage and before the
    valuation date is presumed to be marital property
    regardless of whether title is held individually
    or by spouses in a form of coownership.

6
Nonmarital property
  • Nonmarital property means property real or
    personal, acquired by either spouse before,
    during, or after the existence of their marriage,
    which
  • (a) is acquired as a gift, bequest, devise or
    inheritance made by a third party to one but not
    to the other spouse
  • (b) is acquired before the marriage
  • (c) is acquired in exchange for or is the
    increase in value of property which is described
    in clauses a,b,d,e
  • (d) is acquired by a spouse after the valuation
    date or
  • (e) is excluded by a valid antenuptial contract.

7
Minn. Stat. 518.54
  • Subd. 1a. Transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or
    disposition of marital assets. During the
    pendency of a marriage dissolution, separation,
    or annulment proceeding, or in contemplation of
    commencing a marriage dissolution, separation, or
    annulment proceeding, each party owes a fiduciary
    duty to the other for any profit or loss derived
    by the party, without the consent of the other,
    from a transaction or from any use by the party
    of the marital assets.

8
  • Subd. 2. Award of nonmarital property. If the
    court finds that either spouse's resources or
    property, including the spouse's portion of the
    marital property as defined in section 518.54,
    subdivision 5, are so inadequate as to work an
    unfair hardship, considering all relevant
    circumstances, the court may, in addition to the
    marital property, apportion up to one-half of the
    property otherwise excluded under section 518.54,
    subdivision 5, clauses (a) to (d), to prevent the
    unfair hardship.

9
Problem p. 402
  • Hamilton and Wilma marry at age 21-
  • No assets into the marriage.
  • He works as stockbroker, she is a homemaker.
  • At divorce they have
  • 1) house titled jointly
  • 2) stocks and bonds titled in just his name.

10
Pierson assets
  • 1) Family home- 90,000
  • 2) Kathy Street House 23,310
  • 3) Condo 2,500
  • 4) Farm 131,000-181,000

11
Problem 1, p. 411
  • Theresa and Nandor
  • Both employed throughout their married life,
    Theresa did all the housekeeping.
  • Does she get more?
  • Theresa did all of the saving.
  • Does she get more?

12
Problem 2
  • Betty and Walt, a married couple
  • Six months before the divorce (at a time they are
    experiencing marital difficulties) Walt gives his
    son by a prior marriage a large amount of money
    (lets say 50,000).
  • In MN?
  • In Wisconsin?

13
Problem 3
  • Mary and Victor, a married couple.
  • She is an heiress, he is an unemployed therapist.
    Marital estate in the millions
  • Statute Marital property to be divided equally
    without reference to fault.
  • Victor negotiated unsuccessfully for her murder

14
Problem 4
  • Harry sues Wilma in tort for fraud. The fraud
    She never loved him.
  • Divorce all assets to be divided equally.
  • Can Harry go after her half in this tort action?

15
Problem 5
  • Cherry and David married for five years. She
    gets a restraining order against him and he loses
    his job (hes a police officer)
  • Equal division not followed judge gives him
    15,000 more because he is unemployed.

16
  • Property as Separate or Marital
  • 1) Is it property?-the Identification issue
  • 2) Is it marital or nonmarital (or some portion
    thereof?) The Characterization Issue
  • 3) How much is it worth? (The Valuation issue)
  • 4) How should it be distributed? (Distribution)

17
OBrien
  • Trial court ruling
  • Investment account is wifes separate property.
  • Marital property (140,000) to each.

18
Community property states
  • American rule appreciation and income from
    separate property remains separate property
    (California, Arizona, NM, Nevada, Washington)
  • Spanish rule appreciation is separate, income
    is community. (Idaho, TX, La, Wisconsin)

19
California Pereira/Van Camp
  • Hypo
  • Wife brings to the marriage a separate property
    investment account, worth 100,000.
  • Husband during the five year marriage manages the
    account. (assume nothing gets added)
  • At the time of the divorce the account is worth
    150,000.

20
Pereira/Van Camp
  • Under Pereira-the reasonable rate of return on
    any 100,000 investment account over those five
    years would have increased it to 130,000. So
    there is 20,000 in community property.
  • Van Camp-Value of the time the husband spent on
    the account is 10,000. He was paid nothing.
    The community is due 10,000.

21
Common law states
  • General rule Income from separate property is
    separate
  • MN is not one of those states. Income is
    marital, appreciation is marital if active,
    nonmarital if not.
  • UMDA language-increase in value is nonmarital

22
Cummings v. Cummings,376 N.W. 2d 726 (Minn. App.
1985)
  • Property acquired during premarital cohabitation
    is not marital property.

23
Problem 1, page 423
  • Howard is a waiter and a substantial portion of
    his income is tips.
  • Gift or income?

24
Problem 2
  • Edwin and Julie
  • On their wedding day Julies dad give them
    10,000. Separate or marital?
  • On their wedding day Edwin gives Julie a 5,000
    necklace. Separate or marital?
  • On their fifth anniversary Julie gives Edwin a
    valuable painting purchased with marital funds.
    Separate or marital?

25
Problem 3
  • 1983 Wanda purchases a house, title in her own
    name. She makes DP and mortgage payments.
  • 1985 Wanda marries Henry (equity in house now
    20,000). She changes title to both names.
  • Current Equity in house is 60,000.
  • 20,000 attributable to appreciation 20,000 to
    payments toward the mortgage.

26
Problem 4
  • Herb marries Winnie in year 1.
  • Herb wins the lottery in year 3. (takes the
    payments over 20 years)
  • Herb divorces Winnie in year 6.
  • Assume they separated one day prior to his
    winning the lottery, what then?

27
Problem 5
  • W part owner of a closely held business.
  • W marries H. Both work in the business.
  • Each gets a salary. Business pays W dividends.
  • Are assets purchased with Ws dividends, marital
    or separate?
  • Are assets purchased with Ws wages, marital or
    separate?

28
Problem 5
  • Yr 1John inherits resort, titled in his name
    alone. (worth 150,000 but with a 50,000
    mortgage)
  • Marries Kathleen.
  • John pays off mortgage on the resort with income
    from the resort.
  • Kathleen works at the resort, assisting with
    guests, cleaning cabins, etc.
  • John works at the resort, doing capital
    improvements
  • Year 20 Resort worth 400,000.

29
MN law
  • Resort equity due to the following
  • Paying off of the mortgage
  • General inflation of lake property
  • Johns hard work improving the property.

30
Problem, page 429
  • John and Lois divorcing.
  • John makes 40,000/year
  • Lois makes 7,200/year.
  • 8,950 in marital assets to her 8,800 in
    marital assets to her.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com