Processing EMG - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Processing EMG

Description:

Processing EMG David DeLion UNLV Biomechanics Lab Why do we process EMG? Raw EMG offers us valuable information in a practically useless form Raw EMG signals cannot ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:565
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: facultyUn70
Category:
Tags: emg | noise | processing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Processing EMG


1
Processing EMG
  • David DeLion
  • UNLV Biomechanics Lab

2
Why do we process EMG?
  • Raw EMG offers us valuable information in a
    practically useless form
  • Raw EMG signals cannot be quantitatively compared
    between subjects
  • If electrodes are moved raw EMG signals cannot be
    quantitatively compared for the same subject

3
Types of Signal Processing
  • Raw
  • Half-wave rectified
  • Full-wave rectified
  • Filtering
  • Averaging
  • Smoothing
  • Integration
  • Root-mean Square
  • Frequency spectrum
  • Fatigue analysis
  • Number of Zero-crossings
  • Amplitude Probability Distribution Function
  • Wavelet

4
Removing Bias
  • Low amplitude voltage offset present in hardware
  • Can be AC or DC
  • Calculate the mean of all the data
  • Subtract mean from each data point

5
Raw EMG
  • Unprocessed signal -Amplitude of 0-6 mV
    -Frequency of 10-500 Hz
  • Peak-to-Peak -Measured in mV
    -Represents the amount of muscle
    energy measured
  • Onset times can be determined
  • Analysis is mostly qualitative

6
Rectification
  • Only positive values are analyzed -Mean would
    be zero
  • Half-wave rectification - all negative data is
    discarded, positive data is kept.
  • Full-wave rectification- the absolute value of
    each data point is used
  • Full-wave is preferred

7
Filtering
  • Notch filter -Band reject filter usually
    very narrow -For EMG normally set from
    59-61 Hz -Used to remove 60 Hz
    electrical noise -Also removes real
    data! -Too much noise will overwhelm the
    filter

8
Filtering
  • Band Pass filter -allows specified
    frequencies to pass -low end cutoff
    removes electrical noise associated with wire
    sway and biological artifacts -high end
    cutoff eliminates tissue noise at the electrode
    site -often set between 20-300 Hz

9
Filtering
  • There are no perfect filters!
  • Face muscles can emit frequencies up to 500 Hz
  • Heart rate artifact can be eliminated with low
    end cutoffs of 100 Hz
  • Filters which include 60 Hz include the noise
    from equipment

10
Averaging
  • Average EMG can be used to quantify muscle
    activity over time
  • Measured in mV
  • Values are averaged over a specified time window
  • Window can be moved or static
  • Moving windows are a digital smoothing technique
  • For moving windows the smaller the time window
    the less smooth the data will be

11
Averaging
  • For EMG window is typically between 100-200 ms
  • Window is moved over the length of the sample
  • Moving averages introduce a phase shift
  • Moving averages create biased values -values are
    calculated from data which are common to the
    data used to calculate the previous value
  • Very commonly used technique

12
Integration
  • Calculation of area under the rectified signal
  • Measured in Vs
  • Values are summed over the specified time then
    divided by the total number of values
  • Values will increase continuously over time
  • The integrated average will represent 0.637 of
    one-half of the peak to peak value
  • Quantifies muscle activity
  • Can be reset over a specified time or voltage

13
Root Mean Square
  • Recommended quantification method by Basmajian
    and DeLuca
  • Calculated by squaring each data point, summing
    the squares, dividing the sum by the number of
    observations, and taking the square root
  • Represents 0.707 of one half of the peak-to-peak
    value

14
Number of Zero Crossings
  • Counting the number of times the amplitude of the
    signal crosses the zero line
  • Based on the idea that a more active muscle will
    generate more action potentials, which will cause
    more zero crossings in the signal
  • Primarily used before the FFT algorithm was
    widely available

15
Frequency Analysis
  • Fast Fourrie Transformation is used to break the
    EMG signal into its frequency components.
  • Frequency components are graphed as function of
    the probability of their occurrence
  • Useful in determining cutoff frequencies and
    muscle fatigue

16
Fatigue Analysis
  • Isometric contraction
  • The two most important parameters for fatigue
    analysis are the median and mean frequency.
  • Median frequency decreases with the onset of
    fatigue
  • If fatigue is being measured it is important to
    have a large band pass filter

17
Amplitude Probability Distribution Function
  • Illustrate variance in the signal
  • X-axis shows range of amplitudes
  • Y-axis shows the percentage of time spent at any
    given amplitude
  • Distribution during work should be bimodal -peak
    associated with effort -peak associated with
    rest

18
Wavelet analysis
  • Used for the processing of signals that are
    non-stationary and time varying
  • Wavelets are parts of functions or any function
    consists of an infinite number of wavelets
  • The goal is to express the signal as a linear
    combination of a set of functions
  • Obtained by running a wavelet of a given
    frequency through the original signal

19
(No Transcript)
20
Wavelet Analysis
  • This process creates wavelet coefficients
  • When an adequate number of coefficients have been
    calculated the signal can be accurately
    reconstructed
  • The signal is reconstructed as a linear
    combination of the basis functions which are
    weighted by the wavelet coefficients

21
Wavelet Analysis
  • Time-frequency localization
  • Most of the energy of the wavelet is restricted
    to a finite time interval
  • Fourier transform is band limited
  • Produces good frequency localization at low
    frequencies, and good time localization at high
    frequencies
  • Segments, or tiles the time-frequency plane

22
(No Transcript)
23
Wavelet Analysis
  • Wavelets remove noise from the signal
  • Signal energy becomes concentrated into fewer
    coefficients while noise energy does not

24
Normalizing
  • There is no absolute scale so direct comparisons
    between subjects or conditions cannot be made
  • Maximum voluntary contraction levels are often
    used to compare EMG readings between subjects
    (i.e..50 MVC)
  • Relies on subject to give max effort

25
Normalizing
  • Record contractions over a dynamic movement cycle
  • At least 4 repetitions are required
  • Peak values are averaged which creates an anchor
    point
  • Subsequent values are represented as a percentage
    of the anchor point

26
Conclusion
  • EMG offers a great deal of useful information
  • The information is only useful if it can be
    quantified
  • Quantifying EMG data can be a qualitative process

27
  • Thank You
  • Any Questions?

28
Bibliography
  • Kleissen, R.F.M, Buurke, J.H., Harlaar, J.,
    Zilvold, G. (1998) Electromyography in the
    Biomechanical analysis of human movement and its
    clinical application. Gait and Posture. Vol.
    8,143-158
  • Aminoff, M.J. (1978) Electromyography in Clinical
    Practice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
    Menlo Park, CA
  • Dainty, D.A., Norman, R.W. (1987) Standardized
    Biomechanical Testing in Sport. Human Kinetics
    Publishers, Champaign, IL
  • Cram, J.R., Kasman, G.S. (1998) Introduction to
    Surface Electromyography. Aspen Publishers,
    Gaithersburg, MD
  • Medved, V. (2001) Measurement of Human
    Locomotion. CRC Press, New York, NY

29
Bibliography
  • Loeb, G.E., Gans, C. (1986) Electromyography for
    Experimentalists. The University of Chicago
    Press, Chicago, IL
  • Basmajian, J.V., DeLuca, C.J. (1985) Muscles
    Alive. Williams Wilkins, Baltimore, MD
  • Moshou, D., Hostens, I., Ramon, H. (2000)
    Wavelets and Self-Organizing Maps in
    Electromyogram Analysis. Katholieke Universiteit
    Leuven
  • DeLuca, C.J. (1993) The Use of Surface
    Electromyography in Biomechanics. NeuroMuscular
    Research Center, Boston University
  • DeLuca, C.J. (2002) Surface Electromyography
    Detection and Recording. Delsys Incorporated.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com