Particle placement in early child language. A case study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Particle placement in early child language. A case study

Description:

Bolinger 1971; Fraser 1974, 1976; Bock 1977; Dixon 1982; Chen 1986; ... (1) You put on lipstick on. [ Eve 2;1] (2) I do it turn on the light on. [ Peter 2;1] ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: ACE593
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Particle placement in early child language. A case study


1
Particle placement in early child language. A
case study
  • Holger Diessel
  • University of Jena
  • holger.diessel_at_uni-jena.de
  • http//www.holger-diessel.de/

2
Verb-particle construction
  • He looked up the number.
  • (2) He looked the number up.

(3) He walked up the hill. (4) He walked the
hill up.
3
Verb-particle construction
  • Bolinger 1971 Fraser 1974, 1976 Bock 1977
    Dixon 1982 Chen 1986 Hawkins 1994 Peters 1999
    Wasow 2002 Dehé et al. 2002 Gries 1999, 2003

4
NP-type
  • (1) He put it down.
  • (2) He put the ball down.

(3) He put down it. (4) He put down the ball.
5
Length
  • (1) He looked the number up.
  • (2) He looked the number of his neighbour in the
    yellow pages up.

6
Complexity
(1) He put the ball with the blue stripes
down. (2) He put the ball that Sue had given him
down.
7
Meaning
(1) He pushed the chair away. (2) He ate up his
lunch. (3) He turned on the TV.
8
Information structure
  • (1) What did she do with the ball?
  • -gt She picked the ball up.
  • What did she pick up?
  • -gt She picked up the ball.

9
Definiteness
(1) I turn the light on. (2) I turn on a light.
10
Stress
(1) Pick up him. (2) Pick up HIM (not her).
11
Directional PP
(1) Peter put the cup back. (2) Peter put back
the cup.
(3) Peter put the cup back on the
table. (4) Peter put back the cup on the table.
12
Research question
  • Does the positioning of the particle in child
    language vary with the same factors as in adult
    language?
  • Do children use the two particle positions
    productively?

13
Data collection
14
Data collection
  • Attested
  • on, off, back, away, in, out, down, over, around,
    up

Not attested against, upon,
15
Data collection
  • turn up hill / up hill .
  • then wake up
  • up the wall .
  • up .
  • Eve stand up Mommy stool .
  • I pick up .
  • up wall .
  • bobbing up an(d) down .
  • I covered it up .
  • well this is up in the house .

16
Data collection
  • turn up hill / up hill .
  • then wake up
  • up the wall.
  • up .
  • Eve stand up Mommy stool .
  • I pick up .
  • up wall .
  • bobbing up an(d) down .
  • I covered it up .
  • well this is up in the house .

17
Types of constructions
  • (17) He picked me up. Transitive VPC
  • (18) He walked away. Intransitive VPC
  • (19) I am back. Predicative VPC
  • (20a) Shoes on. Fragmented VPC
  • (20b) Down! Fragmented VPC
  • (21) Put it on the table. PP

18
Types of constructions
19
Types of constructions
20
Types of constructions
21
Types of constructions
22
Hypothetical example
23
Hypothetical example
24
Hypothetical example
25
Development of construction types
26
Construction fragments
(1) Down. (2) Shoes on. (3) Me up. (4) Hat off.
27
Construction fragments
  • The particles basically function as
    predicates.
  • Children acquire the meaning of the transitive
    VPC
  • before they master its form.

28
Particles
29
Verbs
30
(No Transcript)
31
Omitted object NPs
32
Predictor variables
  • Length of object
  • Complexity of object
  • NP Type
  • Meaning of particle
  • Definiteness
  • Directional PP

33
Dependent variables
Two levels
  • Construction 1 V_P_NP
  • Construction 2 V_NP_P

34
Coding
35
Coding
(1) You put on lipstick on. Eve 21 (2) I do
it turn on the light on. Peter 21 (3) Taking
off one my roller skates off Peter
23 (4) Turn on a light off. Peter 20
36
Raw frequency
37
Meaning
  • He pushed the chair away. Spatial
  • He turned on the TV. Non-spatial

38
Meaning
39
Statistical hypothesis testing
  • Null hypothesis There is no significant
    difference
  • between the two groups.
  • Alternative hypothesis There is a significant
  • difference between the two groups.

40
??-square
41
Length
  • Pick him up. 1 word
  • Pull this thing up. 2 words
  • He wiping up that I spilled. 3 words

42
Length
(?2 (2)57.56 plt.001)
  • Pick him up. 1 word
  • Pull this thing up. 2 words
  • He wiping up that I spilled. 3 words

43
Complexity
(?2 (2)29.16 plt.004)
  • He put the ball down. Simple
  • Pulls Eve sleeve up Intermediate
  • He wiping up that I spilled. Complex

44
Complexity
(?2(1) 3.25 p gt .102 )
45
NP type
(?2(2)30.51 plt.001)
  • He picked it up. Third person pronoun
  • Put that down. Other pronouns
  • Put my glasses on. Lexical NPs

46
Definiteness
(?2(2) 28.85 p lt .001 )
  • Put the top on. Definite determiner
  • Picked up a ball. Indefinite determiner
  • Taking these off. No determiner

47
Definiteness
(?2(1) 3.076 p gt .094 )
  • Put the top on. Definite determiner
  • Picked up a ball. Indefinite determiner
  • Taking these off. No determiner

48
Directional PP
(?2(1).849 plt.622)
  • Put the hat away. No PP
  • Put the hat down on the table. PP

49
Interim summary
  • Four of the six factors that correlate with
    particle placement in adult language are also
    significant in early child language
  • Length of object
  • Complexity of object
  • NP type of object
  • Meaning of particle

50
Multifactorial analysis
complexity
length
V_NP_P
meaning
NP type
V_P_NP
PP
definiteness
51
Multifactorial analysis
Effect size Overall model Nagelkerkes R2
.315 Without meaning of particle Nagelkerkes R2
.223 Without NP-type Nagelkerkes R2 .045
52
Discussion
  • Hypothesis
  • The multifactorial analysis suggests that the NP
    type of the direct object and the meaning of the
    particle influence the childrens decision to
    place the particle in a particular position.

53
Alternative explanation
  • Alternative hypothesis
  • Children use the verb-particle constructions they
    encounter in the ambient language without
    processing the factors that influence particle
    placement in adult language.

54
Imitation
  • There is no evidence that children just imitate
    the verb-particle constructions they encounter in
    the ambient language.

55
Route-learning
  • (1) a. Pick them up. Peter 20
  • b. Pick up my cup. Peter 21
  • (2) a. Turn the light on. Peter 21
  • b. Turn on a light. Peter 20
  • (3) a. Dont take a wheels off. Peter 20
  • b. Take off wheels. Peter 20
  • (4) a. I can blow it up. Eve 21
  • b. I want blow up this. Eve 21
  • (5) a. You wipe it up. Eve 22
  • b. He wiping up that I spill. Eve 22
  • (6) a. Gloria picking her up. Eve 23
  • b. Picking up leaves. Eve 110
  • (7) a. Put their hats on. Eve 22
  • b. She putting on her coat. Eve 22

56
Route-learning
  • (1) I put them back. Peter 111
  • (2) Put it back. Peter 20
  • Put a back. Peter 20
  • I have to put the pen back into my
    pocket. Peter 20
  • Put more back. Peter 20
  • Put more back. Peter 20
  • Put it back right there. Peter 20
  • Put it back tape right there. Peter 21
  • Put a back other wheel. Peter 21
  • I put a back. Peter 22
  • Let me put it back Peter 22
  • Lets put a back. Peter 111

57
Route-learning
(1) You put on lipstick on. Eve 21 (2) I do
it turn on the light on. Peter 21 (3) Taking
off one my roller skates off. Peter
23 (4) Turn on a light off. Peter 20
58
Conclusion
  • Children as young as 20 years of age process at
    least some of the factors that motivate particle
    placement in adult language.

Children play an active role in the acquisition
process and begin very early to use grammatical
patterns creatively.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com