Ch. 8. Wellbore stability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Ch. 8. Wellbore stability

Description:

Ch. 8. Wellbore stability Ch. 8.1. Introduction Intro Filtarion control Mechanical Chemical Hole problems / countermeasures Inhibitive muds Typical stability problems – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:521
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: pska1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ch. 8. Wellbore stability


1
Ch. 8. Wellbore stability Ch. 8.1.
Introduction
  1. Intro
  2. Filtarion control
  3. Mechanical
  4. Chemical
  5. Hole problems / countermeasures
  6. Inhibitive muds

Typical stability problems
  • Mechanical stress-induced wellbore stability
  • Chemical related instability after water
    infiltration
  • Time dependent water interaction with chalk,
  • limestone, anhydrite, gypsum
    etc
  • 1. Ca - ions ? flocculation
  • 2. Fines ? LGSC ? rheological problems
  • b. Time-dependent drilling fluid-shale
    interaction

2
Ch. 8.2. Filtration control. In sand. Testing
Lab testing of filter cake
  1. Spurt loss
  2. Initial filter is formed

dpores
dp
Real formation
Typical
Cuttings 5 Barite
55 Clay 10
1. Coarse Particles greater than 2 000 microns
2. Intermediate Particles between 250-2 000microns
3. Mediums Particles between 74-250 microns
4. Fines Particles between 44-74 microns
5. Ultrafine Particles between 2-44 microns
6. Colloidal Particles less than 2 microns
3. Filter cake is formed
3
Ch. 8.2. Filtration control In shale
4
Ch. 8.3. Mechanical stability Failure type
s F/A
Stress related instability
Creep Wellbores that stays open for a long
time (weeks), tend to close in Tensile failure
at high MW Fractures are detected at the
surface as lost circulation. Compression
failure at low MW Cavings, breakouts,
leads eventually to total wellbore
collapse Weakness in the formation
Faults crossing the wellbore. Inter-bedded
formations (between lithology changes, bedding
angle close to wellbore angle) Naturally
weak formations (coal beds, conglomerates, loose
sands, etc)
e Dl/l
Geometry Cause Countermeasure
UBD Abnormal stress regime
Pre-existing fractures/ failures
Increase MW Optimize trajectory
Improve fluid loss Monitor ECD
Increase MW
Reduce hydraulic / mechanical attack
Monitor ECD
5
Ch. 8.4. Chemical stability Shale
interaction
typically 100s of bar
Capillary pressure
typically - 100s of bar
Hydraulic pressure Governed by Darcys law.
Osmotic pressure Activity of pore water,
Aw,pore, gt Aw,mud, controlled through salt c
Shales ability to swell depends on amount of
Montmorilonite Mechanical strength of shale
determines its to resistance to swelling
Diffusion
Salt ions, the opposite direction of water
Symptoms of swelling shale and tight hole
  • Pack Off, Overpull, Took Weight on trips
  • filter loss
  • MBT (CEC)
  • Increased PV YP
  • (increasing with LGSC
  • open hole time) Torque
  • Drag

-
  • Shaker is blocked off by soft, hydrated clay or
    even clay balls
  • Torque fluctuations
  • Large irregular rock fragments on shaker
  • Fill on bottom
  • Shallow depths (lt 2500 m)

6
Ch. 8.5. Hole problems And their symptoms
Bit balling
  • Reduced ROP
  • Increased SPP - due to reduced dann of
    stabilizers
  • Blocked shaker screen (soft clay)
  • Overpull on Tripping Out

Mobile fm
  • Bit balling and pack off due to reactive shale
  • Wellbore erosion when drilling through the salt
    formation and /
  • or though shale above or below the salt
    formation
  • Excessive torque and pack Off caused by salt
    creep
  • Well control issues related to mud losses.
    Rubble zone beneath
  • or adjacent to the salt section usually
    consists of series of highly
  • reactive shale stringers embedded in
    unconsolidated sands
  • Salt-induced casing collapse across mobile salt
    sections is the
  • most common type of casing collapse. Several
    wells in
  • Southern North Sea and Gulf of Sues have
    suffered SICC

Naturally fractured, faulted and unconsolidated fm
  • High CEC
  • High clay porosity
  • High in-situ Stresses
  • Low kshale delayed swelling, f (open hole
    time)
  • Soft, hydrated cuttings in flow line, clay balls
  • Torque or fluctuation
  • Increased filter loss, MBT, PV, VP, LGS,
  • Pack offs during drilling
  • Bit balling when POOH causing Tight Hole and
    Over pull

Rock Bit Failure
Broken Teeth
7
Ch. 8.6. Inhibitive mud OBM
Na
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH2
Na
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH2
Na
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH2
Na
CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-CH2
8
Ch. 8.6. Inhibitive mud OBM
1. Base oil the continuous phase 2.
Emulsifier emulsify water in oil 3. Wetting
agent makes the wellbore oil wet mix
123 4. Water forms viscosifying droplets
mix 4 into it 5. Viscosifyer like in WBM 6.
Weighting material like in WBM
Water phase must have same water activity as pore
water of shale
  • Advantage of OBM
  • Clay / shale do not swell
  • No corrosion
  • Low filter loss
  • T-stable mud

Shale without wetting agent
Shale with wetting agent
9
Ch. 8.6. Inhibitive mud WBM
Acrivity of water Destilled
water 1.000 Ba SO4 0.999 KH2PO4
0.96 NaCl 0.755 CaCl2
0.295 ZnCl2 0.100
pswell -

r
Molecular size (Å)
Not hydrated Hydrated Not hydrated Hydrated
H 1,6 Å 1,6 Å
O 1,3 1,3
H2O 2,9 2,9
K 2,1 7,6
Na 1,8 11,2
Ca 3,0 19,2
Na SiO2 6,1 6,1
Clay pore throat 10-100
days
r
Aw
1.0
0.0
10
Ch. 8.6. Inhibitive mud
WBM
11
Summary
12
Summary
WOB
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com