Human Population Ecology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Human Population Ecology

Description:

Human Population Ecology Background: Thomas Malthus The first significant contribution to the theory of population ecology was that of Thomas Malthus, an English ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: GordonW3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Human Population Ecology


1
Human Population Ecology
2
Background Thomas Malthus
  • The first significant contribution to the theory
    of population ecology was that of Thomas Malthus,
    an English clergyman, who in 1798 published his
    Essay on the Principle of Population.
  • Malthus introduced the concept that at some point
    in time an expanding population must exceed
    supply of prerequisite natural resources, i.e.,
    population increases exponentially resulting in
    increasing competition for means of subsistence,
    food, shelter, etc.
  • This concept has been termed the "Struggle for
    Existence".

3
Background Charles Darwin
  • Malthus's theories profoundly influenced Charles
    Darwin 1859, On the Origin of Species, e.g., the
    concept of "Survival of the Fittest".
  • Mortality of this type can be termed "facultative
    mortality" (as opposed to catastrophic mortality,
    e.g., weather, insecticides)

4
Population Density
  • Harry Smith, pioneering biological control worker
    with the University of California (1935),
    proposed the equivalent and now accepted terms
    density-dependent and density-independent.
  • Density-dependent mortality factors are those
    that are facultative in effect,
    density-independent mortality factors are those
    that are catastrophic in effect.

5
Density Dependent Factors
  • A density-dependent mortality factor is one that
    causes a varying degree of mortality in subject
    population, and that the degree of mortality
    caused in a function (i.e., related) to the
    density of the subject (affected) population
    (density-geared, feedback regulation,
    self-regulating or self-limiting) may and
    typically involves a lag effect., e.g., most
    biological control agents.

6
Density Dependent Factors
  • A density-dependent mortality factor is one that
    causes a varying degree of mortality in subject
    population, and that the degree of mortality
    caused in a function (i.e., related) to the
    density of the subject (affected) population
    (density-geared, feedback regulation,
    self-regulating or self-limiting) may and
    typically involves a lag effect., e.g., most
    biological control agents.

Cycles in the population dynamics of the snowshoe
hare and its predator the Canadian lynx (redrawn
from MacLulich 1937). Note that percent
mortality is an elusive measure, it may, or may
not, be useful since mortality varies with
environment and time.
7
(No Transcript)
8
Biotic Potential vs. Environmental Resistance
  • Royal N. Chapman, Univ. Minnesota, in the 1930s
    proposed the concept of a balance between biotic
    potential and environmental resistance. 
  • Chapmans model was a mathematical representation
    of the Malthusian concept, illustrated here by
    the logistic growth of a laboratory population of
    yeast cells.
  • Population growth trajectory (N1 N0 (Rm
    -sN0)N0 ) Rm maximum rate of increase, here
    1, s interaction coefficient, here 0,0001,
    and carrying capacity of environment 1000.

9
  • Population growth (N1 N0 RN0), where N1 10
    and
  • R0.5 (blue), R0 (black), and R-0.5 (red).

10
Steady-state population model (N1 N0 Rm(1
-sN0 /K)N0, where Rm 2, K 1000, and intitial
displacement from equilibrium x -10.
11
Steady-state population model(N1 N0 Rm(1
-sN0 /K)N0), when K 1000, Rm 3  and initial
displacement from equilibrium x -10.
Steady-state population model(N1 N0 Rm(1
-sN0 /K)N0), when K 1000, Rm 1.5 and initial
displacement from equilibrium x -10.
12
Balance of Nature
  • A. J. Nicholson (Australian entomologist) was a
    leading proponent of concept of density-dependent
    mortality factors.
  • He maintained that density-dependent mortality
    played the key role in regulating prey
    populations.
  • This is the essence of the so-called "Balance of
    Nature" theory.
  • This theory implied a static balance about a mean
    (characteristic) equilibrium density with
    reciprocal (feedback) oscillations in density
    about these means.

13
Balance of Nature
  • Nicholson and V. A. Bailey (1935) proposed a
    population model that incorporated a "lag
    effect".
  • This is particularly appropriate to parasitoids
    were population effects of attack (oviposition)
    may not be evident until the parasitoid has
    completed its immature development and emerges as
    a adult (killing the host).
  • Leading proponents of this view of population
    dynamics included the early California biological
    control workers. The theory and practice of
    biological control can be said to revolve about
    this assumption.

14
Dynamic Equilibrium
  • However, a contrary view of the nature of
    population regulating mortality factors was
    argued by others, especially W. R. Thompson
    (Dominion Parasite Laboratory).
  • The Canadian workers held that assumptions of
    Nicholson and like thinkers were unrealistic, and
    did not occur in nature, i.e., that the
    regulating role of a so- called density-dependent
    mortality factors was largely myth.

15
Dynamic Equilibrium
  • These workers argued that it was unnecessary to
    postulate such a mechanism of population
    regulation.
  • They observed that the environment never remains
    continually favorable or unfavorable for any
    species. If it did so that population would
    inevitably become either infinite or decline to
    extinction.
  • They maintained it was more accurate to say that
    populations were (in reality) always in a state
    of "dynamic equilibrium" with their environment.

16
Life Table Predictive Model
  • One of the most useful starting points for a
    population ecologist is the development of a life
    table.
  • A life table is a schedule of mortality for each
    cohort (age group) of individuals in the
    population.
  • The methods were developed originally for
    actuarial or demographic studies.
  • Multifactor studies which incorporated the life
    table technique were once largely the province of
    forest entomologists, but are now widely used in
    agriculture.

17
Life Table Predictive Model
18
Predictive Value
  • The final test of any population model is its
    usefulness to predict (generation to generation)
    changes in abundance or to explain why changes
    occur at particular population densities.
  • Consequences of recent advances in understanding
    of population dynamics has lead to almost
    universal (among ecologists) acceptance of the
    proposition that population growth is geared to
    population density.
  • Differences in the relative importance of
    density-dependent and density-independent
    mortality factors varies in different
    environments, e.g., the role of biotic components
    tends to be greater in more stable (benign)
    environments.

19
Symbiotic Relationships
  • Competitive processes/cooperative processes we
    often think of interactions between individuals
    even within species as only negative, but
    interactions can be positive (even between
    species), e.g., defense against predators,
    genetic diversity (concept of minimum density),
    mate finding (sustainable population), early
    mortality may favor subsequent survival.
  • Interactions between species can be very complex
    even when only 2 species are considered (through
    impact on environment of other species).
  • Each species can affect environment of other
    positively (), negatively (-), or have no effect
    (0). Major categories include mutualism (),
    commensualism (0), predator/prey (-),
    competition (- -), and amensalism (rare) (-0).

20
Symbiosis in Action
  • Insects and plants of two types
  • 1) good colonizers, e.g., weed species, with high
    reproductive potential (capacity), adaptable,
    invaders, readily dispersed, "r-strategists"
  • 2) good competitors, high survival, tend to
    stable population (K equilibrium), exploit
    stable environments, win out in competition,
    "K-strategists" (R. H. MacArthur and E. O. Wilson
    1967).

21
Symbiosis in Action
  • Most crop pests are r-strategists, e.g., aphids
    and phytophagous insects in general.
  • Natural enemies, i.e., parasites and predators,
    are mostly K strategists.
  • This is said to be one reason for the high
    failure rate associated with introductions of
    exotic natural enemies.
  • Most crop plants are early succession plants,
    i.e., they are weedy species and accordingly they
    also are r-strategists. The r-selected species
    are particularly suited to exploiting the
    ecological patchiness and instability of the
    agroecosystem.

22
Island Biogeography
23
Island Biogeography
  • Equilibrium models for near and distant islands.
  • Equilibrium (in number of species present) occurs
    where curves of rates of immigration and rates of
    extinction intersect.
  • I is the initial rate of immigration and P is the
    total number in the species pool on the mainland.

24
Human Population Dynamics
  • Human populations represent another example of
    exponential growth.
  • Magnitude of the problems posed by human
    population growth can be seen from the fact that
    it took more than 1 million years for the human
    population to first reach 200,000 (the current
    daily rate of increase
  • US Census, Historical Estimates of World
    Population

25
Human Population Dynamics
  • The human population is estimated to have first
    reached 1 billion persons in 1830, and 2 billion
    in 1930, a doubling time of 100 years.
  • In 1960, thirty years later, the population edged
    past 3 billion, and a mere 15 years later, 4
    billion.
  • In 1986, we exceeded 5 billion for the first
    time. Despite a slowing of the growth rate, 6
    billion in early 1999.

26
Human Population Dynamics
  • Barring catastrophic change, it is expected the
    human population will top 7 billion in 2010.
  • To continue feeding our growing population, only
    as well as we presently do, it will be necessary
    to increase food production 6 every two years.
  • Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill's World
    Population Counter

27
Human Population Dynamics
28
http//www.learner.org/vod/asx/utexas/habitable_pl
anet_05.asx
http//www.learner.org/channel/courses/envsci/unit
/text.php?unit5?popyespid2273
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com