Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model

Description:

Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model & Parameter Selection Short Course on Computational Geotechnics + Dynamics Boulder, Colorado January 5-8, 2004 Stein Sture – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: stein85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model


1
Non-Linear Hyperbolic Model Parameter Selection
  • Short Course on Computational Geotechnics
    Dynamics
  • Boulder, Colorado
  • January 5-8, 2004

Stein Sture Professor of Civil Engineering Univers
ity of Colorado at Boulder
2
Contents
  • Introduction
  • Stiffness Modulus
  • Triaxial Data
  • Plasticity
  • HS-Cap-Model
  • Simulation of Oedometer and Triaxial Tests on
    Loose and Dense Sands
  • Summary

3
Introduction
  • Hardening Soils
  • Most soils behave in a nonlinear behavior soon
    after application of shear stress.
    Elastic-plastic hardening is a common technique,
    also used in PLAXIS.
  • Usage of the Soft Soil model with creep
  • Creep is usually of greater significance in soft
    soils.

Hyperbolic stress strain response curve of
Hardening Soil model
4
Stiffness Modulus
Elastic unloading and reloading (Ohde, 1939) We
use the two elastic parameters nur and Eur
Initial (primary) loading
Definition of E50 in a standard drained triaxial
experiment
5
Stiffness Modulus
Oedometer tests
Definition of the normalized oedometric stiffness
Values for m from oedometer test versus initial
porosity n0
Normalized oedometer modulus versus initial
porosity n0
6
Stiffness Modulus
Normalized oedometric stiffness for various soil
classed (von Soos, 1991)
7
Stiffness Modulus
Values for m obtained from triaxial test versus
initial porosity n0
Normalized triaxial modulus versus initial
porosity n0
8
Stiffness Modulus
Summary of data for sand Vermeer Schanz (1997)
Comparison of normalized stiffness moduli from
oedometer and Triaxial test
Engineering practice mostly data on Eoed
Test data
9
Triaxial Data on ?p ? 2?1p
Equi-g lines (Tatsuoka, 1972) for dense Toyoura
Sand
Yield and failure surfaces for the Hardening Soil
model
10
Plasticity
Yield and hardening functions
3D extension
In order to extent the model to general 3D states
in terms of stress, we use a modified expression
for in terms of and the mobilized angle
of internal friction
where
11
Plasticity
Plastic potential and flow rule
with
12
Plasticity
Flow rule
with
Primary soil parameters and standard PLAXIS
settings
13
Plasticity
Hardening soil response in drained triaxial
experiments
Results of drained loading stress-strain
relation (s3 100 kPa)
Results of drained loading axial-volumetric
strain relation (s3 100 kPa)
14
Plasticity
Undrained hardening soil analysis
Method A switch to drained Input
Method B switch to undrained Input
15
Plasticity
Interesting in case you have data on Cu and not
no C and ?
Assume E50 0.7 Eu and use graph by Duncan
Buchignani (1976) to estimate Eu
16
Plasticity
Hardening soil response in undrained triaxial
tests
Results of undrained triaxial loading
stress-strain relations (s3 100 kPa)
Results of undrained triaxial loading p-q
diagram (s3 100 kPa)
17
HS-Cap-Model
Cap yield surface
Flow rule
(Associated flow)
Hardening law For isotropic compression we assume
with
18
HS-Cap-Model
For isotropic compression we have q 0 and it
follows from
For the determination of, we have another
consistency condition
19
HS-Cap-Model
Additional parameters
The extra input parameters are K0 (1-sinf) and
Eoed/E50 (1.0)
The two auxiliary material parameter M and Kc/Ks
are determined iteratively from the simulation of
an oedometer test. There are no direct input
parameters. The user should not be too concerned
about these parameters.
20
HS-Cap-Model
Graphical presentation of HS-Cap-Model
Yield surfaces of the extended HS model in p-q
space (left) and in the deviatoric plane (right)
21
HS-Cap-Model
Yield surfaces of the extended HS model in
principal stress space
22
Simulation of Oedometer and Triaxial Tests on
Loose and Dense Sands
Comparison of calculated () and measured triaxial
tests on loose Hostun Sand
Comparison of calculated () and measured
oedometer tests on loose Hostun Sand
23
Simulation of Oedometer and Triaxial Tests on
Loose and Dense Sands
Comparison of calculated () and measured triaxial
tests on dense Hostun Sand
Comparison of calculated () and measured
oedometer tests on dense Hostun Sand
24
Summary
  • Main characteristics
  • Pressure dependent stiffness
  • Isotropic shear hardening
  • Ultimate Mohr-Coulomb failure condition
  • Non-associated plastic flow
  • Additional cap hardening

HS-model versus MC-model As in Mohr-Coulomb
model Normalized primary loading
stiffness Unloading / reloading Poissons
ratio Normalized unloading / reloading
stiffness Power in stiffness laws Failure ratio
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com