Statutory Rape as a Strict Liability Crime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Statutory Rape as a Strict Liability Crime

Description:

No subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, ... a person acquitted of a criminal charge by reason of insanity, due process shall ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:480
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: lpw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statutory Rape as a Strict Liability Crime


1
Statutory Rape as a Strict Liability Crime
  • and why it MUST change

2
Even a dog distinguishes between being
stumbled over and being kicked U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in The
Common Law (served 1902-1932)
3
Strict Liability
  • Absolute legal responsibility for an act that can
    be imposed on the wrongdoer without proof of
    carelessness or fault.
  • Source Legal-dictionary.thefreedictionar
    y.com
  • Put another way, youre guilty regardless of
    your intentions and you have no defense before
    the court.

4
The Model Penal Code on Crimes
  • At common law, a crime occurred only upon the
    concurrence of an individual's act and his guilty
    state of mind. In this regard, it is well
    understood that generally there are two
    components of every crime, the actus reus or
    guilty act and the mens rea or the guilty mind or
    mental state accompanying a forbidden act. The
    requirement that an accused have acted with a
    culpable mental state is an axiom of criminal
    jurisprudence.

5
Statutory rape requires no mental state ( in 33
out of 50 U.S. States)
  • Mistake of age is irrelevant before the court.
  • The accused is automatically guilty even if he
    believed the age of his partner to be the
    required legal age.
  • The penalties are a felony record and Sex
    Offender Registration. (most states)

6
Why Strict Liability?
  • The origination of Strict Liability finds its
    roots in Public Welfare Offenses.
  • Public Welfare Offenses arose out of the
    Industrial Revolution (late 1700s to mid
    1800s), when large corporations were responsible
    for major environmental damage that endanger the
    public health and safety.
  • Prosecution was difficult to pin on a single
    perpetrator.
  • Proving mental states for individuals within a
    company was difficult and costly and was a huge
    drain on the public resources.

7
4 Concepts of the Public Welfare Doctrine (These
concepts needed to be met in order to justify the
offense as having no required mental element)
8
(1) Risk Assumed by the Actor
  • Historically, the U.S. Government has regulated
    sex acts between consenting adults, even in the
    privacy of their own home. The last of these
    regulating laws was abolished as unconstitutional
    in Lawrence v. TX (2003) which struck down sodomy
    laws nationwide. As little as 50 years ago, it
    was illegal for a married couple to use birth
    control (Griswold v. CT, 1965). Fornication,
    known as sex outside of marriage, was illegal and
    regulated by law.
  • 50 years ago, the average American citizen would
    have been on notice that their consensual sex
    acts may be illegal under the law.

9
Would the average American still be on notice
that their consensual acts with another of legal
age may be criminal?
  • Is fornication (sex before marriage) still
    illegal? NO
  • Are contraceptives illegal? NO
  • Is consensual sodomy illegal? NO
  • Conclusion The average adult American in
    todays society would NOT know that their
    consensual sex acts with another of legal age
    might be illegal.

10
(2) Government and Societal Interests
  • There is a societal interest in preventing and
    deterring sexual activity with the immature.
  • Exploitative relationships
  • Possible coercion (based on the age difference
    alone)
  • STDs
  • Pregnancy
  • Emotional harm

11
Is this Interest Best Served through Strict
Liability?
  • Strict Liability denies a defendant due process
    of law (he is guilty till proven guilty, instead
    of innocent till proven guilty).
  • Should statutory rape require a mens rea of
    recklessly or negligently? You must know the age
    or fail to ask the age of your partner in order
    to be reckless or negligent. - this requires a
    higher degree of proof and could make prosecution
    more difficult.
  • An Affirmative Defense allowing a reasonable
    mistake of age defense to a statutory rape
    prosecution. - this is the best compromise
    between more difficult prosecutions with a mens
    rea and denying a defendant the right to be
    treated innocent till proven guilty under strict
    liability.

12
(3) Carries a Small Penalty
  • 3 levels of penalties violations, misdemeanors
    and felonies.
  • Statutory Rape is a felony in most states (some
    states have age gap exceptions, or minimum or
    maximum ages to prosecute, but the penalties are
    still felonies under most circumstances)
  • Statutory Rape requires registration as a sex
    offender (for a number of years or life, varies
    by state).

13
A Statutory Rape Conviction consisting of
a felony record and sex offender registration is
NOT a small penalty.
14
(4) Social Stigma Today
  • A felony record prevents a person from obtaining
    many jobs (CORI reports), may require seizure of
    DNA and a person may lose the right to vote in
    some states.
  • Sex Offender Registration brands someone as a
    child molester and subjects them to a host of
    other registration and proximity laws.

15
CONCLUSION
  • Fifty some odd years ago the penalties were
    minimal, there was no social stigma, nor was
    conviction coupled with other laws (registration
    and CORI reports) and the determination that
    premarital sex by itself served as notification
    that one was engaging in risky behavior and this
    was the entire justification for a strict
    liability application.
  • This is not the world we live in today!

16
Moral Wrong Doctrine
  • The belief that the defendant acted immorally and
    it is reasonable for him to assume the unknown
    risk that he may be guilty of some crime, even if
    he did not intend to cause harm or commit a known
    crime.

17
Garnett v. State of Maryland (1993)
  • Immorality is not synonymous with illegality
    intent to do an immoral act does not equate to
    intent to do a criminal act. Inferring criminal
    intent from immorality, especially when the
    accused is not even aware that the act is
    criminal, seems unjustifiable and unfair.
    Justice Robert M. Bell, dissent

18
NH Bill of Rights
  • Art. 15. Right of Accused. No subject shall
    be held to answer for any crime, or offense,
    until the same is fully and plainly,
    substantially and formally, described to him or
    be compelled to accuse or furnish evidence
    against himself. Every subject shall have a right
    to produce all proofs that may be favorable to
    himself to meet the witnesses against him face
    to face, and to be fully heard in his defense, by
    himself, and counsel. No subject shall be
    arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of
    his property, immunities, or privileges, put out
    of the protection of the law, exiled or deprived
    of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the
    judgment of his peers, or the law of the land
    provided that, in any proceeding to commit a
    person acquitted of a criminal charge by reason
    of insanity, due process shall require that clear
    and convincing evidence that the person is
    potentially dangerous to himself or to others and
    that the person suffers from a mental disorder
    must be established. Every person held to answer
    in any crime or offense punishable by deprivation
    of liberty shall have the right to counsel at the
    expense of the state if need is shown this right
    he is at liberty to waive, but only after the
    matter has been thoroughly explained by the court.

19
Our Fundamental Rights
  • We hold them so dearly, yet we allow the mentally
    innocent to be guilty until proven guilty with
    respect to Statutory Rape.
  • Age is the required fact that makes this act
    illegal. If one is reasonably mistaken, it
    should be allowed as a defense.

20
A man who engages in consensual
intercourse in the reasonable belief that his
partner has reached the age of consent
evidences no abnormality, no willingness to take
advantage of immaturity, no propensity to
corruption of minors. In short, he has
demonstrated neither intent nor inclination to
violate any of the interests that the law of
statutory rape seeks to protect Justice
Robert M Bell (Garnett v. Maryland)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com