Sociodemographic Effects on Taskspecific ADL Functioning at the Oldestold Ages - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Sociodemographic Effects on Taskspecific ADL Functioning at the Oldestold Ages

Description:

include bathing, toileting, dressing, indoor transferring ... The incidence rate for bathing is almost two times more than that of continence. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Xuq5
Learn more at: http://www.duke.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sociodemographic Effects on Taskspecific ADL Functioning at the Oldestold Ages


1
Sociodemographic Effects on Task-specific ADL
Functioning at the Oldest-old Ages
  • Danan Gu1 and Qin Xu2

1. Public Policy, Duke University, 2. 3. China
Research Center on Aging
2
Outline
  • Introduction objectives
  • Data and methodology
  • Results
  • Discussion

3
I. Introduction objectives- Introduction
  • ADL has a hierarchy Previous research has
    suggested that Individual loses functioning of
    each six task probably has ordering in that each
    task involves different required capability to
    perform (e.g., Dunlop et al. 1997Jagger et al.
    2001 Katz et al. 1963)
  • Studies systematically examining the dynamic of
    task-specific ADL and its associates are very
    rare.
  • None of previous studies, which focus on ADL
    task-specific, explore the correlations with
    socio-demographic factors.
  • There is no study to examine the dynamics of each
    ADL task-specific focusing on the oldest-old in
    developing countries.
  • One of major limitations is the underestimation
    of disability in the study of ADL functioning at
    the old ages (Gill et al. 2002 Zeng, Gu, and
    Land 2004)
  • The conventional method which does not include
    the ADL change before dying overestimate effect
    of age, gender, ethnicity, and living alone on
    disability transitions while underestimates the
    effects of SES (Gu Zeng 2004).

4
I. Introduction objective- Objective
  • By including the ADL information before dying,
    this study tries to capture more robust effects
    of sociodemographic factors on task-specific ADL
    functioning over a two-year survey interval.

5
II. Data source methodology - Data source
  • The Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey
    (CLHLS) in 1998, 2000, and 2002. All three waves
    of data are pooled together.
  • Persons who reported age 106 or higher at Time 1
    are excluded from this study.
  • Total 19,778
  • Male 8,142
  • Female 11,636

6
II. Data source methodology- methodology
  • Time 1 the start-point of each two-year
    interval.
  • Time 2 the endpoint of each two-year interval.

7
Measuring onset and recovery of disability in
each ADL task
Bathing
Toileting
Dressing
ADL
Indoor transferring
Eating
Continence
8
II. Data source methodology-continue
not disabled(or no need help)
each ADL task
disabled (or need help)
9
onset of task disability
the information of ADL changes before dying
task recovery
10
  • An individual is considered having an onset of
    disability in one task
  • if he/she moved from not disabled (no need in
    help) in that task at Time 1 to disabled (need in
    help) in the same task at Time 2 or before dying
  • A person is classified as having a recovery
    from disability in one task
  • if he/she moved from need in help in that task at
    Time 1 to no need in help in the same task at
    Time 2 or before dying

11
six items into two categories
  • requires both upper and low extremities
    (high-level tasks/items )
  • include bathing, toileting, dressing, indoor
    transferring
  • requires upper extremities only or continence
    (low-level tasks/items )
  • include feeding, continence
  • Factor analysis confirms this classification

12
Sociodemographic factors
  • Age 80-89, 90-99,100-106
  • Sex Male, Female
  • Residence urban, rural
  • Ethnic group Han, other minorities
  • Education 0 year (illiteracy), 1 years of
    schooling
  • Economic independence
  • economic independence mainly relying on
    pension or own financial source
  • economic dependence namely relying on other
    resources such as spouse, children or other
    family members, or government subsidy and others

13
Sociodemographic factors -continue
  • Primary lifetime occupation
  • for males agriculture, non-agriculture
  • for females agriculture, housewife,
    non-agriculture
  • Marital status
  • currently not married (never married,
    divorced, and widowed)
  • currently married
  • Living arrangement living alone , not living
    alone

14
Control variables
  • The confounders include
  • (1) Family/social support and connection
    Religious activities, proximity with children,
    playing card, and who take care of the elder in
    the daily life are considered as the proxy of
    family and social supports/connections in this
    study.
  • (2) Health practice alcoholic consumption,
    smoking, diet, and doing exercise
  • (3) Health conditions cognitive function,
    self-reported health, chronic disease conditions,
    hearing and visual function, and functional
    limitations.
  • (4) The length of surviving between Time 1 and
    Time 2, and whether the respondent died or not
    before Time 2 were also included in the model to
    adjust their influence.

15
Statistical models
  • models for males and females separately
  • those who lost to follow-up respondents at Time 2
    are excluded
  • Random effect logit model after correcting
    intra-person correlation was applied

16
III. Results
17
Table 1 Percentage distributions of
socio-demographic variables by gender ()
18
Table 2 Dynamics changes of each ADL task by
gender
19
  • The functioning of the high level tasks declines
    faster than the low level tasks.
  • The incidence rate for bathing is almost two
    times more than that of continence.
  • The recovery rates present an opposite pattern,
    and the recovery rate for bathing is 50 less
    than that of continence.

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Table 3 Odds ratios of gender and age on
the onset of disability and recovery from
disability of each ADL task
Notes (1) Male is the reference group. Age is
measured at the beginning of each two-year
interval. (2) N is the number of observations.
(3) The results are based on controlling other
confounders mentioned in the text. (4) Odds
ratios and their significant level were corrected
by intra-subject correlations due to some
subjects contributing two or threemore than one
observations to the pooled data set at a specific
time (Time 1or Time 2). (5) , plt0.1 , plt0.05
, plt0.01 , plt0.001.
23
  • Gender differential effect is significant among
    nonagenarians and centenarians, and it reaches
    the biggest among nonagenarians. The gender
    differential patterns are similar across six
    tasks.
  • The effect of increasing each additional age on
    onset of and recovery from task-specific
    disability is different both across tasks and
    across age groups.
  • The effect of increasing each additional age on
    onset of task disability is gradually diminishing
    with the advancement of age.

24
Table 4 Odds ratios of the onset of
disability of each ADL task
25
Table 4 Odds ratios of the onset of
disability of each ADL task
Notes (1) Reference group of each covariate is
listed in the parentheses. (2) All variables are
measured at the beginning of each two-year
interval. (3) The results are based on
controlling other confounders mentioned in the
text. (4) Odds ratios and their significant
level were corrected by intra-subject
correlations due to some subjects contributing
two or threemore than one observations to the
pooled data set at a specific time (Time 1or Time
2). (5) , plt0.1 , plt0.05 , plt0.01 ,
plt0.001.
26
Table 5 Odds ratios of the recovery of each
ADL task
27
Table 5 Odds ratios of the recovery of each
ADL task
Notes (1) Reference group of each covariate is
listed in the parentheses. (2) All variables are
measured at the beginning of each two-year
interval. (3) The results are based on
controlling other confounders mentioned in the
text. (4) Odds ratios and their significant
level were corrected by intra-subject
correlations due to some subjects contributing
two or threemore than one observations to the
pooled data set at a specific time (Time 1or Time
2). (5) , plt0.1 , plt0.05 , plt0.01 ,
plt0.001.
28
  • Among males, compared to octogenarians,
    nonagenarians and centenarians have a higher risk
    to develop task-specific disability in high level
    of hierarchy, while they share a similar risk to
    develop task disability in the low level tasks in
    the hierarchy.
  • On the other hand, female nonagenarians and
    centenarians have a significant higher risk to
    develop task-specific disability in all tasks
    compared to female octogenarians. The
    disadvantage of older ages in effect on task
    recovery is less apparent than its effect on
    onset of task-specific disability (see Table 5).
    Such results indicate that disability
    deceleration is more obvious for males than for
    females at oldest-old ages.

29
  • Result presented in Table 4 reveals that
    urban/rural residential difference in onset of
    task-specific disability is homogeneous rather
    heterogeneous although urban oldest olds have a
    higher chance to have onsets of task-specific
    disability and lower chance to get recovery on
    general.
  • The difference of residential effect on
    task-specific disability between females was
    found. Whereas urban males have same risks to
    have onset of task-specific disability as rural
    males, urban females experience 10-20 higher
    risks to develop task-specific disability than
    rural females.
  • Furthermore, Table 5 indicates that urban
    oldest-olds have a lower chance to get recovery
    from high level task disability for both males
    and females.

30
  • Table 4 illustrates that Minority ethnicities
    have better ADL functioning over Han, the
    majority. Minorities have 20-45 lower risk to
    develop task-specific disability except eating
    for both males and females.
  • Table 5 further indicates that although
    minorities have higher chances to recover once
    they have onset of disability across all tasks
    for both males and females, such higher chances
    are not statistically significant possibly due to
    highly individual variation.

31
  • SES has limited effect on both onset of and
    recovery from task-specific disability. SES
    demonstrates the similar pattern across tasks and
    across genders. Living alone has significant
    lower risk to develop disability across tasks for
    males, but such effective is not significant
    among females (Table 4).
  • On the other hand, the positive effects of living
    alone on task-specific recovery are not all
    significant across tasks despite all the odds
    ratios are much higher than 1 except eating for
    females (Table 5). The protective effect of
    marriage on task-specific disability and recovery
    was not detected.

32
  • Additionally, for males, chronic condition
    and functional limitation will raise the risk of
    developing disability across tasks.
  • But they dont have effect on getting recovery
    from disability across tasks.
  • Generally speaking, persons who are in absence of
    limitation in high level tasks in the hierarchy
    will postpone his/her onset of disability of the
    low tasks in the hierarchy.
  • Such pattern is similar for both males and
    females (Table 4).
  • The results listed in Table 5 show that it will
    not help male oldest-olds to get recovery from a
    task disability if they have no limits in any
    other task.
  • But for female oldest-olds, they will have a
    higher chance to get recovery from a task
    disability if they dont have functioning limits
    in other task.

33
IV. Discussion
  • Slightly higher recovery from each task
    disability was observed. The main possible reason
    is that China has a higher mortality, which makes
    the oldest-old in China more robust compared to
    their counterparts in western nations.
  • Our results show that each sociodemographic
    factor has somewhat different role in dynamics of
    ADL functioning across tasks.
  • Consistency and inconsistency with previous
    studies.
  • Although the results of this study are far from
    conclusive and deserve further investigation,
    they provide new knowledge about the general
    patterns of dynamics of task-specific disability
    of the oldest-old, which contributes to a better
    understanding of the social and demographic
    factors associated with task-specific onset of
    and recovery from disability.

34
  • One strength point of this study lies its
    systematically examination of socio-demographic
    effect on dynamics of six task-specific ADL
    functions at the oldest-old ages, which is rarely
    touched by previous studies, but is more
    informative.
  • One limitation of the present study is that
    information on ADL status before dying for the
    dead persons before the second interview is
    obtained from next-to-kin, which may involve some
    bias.
  • We only collected one episode of dynamic change
    for each ADL task both among survivors and among
    the deceased persons, which will not fully
    capture the whole story of dynamics of each task
    given.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com