Title: PSY 429. Paranormal Phenomena and Experience
1PSY 429. Paranormal Phenomena and Experience
2What are we going to do?
- Social Science Natural Science
- Religion Philosophy
- Importance of skepticism, scientific analysis,
and valid logic when evaluating fringe
science/paranormal claims
3What do I call you?
- Dr. Dewald?
- Mr. Dewald?
- Professor Dewald?
ANDY!
4The Books
5Penn and Teller
Penn and Teller are bad men They say bad
words. If you are easily offended by the F
word, and other brilliant profanities.dont
watch. .its the lawthey have to talk like jerks.
6What do you have to do?
- 1. Midterm
- 2. Final
- 3.Reading Responses
- 4. Paper
- 5. SPEAK UP!
- There is no attendance, but you must be present
on the day that responses are do.somebody else
may NOT hand them in.
7Reading Responses
- Based on Chapters in the book
- You do ityou get credit
- Write a short description of your reaction to the
reading, anything you have in your life that
relates and 1-3 questions. - We will go over them in class and discuss.
8The Paper
- 1. Pick a Paranormal Topic
- 2. Explain the history and current information
about it. - 3. Using techniques learned in class, explain why
this is a paranormal belief and the tactics used
to convey its reality. - 4. Show evidence against the proposed phenomena
based on science and empiricism. - October 3rd Due date for proposed topic.
9Examples
- Big Foot
- God
- Creationism
- Aliens
- UFOs
- Psychics
- Monsters.
- Faith Healing
- Levitation
- Ghosts
- Conspiracy theories
10Extra Credit
- Experiments
- 2.5 points for participation
- No more than 3/ semester
- Local Publication coverage of paranormal events
- Must be a local and current.
- Cut out/ print, bring in and present.
- 3 points
- (cat example)
11What we are not going to do
- This class is NOT a witch hunt.
- We will not bash other beliefs
- One persons weird thing could be anothers
cherished belief! - We will be thinking about things in an empirical
and skeptical manner, NOT ripping on, making fun
of, or taunting others.
- http//www.youtube.com/watch?vzrzMhU_4m-g
12What are we going to do?
- Baruch Spinoza
- Dutch Philosopher
- I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule,
not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to
UNDERSTAND them.
13However
- Some things are just absolutely insane.
- We can have a chuckle at their expense, but be
sure to respect the views and feelings of your
peers in the class so as not to make enemies. - Discussdont Argue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
14About me
15About me
My Flat!!!!!!!!
- Undergrad
- Lebanon Valley College (PA)
- London Metropolitan University (UK)
16About me
17About me
- Guitars, Guns, Baseball .
18Lets talk.
- Name
- Year
- Where you from?
- Why did you take this class?
19What are some things you have heard of?
- Has anybody experienced anything paranormal?
- Have you known anybody who has made these claims?
- What is the general consensus in the United
States about this sort of stuff?
20What will we cover?
- Ghosts
- Afterlife
- Channeling
- Near-death experiences
- Psychics
- Psychology and all its BS!
- UFOs and alien abductions
- Creationism vs. evolution
- Religious miracles
21How will we cover?
- 1.Reviewing the myriad of events that are
considered to be paranormal - 2. Addressing the publics interest in paranormal
phenomena - 3. Evaluating and dispelling the myths
surrounding paranormal events - 4. Encouraging scientific rigor when examining
paranormal events - 5. Reviewing the consequences of erroneous belief
systems.
22Psychology?
- Unknown to most people
- Information concerning human behavior and the
unconscious - Most who are considered to be in the field of
psychology (as determined by the general
population) are far from it. - SO WHAT?!
23Psychology?
- Requires critical thinking skills!!!
- More so than any other science.
- Example Chemistry
- Hydrochloric Acid and Aluminum Foil
Predictions? - Example Psychology
- Joshs parents get divorced when he is 7.when he
turns 25 he will be __________________
24Skeptic?
- What is a skeptic?
- Do you know of any?
25Skeptic?
- Skeptic
- Greek thoughtful or full of though
- 2500 years old!
- Plato and Socrates
- all I know is that I know nothing
26Skeptics?
- Modern Skepticism
- Science based movement
- First Pop skeptic James Randi (the amazing)
- 70s and 80s-debunked many psychics and
spiritualists on the Tonight Show.
27Skepticism
- Embodies in the scientific method
- Skepticism is a METHOD leading to conclusions
- A skeptic is one who questions the validity of a
particular claim by calling for evidence to prove
or disprove it - Thats niceprove it
28Skepticism
- 1.Universal Skepticism
- The reality of the senses and the validity of
rational inference should be mistrusted. - Philosophy this has led to Extreme Solopsism
- The reality of the external world and even ones
existence are doubted.
Nothing is real?!
29Universal?
- Problems?
- Overall, it can be seen that Universal
Skepticism is negative, self-defeating, and
contradictory
30Skepticism
- 2. Selective Skepticism
- If a finding seems scientifically valid, it is
accepted, until a better theory comes along to
replace it. - there are NO absolute laws !!!
- a bit better
I existfor now
31Science?
- What the heck is science?
32What science is NOT
- 1. Not defined by subject matter
- Bio, Chem, Psych, Physics..what about selling
cars? - 2. Not defined by use of particular
instrumentation and tools. - Do I have to blow stuff up?
33So what is it then?
- You tell me
- A way of thinking!
34Science!
- Science and Skepticism
- a set of methods designed to describe and
interpret observed or inferred phenomena, past or
present, and aimed at building a testable body of
knowledge open to rejection or confirmation. - What are some VERY important words here?
35Scientific Principles
- Induction
- Forming a hypothesis from existing data
- Deduction
- Making specific predictions based on hypothesis
- Observation
- Gathering data, driven by our hypothesis that
tells us what to look for - Verification
- Testing the predictions against further
observations to confirm or falsify the initial
hypothesis.
36Scientific principles
- Via the scientific method we can come to the
following conclusions - 1.Hypothesis
- A testable statement accounting for a set of
observations - 2.Theory
- A well-supported and well-tested hypothesis
- evolution
- 3.Fact
- A conclusion confirmed to such an extent that it
would be reasonable to offer provisional
agreement. - The earth is not flat
37Rationalism
- Basing conclusion on logic and evidence
- How do we know the world is round?
- Dogmatism
- Basing conclusion on authority
- Parents said so
- I said so
- Textbook says so
38Scientific Principles
- How to ALWAYS think about explaining the
universe - Systematic Empiricism
- Production of Public Knowledge
- Examination of Solvable Problems
39Systematic Empiricism
- Empiricism?
- Relying in observationgood enough?
- STRUCTURE!!!!
- My car is scratched Who did it?
40Production of Public Knowledge
- No man is an island
- Must be public and repeatable.
- Why is this necessary?
- Findings must be presented to the community in
such a way that they can be replicated,
criticized or extended by anyone
41Cold Fusion?
- What is it?
- Pons and Fleischmann
- Faulty measures
- Required Special Instruments
42Empirically Solvable Problems
- Predict? Control? Explain
- What are some questions?
- What are NOT some questions?
- Pinker Mysteries to Problems?
- Jefferson and Sally?! Mystery back thenProblem
now!
43Pseudoscience/ Paranormal
- Characteristics
- 1. non-falsifiable or irrefutable hypothesis.
- What does non-falsifiable mean?
- No evidence can show the hypothesis to be wrong.
44Falsifiability?
- Scientific theories must be presented in a way so
as that they can be shown to be false. - What SHOULD happen and what will NOT happen
- Predictions on Josh He SHOULD develop some sort
of behavior related to the divorce of his parent,
how it manifests itself is TBD. - Josh will NOT develop the power to kill a deer
from 40 yards with mind bullets, on account of
his parents divorce.
45Lets try one
- I, Andrew D. Dewald am God
- I created all of you
- I control all of you
- And you all have no free will.
- I determine everything
46Characteristic 2
- Unwillingness to look closely at the phenomenon
they claim exists. - Need for hard data completely ignored.
- We never landed on the moon
47What if science cant explain?
- If science cant fully explain the phenomena
COMPLETELY, reasonable explanations are ignored
or dismissed and the proponent concludes that
pseudoscience is supported. - Why is this dangerous?
48Santa?
- Who has seen him?
- NASA Apollo 8 saw him
- Santa produces
- Who does the burden lie on?
- The proponent or the Skeptic?
- -shifting the burden to the Skeptic is NOT a
legitimate means of defending unattainable
hypothesis.
49 Because Im a nerd.
- 2 Billion Children in the World
- (Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist children no
need to apply) - 378 Million Children (Assuming they are good)
- 31 Hours to work 821.6 visits per second
- 1/1000th of a second/ kid
- 650 miles per second, 3000 times the speed of
sound 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy per
SECOND
50Conspiracy Theories
- Not paranormal in nature but pop up in the belief
systems of proponents of claims. - Who knows some?
- Biggest Problem?
- HUGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE TO NOT COME FORWARD!
51Polywater
- 1960s Russia
- Boils way high, freezes way low
- More stable than H20
- If allowed to contaminate actual waterBOOM!
- Skeptics could not make it
- Russia Youre not doing it right!
52Conclusion
- Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof!
- Science is open minded Believers are NOT!
53What is the Paranormal?
- A subset of pseudoscience
- any phenomenon that in one or more respects
exceeds the limits of what is deemed physically
possible according to current scientific
assumptions - A reliance on explanations for alleged phenomena
that are WELL outside the bounds of established
science. - Paranormal?Pseudoscience
54Pseudo vs. Paranormal
- UFOs-You tell me.
- We have been visited by aliens who use wormhole
technology to warp space to reach us. - All UFO space craft is actual psychic projections
from the dead spirits of the Universe.
55Who cares?
- What does it matter if people believe crazy
stuff? - What do you think?
56Who cares?
- Late 19th/ Early 20th century
- People started to care
- Spiritualists were exposed by magicians.
- Today
- CSICOP (1970)
- Committee for the Scientific Investigation of
Claims of the Paranormal.
57CSICOP
- CSICOP established several goals
- A. to encourage the investigation of paranormal
and fringe-science claims in a responsible,
scientific way - B. to obtain and disseminate to the public
accurate, scientifically reliable information
about the paranormal.
58Who cares?
?
http//www.csicop.org/
59Question
- Is teaching skepticism harmful to curiosity and
creativity? - What do you think?
60Why do they care?
- I. Claims might be true!
- A.Hypnotism
- Franz Anton Mesmer 1700s
- B. Stones from space?(17th c)
- C. Acupuncture?(70s)
- Aliens?
- (sure)
61Why do they care?
- II. Responsibility to inform the public
- America is easy
- Nisbet (1998)
- 45-Faith Healing
- 30-UFOs (like actually here now)
- 37- Astrology (like in the paper!)
- 25-Reincarnation (Christians)
62Why do they care?
- II. Responsibility to inform the public
- The public spends a lot of time and MONEY on this
junk. - Fraud (John Edward)
- Uncritical coverage of paranormal claims (Faith
healers, prayer, Mary on toast) - Alternative Medicine (10 BILLION/ year)
63Why do they care?
- III. Dangers in belief
- So what if I believe?
- 3 levels of why this is trouble
- 1.Philosophical
- 2. Practical
- 3. Social
64Philosophy
- False beliefs about how the world actually works
DANGEROUS! - Truthgood
- Holding an incorrect view of how the world works
is referred to as a?
65Practical
- New Kona Coffee
- 200 the regular caffeine! (only has 10)
- Problems?
- The Amish (sorry boys)
- Prayer over inoculation
66SocialBringing it to the masses!
- Uncritical acceptance of paranormal belief
systems can be extremely damaging - Examples
67Conclusion
- Those are extremes
- However If one accepts faulty evidence,
intellectual shoddiness and fraud and twisted
logic for little thingsit be comes EASIER to
accept the same type of evidence in support for
REALLY bad stuff.
68(No Transcript)