Title: Does Using the Tax System to Collect Other Obligations Affect Tax Compliance An Australian Case Stud
1Does Using the Tax System to Collect Other
Obligations Affect Tax Compliance?An Australian
Case Study
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Lecture 11
- November 15, 2005
2Australian Federal tax agency is also responsible
for collecting child support payments (CSS) and
student loan obligations (HECS).
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Similar proposals for U.S. systems, particularly
for child support obligations. - Comparisons possible because both systems are
taxpayer-active. - Article is interesting because it explores the
motivations for voluntary compliance.
3PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
Motivation is to increase efficiency of
collection of child support and student loans.
- If collection of CSS and HECS through tax system
is detrimental to voluntary compliance, there are
hidden costs of collection. -
-
4Tax compliance traditionally understood in terms
of benefits of successful evasion vs. costs of
detection.
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Monetary costs fines and penalties.
- Cost Risk of detection X Severity of fines and
penalties - Social sanctions.
5PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Fear not sufficient for explaining why people pay
tax. - Alternative/Complementary explanations
- Moral obligationpeople pay tax because they
believe its the right thing to do. - Community norms, personal norms, tax morale
- Perceived fairness of exchangepeople pay tax
because they trust government to use revenues to
provide useful benefits. - Contingent consent
6Other factors known to affect tax compliance
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- AgeOlder taxpayers are less likely to cheat on
taxes. - GenderWomen are less likely to cheat on taxes.
- Income levelPoor people are more likely to cheat
on taxes. Rich people are also more likely to
cheat on taxes. - When it comes to additional payments, it
is reasonable to assume that likelihood of
cheating will increase for poor people.
7Hypotheses about the effects of adding child
support and student loan payments
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Additional payments have the effect of increasing
the marginal tax rate. This increases the
benefit to be derived from cheatingmain effect
hypothesis. - Additional payments could interact with
constraints of deterrence, moral obligation, and
trustworthiness, increasing incidence of cheating.
8The survey
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Mail survey29 response rate
- Measuresmulti-item, multi-dimensional
- Tax evasion under-reporting income, engaging in
cash economy, exaggerating deductions. - Additional payments CSS and/or HECS.
- Deterrence perceived likelihood of getting
caught, perceived likelihood of sanctioning,
perceived severity of sanctions. - Moral obligation personal norm of tax honesty,
shame displacement and acknowledgement. - Trustworthiness exchange trustworthiness,
communal trustworthiness.
9The results
PA 546 Constantine Hadjilambrinos
- Findings of previous research confirmed.
- Only significant interaction relationships were
with trustworthiness and with income level. - Tax evasion is higher after CSS and HECS
payments, even after controlling for gender, age,
income, and the constraint variables (deterrence,
moral obligation, and trustworthinessthe main
effect hypothesis is supported.