DEBATE 101 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

DEBATE 101

Description:

A value debate involves a moral argument. ie: 'capital punishment is wrong' or 'the apartheid is evil' Usually includes the following: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: hfrisc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEBATE 101


1
DEBATE 101
  • A VERY quick guide to VALUE debate.

2
a VALUE debate
  • A value debate involves a moral argument. ie
    capital punishment is wrong or the apartheid
    is evil
  • Usually includes the following
  • Evaluation of a given act, principle, or
    condition
  • Is it right or wrong, just or unjust, good or
    evil?
  • Comparison of competing values
  • When two values are in conflict (such as one
    persons right to free speech and anothers right
    to privacy), which should prevail.

3
strategies to WIN a VALUE debate
  • Use analogies
  • ie When President Lincoln was running for
    reelection, he used this analogy it is not best
    to swap horses while crossing the river
  • Analogies may lend credence to predictions
  • Analogies may draw the opponent onto unfamiliar
    ground
  • Analogies may place the opponent in an uncertain
    position (one that will be hard to defend)

4
how to REFUTE an analogy
  • argue that the cases are not the sufficiently
    similar
  • deny your opponents analysis of the analogy
  • deny the virtue of consistency
  • use the opponents analogy against them
  • construct a counteranalogy

5
other ways to WIN a VALUE debate
  • Discover anomalies and exceptions to the
    opponents principle
  • Enforce the consequences of the opponents
    principle
  • Reduce the opponents principle to absurdity
  • Extrapolate the opponents principle
  • ie what would happen if everyone did thatthink
    Harrison Bergeron and the Handicapper General

6
Debate Format 101
  • 1st Affirmative Constructive (pre-written) (5 m)
  • Cross examination by 2nd negative (2m)
  • 1st Negative Constructive (5m)
  • Cross examination by 2nd affirmative (2m)
  • 2nd Affirmative Constructive (5m)
  • Cross examination by 1st negative (2m)
  • 2nd Negative Constructive (5m)
  • Cross examination by 1st affirmative (2m)
  • 1st Negative Rebuttal (3m)
  • 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (3m)
  • 2nd Negative Rebuttal (3m)
  • 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (3m)

7
so WHAT does this all MEAN?
  • The affirmative case Supports the proposition in
    the resolution
  • The negative team refutes the proposition
  • The 1st AC presents the case
  • The 1st NC refutes the arguments and present
    their teams position
  • The 2nd AC rebuilds the case, refutes the points
    the negative presents, and points out what
    arguments the 1st AC made that the negative team
    dropped.
  • The 2nd NC can extends the argument of the 1st
    NC, answer arguments made by the 2 AC, this is
    the LAST TIME a new issue can be raised in a
    debate!!!

8
REBUTTALS
  • The rebuttal time is designed to argue the case
    made. A lot of information has been given, and
    this is your time to point out the
    inconsistencies, absurdities, and illogical
    arguments of your opponents.
  • No new information can be presented during the
    rebuttal time

9
Cross Examination
  • Best put to use for three good reasons
  • Information- gain details needed in order to
    refute the answerers position
  • Ask what they mean by vague terms, like evil
  • Focus- narrow the audiences attention to what
    you believe to be the most vulnerable aspect of
    your opponents arguments
  • Consensus- the most important strategic function
    of cross-x is its ability to generate agreement
    between the two sides, so that they may be used
    for the questioners benefit later!

10
terms to KNOW
  • T-Topicality-is what the team talking about
    even topical?
  • SQ- status quo- what is the status quo? Can we
    use that to support a point?
  • Weighing mechanism- what you use to show the
    higher good
  • ie using a quotation saying that money is the
    root of all evil as your weighing mechanism. You
    balance your ideas based on a popular philosopher
    or Biblical idea, for instance.

11
Before you Go
  • Your team has 6 minutes prep time total. There
    will be someone keeping track for you, just ask
    prep please and say stop prep when youre
    done
  • As the affirmative team, your responsibility is
    to prove the case
  • As the negative, your responsibility is to
    disprove the case.
  • Watch for dropped arguments, irrelevant sources,
    or analogies that dont make sense. These are key
    to helping you WIN!
  • Use your prep time wisely, but remember, that
    your prep time is being used by the other team,
    too!
  • Remember, this is a VALUE debate. One position is
    BETTER than another. Its your job to convince us
    which is best!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com