Philosophical Keynote Address - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophical Keynote Address

Description:

Of course some people make a better living off change ... Changing Around Us Most Popular Cartoon Today ... is required when two are more people are involved, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: tugClov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophical Keynote Address


1
Philosophical Keynote Address
  • On Change

2
Defining it isnt as easy as you might think...
If change is just inconsistency, maybe its a bad
thing.
2
3
There is more than one kind.
Brother can you spare a dime.
3
4
Change is not a new thing.
4
5
Change isnt always welcome or good.
5
6
Change is often expensive.
6
7
In other words, if you dont know what youre
signing up for, it may.
7
8
--BUT It pays the bills If nothing ever
changed most if not all of us would be out of
work.
Of course some people make a better living off
change than others.
8
9
Disclaimer Not intended as a political statement
one way or the other. Just talking about change.
Change doesnt always have to be defined to be
popular.
When it is defined it wont be popular with
everyone.
9
10
A real agent of change.
11
Not the preferred method.
10
12
In order to determine the value of a change we
really need to know
what will change, how it will change and at what
cost.
Maybe for you.
If its a boy you better be quick about it.
--and how will the change impact me?
11
Even a decision not to change can result in a
change in satisfaction.
13
The World is Changing Around Us Most Popular
Cartoon Today
  • 2005 Pulcinella Awards Best Action/Adventure TV
    Series
  • Best TV Series
  • 2007 Genesis Awards Outstanding Children's
    Programming (Appa's Lost Days)
  • 2008 Kid's Choice Awards Favorite Cartoon

12
14
Influences
  • Explicitly stated influences include Chinese art
    and history, Japanese anime, Hinduism (India),
    Taoism (China), Buddhism (India), and Yoga
    (India).
  • The production staff employs a cultural
    consultant, to review scripts.

13
15
Back in The Day / Influences
  • Sailors
  • Hunters Rabbits

14
16
Reasons not to change
  • Its hard.
  • Its uncomfortable.
  • It costs a lot.
  • Its no fun.
  • Its a lot of work.
  • Fatigue, change is constant.
  • If it aint broke, dont fix it.

15
17
Why Cant Things Stay Simple?
16
18
Good chart. The numbers may be flawed but we
all know on-going maintenance and enhancement
costs are high.
17
19
Reasons to Change TrnsPort
  • Older software higher maintenance costs.
  • Finding RTF expertise is tough and it gets
    tougher every day. They dont teach it in
    college.
  • TrnsPort doesnt include CRLMS functionality
    today.
  • Cant easily pass data back forth to/from
    contractors consultants with the existing
    legacy CS systems.
  • TrnsPort is all about, keeping our software
    up-to-date, thats why were here.

18
20
Reasons to Change TrnsPort
  • Older software higher maintenance costs.
  • Finding PowerBuilder expertise is tough and it
    gets tougher every day. They dont teach it in
    college and the training you can get is pricy.
  • Its going to take several years to get this
    developed so if we want a replacement in this
    lifetime we need to start working on it now.
  • At some point TrnsPort has to change or it will
    become extinct.

19
21
We have changed.
Ten short years ago
20
22
Today
21
23
TTF Cant do this alone.
24
23
25
Middle Management
24
26
We will change what how is up to you.
25
27
Heres what you should never do.
26
28
Case Study
  • CIO Insight
  • Behind the Census Bureaus Mobile SNAFUBy Jean
    Thilmany 05-20-2008
  • The U.S. Census Bureaus flub of a large-scale
    mobile implementationthe latest in a long line
    of government IT disasterssets modernization
    back a decade.

27
29
Census Bureau Case Study
  • In April, Census Bureau Director Steve Murdock
    testified before Congress on this matter. He
    acknowledged that the bureau did not effectively
    convey the complexity of census operations to the
    contractor, and said problems arose in part
    because of ineffective communicationsincluding
    information about IT requirementsbetween the
    bureau and Harris Corp.

28
30
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Once these detailed requirements were completely
    delineated, we had serious concerns about rising
    costs and our ability to complete a successful
    2010 census if we continued developing the
    program as planned, Murdock told the House
    Information Policy, Census and National Archives
    Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and
    Government Reform.

29
31
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Those detailed requirements were indeed a
    problem. The initial contract contained roughly
    600 requirements, and the bureau later added 418
    more, says David Powner, GAO director of IT
    management issues. What happened with the Census
    Bureau is a case study of why federal government
    IT implementations often go wrong, according to
    Powner, who came to government service after
    spending years overseeing large-scale IT
    implementations in the private sector. (The
    government spends 70 billion annually on nearly
    900 IT projects.)

30
32
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Step one in an escalating chain of errors that
    went uncorrected The contractor presented a
    poorly calculated estimate. Federal entities
    dont require the same rigorous up-front cost
    estimates as their nongovernmental counterparts
    do.

31
33
Census Bureau Case Study
  • To complicate things, that poor cost estimate was
    compounded by requirements creep the tendency
    for clients to add more features to their wish
    list long after theyve signed off on the
    original requirements. Those of us who define
    requirements for systems know it isnt easy, but
    you need a validated set of requirements up
    front, and government doesnt often do that
    up-front work, Powner says.

32
34
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Adding to the woes was the lack of oversight of
    the contractor. It seems that the Census Bureau
    didnt lean hard enough on Harris to provide
    continued implementation updates, but Murdocks
    testimony doesnt directly address such
    activities.

33
35
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Another problem is the result of the relative
    newness of the mobile technology. The bureau has
    ventured into a new territory with technology
    that is not fully mature and doesnt come with an
    implementation road map, says Philippe Winthrop,
    research director for wireless and mobility at
    the IT analysis firm Aberdeen Group.

34
36
Census Bureau Case Study
  • The Census Bureau probably didnt take market
    immaturity into account when signing the
    contract, surmises Sheldon Needle, president of
    CTS, which evaluates software for midsize
    companies. Mobile is still a fairly raw
    technology so they should have had their antennas
    up from the beginning, he says. If the bureau
    was in it two years ago, it was even rawer.

35
37
Census Bureau Case Study
  • If I were running such a job and the vendor
    couldnt give me a couple of referrals of
    large-scale sites theyd done, I wouldnt even
    talk to them. What happened sounds improbable,
    but this kind of stuff goes on all the time with
    huge-scale implementations.

36
38
Census Bureau Case Study
  • Finally, implementations of mobile technology
    can be very complex. The systems encompass
    multiple components, carriers, devices, operating
    systems and applications that need to be agreed
    upon well before the systems are installed. CIOs
    also need to ensure that all parts of the system
    can be integrated.
  • A need also exists to develop business rules for
    each of these multiple components. Were in new
    territory here, Aberdeen Groups Winthrop says.

37
39
Bottom Line
  • Change is risky enough when its well defined no
    point in attempting to develop the unknown.

38
40
Changing Horses Is Never Easy
  • Old horses are slow.
  • Its hard to teach an old horse new tricks.
  • Old horses tend to do less with more.
  • Old horses die.
  • Horses need big graves.
  • Best to switch before the grave digging starts.

39
41
It wont be easy.
40
42
So what should we do?
41
43
We got off to a slow start.
42
44
Take control of your future, participate in
fruitful meetings!
43
45
Goal Setting Helps
  • 1st you must know what you want,
  • Compromise is required when two are more people
    are involved,
  • Cant be successful with conflicting goals,
  • Goals define requirements,
  • When you cant see the final destination
    milestones help make sure you dont get lost
    along the way,
  • But always keep and eye on the overall goal to
    make sure you dont get off track.

44
46
Break it Down
  • Once you start the trip, changing direction
    really slows down progress.
  • In other words once you decide to swim across the
    big lake to avoid failure / sinking / drowning /
    death
  • you should know which direction to go in
  • take the straight path / dont change direction
  • Change in and of itself is a oxymoron because
    commitment and consistency are required to
    accomplish goals and change.

45
47
Be specific about what you want or prepare for
less...
46
48
How do we succeed?
  • Clear requirements with managed change
  • Well calculated estimates
  • Oversight
  • Effective communications at all levels
  • Keep it as simple as possible
  • Break it down to component parts
  • Develop the application
  • Provide an implementation roadmap.

47
49
Courage Be strong dont be ruled by fear Be
calm dont freak out when things go wrong Be
clear develop and communicate a plan Be careful
dont take unnecessary risk
The End.
48
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com