STRESS AND STRAIN ANALYSIS OF A HOCKEY STICK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

STRESS AND STRAIN ANALYSIS OF A HOCKEY STICK

Description:

STRESS AND STRAIN ANALYSIS OF A HOCKEY STICK Andrew Mills Jeff Tibbe Brad Vander Veen Loading Analysis Loading is due to stick blade striking the ice In bending and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: vand68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STRESS AND STRAIN ANALYSIS OF A HOCKEY STICK


1
STRESS AND STRAIN ANALYSIS OF A HOCKEY STICK
  • Andrew Mills
  • Jeff Tibbe
  • Brad Vander Veen

2
Loading Analysis
  • Loading is due to stick blade striking the ice
  • In bending and torsion
  • The stick bends similar to a bow
  • Elastic energy stored in the bent stick is used
    to accelerate the puck

3
Picture
4
Picture
  • The bottom half of the stick looks like a
    cantilever beam this is how the load will be
    modeled

5
Model of a Hockey Stick
6
Experimental Setup
  • Cantilever beam in torsion and bending
  • Fixed with clamps at midpoint of shaft
  • Mass hung where stick blade would strike the ice
  • Strain gage place at fixed end

7
Theoretical Principal Strains
8
Theoretical Principal Stresses
9
Experimental Setup
10
Experimental Setup
11
Experimental Setup
12
Diagram of Rosette
13
Results
14
Experimental Principal Strains
15
Experimental Principal Stress
16
Comparison
  • Theoretical and Actual follow the same trends.
  • Most results had a percent discrepancy of about
    15 to 40
  • Torsional stress results did not agree as well as
    bending stress results
  • Angles of principal stresses and strains agreed
    (3 vs 5)

17
Failure Analysis
  • Hockey stick yielded when a 70 lb load was
    applied.
  • At 60 lbs, the measured maximum principal stress
    was 49,000 psi
  • The yield stress for the material was 52,900 psi
  • The 70 lb load caused a principal stress higher
    than the yield stress

18
Discussion
  • Error in torsional results was higher because it
    was hard to constrain it
  • Measurements were very sensitive to slight
    constraint movements

19
Conclusion
  • Stresses and strains in a theoretical analysis
    agreed well with results found in the actual
    experiment

20
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com