Biomaterials Used in Orthopedic Implants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Biomaterials Used in Orthopedic Implants

Description:

Biomaterials Used in Orthopedic Implants Magnesium Foam As a Bioresorbable Implant Presented By Joe Barker Orthopedics Bone properties, Osteoconductivity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: Asatisfie94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biomaterials Used in Orthopedic Implants


1
Biomaterials Used in Orthopedic Implants
  • Magnesium Foam As a Bioresorbable Implant
  • Presented By
  • Joe Barker

2
Orthopedics
  • Bone properties, Osteoconductivity,
    Biocompatibility

3
Bone Properties
  • Density 2.3g/cm3
  • Tensile Strength 3-20MPa
  • Compressive Strength 15,000 psi
  • Shear Strength 4,000 psi
  • Youngs Modulus 10-40 MPa

4
Orthopedic Terms
Osteoconductive The property of a material that
allows for the possible integration of new bone
with the host bone.
Osteoinductive Characteristic in materials that
promote new bone growth.
Bioresorbable The ability of a material to be
entirely adsorbed by the body.
Trochanter The second segment of the leg, after
the coxa and before the femur
5
Screw Types
  • OBLIQUE SCREWS
  • In subtrochanteric and high femoral fractures
    oblique screws may be required to be inserted up
    the femoral neck
  • Screws are 4.5mmX150mm

6
Screw Types
  • CANNULATED SCREW
  • Screw Sizes
  • 6.5mm X 102mm
  • 4.5 X 12.5mm

7
Screw Types
  • CANNULATED SCREW Continued...
  • A bulbous ended nail with cannulated 12.5 mm
    screws is shown here successfully stabilizing a
    subtrochanteric non-union of the femur following
    a failed Gamma nail

8
Screw Types
  • TRANSVERSE SCREWS
  • In most subtrochanteric and upper femoral
    fractures it is much easier to insert transverse
    screws in the upper femur, than use oblique
    screws up the neck of the femur.

9
Screw Types
Transverse Screws Continued....
10
Orthopedic Materials
  • Metals

11
Metals For Implants
  • Must be corrosion resistant
  • Mechanical properties must be appropriate for the
    desired application
  • Areas subjected to cyclic loading must have good
    fatigue properties -- implant materials cannot
    heal themselves

12
Devices Were Metals Are Used
  • Orthopedic devices
  • Plates and screws, Pins and Wires, rods
    (temporary)
  • Total joints (permanent)
  • Clips and staples

13
Metals Used in Implants
  • Three main categories of metals for orthopedic
    implants
  • stainless steels
  • cobalt-chromium alloys
  • titanium alloys
  • Material looked at in this project
  • Magnesium Foam

14
Stainless Steel
  • Generally about 12 chromium (316L, Fe-Cr-Ni-Mo)
  • High elastic modulus, rigid
  • Low resistance to stress corrosion cracking,
    pitting and crevice corrosion, better for
    temporary use
  • Corrosion accelerates fatigue crack growth rate
    in saline (and in vivo)
  • Intergranular corrosion at chromium poor grain
    boundaries -- leads to cracking and failure
  • Wear fragments - found in adjacent giant cells

15
Cobalt Based Alloys
  • Co-Cr-Mo
  • Used for many years in dental implants more
    recently used in artificial joints
  • good corrosion resistance
  • Co-Cr-Ni-Mo
  • Typically used for stems of highly loaded
    implants, such as hip and knee arthroplasty
  • Very high fatigue strengths, high elastic modulus
  • High degree of corrosion resistance in salt water
    when under stress
  • Poor frictional properties with itself or any
    other material
  • Molybdenum is added to produce finer grains

16
Titanium and Titanium Alloys
  • High strength to weight ratio
  • Density of 4.5 g/cm3 compared to 7.9 g/cm3 for
    316 SS
  • Modulus of elasticity for alloys is about 110 GPa
  • Not as strong as stainless steel or cobalt based
    alloys, but has a higher specific strength or
    strength per density
  • Low modulus of elasticity - does not match bone
    causing stress shielding

17
Titanium Alloys
  • Co-Ni-Cr-Mo-Ti, Ti6A4V
  • Poor shear strength which makes it undesirable
    for bone screws or plates
  • Tends to seize when in sliding contact with
    itself or other metals
  • Poor surface wear properties - may be improved
    with surface treatments such as nitriding and
    oxidizing

18
Best Performance
  • Titanium has the best biocompatibility of the
    three.
  • Metal of choice where tissue or direct bone
    contact required (endosseous dental implants or
    porous un-cemented orthopedic implants)
  • Corrosion resistance due to formation of a solid
    oxide layer on surface (TiO2) -- leads to
    passivation of the material

19
Orthopedic Materials
  • Metallic Foams

20
Metallic Foam
  • Types of metallic foams
  • Solid metal foam is a generalized term for a
    material starting from a liquid-metal foam that
    was restricted morphology with closed, round
    cells.
  • Cellular metalsA metallic body in which a
    gaseous void is introduced.
  • Porous metal Special type of cellular metal with
    certain types of voids, usually round in shape
    and isolated from each other.
  • Metal Sponges A morphology of cellular metals
    with interconnected voids.

21
Magnesium Foam
  • The type of Magnesium foam used in this study
    would be classified as a porous metal.
  • Why Foam?
  • Open cellular structure permits ingrowths of
    new-bone tissue and transport of the body fluids
  • Strength Modulus can be adjusted through
    porosity to match natural bone properties

22
Requirements for Porous Implant
  • Pore Morphology (Spherical)
  • Pore Size (200?m - 500?m)
  • Porosity
  • High Purity (99.9)
  • Biocompatibility

23
Why Magnesium?
  • Bioresorbable
  • Biocompatible
  • Osteoconductive
  • Osteoinductive
  • Properties of bone can be easily attained using
    varying processing techniques

24
Processing the Mg by Powder Metallurgy Techniques
  • Powder
  • Mg powder
  • 99.9 purity
  • particle size ?180?m
  • Binder Ammonium Bicarbonate
  • Spherical Shape
  • 99.0 purity
  • Size between 200?m 500?m

25
Processing the Mg by Powder Metallurgy Techniques
  • Processing Steps
  • Blend powders until a homogenous mixture is
    attained.
  • Uniaxially press at 100MPa into green compacts
  • Heat treat at 200ºC for 5hrs, for binder burnout
  • Sinter at 500ºC for 2hrs

26
Results From Processing
  • Optical Micrograph of Porous Mg
  • Small isolated micropores distributed in the wall
    of the interpenetrated macropores.
  • The micropores are on the order of microns, while
    the macropores are in the range of 200?m 500?m

27
Results of Processing
  • SEM Micrograph of Mg
  • Micropores result from the volume shrinkage
    during sintering and are to small for bone growth
  • Macropores are made on the appropriate size level
    to promote the ingrowths of new-bone tissues and
    transport of body fluid

28
Determination of Mechanical Properties
  • The Stress Strain Curve shows a large plateau
    region
  • From this you can see that the plateau stress of
    the Mg foam is roughly 2.33 MPa
  • Using Gibson Ashby model the following
    properties can be attained
  • ?pl/?ysC(?/?s)3/2 C0.3
  • E/EsA(?/?s)2 A1

29
Properties Attained from Processing
  • With a porosity of ? 50
  • Density 0.87g/cm3
  • ?pl 2.33MPa
  • ?ys 2.843 MPa
  • E 10.476GPa

30
Adsorption and Toxicity
  • Adsorption Rates for Mg
  • The bone will adsorb around 40 of the Mg in the
    screw per year.
  • From this the lifetime of the screw would be
    between 5 7 years before no traces are left.
  • Toxicity
  • Recommended dosage of Mg per day is 350mg
  • 60 of Mg in the body is found in bones
  • In recent studies, a diet rich in Mg resulted in
    increases in bone density in postmenopausal women
  • Relatively low toxicity issues, but in vivo
    testing would clarify.

31
Cost of Materials
  • Price of Mg powder for particle size ? 200?m
  • 56.24 for 1Kg
  • Price of Binder powder within set size limits
  • 40.66 for 1Kg
  • Cost for smallest screw size 4.5mm X 12.5mm
  • 0.07
  • Cost for largest screw size 6.5mm X 150mm
  • 0.50

32
Processing Costs
  • Processing features
  • Simple Uniaxially pressed operation
  • No need for mass production
  • No continuous processing (more costly)
  • No need for multiple large industrial scale
    facilities
  • Less workers and utility costs

33
Comparisons
Material Density Youngs Modulus Tensile Strength Estimated Cost Ranking
Bone 2.3 10 40 3 20 Na
Stainless Steel 7.9 196 290 1
Co Alloys 8.9 211 345 4
Ti Alloys 4.5 105 200 3
Mg Foam 2.33 10.476 2.843 2
34
Conclusions
  • Mg Foam has mechanical properties better suited
    for bone substitute than the other commercial
    products
  • You have the advantage of Mg being bioresorbable
    and osteoconductive.
  • Promotes new bone growth
  • Is completely replaced by new bone, making the
    bone stronger
  • You dont have to walk around with a foreign body
    inside your leg for the duration of your life, or
    you dont have to have a second surgery to remove
    the implant

35
Conclusion Continued....
  • Processing cost is comparative to products all
    ready in use
  • Toxicity issues are small since the amounts of Mg
    is low, but medical workups would be advised
    before implantation
  • Mg Foam is a viable option for use in a screw
    implant.

36
Questions
  • Any Questions about the project?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com