Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact Statement EIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact Statement EIS

Description:

... capacity for the Santee Cooper's residential and commercial customers by ... Tires were eliminated from further study as a sole source to generate 1,320 MW. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: heather105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact Statement EIS


1
Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact
Statement(EIS)
2
WELCOME and
INTRODUCTIONS
3
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT
4
The Proposed Project consists of the preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to
Study a cost-effective means to satisfy the
projected demand for electrical generation
capacity for the Santee Coopers residential and
commercial customers by 2013 to avoid an
electrical shortfall.
5
  • The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
    is responsible for the preparation of the EIS,
    and for approval of permits under its authority
    from the
  • River and Harbors Act of 1899
  • Clean Water Act

6
  • Public Input is vital to the successful
    completion of the project. We will obtain Public
    Input through
  • Project Scoping Meetings
  • Agency Scoping Meeting (September 20, 2007)
  • Public Scoping Meetings
  • Conway (September 25, 2007)
  • Florence (September 27, 2007)

7
  • Public Input (continued)
  • Public Information Meetings
  • Public Hearings
  • Stakeholders Working Group Meetings
  • The Project Website (www.peedeepowereis.com)
  • Comments, letters, and documents provided to the
    Project Team

8
(No Transcript)
9
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
10
Purpose and Need
  • Purpose
  • The purpose of the proposed project is to provide
    a reliable and cost-effective means to satisfy
    the projected demand for electrical generation
    capacity for Santee Cooper's projected
    residential and commercial customers beginning in
    the year 2013.
  • Primary Needs
  • Electrical Generation
  • Economic Sustainability
  • Secondary Needs
  • Fulfill Obligation to Customers
  • Minimize Transmission Loss

11
Purpose and Need
  • Primary Needs
  • Electrical Generation
  • 225 MW shortfall expected by 2012 (370 MW)
  • 310 MW shortage expected by 2013 (525 MW)
  • 445 MW shortage expected by 2014 (680 MW)
  • 545 MW shortage expected by 2015 (835 MW)
  • The Load Forecast, Generation Plan, and DSM are
    being evaluated by an independent consultant.
  • Pending the outcome of the review, some
    alternatives that have been eliminated may need
    to be reevaluated.

12
Alternatives Analysis
  • Technology Alternatives
  • Site Selection Analysis
  • No Build Alternative
  • Demand Side Management Alternatives
  • The planning, implementation, and monitoring of
    utility activities designed to encourage
    customers to modify patterns or electricity
    usage, including the timing and level of
    electricity demand (EIA)
  • Efficiency
  • Refers to programs that are aimed at reducing
    the energy used by specific end-use devices and
    systems, typically without affecting the services
    provided (EIA)

13
Level ITechnology Alternatives Analysis
  • Based on the permit application submitted to the
    USACE, the proposed facility would generate 1,320
    MW.
  • Alternatives Analysis
  • Sole Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
  • Designation of Reasonable Technology
    Alternatives
  • Combined Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
  • Designation of Reasonable Technology
    Alternatives

14
Preliminary Energy Sources
  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Hydroelectric
  • Geothermal
  • Tires
  • Forest Biomass
  • Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
  • Landfill Gas
  • Municipal Solid Waste
  • Digester Gas
  • Ethanol
  • Biodiesel
  • Tidal
  • Nuclear
  • Natural Gas
  • Fuel Oil
  • Coal

15
Wind (Onshore)
  • Need Class 4 wind speeds or higher for utility
    scale production.
  • Not consistent source due to lack of sustained
    Class 4 winds.
  • Onshore wind was eliminated from further study.

16
Wind (Offshore)
  • Class 4 winds are available.
  • Intermittent energy source.
  • Technology has not been installed in southeast
    U.S., extensive testing needed prior to becoming
    operational.
  • Offshore wind was eliminated from further study.

17
Solar
  • Intermittent source of power.
  • South Carolina has moderate to poor solar
    resources.
  • Minimum ability to store power.
  • Solar was eliminated from further study.

18
Hydroelectric
  • Average flow on Great Pee Dee River is not
    adequate to generate 1,320 MW without creation of
    reservoir.
  • An 80-foot high dam would generate between 41-69
    MW.
  • An 80-foot high dam would produce a reservoir
    greater than 350 square miles.
  • Hydroelectric was eliminated from further study.

19
Geothermal
  • No natural geothermal resources in South
    Carolina.
  • Water temperatures not sufficient at reachable
    depths.
  • Technology has not been developed to reach depths
    required in South Carolina.
  • Geothermal was eliminated from further study.

20
Tires
  • 1.5 million tons per year are required to produce
    1,320 MW.
  • 1.5 million tons equals approximately 105 million
    tires per year.
  • Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
    North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee
    generate 60 million scrap tires per year.
  • Competing uses for scrap tires.
  • Tires were eliminated from further study as a
    sole source to generate 1,320 MW.

21
Forest Biomass
  • Approximately 19 million green tons per year
    needed to generate 1,320 MW.
  • 20.9 million tons are available annually in South
    Carolina.
  • Potential issues with collection, transportation,
    and storage of materials will be evaluated.
  • Forest biomass will be further studied.

22
Agricultural Residue and Dedicated Energy Crops
  • Need over 20.3 million green tons of agricultural
    residue per year to generate 1,320 MW.
  • South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia
    produce a total of 4.4 million tons of
    agricultural residue per year.
  • Competing uses.
  • Agricultural residue and dedicated energy crops
    were eliminated from further study as a
    sole-generator.

23
Landfill Gas
  • Five landfills are currently operational in South
    Carolina.
  • 15 candidate landfills in South Carolina.
  • 30 potential landfills in South Carolina.
  • The maximum generation is approximately 3.66 MW
    per landfill.
  • Landfill gas was eliminated from further study.

24
Municipal Solid Waste
  • Approximately 22.3 million tons per year needed
    to generate 1,320 MW.
  • 38.3 million tons per year are available in South
    Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.
  • Potential issues with collection, transportation,
    and storage of materials will be further
    evaluated.
  • Municipal solid waste will be further studied.

25
Digester Gas
  • Approximately 7.9 million cows/pigs needed to
    generate 1,320 MW.
  • 9.8 million pigs in South Carolina and North
    Carolina.
  • Potential issues with collection, transportation,
    and storage of materials will be further
    evaluated.
  • Digester gas will be further studied.

26
Ethanol
  • 519 million gallons of ethanol needed to produce
    1,320 MW.
  • 219 million bushels of corn needed annually to
    produce 519 million gallons of ethanol.
  • 96.7 million bushels produced by South Carolina,
    North Carolina, and Georgia.
  • Competing uses.
  • Ethanol was eliminated from further study as a
    sole source to generate 1,320 MW.

27
Biodiesel
  • Need 334-401 million gallons per year to generate
    1,320 MW.
  • South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia
    produce 59.1 million gallons of waste grease per
    year.
  • Competing uses.
  • Biodiesel was eliminated from further study as a
    sole-generator.

28
Tidal
  • To generate electricity the tidal range must be
    16 feet or higher.
  • South Carolina only has a tidal range of 6.6 to
    13.2 feet.
  • Tidal was eliminated from further study.

29
Nuclear
  • 2-3 years for review of license application.
  • Additional 6-10 years for construction.
  • Time period for licensing and construction will
    not meet the project need.
  • Nuclear was eliminated from further study.

30
Natural Gas
  • Approximately 220 million cubic feet per day is
    needed to generate 1,320 MW.
  • Adequate supply of natural gas.
  • Potential issues with supply and market
    fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated.
  • Natural gas will be further studied.

31
Fuel Oil
  • Approximately 318-343 million gallons per year is
    needed to generate 1,320 MW.
  • Limited domestic production.
  • Potential issues with supply and market
    fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated.
  • Fuel oil will be further studied.

32
Coal
  • Approximately 410 tons per hour is needed to
    generate 1,320 MW.
  • Adequate supply of coal.
  • Types of coal combustion will be further
    evaluated.
  • Coal will be further studied.

33
Sole Source Alternatives(Status for potential to
generate all 1,320 MW)
  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Hydroelectric
  • Geothermal
  • Tires
  • Forest Biomass
  • Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
  • Landfill Gas
  • Municipal Solid Waste
  • Digester Gas
  • Ethanol
  • Biodiesel
  • Tidal
  • Nuclear
  • Natural Gas
  • Fuel Oil
  • Coal

34
Combined Source Alternatives(Status for
potential to be combined to generate 1,320 MW)
  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Hydroelectric
  • Geothermal
  • Tires
  • Forest Biomass
  • Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
  • Landfill Gas
  • Municipal Solid Waste
  • Digester Gas
  • Ethanol
  • Biodiesel
  • Tidal
  • Nuclear
  • Natural Gas
  • Fuel Oil
  • Coal

35
Next Steps
  • Alternatives Analysis
  • Sole Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation
  • Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
  • Combined Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation
  • Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
  • No-build
  • Site Selection

36
Detailed Evaluation Criteria(Level II)
  • Raw Material Availability
  • Plant Efficiency
  • Plant Capacity Factor
  • Raw Material Feed Rates
  • Costs (2012 Dollars)
  • Raw Material Availability
  • Total Plant Costs
  • Operating and Maintenance Costs
  • Delivered Fuel Costs
  • Levelized Cost of Energy
  • Other Associated Costs

37
Detailed Evaluation Criteria(Level II)
  • Solid and Liquid Waste Production
  • Air Emissions for Criteria Pollutants
  • Green House Gas Emissions
  • Other Emissions

38
TiresCombined Source
  • Existing demand exceeds the supply.
  • Competing uses for scrap tires.
  • In 2005, there were 12 Million scrap tires
    recycled in South Carolina, leaving none or very
    few for energy use.
  • Tires were eliminated from further study as a
    combined source.

39
Forest Biomass Sole Combined Source
  • Need 6.4 Million tons per year for sole source.
  • Not enough forest biomass available annually in
    South Carolina.
  • Forest biomass was eliminated from further study
    as a sole source to generate 1,320 MW.
  • Forest biomass will be further studied as a
    combined source.

40
Agricultural Residue and Dedicated Energy
CropsCombined Source
  • Need 346,239 tons per year of switchgrass to
    co-fire at 5.
  • Switchgrass is not currently being grown in South
    Carolina.
  • Need 335,070 tons per year of corn stover to
    co-fire at 5.
  • South Carolina has 482,286 tons per year.
  • Based on research it is only feasible to count
    half of the available corn stover due to
    collection, storage, and transportation.
  • Competing uses.
  • Agricultural residue and dedicated energy crops
    were eliminated from further study as a combined
    source.

41
Municipal Solid WasteSole Combined Source
  • Need 26 Million tons per year for sole source.
  • South Carolina has 3.2 Million tons per year.
  • 3.2 Million tons per year is approximately 12 of
    need.
  • All of South Carolina trash would have to be
    sorted to achieve a co-fire situation of 5.
  • Would decrease longevity of landfill gas to
    energy facilities.
  • Municipal solid waste was eliminated from further
    study as a sole source to generate 1,320 MW.
  • Municipal solid waste was eliminated as a
    combined source.

42
Digester GasSole Combined Source
  • Would need 3.76 Million dairy cattle
  • South Carolina has 432,265 dairy cattle (11)
  • Would need 44.7 Million pigs
  • South Carolina has 291,743 pigs (0.6)
  • Would need 602.2 Million chickens
  • South Carolina has 5.58 Million chickens (0.9)
  • Unable to pull waste from neighboring states due
    to implemented regulations.
  • Digester gas was eliminated as a sole and
    combined source.

43
EthanolCombined Source
  • USEPA has set Renewable Fuel Standard which is
    the amount of renewable fuels that must be
    blended into gasoline.
  • In 2008, 9 Billion gallons must be blended.
  • To meet this standard the U.S. has to import.
  • Ethanol was eliminated from further study as a
    combined source.

44
BiodieselCombined Source
  • A very limited supply of Biodiesel is produced in
    South Carolina.
  • Competing uses.
  • Biodiesel was eliminated from further study as a
    combined source.

45
Nuclear
  • Three types of Nuclear were evaluated
  • New facility
  • 10-15 years to operation
  • Uprate existing facility
  • All facilities have completed uprates.
  • A new unit at an existing facility
  • 9-12 years to operation
  • VC Summer application submitted. Projected to be
    online in 2016 and 2019.
  • Nuclear was eliminated from further study.

46
Natural GasSole Combined Source
  • Approximately 244 million cubic feet per day is
    needed to generate 1,320 MW.
  • Adequate supply of natural gas.
  • Potential issues with supply and market
    fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated.
  • Natural gas will be further studied as a
    Reasonable Alternative.

47
Fuel OilSole Combined Source
  • Need 484 Million gallons of Fuel Oil 2.
  • Undelivered cost of 793.4 Million per year.
  • Need 573 Million gallons of Fuel Oil 6.
  • Undelivered cost of 704.3 Million per year.
  • U.S. imports majority of the oil used in the
    country.
  • Fuel oil has been eliminated from further study.

48
CoalSole Combined Source
  • Adequate supply of coal.
  • Types of coal combustion will be further
    evaluated.
  • Pulverized Coal
  • Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
  • Circulating Fluidized Bed
  • Coal will be further studied as a Reasonable
    Alternative.

49
Reasonable Technology Alternatives
  • Wind
  • Solar
  • Hydroelectric
  • Geothermal
  • Tires
  • Forest Biomass as Combined Source
  • Forest Biomass as Sole Source
  • Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
  • Landfill Gas
  • Municipal Solid Waste
  • Digester Gas
  • Ethanol
  • Biodiesel
  • Tidal
  • Nuclear
  • Natural Gas
  • Fuel Oil
  • Coal

50
Next Steps
  • Technology Alternatives Analysis
  • Sole Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
  • Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
  • Combined Source
  • Feasibility Determination
  • Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
  • Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
  • Site Selection
  • No Build
  • Demand Side Management Alternatives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com