Title: Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact Statement EIS
1Pee Dee Generating Station Environmental Impact
Statement(EIS)
2WELCOME and
INTRODUCTIONS
3BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT
4The Proposed Project consists of the preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to
Study a cost-effective means to satisfy the
projected demand for electrical generation
capacity for the Santee Coopers residential and
commercial customers by 2013 to avoid an
electrical shortfall.
5- The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
is responsible for the preparation of the EIS,
and for approval of permits under its authority
from the - River and Harbors Act of 1899
- Clean Water Act
6- Public Input is vital to the successful
completion of the project. We will obtain Public
Input through - Project Scoping Meetings
- Agency Scoping Meeting (September 20, 2007)
- Public Scoping Meetings
- Conway (September 25, 2007)
- Florence (September 27, 2007)
7- Public Input (continued)
- Public Information Meetings
- Public Hearings
- Stakeholders Working Group Meetings
- The Project Website (www.peedeepowereis.com)
- Comments, letters, and documents provided to the
Project Team
8(No Transcript)
9ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
10Purpose and Need
- Purpose
- The purpose of the proposed project is to provide
a reliable and cost-effective means to satisfy
the projected demand for electrical generation
capacity for Santee Cooper's projected
residential and commercial customers beginning in
the year 2013. - Primary Needs
- Electrical Generation
- Economic Sustainability
- Secondary Needs
- Fulfill Obligation to Customers
- Minimize Transmission Loss
11Purpose and Need
- Primary Needs
- Electrical Generation
- 225 MW shortfall expected by 2012 (370 MW)
- 310 MW shortage expected by 2013 (525 MW)
- 445 MW shortage expected by 2014 (680 MW)
- 545 MW shortage expected by 2015 (835 MW)
- The Load Forecast, Generation Plan, and DSM are
being evaluated by an independent consultant. - Pending the outcome of the review, some
alternatives that have been eliminated may need
to be reevaluated.
12Alternatives Analysis
- Technology Alternatives
- Site Selection Analysis
- No Build Alternative
- Demand Side Management Alternatives
- The planning, implementation, and monitoring of
utility activities designed to encourage
customers to modify patterns or electricity
usage, including the timing and level of
electricity demand (EIA) - Efficiency
- Refers to programs that are aimed at reducing
the energy used by specific end-use devices and
systems, typically without affecting the services
provided (EIA)
13Level ITechnology Alternatives Analysis
- Based on the permit application submitted to the
USACE, the proposed facility would generate 1,320
MW. - Alternatives Analysis
- Sole Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
- Designation of Reasonable Technology
Alternatives - Combined Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
- Designation of Reasonable Technology
Alternatives
14Preliminary Energy Sources
- Wind
- Solar
- Hydroelectric
- Geothermal
- Tires
- Forest Biomass
- Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
- Landfill Gas
- Municipal Solid Waste
- Digester Gas
- Ethanol
- Biodiesel
- Tidal
- Nuclear
- Natural Gas
- Fuel Oil
- Coal
15Wind (Onshore)
- Need Class 4 wind speeds or higher for utility
scale production. - Not consistent source due to lack of sustained
Class 4 winds. - Onshore wind was eliminated from further study.
16Wind (Offshore)
- Class 4 winds are available.
- Intermittent energy source.
- Technology has not been installed in southeast
U.S., extensive testing needed prior to becoming
operational. - Offshore wind was eliminated from further study.
17Solar
- Intermittent source of power.
- South Carolina has moderate to poor solar
resources. - Minimum ability to store power.
- Solar was eliminated from further study.
18Hydroelectric
- Average flow on Great Pee Dee River is not
adequate to generate 1,320 MW without creation of
reservoir. - An 80-foot high dam would generate between 41-69
MW. - An 80-foot high dam would produce a reservoir
greater than 350 square miles. - Hydroelectric was eliminated from further study.
19Geothermal
- No natural geothermal resources in South
Carolina. - Water temperatures not sufficient at reachable
depths. - Technology has not been developed to reach depths
required in South Carolina. - Geothermal was eliminated from further study.
20Tires
- 1.5 million tons per year are required to produce
1,320 MW. - 1.5 million tons equals approximately 105 million
tires per year. - Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee
generate 60 million scrap tires per year. - Competing uses for scrap tires.
- Tires were eliminated from further study as a
sole source to generate 1,320 MW.
21Forest Biomass
- Approximately 19 million green tons per year
needed to generate 1,320 MW. - 20.9 million tons are available annually in South
Carolina. - Potential issues with collection, transportation,
and storage of materials will be evaluated. - Forest biomass will be further studied.
22Agricultural Residue and Dedicated Energy Crops
- Need over 20.3 million green tons of agricultural
residue per year to generate 1,320 MW. - South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia
produce a total of 4.4 million tons of
agricultural residue per year. - Competing uses.
- Agricultural residue and dedicated energy crops
were eliminated from further study as a
sole-generator.
23Landfill Gas
- Five landfills are currently operational in South
Carolina. - 15 candidate landfills in South Carolina.
- 30 potential landfills in South Carolina.
- The maximum generation is approximately 3.66 MW
per landfill. - Landfill gas was eliminated from further study.
24Municipal Solid Waste
- Approximately 22.3 million tons per year needed
to generate 1,320 MW. - 38.3 million tons per year are available in South
Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. - Potential issues with collection, transportation,
and storage of materials will be further
evaluated. - Municipal solid waste will be further studied.
25Digester Gas
- Approximately 7.9 million cows/pigs needed to
generate 1,320 MW. - 9.8 million pigs in South Carolina and North
Carolina. - Potential issues with collection, transportation,
and storage of materials will be further
evaluated. - Digester gas will be further studied.
26Ethanol
- 519 million gallons of ethanol needed to produce
1,320 MW. - 219 million bushels of corn needed annually to
produce 519 million gallons of ethanol. - 96.7 million bushels produced by South Carolina,
North Carolina, and Georgia. - Competing uses.
- Ethanol was eliminated from further study as a
sole source to generate 1,320 MW.
27Biodiesel
- Need 334-401 million gallons per year to generate
1,320 MW. - South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia
produce 59.1 million gallons of waste grease per
year. - Competing uses.
- Biodiesel was eliminated from further study as a
sole-generator.
28Tidal
- To generate electricity the tidal range must be
16 feet or higher. - South Carolina only has a tidal range of 6.6 to
13.2 feet. - Tidal was eliminated from further study.
29Nuclear
- 2-3 years for review of license application.
- Additional 6-10 years for construction.
- Time period for licensing and construction will
not meet the project need. - Nuclear was eliminated from further study.
30Natural Gas
- Approximately 220 million cubic feet per day is
needed to generate 1,320 MW. - Adequate supply of natural gas.
- Potential issues with supply and market
fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated. - Natural gas will be further studied.
31Fuel Oil
- Approximately 318-343 million gallons per year is
needed to generate 1,320 MW. - Limited domestic production.
- Potential issues with supply and market
fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated. - Fuel oil will be further studied.
32Coal
- Approximately 410 tons per hour is needed to
generate 1,320 MW. - Adequate supply of coal.
- Types of coal combustion will be further
evaluated. - Coal will be further studied.
33Sole Source Alternatives(Status for potential to
generate all 1,320 MW)
- Wind
- Solar
- Hydroelectric
- Geothermal
- Tires
- Forest Biomass
- Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
- Landfill Gas
- Municipal Solid Waste
- Digester Gas
- Ethanol
- Biodiesel
- Tidal
- Nuclear
- Natural Gas
- Fuel Oil
- Coal
34Combined Source Alternatives(Status for
potential to be combined to generate 1,320 MW)
- Wind
- Solar
- Hydroelectric
- Geothermal
- Tires
- Forest Biomass
- Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
- Landfill Gas
- Municipal Solid Waste
- Digester Gas
- Ethanol
- Biodiesel
- Tidal
- Nuclear
- Natural Gas
- Fuel Oil
- Coal
35Next Steps
- Alternatives Analysis
- Sole Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation
- Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
- Combined Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation
- Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
- No-build
- Site Selection
36Detailed Evaluation Criteria(Level II)
-
- Raw Material Availability
- Plant Efficiency
- Plant Capacity Factor
- Raw Material Feed Rates
- Costs (2012 Dollars)
- Raw Material Availability
- Total Plant Costs
- Operating and Maintenance Costs
- Delivered Fuel Costs
- Levelized Cost of Energy
- Other Associated Costs
-
37Detailed Evaluation Criteria(Level II)
-
- Solid and Liquid Waste Production
- Air Emissions for Criteria Pollutants
- Green House Gas Emissions
- Other Emissions
-
38TiresCombined Source
- Existing demand exceeds the supply.
- Competing uses for scrap tires.
- In 2005, there were 12 Million scrap tires
recycled in South Carolina, leaving none or very
few for energy use. - Tires were eliminated from further study as a
combined source.
39Forest Biomass Sole Combined Source
- Need 6.4 Million tons per year for sole source.
- Not enough forest biomass available annually in
South Carolina. - Forest biomass was eliminated from further study
as a sole source to generate 1,320 MW. - Forest biomass will be further studied as a
combined source.
40Agricultural Residue and Dedicated Energy
CropsCombined Source
- Need 346,239 tons per year of switchgrass to
co-fire at 5. - Switchgrass is not currently being grown in South
Carolina. - Need 335,070 tons per year of corn stover to
co-fire at 5. - South Carolina has 482,286 tons per year.
- Based on research it is only feasible to count
half of the available corn stover due to
collection, storage, and transportation. - Competing uses.
- Agricultural residue and dedicated energy crops
were eliminated from further study as a combined
source.
41Municipal Solid WasteSole Combined Source
- Need 26 Million tons per year for sole source.
- South Carolina has 3.2 Million tons per year.
- 3.2 Million tons per year is approximately 12 of
need. - All of South Carolina trash would have to be
sorted to achieve a co-fire situation of 5. - Would decrease longevity of landfill gas to
energy facilities. - Municipal solid waste was eliminated from further
study as a sole source to generate 1,320 MW. - Municipal solid waste was eliminated as a
combined source.
42Digester GasSole Combined Source
- Would need 3.76 Million dairy cattle
- South Carolina has 432,265 dairy cattle (11)
- Would need 44.7 Million pigs
- South Carolina has 291,743 pigs (0.6)
- Would need 602.2 Million chickens
- South Carolina has 5.58 Million chickens (0.9)
- Unable to pull waste from neighboring states due
to implemented regulations. - Digester gas was eliminated as a sole and
combined source.
43EthanolCombined Source
- USEPA has set Renewable Fuel Standard which is
the amount of renewable fuels that must be
blended into gasoline. - In 2008, 9 Billion gallons must be blended.
- To meet this standard the U.S. has to import.
- Ethanol was eliminated from further study as a
combined source.
44BiodieselCombined Source
- A very limited supply of Biodiesel is produced in
South Carolina. - Competing uses.
- Biodiesel was eliminated from further study as a
combined source.
45Nuclear
- Three types of Nuclear were evaluated
- New facility
- 10-15 years to operation
- Uprate existing facility
- All facilities have completed uprates.
- A new unit at an existing facility
- 9-12 years to operation
- VC Summer application submitted. Projected to be
online in 2016 and 2019. - Nuclear was eliminated from further study.
46Natural GasSole Combined Source
- Approximately 244 million cubic feet per day is
needed to generate 1,320 MW. - Adequate supply of natural gas.
- Potential issues with supply and market
fluctuations in cost will be further evaluated. - Natural gas will be further studied as a
Reasonable Alternative.
47Fuel OilSole Combined Source
- Need 484 Million gallons of Fuel Oil 2.
- Undelivered cost of 793.4 Million per year.
- Need 573 Million gallons of Fuel Oil 6.
- Undelivered cost of 704.3 Million per year.
- U.S. imports majority of the oil used in the
country. - Fuel oil has been eliminated from further study.
48CoalSole Combined Source
- Adequate supply of coal.
- Types of coal combustion will be further
evaluated. - Pulverized Coal
- Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
- Circulating Fluidized Bed
- Coal will be further studied as a Reasonable
Alternative.
49Reasonable Technology Alternatives
- Wind
- Solar
- Hydroelectric
- Geothermal
- Tires
- Forest Biomass as Combined Source
- Forest Biomass as Sole Source
- Agricultural Residue Dedicated Energy Crops
- Landfill Gas
- Municipal Solid Waste
- Digester Gas
- Ethanol
- Biodiesel
- Tidal
- Nuclear
- Natural Gas
- Fuel Oil
- Coal
50Next Steps
- Technology Alternatives Analysis
- Sole Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
- Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
- Combined Source
- Feasibility Determination
- Detailed Evaluation (Level II)
- Designation of Reasonable Alternatives
- Site Selection
- No Build
- Demand Side Management Alternatives