Title: Siting Issues for Offshore LNG Facilities
1Siting Issues for Offshore LNG Facilities
2Presentation
- Background LNG and its transport, agency
responsibilities - Siting issues EIS (environmental and safety)
risk analysis, consequence modeling - Preliminary LNGMAP modeling results
- Summary
3What is LNG?
- Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is natural gas that
has been cooled to -260F at atmospheric
pressure - Colorless, odorless, non-toxic and non-corrosive
- Less dense than water
- Liquid occupies 600 times less volume than gas
- Vapor is more dense than air until 162F when it
becomes buoyant appears as white cloud since its
cold temperature causes humidity in air to
condense - Flammable at concentrations between approximately
5 and 15 by volume - Non explosive in unconfined areas
- Composed mainly of
- methane and small amounts
- of heavier hydrocarbons
- such as ethane, propane,
- butane, and inerts such as
- nitrogen and carbon dioxide
4How does LNG get to us?
- Most sources are located in Trinidad and Tobago,
Qatar, Algeria, Nigeria, Australia and Indonesia. - Transported in large, specially built tankers to
one of five U.S. import terminals. - Most LNG is regasified and sent out via pipelines
as ordinary natural gas some LNG is delivered to
consumers as liquid. - There are 113 LNG production, transport and
storage facilities across the country.
Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP is located on the
Chesapeake Bay in Cove Point, Maryland, south of
Baltimore
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7How is LNG transported?
- 175 specially designed ships with approximately
140,000 m3 capacity - LNG is stored in either double membrane
containment systems or Moss spherical tanks with
heavy insulation unpressurized but not freely
vented - Emergency systems identify potential safety
problems and shut down operations - 33,000 carrier voyages covering 60 million miles
around the globe without a major accident over a
45-year history - In 16 marine incidents (9 with spillage) only
minor hull damage occurred - No explosions, cargo fire, or fatalities have
ever occurred in the marine incidents
Moss
Membrane
8Federal Agency Oversight - Onshore -
- Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission
- Authorizes siting and construction of LNG import
terminals - Lead federal agency under National Environmental
Policy Act analyzing environmental, safety,
security and cryogenic design of proposed
facilities - Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration of the DOT - Authority over safety regulations and standards
of onshore LNG facilities beginning at last valve
before storage tanks
9Federal Agency Oversight - Offshore -
- United States Coast Guard (USCG)
- Responsible for the safety of marine operations
at LNG terminals and of tankers in U.S. coastal
waters - Regulates the design, construction, manning, and
operation of vessels and the duties of crew - Inspects all LNG vessels to ensure they comply
with safety regulations - Ensures policies and procedures conform to
required standards - Assists in conducting emergency response drills
to test response plans - Ensures there are adequate safety and
environmental protection equipment and procedures
to respond to an incident - Determines suitability of a waterway to transport
LNG safely - Creates safety rules for specific ports, such as
port safety zones for each tanker - USDOT Maritime Administration (MARAD)
- Issues license to operate deepwater port facility
- Works jointly with USCG to process applications
to construct, own and operate deepwater ports
10Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Process for
Offshore Facilities
- Necessary to satisfy requirements of National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) - Integrated with FERC requirements for onshore
components and USCG requirements for offshore
operations - Prepared for the USCG by a 3rd party contractor
paid for by the applicant and based on USCG
specifications
11Project Components Requiring EIS
- Deepwater Port
- Offshore Pipeline
- Onshore Pipeline
- Graving Dock (if required)
12EIS Organization
- Description of proposed action and alternatives
for each project component - Description of affected environment for each
component - Environmental consequences of each alternative /
component - Cumulative impacts of multiple activities
- Risk management for terminal, marine operations
and pipeline
13EIS Environmental Concerns
- Water Resources
- Water quality
- Circulation
- Turbidity
- Wildlife and Fisheries Resources
- Marine mammals
- Seabirds and migratory birds
- Aquatic habitats
- Benthos
- Plankton
- Fisheries
- Threatened and Endangered Species
- Marine mammals
- Sea turtles
- Birds
- Fisheries
- Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)
- Geological Resources
- Geologic setting
14EIS Environmental Concerns
- Cultural Resources
- Existing conditions
- LNG terminal archaeological survey
- Offshore pipeline archaeological survey
- Land Use, Recreation, and Visual Resources
- Principal uses of area in vicinity
- Near and off shore recreation
- General aesthetic appeal
- Socioeconomic Resources
- Population
- Employment
- Housing
- Commercial fisheries
- Recreational fisheries
- Environmental justice
- Transportation Resources
- Movement of marine vessels and helicopters
- Air Quality
- Pollutant levels
15EIS Safety and Security Concerns
- Major hazards
- Flammable vapor clouds that form if spill is not
immediately ignited - LNG pool fires that could occur on surface of
water - Rapid phase transition (RPT) from rapid mixing of
LNG and water (less likely) - Minor hazards
- Asphyxiation by concentrated vapors
- Exposure to low temperature LNG sufficient to
cause rapid frostbite, severe tissue damage or
death - Thermal stress can cause brittleness and fracture
in common construction materials like steel
16Risk Management Planning
- Risk management is designed to ensure
- Terminal safety
- Vessel safety
- Pipeline safety
- Port security and maritime safety
- Hazards Identification (HAZID) analysis is
conducted to identify, rank and establish
probability of occurrence of potential accidents
for - LNG carrier approach berthing
- Offloading of LNG
- LNG carrier unberthing
- Regasification of LNG
- Pipeline operations
- General facility assessment
17Risk Analysis
- Risk is potential for suffering harm or loss from
an event - Risk can be quantified as product of
- Probability of an event occurring
- Probability of preventive or mitigating measures
failing - Consequences of event
- LNG spills are considered low probability, high
consequence risks - Possible events
- Accidental LNG ship collision with another ship
or a stationary object - Intentional attack on LNG ship by terrorist group
- Understanding potential risks ahead of time
allows for preparation and planning to mitigate
the risks.
18LNG Consequence Analysis
Depends on
Modeled by
Release rate from vessel tank
- Quantity released
- Duration of release
Transport and spreading of pool
Pool spreading dynamics
Plume fate and transport
- Evaporation from spill to atmosphere (heat
transfer from water and fire) - Dense gas vapor dispersion
Ignition of LNG
Thermal radiation from pool fire
19Gaps in LNG Spill Modeling
- Over-simplified assumptions on release rate
(ignores pressure effects varying head,
glug-glug effect, hole shape) - Effect of environmental conditions (currents,
waves, wind) on pool development and vaporization
not explicitly taken into account - Simplified assumptions of vaporization and
burning for large pool fires (evaporation rate
poorly quantified, empirical models based on
small scale experiments, effect of flamelets)
20LNGMAP
- ASA has extensive experience in spill modeling of
oil and other hazardous materials in aquatic
environments - ASA is developing LNGMAP, a PC-based computer
model based on ASAs proven integrated GIS and
modeling approach - Model components include release (orifice) model,
pool fate and transport model, vapor dispersion
model, thermal effects model, environmental
conditions (hydrodynamics model) - Model output provides geographical context for
pool size and shape and vapor and thermal hazard
zones
21LNGMAP Model Overview
- Intended for instantaneous or continuous moving
LNG spills on water - LNG is represented by spillets with unique mass,
surface area and location - LNG moves in response to winds and currents
- LNG vapor may either burn or disperse
- If LNG burns, thermal intensity levels are
calculated - If LNG disperses, the vapor plume is tracked and
concentrations calculated
22LNG Release
- Stationary or moving, instantaneous or continuous
source - Orifice model release rate depends on
- Size (larger hole allows more flow)
- Shape (jagged hole lowers flow)
- Location (higher elevation above water surface
lowers flow) - Level of LNG in tank (lower level lowers flow)
- Tank venting (partial vacuum lowers flow)
- Simulated as a series of particles (spillets)
having mass and size that undergo transport and
fate processes
23Pool Spreading
- Upper limit on pool size depends on the duration
of the release - Pool will spread to the point where evaporation
rate (or burning rate in case of a fire) equals
the release rate into the pool - Spreading is governed by fluid inertia, gravity
forces and friction effects - Pool shape is affected by waves, currents, and
wind
24Vapor Dispersion
- Dispersion and transport is governed by local
environmental conditions - Vapor cloud initially hugs the ground when the
vapors are cold (-260F to - 162F) - When vapor warms above 162F the cloud becomes
lighter than air and quickly disperses
25Burning
- Flammable with right proportions of air
(approximately 5 to 15 methane by volume) - Easily ignited by machinery, cigarettes or static
electricity - Will burn back to the vapor source
- Does not explode in unconfined spaces
Threshold Effect
1,600 BTU/hr/ft2 (5 kW/m2) Sufficient to cause pain in 20 seconds, 2nd degree burns are possible but non fatal. Typical value for injury threshold.
3,800 BTU/hr/ft2 (12 kW/m2) Minimum energy required for piloted ignition of wood and melting of plastic tubing. Typical value used for fatality.
7,900 BTU/hr/ft2 (25 kW/m2) Minimum energy required to ignite wood at indefinitely long exposure
12,000 BTU/hr/ft2 (38 kW/m2) Sufficient to cause damage to process equipment
26Preliminary LNGMAP Results in Boston Harbor
- Two scenarios in Boston Harbor
- Release via a 1 m diameter hole
- Release occurs during ebb tide after high slack
- Ship traveling at 10 kt in outer harbor and 5 kt
in inner harbor - SW wind at 5 mph
- Volume of LNG spilled 12,500 m3
- Release duration of 33.2 minutes
Assumed ship routes
27Outer Ship Path and Surface Spillets with Burning
28Thermal Radiation - Outer Ship Path
29Outer Ship Path and Surface Spillets with
Evaporation
30Vapor Plume - Outer Ship Path
31Inner Ship Path and Surface Spillets with Burning
32Thermal Radiation - Inner Ship Path
33Inner Ship Path and Surface Spillets with
Evaporation
34Vapor Plume - Inner Ship Path
35Summary
- LNG is an important energy source for the U.S.
- Ship borne transport of LNG is required because
of distant sources - Siting based on access to shipping and delivery
options - LNG risk analysis expanded from accidents to
attacks since 9/11 - Both environmental and safety issues determine
project acceptance or rejection - Offshore siting presents less public safety risk
(onshore presents more delivery options and lower
costs) - Models now under development to address analysis
gaps in assessing consequences of LNG spills - Future model systems will provide more accurate
estimate of consequences resulting in better
analysis of risk
36(Globe Staff Photo / David L. Ryan)