FY 2006 Budget Roll Out February 7, 2005

1
FY 2006 Budget Roll OutFebruary 7, 2005
2
We Are Guided By the Presidents Direction

• Budget maintains resolute focus on exploration
  priorities and critical milestones, informed by
  our science priorities
• First Step Return Shuttle to flight and complete
  Space Station assembly
• Flagship Program Project Constellation (maintain
  2008 CEV flight demo)
• Technology Base Critical exploration
  technologies
• Transforming Technologies Project Prometheus
  (flight demo in a decade)
• Robotic Precursors Lunar beginning in 2008
  added Mars in 2011
• Shuttle Transition ISS Cargo/Crew Services,
  near-term commercial service
• Scientific Breakthroughs Exploration of the
  solar system and Universe (e.g., Webb in 2011)
  and the search for earth like planets

3
We Are Guided By The Presidents Direction
(Continued)

• Budget supports critical National needs and
  revolutionary technologies
• Aeronautics Protects Aviation Safety Security
  and Airspace Systems, and restructures Vehicle
  Systems to focus on technology breakthroughs and
  near-term demonstrations
• Climate Change Invest in next generation earth
  observing satellites
• Education Continues to inspire the next
  generation of explorers with priority programs
  (e.g., Explorer schools, scholarship for service)

4
Supported by a Solid Budget
( in millions) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Science, Aero Exploration 8,912 9,661 10,550 11,215 12,210 12,796
Science Exploration Systems Aeronautics Research Education 5,364 2,568 813 166 5,476 3,165 852 167 5,960 3,707 728 155 6,503 3,826 731 155 6,853 4,474 728 155 6,798 5,125 718 155
Exploration Capabilities 6,704 6,763 6,379 6,057 5,367 5,194
Space Operations 6,704 6,763 6,379 6,057 5,367 5,194
Inspector General 27 32 34 35 35 37
Unrequested Items 426
TOTAL -- annual increases Emergency Hurricane Supplemental 16,070 126 16,456 2.4 16,962 3.1 17,306 2.0 17,612 1.8 18,027 2.4
FY 2005 budget is shown in new budget structure
for comparison purposes, and allocation by
Mission Directorate does not include 426m in
unrequested items to allow a direct comparison of
content included in the Presidents request.
5
Building on Our Scientific Successes
( in millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
SCIENCE 5,476 5,960 6,503 6,853 6,798
Space System Exploration The Universe Earth-Sun System 1,900 1,512 2,064 2,348 1,532 2,081 2,832 1,539 2,132 2,999 1,495 2,359 3,066 1,407 2,325

• The FY06 budget request for Science Mission
  Directorate includes
• FY06 budget will support 55 missions in orbit, 26
  in development, and 34 in design phase
• 858m, a 17 increase, for Mars/Lunar robotic
  exploration
• 372m, a 19 increase, to maintain Webb telescope
  on pace for 2011 launch
• 93m in development funds for Hubble to extend
  scientific productivity and initiate a robotic
  mission to safely deorbit the telescope
• 218m, a 17 increase, to maintain competitive
  efforts for Explorer Program
• 56m, a 33 increase, for Beyond Einstein program
  to study the universe
• 234m, a 16 increase, for studying the sun in
  Living With a Star
• 136m, a 26 increase, for competitive
  opportunities in Earth System Science Pathfinder
• 6.8b, a 23 increase in the projected annual
  budget by 2010, increasing the Science portion of
  total Agency budget from 33 in FY 2006 to 38 in
  2010

6
Preparing for Our Exploration Future
( in millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
EXPLORATION SYSTEMS 3,165 3,707 3,826 4,474 5,125
Constellation Systems Exploration Systems RT Prometheus Human Systems RT 1,120 919 320 806 1,580 907 424 797 1,524 989 501 812 1,991 1,050 614 819 2,452 1,078 779 816

• The FY06 budget request for Exploration Systems
  Directorate includes
• 753m for the Crew Exploration Vehicle, Americas
  future workhorse for safe and affordable human
  exploration, with resources to pursue a timely
  flight demo in 2008
• 919m, a 27 increase, for Exploration Systems
  RT that will enable a designs for sustainable
  exploration, including 44m for a revamped
  technology transfer program and 34m for
  Centennial Challenges prize program
• 320m for Project Prometheus to test of a nuclear
  reactor in 2008 and fly a demo mission within a
  decade, followed later by other demonstrations
  (e.g., to Jupiters moons)rephased to reflect
  development profile and more than doubling over
  five years
• 806m for Human Systems RT, which after a
  thorough bottom-up review, is now directly linked
  to exploration requirements for human missions to
  the moon and beyond

7
Enabling Breakthrough Aeronautics Research
( in millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
AERONAUTICS RESEARCH 852 728 731 728 718

• The FY06 budget request for Aeronautics
  Directorate includes
• Maintains top priorities in aeronautics research
• 193m, a 4 increase, for Aviation Safety
  Security
• 200m, a 32 increase, for Airspace Systems
• Also provides 459m for a restructured and
  improved Vehicle Systems program
• Focused on breakthrough research culminating in
  flight demos
• Pursues high risk, high payoff concepts beyond
  incremental research of interest to industry
  (e.g. eliminates almost all work in conventional
  subsonic aircraft)
• Consists of projects in noise reduction, high
  altitude unmanned vehicles, and an all-electric
  airplane
• Includes realignment of workforce and facilities
  to best implement new priorities

8
Meeting Our Obligations
( in millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
SPACE OPERATIONS 6,763 6,379 6,057 5,367 5,194
Space Shuttle Space Station Space Flight Support 4,531 1,857 376 4,172 1,835 371 3,866 1,791 400 2,815 2,152 400 2,419 2,376 399

• The FY06 budget request for Space Operations
  Mission Directorate includes
• 4.5b to return Shuttle to flight as a top
  priority and resume flight operations
• Provides 366m more for return to flight and
  related activities in FY06 to maintain safe
  operations in support of five planned flights
• NASA will retire the Space Shuttle in 2010 while
  working to ensure that the last flight is as safe
  as the flights this year
• 1.9b for the International Space Station
• NASA is examining configurations for the Space
  Station that meet the needs of both the Space
  Exploration Vision and our international partners
  while using as few Shuttle flights as possible to
  complete Station assembly
• Assembly sequence and funding support enhanced
  crew size of up to 6 prior to completion of
  assembly, enabling important Vision work

9
Pursuing Competition to Best Meet Requirements

• Industry, academia, and NASA field centers will
  have opportunity to compete for over 10 billion
  in new opportunities over the next five-years.
  Examples
• Exploration Systems --Crew Exploration Vehicle,
  Crew Launch Vehicle, Project Prometheus, and
  exploration research and technology
• Science --Discovery, Explorer, New Frontiers,
  Mars Scouts, Lunar Robotic Earth Science
  Pathfinders, New Millennium, Living with a Star
• Space Operations --Launch services to Station and
  other users
• Aeronautics --New breakthrough flight
  demonstration projects in billions

10
And Retooling Our Institution

• The focus of the transformed NASA is on how best
  to achieve the Vision and other national
  priorities assigned to NASA the Mission is
  First
• Human Capital Workforce transformation is
  growing in importance and will require workforce
  adjustments and distribution of needed skills
  based on mission and core competency requirements
• Physical Capital Growing list of underutilized
  facilities will be assessed to determine the
  critical requirements to support the Vision
• Organization Based on Aldridge Commission
  recommendations, plan proposals and legislation
  to pursue non-governmental organizations to
  enhance Center management structures
• Transforming NASA field centers for the coming
  decade through improved agility and
  competitiveness
• Vision provides the long-term focus and stability
  required for sound business planning and for
  attracting skills important to the US economy
• Competition will help the Centers to provide the
  best value and new and innovative approaches
  while encouraging partnerships and collaboration
  with industry and academia (notable successes
  this past year)
• Agility, enhanced by new legislative authorities,
  will enable Centers to maintain cutting edge
  capabilities as the Vision progresses and
  technologies advance
• Core competencies will be maintained and funded
  through competition

11
Maintaining Core Competencies
END-TO-END MISSION SYSTEMS
1. End-to-end mission sys. arch., design, dev ops -- GSFC, JPL, TBD
2. Large Complex Space Sys Dev Int (Space Infrast Dev) MSFC
3. Human Mission Planning, Training and Operations -- JSC
SCIENCE AND SCIENCE SUPPORT
1. Astrobiology ARC
2. Human Health Sciences and Astromaterials Res and Curation -- JSC
3. Observing Systems -- GSFC, JPL
4. Sensors and Instruments -- GSFC, JPL, LaRC
PROPULSION
1. Trans. and Prop. Systems Dev. MSFC
2. In-Space Propulsion (including Nuclear Systems) GRC
3. Rocket Propulsion Test (RPT) -- SSC
LAUNCH PROCESSING AND SERVICES
1. End-to-end launch services KSC
2. Assy, test, integ. processing of s/c, payloads flt sci exp KSC
3. RD, des, constr ops of spaceport services on all surfaces -- KSC
AERONAUTICS
1. Aero-propulsion Systems GRC
2. Aerosciences -- Research for Flight in all Atmospheres LaRC
3. Atmospheric Flight Research Test DFRC
4. Air Transportation Management Systems -- ARC
SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM COMPETENCIES
1. Power and Energy Conversion Systems GRC
2. Communication and Navigation Systems -- GSFC, JPL
3. Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems -- ARC, JPL, LaRC
4. Integrated Next-Generation Computing Systems ARC
5. Intelligent/Adaptive Systems ARC
6. Aerospace Materials and Manufacturing -- LaRC, MSFC
7. Systems Analysis/Engineering and Safety (One NASA) -- LaRC

• NASA Core Competencies are critical factors for
  mission success
• Funds will be provided as a result of competitive
  selection decisions
• Competition will enhance competencies through new
  opportunities
• NASA Core Competencies are resident at one or
  more NASA Center
• NASA Core Competencies will be periodically
  reassessed
• Annually to assess desired capability
• Tri-annually to determine if reassigned or
  changed in response to changing mission
  requirements, emerging commercial capabilities
  and/or competitive results.

12
And Reshaping Our Workforce

• Transforming workforce is a significant issue
• Termination of previous programs, like Space
  Launch Initiative two years ago, significantly
  increased the workforce not supporting a specific
  program
• As previous work has been completed, and some
  projects discontinued, the issue has grown,
  placing an untenable burden on Center GA
• NASA must take necessary action to transform its
  workforce to ensure the successful implementation
  of the Vision
• Centers are restructuring themselves as necessary
  to ensure successful competition for new business
  opportunities
• Pursue new legislation and aggressively evaluate
  and implement alternative management structures
  to enhance agility and enable new opportunities
• Sufficient workforce funding is provided in
  FY05-06 to provide time for transition
• Compete for new business opportunities
• Pursue expanded buyouts, training, and job fairs
• Seek voluntary reassignments, or directed
  reassignments if necessary
• Must actively address these initiatives to
  complete this realignment by FY 2007 to avoid
  undesirable consequences

13
To Enable The New Age of Exploration

• The torch is being passed from the pioneers, who
  first took us to the moon and beyond, to the new
  generation of explorers who will take us into
  deep space to stay
• Sustainable implementation of the Vision will
  provide the legacy for future generations
• The FY06 NASA Budget reaffirms the Presidents
  commitment and provides us the next step in
  implementing the Vision
• Returning Shuttle to completing assembly of the
  Space Station
• Exploring the cosmos with robots and humans
• Transforming to enable the Vision without
  change, there is no Vision

We choose to explore space because doing so
improves our lives and lifts our national
spirit. So let us continue the journey.--Pres.
George W. Bush
14
(No Transcript)
15
Aeronautics Program ReplanGRC View

• A reduction of 40M to the Vehicle Systems
  Program at GRC in
• FY 2006 no top line change on Airspace Systems
  and Aviation Safety Security Programs
• The Vehicle Systems Program will be restructured.
  It will include four flight demonstration
  projects
• Three related to Breakthrough in Environment
  10 dB Noise Reduction, Sonic Boom and Zero
  Emissions Aircraft
• One related to Science and Exploration High
  Altitude Long Endurance (HALE ROA) Aircraft
• Majority part of the Program will be competed in
  different levels (e.g. flight demonstration,
  technology demonstration, technology development)
  ? Process will be developed with Center
  participation in Feb/March timeframe.
• Project Management and Implementation processes
  will be developed with Center participation in
  February and March timeframe.

16
GRC Human Systems Research and Technology Program

• A loss of 18M to the Human Systems Research
  Technology Program activities at GRC will occur
  from FY05 to FY06, mostly due to the flight
  hardware delivery of the Combustion Integrated
  Rack (CIR) and the Fluids Integrated Rack (FIR)
  to KSC
• The legacy Office of Biological and Physical
  Research (OBPR) program has been transformed into
  the Human Systems Research and Technology (HSRT)
  program and is aligned with the goals and
  objectives of the Exploration program.
• GRC continues to have a major role in the Human
  Systems Research and Technology program,
  specifically in
• Advanced Extra Vehicular Activity
• Advanced Life Support
• Human Health and Countermeasures
• Advanced Environmental Monitoring and Control
• Fire Prevention, Detection, and Suppression
• Multiphase Flow Technology

17
GRC Human Systems Research and Technology
Program (continued)

• The GRC Combustion Science program has been
  transformed into the Fire Prevention, Detection,
  and Suppression program and will be directed
  towards developing engineering design data rather
  than purely basic research.
• The GRC Fluid Physics program has been
  transformed into Advanced Life Support and
  Multiphase Flow Technologies that will be
  directed towards developing engineering design
  data.

18
Prometheus

• Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter Mission (JIMO)
• Mission deferred for alternate mission that will
  both demonstrate the use of nuclear electric
  propulsion and provide a lower risk, science and
  exploration relevant mission
• GRC will retain responsibilities independent of
  mission destination
• Electric Propulsion design and technology
• Power conversion Heat Rejection technology
• Phase B co-design with Northrop Grumman, Naval
  Reactors and JPL
• Provide facilities, technicians, and engineering
  capabilities to support naval reactors and prime
  contractor development and qualification tests
• Advanced Systems and Technology
• - GRC retains technology development and
  management responsibilities in systems analysis,
  advanced power and propulsion, nuclear thermal
  and surface power

19
Top Level Summary of GRC ICP Results

• Intramural Call for Proposals (ICP) Process
• 135 NOIs Submitted
• 18 Proposals Requested, 17 Proposals Submitted
• 44 Supporting Tasks Submitted as part of other
  Center Proposals
• ICP Selections (Announced 7/28/04)
• 4 Proposals Selected for GRC Lead Projects
  (32.1M Total,24.7M GRC))
• 15 Supporting Tasks Selected (30M)
• Total Capture ICP
• Fluctuation expected due to negotiations and
  potential selection of portions of the GRC led
  proposals

20
BAA Extramural Call for Proposals Success at GRC

• GRC was partner on 138 of the 500 total ECP
  proposals
• On Tuesday, Nov. 16, HQ announced that 70
  proposals were selected with a total value of
  over 1B
• General Statistics out of 70 Selected Proposals
• GRC partnerships 20
• At least one NASA Center partner 68
• At least one University (or associated
  institute) 46
• Largest number of Lead Roles Boeing, 7
• Largest number of Partner Roles JPL, 28

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Totals
GRC FTEs 10.1 23.0 20.1 17.4 3.2 73.8
GRC Total M 3.2 8.4 7.4 7.0 1.2 27.2
21
GRC Workforce

• As we went through the 2006 budget process, we
  realized that we had a Civil Service workforce
  challenge (reduction) of approximately 500 FTE by
  2010
• We proposed handling approx 300 by a series of
  buyouts over FY 2005-2006-2007, and another 80 by
  other normal attrition
• This approach left us with approx 100 FTE that
  would have been added to our Center GA, in
  anticipation of new work
• The impacts on GRC of the Agencys response to
  the OMB passback resulted in our workforce
  challenge increasing to approx 700 FTE by 2007
• The agency is preparing additional options to try
  to deal with this challenge
• Agency-wide job fair and expanded buyout
  opportunities in 2005
• Accelerating the analysis of alternative
  management structures as recommended in the
  Aldridge Report
• Consideration of voluntary (and potentially
  directed/involuntary) inter-center transfers
• As a very last resort, consideration of Reduction
  in Force procedures
• In addition to these options, at GRC we are also
  actively pursuing additional work and reviewing
  the levels of our on-site support contractors
  with the objective of identifying contractor
  supplied tasks that could more appropriately be
  performed by Civil Servants

22
Summary

• The NASA Transformation in support of the
  Presidents vision is moving forward aggressively
• The ways that we collectively will be moving
  forward as part of this transformation are
  changing rapidly
• We at GRC are committed to supporting the
  Agencys transformation and expect to be a vital
  contributor to the overall mission of the Agency
• The rapidity and breadth of the transformation
  present some very real and difficult challenges
  to Glenn and the other centers
• I am confident that by working together we can
  successfully address these challenges
• Questions?