CRM 304: Canadian Criminal Justice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CRM 304: Canadian Criminal Justice

Description:

... inmates are eventually paroled. Cheaper than incarceration. Different ... Others argued that they avoided due process. American states began to remove parole ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ginab9
Category:
Tags: crm | be | canadian | criminal | due | justice | paroled | to

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRM 304: Canadian Criminal Justice


1
CRM 304 Canadian Criminal Justice
  • Week 12
  • Release and Reintegration

2
This week
  • Key terms
  • Philosophy of release reintegration
  • Conditional release (parole)
  • Legislation and Institutions
  • Release and Recidivism
  • Critiques of parole and parole boards

3
Key Terms
  • Release
  • Offenders leave prison
  • Statutory Release
  • Obligatory release when sentence is completed
  • Parole
  • Conditional release before end of sentence
  • Reintegration
  • Reintegrate offender back into society

4
Conditional Release/Parole
  • Inmates are released before sentence is
    completed
  • Decision made by a parole board
  • Different types of parole options
  • Eligible for full parole after 1/3 sentence
    served
  • Many inmates are eventually paroled
  • Cheaper than incarceration
  • Different than probation

5
Release/Reintegration Plan
  • Developed by Parole Board with correctional
    officials (begins soon after incarceration)
  • Specifies
  • Rehabilitation/reintegration potential of inmate
  • Individualized risk management strategy
  • Interventions and monitoring
  • Where inmate will live
  • Employment prospects
  • Prohibited activities
  • Required activities

6
Parole Reintegration Principles
  • Only most serious offenders should be
    incarcerated
  • Alternative sanctions should be maximized
  • Should help promote rehabilitation/pro-social
    behaviour
  • Maintain connections to family and the community
  • Over-riding concerns impact on offender and
    society

7
Corrections and Conditional Release Act
  • Purpose of conditional release
  • Maintain a just, peaceful, and safe society
  • Implementation
  • Safe, humane custody, supervision of inmates
  • Rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders
  • Transparency
  • Disclosure of information to offenders, victims
    and the National Parole Board
  • Risk Assessment
  • Includes general criteria against which inmates
    are assessed to decide parole

8
National Parole Board
  • Established in 1958
  • Makes parole decisions for federal offences and
    in provinces other than Ontario, Quebec, B.C.
  • Board members are appointed by Prime Minister
  • Country divided into 5 regions
  • Board members travel to institutions to hear
    testimony from inmates
  • Usually two board members preside
  • Parole board members have risk assessment
    training

9
Conditional Release Options
  • Temporary absence
  • Medical treatment, compassionate (death, birth)
    counseling, decision made by prison official
  • Day parole
  • Short periods, prepare for full parole, or for
    school, work
  • Eligibility starts 6 months before full parole
  • Full parole
  • Apply after 1/3 of sentence is completed
  • Statutory release
  • 2/3 of sentence expired, may be denied by parole
    board
  • Some may never get early released
  • Dangerous offenders, sex offenders, those certain
    to re-offend

10
Parole Factors to Consider
  • Criminal record
  • Current offence
  • Time served (relative to offence)
  • Behaviour while incarcerated
  • Inmates insight/perceptions of own behaviour
  • Involvement in treatment and training programs
  • Rehabilitated? Re-offend?
  • Mental and emotional outlook
  • Other personal factors
  • Previous parole violations
  • Plans for employment and training
  • Objections of victims and community
  • Social support in the community

11
Due Process
  • 1978 Parole Act
  • Hearing
  • Disclosure of information
  • Reasons for denial
  • 1992 CCRA
  • Right to appeal decision based on fundamental
    justice, special needs, error, etc.
  • Federal and provincial judicial review.

12
Parole Hearings
  • 2000-2001
  • About 40 of federal and provincial applicants
    received full parole
  • Females are more likely to get parole
  • Releases are declining in Ontario, BC, Quebec
  • 120,000 under community sanction
  • http//www.cbc.ca/prison/parolehearing.html

13
Recidivism
  • Type of release
  • Day parole has low recidivism
  • Mandatory supervision has higher recidivism
  • Majority who get in trouble do so within 12
    months
  • Mental health problems
  • More technical violations
  • Fewer new offences
  • Recidivism based on type of crime
  • Homicide low. Sex offence high.

14
Faint Hope Clause
  • Section 745 of Criminal Code
  • Allows lifers to apply for a judicial review of
    sentence after 15 years
  • Process
  • Inmate first applies to a judge
  • if approved trial
  • If successful, applies to National Parole Board
  • Denial may be appealed to the Supreme Court

15
Parole Application (Faint Hope) Process
  • Case Study Colin Thatcher
  • Timeline
  • http//www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/facts/thatcher_coli
    n.html
  • Oct. 18, 2000 Thatcher asks for Faint Hope
  • http//www.cbc.ca/stories/2000/10/17/canada/thatch
    er001017
  • Oct. 1 2003 Thatcher still denies murdering his
    ex-wife
  • http//www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/10/01/canada/thatch
    er031001
  • Oct. 8 2003 Jury decides Thatcher can apply for
    early parole.

16
Olsen Amendment
  • Passed in 1996 in reaction to the case of
    Clifford Olsen.
  • Murderers with multiple victims may not apply
    under the faint hope clause.
  • Early release requires unanimous jury
  • Example Paul Bernardo

17
Parole Under Attack
  • Some believed community sanctions were too soft
  • Others argued that they avoided due process
  • American states began to remove parole
  • Canadian Sentencing Commission recommended
    abolition of parole (1987)
  • http//ottawa.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filenam
    emurderer20030313

18
Criticisms of Parole Boards
  • Board members are appointed political patronage
  • Board members dont have expertise
  • Legislation provides only general criteria for
    release
  • Board members are not accountable for their
    decisions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com