Title: Can you Taste PTC ?
1Using a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism to Predict
Bitter-Tasting Ability
2Important concepts
- Science evolves from past discoveries.
- Modern biological research merges genetics,
biochemistry, comparative studies and
bioinformatics. - Receptors Genetic differences in taste and smell
- drug efficacy
3Taste in Mammals
- Mammals can distinguish only five basic tastes
- Sweet
- Sour
- Bitter
- Salty
- Umami (the taste of monosodium gluatmate)
4Taste in Mammals
- Taste perception is a two-step process
- 1stA taste molecule binds to a specific receptor
on the surface of a taste cell - Question..WHAT IS A RECEPTOR?????
- Question..WHAT DETERMINES THE STUCTURE OF A
RECEPTOR - 2nd The taste cell generates a nervous impulse,
which is interpreted by the brain
5(No Transcript)
6An Example Taste in Mammals
- Stimulation of sweet cells generates a
perception of sweetness in the brain - Taste sensation is ultimately determined by the
wiring of a taste cell to the cortex in the brain
- If you have a sweet cell
- But it expresses a bitter taste receptor
- Bitter molecule will be perceived as being sweet!
7Taste in Mammals
- Taste recognition is mediated by specialized
taste cells that communicate with several brain
regions through direct connections to sensory
neurons
8- While there are only 5 tastes there are thousand
more olefactory (smell) receptors (OR) - Smell is like tastea receptor a protein that
binds to a molecule that we smell. - Similar also to how many drugs work (the drug
binds to a cell proteinor receptor) - All are coded by specific genes
9A Serendipitous Observation
- The genetic basis of taste first observed by
accident in 1930s - PTC phenylthiocarbamide
- Prepared by Arthur Fox at Du Pont Company in
late 1920s - Lab partner C.R. Noller complained of bitter
taste but Fox had no taste
10Albert Blakeslee with Jimson WeedCarnegie
Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, New
York, 1933
- Followed up by Albert Blakeslee at Carnegie
Department of Genetics showed that inability to
taste is recessive - Published in 1932
11Albert Blakeslee, AAAS Convention, 1938
12Punnett Square
13Molecular Genetics of PTC Tasting
- Gene identified in 2003 by Dennis Drayna TAS2R38
gene - Polymorphism associated with PTC tasting
- SNP--Nucleotide position 145
-
- Taster C Nontaster G
- Change in Amino acid 49 . (proline) ? (alanine)
14Analysis of the Trait--CAPS
- Cleavage amplified polymorphisms
- Amplify a region of TAS2R38 gene by PCR
- Primers used in the experiment
- CCTTCGTTTTCTTGGTGAATTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- AGGTTGGCTTGGTTTGCAATCATC
- Then cut with restriction enzyme (HaeIII)
- RFLP-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
15 16Analysis by eletrophoresis
17 2 Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
18 1ST PERIOD BIOTECHNOLOGY
NF CK NB AB PH BF
AW JF MR TW KK ZQ MH
600 U C U C U
600 C U C U C U U
600 U C C U C U C U
L H ZP JG CW PH BP
MN SL RBS KH KJK SB BE
600 U C U C U C U C C
C U C U C U C U 600
C U C U C U C U 600
19 2ND PERIOD BIOTECHNOLOGY
AH ML TS HB JS
RH AL A K LB RB? JP RP
CG CC WM
600 U C U C U C U C U 600
U C C U C U C 600 U C
U C U C U C C
CT CV SB EB JS
HSM NVS DMR BM
JC SH
600 U C U C U C U C C 600 U
C U C U C 600 U
C U C U C
20- What is the relationship between this trait and
our ancestors? - What is the normal state?
- To taste or to not taste?
21Multiple Sequence Alignment
22- Advantage Taste or not to taste?
23More Complication More than 1 PTC Haplotypes
Postition Taster Nontaster
145 C (proline) G (alanine)
785 C (alanine) T (valine)
886 G (valine) A (isoleucine)
24Results 2010
1 KB C U C U RG AG
1 KB U C U C U C U C
CB RR AS JC
1 KB C U C U U C U
C BP BS RF
EC
SORRY mb/fd/kr
25Results 2010
1 kb U U U U C
C C C tb aa
go DP TB AA GO DP
1KB C U C U C U
AM SG KT
1KB U C U C U C U C
TF AS TJ NJ
1KB C U U C U C
C U DD CT
DN TP
26Results 2010
1KB C U C U U C C U
JO AH MS RH
1KB C U C U C U C
U TLL OSC ATM
SE
1kb U C U C U C U U C
CN AC ALG SC BT
1KB C U C U C U
DH KS WT
27How does HaeIII Cut the taster allele?
- Hae III restriction site GGCC
- In the regions around the 145 SNP
- Taster 141 GCAGGCAGCCACT
- Nontaster 141 GCAGGCAGGCACT
28Compare primer to sequence
- Primer
- CCTTCGTTTTCTTGGTGAATTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- primer anneal
-
- TTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- Taster TAGTGAAGAGGCAGCCACTG
- Nontaster TAGTGAAGAGGCAGGCACTG
-
29Compare primer to sequence
- Primer
- CCTTCGTTTTCTTGGTGAATTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- primer anneal
-
- TTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- 3 AAAAACCCTACATCACTTCTCCGTC
- Taster 5 TAGTGAAGAGGCAGCCACTG
- Nontaster TAGTGAAGAGGCAGGCACTG
-
30Compare primer to sequence
- Primer
- CCTTCGTTTTCTTGGTGAATTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGG
- primer anneal
-
- TTTTTGGGATGTAGTGAAGAGGCGGCCACTG..
- 3AAAAACCCTA CATCACTTCTCCGTC
- Taster TAGTGAAGAGGCAGCCACTG
- Nontaster TAGTGAAGAGGCAGGCACTG
-
31- http//bioinformatics.dnalc.org/ptc/animation/ptc.
html
32After PCR
-
-
HaeIII cut site - Taster TAGTGAAGAGGCGGCCACTG
- Nontaster TAGTGAAGAGGCGGGCACTG
33 Results of thePTC Taste
Receptor
- 1. According to the class data (YOUR DATA???),
how well does TAS2R38 genotype predict
PTC-tasting phenotype?
Phenotype Phenotype Phenotype Phenotype
Genotype Strong taste Weak Taste Nontaste
TT 4 ----24 12 28
Tt 635 12- 28
tt---- 7--- 41 19- 44
34- What does this tell you about classical dominant
/recessive inheritance? - Dominate If you have one copy of a gene
- you will express that trait
- Ability to taste is dominant
- RecessiveTrait that is masked by the
dominate form of the trait..Need two copies of
this gene if it will be expressed
35- How does the Hae III enzyme discriminate between
the C-G polymorphism in the TAS2R38 gene. - HaeIII cuts at the sequence GGCC
- This is at the 143-145 position of the gene
- The nontaster has a GGGC and wont cut
36- The fwd primer has the HaeIII recognition site
GGCC. How is this different from the seq. of the
gene? - The gene sequence has an Athe primer a G.
37- What characteristic of the PCR reaction allows
the Primer sequence to override the natural
gene sequence. - In PCRthe product produced always has primer.it
starts with a primer and ends with a primer.so
the sequence in the primer (and not the gene) is
what appears in the final product - This creates a Hae III restriction site in the
taster allele, but not the non-taster.
38- Consider the terms below for mutations
- Synonymous
- Substitution of one base for another in an exon
of a gene coding for a protein, so that the
amino acid sequence produced is the same.
Synonymous substitutions and mutations affecting
noncoding DNA are collectively known as silent
mutations - Nonsynonymous
- Substitutions that result in amino acid
replacements are said to be nonsynonymous - What sort of mutation is the G-C polymorphism in
the TAS2R38 gene? - Taste..CCA proline
- NontasteGCA alanine
39Other mutations in the TAS2R38 gene
Positition Taster Nontaster
145 C (proline) G (alanine)
785 C (alanine) T (valine)
886 G (valine) A (isoleucine)
These three mutations influence the ability to
have this bitter taste perception. They are
inherited together as a unit.
40- Many people are nontastersmore than what is
expected if bitter taste was the ONLY trait under
natural selection - SO. Is there some factor that makes this a
positive outcome to balance out the negative
effect of not tasting bitter? Is there an
advantage to being a heterozygote (like sickle
cell anemia)? - Maybe.Maybe the NONTASTING form allow for
individuals to taste another type of bitter
molecule and so these people may know to avoid
potentially toxic compounds.
41Methods in DNA typing
- How are these techniques different from that used
in forensic crime lab. - Here we use a SNP and RFLP
- Crime labs use VNTRs and STRs and sequencing
- Samples are checked carefully to insure they are
not mixed up
42- ETHICAL ISSUES?
- Consent?
- Knowledge of use?
- After usesamples stored or destroyed?
43 Genotype Taste Strong Phenotype Weak Non
44Olfactory Receptors (ORs)
- Largest mammalian gene family
- 1,000 genes or 4 of total genes
- Can detect 10,000 different odors
- Each OR gene expressed in 1 in 1,000 epithelial
cells - Multiple receptors bind different parts of an
odorant molecule - Odor code different odorant molecules are
detected by different combinations of receptors
45(No Transcript)
46OR Evolution
- Mice 20 of ORs are inactive
- Primates 30-40 of ORs are inactive
- Humans 60 of ORs are inactive
- Human-chimp comparisons
- OR genes are diverging quickly
- OR genes are under natural selection
47The future Pharmacogenetics