ENV-2E1Y: Fluvial Geomorphology: 2004 - 5 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

ENV-2E1Y: Fluvial Geomorphology: 2004 - 5

Description:

ENV-2E1Y: Fluvial Geomorphology: 2004 - 5 Slope Stability and Geotechnics Land Hazards River Bank Stability N.K. Tovey Lecture 4 Lecture 3 Lecture 5 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: KeithT150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ENV-2E1Y: Fluvial Geomorphology: 2004 - 5


1
ENV-2E1Y Fluvial Geomorphology 2004 - 5
  • Slope Stability and Geotechnics
  • Landslide Hazards
  • River Bank Stability
  • N.K. Tovey

Lecture 4
Lecture 3
Lecture 5
Lecture 1
Lecture 2
Landslide on Main Highway at km 365 west of Sao
Paulo August 2002
2
ENV-2E1Y Fluvial Geomorphology 2004 - 5
  • Introduction 4 lectures
  • Seepage and Water Flow through Soils 2
    lectures
  • Consolidation of Soils 4 lectures
  • Shear Strength 1 lecture
  • Slope Stability 4 lectures
  • River Bank Stability 2 lectures
  • Special Topics
  • Decompaction of consolidated Quaternary deposits
  • Landslide Warning Systems
  • Slope Classification
  • Microfabric of Sediments

3
1. Introduction
  • General Background
  • Classification of Soils
  • Basic Definitions
  • Basic Concepts of Stress

4
1.1 Aims of the Course
  • To understand
  • the nature of soil from a physical (and chemical)
    and mechanical standpoint.
  • how water flows in soils and the effects of water
    pressure on stability.
  • how the behaviour of soils and sediments change
    with consolidation.
  • -
    implications for Quaternary Studies
  • the nature of shear behaviour of soils and
    sediments
  • the application of the above to study the
    stability of soils.
  • Subsidiary aims include
  • instruction in field sampling and laboratory
    testing methods for the study of the mechanical
    properties of soils
  • Managing Landslide Risk the study of river bank
    stability.
  • Modification of slope stability ideas to the
    study of river bank stability

5
1.2 Background
  • Geotechnics
  • "the application of the laws of mechanics and
    hydraulics to the mechanical problems relating to
    soils and rocks"
  • Soil Mechanics
  • Rock Mechanics
  • not covered in this course some references in
    Seismology
  • Factor of Safety (Fs)

Forces resisting landslide movement arising from
the inherent strength of the soil.
Fs
Forces trying to cause failure (i.e. the
mobilizing forces).
6
berms
Heave at toe
  • Landslide in man made Cut Slope at km 365 west of
    Sao Paolo - August 2002

7
berms
Steep scar to rotational failure
8
Mans Influence (Agriculture /Development)
Cut / Fill Slopes
Construction
Drainage
Pumping
Hydrology (rainfall)
Earthquakes
Geology
Ground Water
Ground Loading (Consolidation)
Erosion/Deposition
Glaciation
Weathering
Surface Water
Material Properties (Shear Strength)
Geochemistry
Stability Assessment
Slope Profile
Landslide Preventive Measures
Design
Landslide Warning
Landslide
Cost
Build
No Danger
Consequence
9
1. Introduction continued
  • Last Lecture
  • Water plays an important role in ability of soils
    to resist deformation
  • Small amount of water increases strength
  • Large amount of water decreases strength
  • Water pressure affects strength

10
Mans Influence (Agriculture /Development)
Cut / Fill Slopes
Construction
Drainage
Pumping
Hydrology (rainfall)
Earthquakes
Geology
Ground Water
Ground Loading (Consolidation)
Erosion/Deposition
Glaciation
Weathering
Surface Water
Material Properties (Shear Strength)
Geochemistry
Stability Assessment
Slope Profile
Landslide Preventive Measures
Design
Landslide Warning
Landslide
Cost
Build
No Danger
Consequence
11
Mans Influence (Agriculture /Development)
Cut / Fill Slopes
Construction
Drainage
Pumping
Hydrology (rainfall)
Earthquakes
Geology
Ground Water
Ground Loading (Consolidation)
Erosion/Deposition
Glaciation
Weathering
Surface Water
Material Properties (Shear Strength)
Geochemistry
Stability Assessment
Slope Profile
Landslide Preventive Measures
Slope Management
Design
Landslide Warning
Landslide
Cost
Build
Temporarily Safe
No Danger
Consequence
12
1.6 Classification of Soils
  • Particle Size Distribution

  • boulders gt 60mm
  • 60mm gt gravel
    gt 2mm
  • 2mm gt sand
    gt 60 ?m
  • 60 ?m gt silt
    gt 2 ?m
  • 2 ?m gt clay
  • Each class may is sub-divided into coarse, medium
    and fine.
  • for sand
  • 2mm gt coarse sand gt
    600 ?m
  • 600 ?m gt medium sand gt 200
    ?m
  • 200 ?m gt fine sand gt
    60 ?m
  • Classification boundaries either begin with a '2'
    or a '6'.

13
1.6 Classification of Soils
Particle Size Distribution (continued)
  • Data often presented as Particle Size
    Distribution Curves with logarithmic scale on
    X-axis
  • S - shaped - but some conventions of curves
    going left to right,
  • others, the opposite way around

14
1.6 Classification of Soils
Particle Size Distribution (continued)
  • A Problem
  • clay is used both as a classifier of size as
    above, and also to define particular types of
    material.
  • clays exhibit a property known as cohesion
  • (the "stickiness" associated
    with clays).
  • General Properties
  • Gravels ----- permeability is of the
    order of mm s-1.
  • Clays ----- it is 10-7 mm/s or less.
  • Compressibility of the soil increases as the
    particle size decreases.
  • Permeability of the soil decreases as the
    particle size decreases

15
1.6 Classification of Soils
Soil Fabric
Dense Sand
Loose Sand
  • Individual voids are larger in the loose-packed
    sample.
  • Void Ratio is higher in loose sample

16
1.6 Classification of Soils
Soil Fabric
Collapsed fabric after consolidation - note
particles are not fully aligned
Open honey comb fabric as deposited
  • Fig. 5 Typical clay fabrics.

17
1.6 Classification of Soils
Soil Fabric
  • Fig. 6 Cation forming a bridge between two clay
    particles.

18
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits
Semi-plastic material
Liquid sediment transport
volume
Plastic material
Solid brittle
weight
Shrinkage Limit
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
  • Fig. 7 Volume of saturated soil against weight.

19
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits
  • i) Shrinkage Limit (SL) - The smallest water
    content at which a soil can be saturated.
    Alternatively it is the water content below which
    no further shrinkage takes place on drying.
  • ii) Plastic Limit (PL) - The smallest water
    content at which the soil behaves plastically. It
    is the boundary between the plastic solid and
    semi-plastic solid. It is usually measured by
    rolling threads of soil 3mm in diameter until
    they just start to crumble.
  • iii)Liquid Limit (LL) - The water content at
    which the soil is practically a liquid, but still
    retains some shear strength.
  • a) Casagrande apparatus
  • b) Fall cone apparatus.

20
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
1) Liquidity Index
m/c - PL
(LI) -----------
---------------- (1)
LL - PL
  • where LL - moisture content at the Liquid Limit
  • PL - moisture content at the
    Plastic Limit
  • and m/c is the actual current moisture
    content of the soil.
  • LI 0 at Plastic Limit
  • LI 1 at Liquid Limit

21
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
  • 2) Plasticity Index (PI)
  • This is defined as PI LL - PL
    ------------------------------- - (2)
  • Soils with high clay content have a high
    Plasticity Index.
  • 3) Activity Index (AI)
  • This is defined as

PI LL - PL ------
------- .
clay clay
clay is determined from the size distribution
- i.e. proportion less than 2 ?m in equivalent
spherical diameter
22
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
Shear strength at Liquid Limit 1.70
kPa Critical State Soil Mechanics shear
strength of Plastic Limit is 170 kPa (i.e.
100 times that of LL)
Liquid Limit
100 80 60 40 20 0
Moisture Content ()
Plastic Limit
Decreasing particle size
  • Fig. 8 Relationship between mean particle size
    and moisture content for some soils

23
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
Plasticity Index (PI) 0.8
0.6 0.4 0.2
0
Increase in toughness and dry strength decrease
in permeability
A-line
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Liquid
Limit/100
  • Fig. 9 Plasticity Chart.

24
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
LL PL
Each line represents a particular soil. Lines
from different soils appear to converge on a
single point (known as the ? - point)
Void Ratio
? - point
1.7 170 log stress (kPa)
  • Fig. 10 Typical Plots of Voids Ratio Content
    against shear strength.

25
1.6 Classification of Soils
Atterberg Limits - Derived Indices
1.0 Liquidity Index 0
(WLL - WPL) --------------------
0.5(WLL - WPL) log(170) - log(1.7)
..equation (1) (Note log(170) -
log(1.7) log(170/1.7) log 100
2) This is an estimate of the compression
index (Cc).
1.7 170 log stress (kPa)
  • Fig. 11 Liquidity Index against shear
    strength.

26
1.7 Two Volumetric Definitions
  • VOID RATIO (e)
  • ratio of the volume of the voids to the volume of
    SOLID.
  • POROSITY (n)
  • ratio of the volume of the voids to the total
    volume of the SOIL
  • (i.e. solid voids).
  • e and n are related

e
n n ------- or
e -------- 1 e
1 - n
e Gs x (moisture
content) Gs is specific gravity ratio of mass of
unit volume of soil particles) to unit mass of
water
27
1.8 Further Applications of the Atterberg Limits
Consolidation normally requires the gradient of
the consolidation line in terms of voids ratio,
and not moisture content as indicated above.
Transform equation (1) Cc 1.325
(WLL - WPL)
Relationship between Plasticity Index and shear
strength
Correlation is good ? --- 0.22
0.74 PI ?'v Applicable to normally
consolidated clays
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 PI
28
1.9 Definitions
Volume Unit Weight Weight
0
Vg
0
Vw
?w
Vw.?w
Voids
Vs
?s
Vs.?s
Volume of voids (Vv)
Vg Vw
Volume of voids (Vt)
Vv Vs
and Vs Ws / ?s
Vw Ww / ?w
But ?s Gs ?w
So Vs Ws / Gs ?w
29
1.9 Definitions
30
1.9 Definitions
Definition 8
Divide top and bottom lines by Vs
31
1.9 Definitions
32
1.10 Estimation of effective vertical stress at
depth
Method 1
  • Total Vertical Stress
  • ? (?i . zi) (?1 .3 ?2 .2 ?3
    .3 )
  • where zi is the depth of layer i
  • If ?1 16 kN m-3 , ?2 19 kN
    m-3 ,
  • and ?3 17 kN m-3
  • Total stress (16 x 3 19 x 2 17 x 3)
  • 137 kPa (kN m-3)
  • Deduct the buoyant effect of water
  • ?w x. 4 40 kPa (since ?w 10 kN
    m-3)
  • effective stress 137 - 40 97 kPa

?1 ?2 ?3
33
1.10 Estimation of effective vertical stress at
depth
Method 2
  • stress at A
  • 16 x 3 1 x 19 1 x (19 - 10) 3 x (17
    - 10)

  • layer 1 ---- layer 2 -----------
    layer 3

  • 19-10 is submerged unit wt of layer 2 ?2'
  • 97 kpa as before

?1 ?2 ?3
34
(No Transcript)
35
Mans Influence (Agriculture /Development)
Cut / Fill Slopes
Construction
Drainage
Pumping
Hydrology (rainfall)
Earthquakes
Geology
Ground Water
Ground Loading (Consolidation)
Erosion/Deposition
Glaciation
Weathering
Surface Water
Material Properties (Shear Strength)
Geochemistry
Stability Assessment
Slope Profile
Landslide Preventive Measures
Slope Management
Design
Landslide Warning
Landslide
Cost
Build
Temporarily Safe
No Danger
Consequence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com