Carrier Ethernet Access Technology Shoot-Out - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Carrier Ethernet Access Technology Shoot-Out

Description:

GEPON GPON FTTC / VDSL Active Ethernet Fiber Which technology addresses better IPTV and VoIP? What about legacy & TDM? Bandwidth ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: marcomser
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Carrier Ethernet Access Technology Shoot-Out


1
  • Carrier Ethernet Access Technology Shoot-Out
  • Copper PDH vs. Active Fiber vs. PON

2
Panelists
Ralph Santitoro Chair, MEF Web Marketing
Committee Director of Carrier Ethernet
Solutions Ralph_at_Marcom-Services.net
Wolfgang Fischer Senior Manager, Business
Development wfischer_at_cisco.com
Dr. Michael Ritter Vice President Business
Management Ethernet Access MRitter_at_advaoptical.co
m
Gerlinde Bedö Head of Broadband Access
Marketing Gerlinde.bedoe_at_nsn.com
3
Access Shoot Out IntroductionPanel Moderator
Greg Poggi Vice President of Sales
gpoggi_at_omnitron-systems.com
4
Carrier Ethernet in the Access, Metro Global
Networks
  • Carrier Ethernet Services operate independently
    of the physical networks they run across making
    expansion to new technologies easy
  • Creates a single service connection from
    Enterprise or business office, in a single person
    office, or home or on the road.
  • In the Metro and First Mile, Ethernet is becoming
    the network of choice with migration from Frame
    Services

5
Ethernet over Different Access Network
Technologies
10/100BT
GigE
GBE or 100FX (Standard or WDM)
EoCopper
Service Provider Network (Hybrid of Ethernet and
TDM)
EoPDH
10/100BT
PON
GBE or 100FX (Standard or WDM)
PON
HFC Hybrid Fiber and Coax
Coax
10/100BT
6
Carrier Ethernet Scope and Reach
HD TV, TVoD, VoD, Content Providers
Voice/Video Telephony
Internet information Software apps
Host applications, Consolidated Servers
Gaming, DR, ERP
Video Source
7
Carrier Ethernet in Access Networks
  • Active areas in Carrier Ethernet development
  • Ethernet Access for Mobile Backhaul
  • Ethernet over Active Fiber
  • Ethernet over Passive Fiber (PON)
  • Ethernet over Copper PDH (E1/DS1)
  • Ethernet over Copper DSL
  • Ethernet over Hybrid Fiber Coax (HFC)

8
Converged Ethernet/IP Services over Copper PDH
Access Networks
Ralph Santitoro Chair, MEF Web Marketing
Committee Director of Carrier Ethernet
Solutions Ralph_at_Marcom-Services.net
9
Delivering Ubiquitous Ethernet Services- The
Access Network Challenge
  • Ethernet over Fiber (EoF) access networks
  • The optimal technology for delivery of Ethernet
    services
  • Unfortunately, not all Enterprise sites have
    fiber access
  • However, they all have access to copper/PDH
    circuits

How does a service provider deliver Ethernet
services to all Enterprise locations?
10
What is Ethernet over PDH (EoPDH)?
  • Technology that enables delivery of Ethernet
    services over PDH (E1/DS1, E3/DS3) access
    networks
  • Service Bandwidth Granularity
  • N x 2Mbps (N bonded E1s), N x 1.5Mbps (N bonded
    DS1s)
  • N x 32Mbps (N bonded E3s), N x 45Mbps (N bonded
    DS3s)
  • Example 5 bonded E1s provide a 10Mbps Ethernet
    service
  • Supports same MEF service attributes as EoF
    services
  • Ethernet UNI to subscriber
  • Granular bandwidth and QoS per service
  • Fault Management and Performance Management for
    SLAs

EoPDH enables a common Ethernet service offering
and SLA over both copper and fiber access networks
PDH (Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy) Term to
collectively refer to E1/E3 and DS1/DS3 copper
access network circuits
11
How does EoPDH work?
EoPDH Aggregator
EoPDH CLE
Enterprise Subscriber
Copper PDH Access Network
  • Ethernet Frames enter UNI on EoPDH CLE and
    encapsulated in GFP
  • Access Network multiplexes E1s into channelized
    STM-1 circuits
  • E1s in STM-1 circuits terminated on EoPDH
    Aggregator
  • GFP terminated, Ethernet frames reconstructed
  • EoPDH Aggregator adds S-VLAN tag (QinQ) and
    passes Ethernet Service Frames to Ethernet
    Transport Network

12
Ethernet L2 Services and Ethernet Access to IP
Services over E1s PDH circuits PMO
Customer Premise
SDH ADM
Local Switching Office (LSO)
PDH/SDH Access Network
CE
EoPDH CLE
Ethernet handoff to customer
Ethernet over E1s
Ethernet over E1s in Channelized STM-1s
SDH
IP Service Edge
DCS
SDH ADM
PE Router
L2 switch
PDH Aggregation Router
Ethernet
Ethernet
Ethernet over E1s in Channelized STM-1s
TDM PDH circuits from Customer Premise to IP
Service Edge
13
FMO Step 1 in Network Evolution to Carrier
Ethernet
Customer Premise
SDH ADM
Local Switching Office (LSO)
PDH/SDH Access Network
CE
EoPDH CLE
Ethernet handoff to customer
Ethernet over E1s
SDH
SDH ADM
  • EoPDH aggregator terminates PDH circuits and
    provides Ethernet to backhaul network resulting
    in improved bandwidth utilization
  • DCS and PDH Aggregation Router eliminated at IP
    Service Edge since PDH circuits terminated at LSO

14
FMO Step 2 in Network Evolution to Carrier
Ethernet
Customer Premise
Managed CLE
PDH/SDH Access Network
Local Switching Office (LSO)
EoPDH Aggregator
CE
Ethernet handoff to customer
Ethernet over E1s
  • SDH ADMs / Transport replaced by Ethernet
    Transport
  • Shortest possible Ethernet over E1 (PDH) loops
  • CLE at customer premise enables converged
    Ethernet and IP services

15
Ethernet over PDH Benefits
  • Simplifies Enterprise subscribers WAN
    connectivity
  • Provides IT friendly Ethernet (UNI) instead of
    E1 TDM circuit
  • Simplifies Providers Access/Aggregation Network
  • Terminates TDM PDH circuits as close to
    subscriber as possible
  • Media conversion (Ethernet?TDM?Ethernet)
    performed between EoPDH CLE and Aggregation
    Device
  • Improves backhaul bandwidth utilization

EoPDH enables ubiquitous, global Ethernet
services over existing copper PDH access network
facilities
16
Ethernet Point-to-Point
Wolfgang Fischer Senior Manager, Business
Development wfischer_at_cisco.com
17
A technology fairy tale
  • Once upon a time in the last century...
  • Fiber was expensive and had to be shared
  • Optical transceivers were expensive and had to be
    shared
  • Few 10s of Mbit/s were considered more than
    enough to satisfy everybodys bandwidth appetite
  • ITU-T and IEEE developed various flavours of PON
  • In the world as we know it today...
  • Fiber is cheap
  • Optical transceivers for FE and GE are cheap
  • Typical access bitrates grow 50 YoY reaching
    100Mbit/s before the end of this decade and
    1Gbit/s before the end of the next decade
  • Compelling reason for PON?

18
What is Ethernet Point-to-Point?
  • Direct star connectivity between POP and
    subscriber
  • topology similar to telephone access network
  • Using standard Ethernet technology (FE, GE, ...)
    over single strand of single-mode fiber

19
Benefits of Ethernet point-to-point
  • Simplicity
  • Virtually unlimited bitrate per subscriber
  • Fiber is neutral with respect to transmission
    technology
  • Migration to higher speeds or new technologies on
    a per-customer basis
  • Pay as you grow
  • Open Access to fiber inherently embedded in the
    architecture
  • Flexible, Future Proof

20
What about fiber management / space?
  • ODF for 2304 fiber terminations
  • Rack for 1502 active fiber interfaces
  • 50 take rate
  • up to 100 take rate achievable with second
    switch rack

Source Huber Suhner
21
What about OPEX?
Issue Point-to-Point PON
Resource planning in access / engineering rules Simple dedicated fiber Complex shared medium, subscribers mutually dependent, of customers on tree varies
Fiber troubleshooting Simple failure uniquely located through reflection measurements Complex location of failure behind splitter difficult to identify
Encryption key management Not needed Required
Bandwidth / technology upgrade Simple can be done on a per-customer basis Complex replacement of all active equipment at once or wavelength overlay
Connecting a new subscriber Patch at ODF and config of switch, compensated by initial capex savings Config of OLT
Outage after cable break Longer in the feeder part (more fibers to splice), shorter in the drop part (easier diagnostics) Shorter in the feeder part (less fibers to splice), longer in the drop part (difficult diagnostics)
22
But I want to share fiber!
  • Most natural way of sharing a fiber is in
    wavelength-domain
  • DWDM-PON
  • technology available
  • economically viable within 2 years
  • Ethernet Point-to-Point per wavelength
  • Combines best of both worlds

23
Ethernet over WDM-PON
Dr. Michael Ritter Vice President Business
Management Ethernet Access MRitter_at_advaoptical.co
m
24
WDM PON network architecture
l1
FTTC
VDSL
l2
l3
l1 . . . ln
Ethernet
CentralOffice
FTTC
PassiveRemoteNode
ln
FTTB
FTTH
25
Benefits of WDM PON technology
  • Scalability through bitrate and protocol
    independency
  • Upgrade path on a per service level
  • High degree of security and privacy
  • Simple and straightforward network planning
  • Geographical flexibility with long reach
    capability
  • Architecture supporting open access networking
  • Standard Ethernet technology and inter-working

26
WDM PON options
  • Power splitters vs. filters in remote node
  • Lambda grid options DWDM, CWDM,
  • Bit rate per wavelength 1G, 2G5, 4G3, 10G
  • Colored or colorless ONU design
  • Underlying TDM scheme for high fan out
  • Protection options for highest availability
  • Optional amplification for extended reach

27
Optical access applications
residential services access
business servicesaccess
infrastructure backhaul
FTTN
FTTC
FTTB
FTTH
FTTO
FTTB
opticalbackhaul
activeEthernet
E/GPON
opticalbackhaul
opticalbackhaul
activeEthernet
passiveWDM
opticalbackhaul
all access technologies need efficient
high-capacity backhaul
28
Eliminating active equipment and freeing up real
estate
LO
Curb
CP
CO
FTTC/VDSL 2550 Mbps per user
VDSL DSLAM
aggregationswitch
opticaltransport
aggregationswitch
FTTB/H GPON lt100 Mbps per user
passiveopticalsplitter
OLT
aggregationswitch
aggregationswitch
opticaltransport
FTTB Passive WDM 1 Gbps per user
passiveWDM
opticaltransport
29
Smart service termination
Optojack - loop, plug, device
  • Potential demarcation layers
  • fiber availability
  • optical performance
  • coding integrity
  • protocol statistics
  • Ethernet virtual circuit statistics
  • Loop passive pilot tone
  • Plug active intelligent transceiver
  • Device active demarcation unit

OJ - Loop
Application
SFP
OJ - Plug
Application
SFP
OJ - Device
Application
SFP
SFP
SFP
30
Summary
  • Simple, open and dedicated point-to-point
    connectivity
  • Efficient and future-proof transport architecture
    optimized for access networks
  • Utilized leading edge technology to reduce both
    capital and operational cost

31
Ethernet over PON
Gerlinde Bedö Head of Broadband Access
Marketing Gerlinde.bedoe_at_nsn.com
32
There is no doubt World goes fiber
  • The results of the research evaluating the
    sustainability and environmental impact of fiber
    networks clearly demonstrate the overall service
    and environmental benefits of FTTH. The findings
    stand as testament that fiber is a sustainable
    and future-proof technology for the 21st
    century.
  • Joeri Van Bogaert, president FTTH Council, 2008

Fiber right now is not just a means to get bits
to the subscriber,it is also a potentially
effective marketing tool. Telecom Strategy
Partners, 2008
33
But which technology fulfills best all
requirements?
  • Which technology addresses better IPTV and VoIP?
    What about legacy TDM?
  • Bandwidth availability flexibility, capacity
    upgrade possibilities
  • Maintenance fault isolation
  • Interoperability multi-vendor networks
  • SLA assurance, service protection, and their
    associated costs
  • How to maximize the use of existing
    infrastructure?
  • The access network and future applications
    network dimension bandwidth simulation

Fiber
Active Ethernet
GEPON
FTTC / VDSL
GPON
34
PON is becoming a leading fibre technology
GPON will dominate in the US, since it is now
certain to be used by both the major ILECs and
many independent telcos. Active Ethernet has some
limited support in the US, but it will remain a
minority technology, taking declining share in
the overall market FTTH Worldwide technology
update market forecast
Because GE-PON is currently the technology of
choice in Japan, it will dominate overall global
FTTH deployments over next few years. FTTH
Worldwide technology update market forecast
35
All over the world operators go for PONPON
subscribers will dominate ptp subscribers
Worldwide fiber deployments
36
What is PON?
FTTH
Carrier Network
Passive Optical splitter
Passive Optical splitter
ONT SFU
Metro MPLS / VPLS
2.5Gbps DS 1.25Gbps US
116 Optical splitter
TDM Network
  • Created by the FSAN organization (driven by
    service providers operators) Standardized by
    ITU-T (A/BPON, GPON) or IEEE (EPON)
  • Bandwidth gt100Mbit/s per subscriber through DBA
  • PON optimized for multicast and downstream
    intensive traffic
  • Cost-optimized support of multiple (legacy and
    new) services through various subscriber
    interfaces VoIP (SIP, H.248), video (IPTV, cable
    TV), data
  • Support of all types on in-house cabling copper
    TP, CAT5, fiber
  • Real multi-service platform in the 1st mile and
    in the CO
  • Easy upgrade to more subscribers and higher
    bandwidth
  • Clear migration path to NG-PON
  • PON is a green technology

Multi-Dwelling Unit
FTTB
37
PON is the ideal solution to backhaul mobile
traffic
SDH
RNC
Node-B/BTS
STM 1/4
Mobile core
1/10 GE
E1/TDM
E1/TDM
TDMoIP
Ethernet
  • GPON is the ideal platform to backhaul mobile
    traffic (from 2G to LTE)
  • Through built in synchronization capabilities in
    OLT
  • Support of all relevant BTS interfaces E1,
    Ethernet
  • Sufficient bandwidth for LTE traffic

38
The TCO advantage of GPON
Point-to-point Ethernet
GPON
  • Realistic deployment
  • 5000 subscribers connected to CO
  • PON splitting ratio 132
  • Fibre terminations per ODF rack 1,440(10
    shelves holding 144 fibres)
  • Power consumption figures and ports per cage
    based on real product specs

19.6
5000
x 6.7
38
x 31.8
x 3.6
Ethernet
GPON
10
2.9
157
Patch cords
PowerkW
CO SpaceM2
39
Active Ethernet vs. GPON FTTx
Technical Requirement ETTx GPON Comments
Residential services handle VoIP/POTS, video, multicast
OAM tools
Bandwidth availability Both provide same possibilities
Bandwidth flexibility Important for business services
Support of existing infra. Including existing building infra.
QoS SLA guarantee
Service protection Natural support of Ethernet rings
TDM and legacy support Ethernet support through CES
Cost
CapEx Integrated with Ethernet rings
OpEx
Total evaluation
40
Q and AShootout
Greg Poggi Vice President of Sales
gpoggi_at_omnitron-systems.com
Ralph Santitoro Chair, MEF Web Marketing
Committee Director of Carrier Ethernet
Solutions Ralph_at_Marcom-Services.net
Wolfgang Fischer Senior Manager, Business
Development wfischer_at_cisco.com
Dr. Michael Ritter Vice President Business
Management Ethernet Access MRitter_at_advaoptical.co
m
Gerlinde Bedö Head of Broadband Access
Marketing Gerlinde.bedoe_at_nsn.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com