Floating Gate Devices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Floating Gate Devices

Description:

FLOATING GATE DEVICES Kyle Craig * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Flash Memory Cells An overview Paolo Pavan, Roberto Bez, Piero Olivo and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: uva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Floating Gate Devices


1
Floating Gate Devices
  • Kyle Craig

2
  • Flash Memory Cells An overview
  • Paolo Pavan, Roberto Bez, Piero Olivo and Enrico
    Zanoni

3
Motivation!
  • Predicted Worldwide Memory Market
  • Flash prediction, 6 of total memory market

4
  • According to Gartner Research in 2006 flash
    consisted of 33 of the market

5
FGMOSFET
  • If a charge can be forced onto the floating gate,
    it will remain there.
  • Charge on the floating gate shifts the VT of the
    device
  • Two VT device

6
  • By having two VTs depending on the charge of the
    floating gate, device can be used as a memory.
  • No charge on floating gate logic 1
  • Charge on floating gate logic 0

7
Hot Electron Injection
  • Electrons travel laterally from source to drain
    with applied voltage. Voltage on gate gives
    enough energy to inject through the thin oxide
    onto the floating gate
  • Three principles
  • lucky enough to gain
  • enough energy
  • No collisions in substrate
  • No collisions in oxide

8
Fowler Nordheim Tunneling
  • With an applied electric field, electrons are
    able to tunnel through the oxide.
  • The thicker the oxide, the greater the applied
    voltage needs to be
  • 10nm oxide is considered standard
  • Variation in this oxide will lead to
  • wide distribution of VT values

9
Side effects
  • HEI and FN Tunneling can lead to charge being
    trapped in the oxide
  • Change in the VTs of the device
  • Inability to add or remove charge from floating
    gate

10
Flash Memory Programming
  • Assumed device starts with no charge on the
    floating gate i.e., storing a 1
  • Use HEI to put charge onto floating gate
  • Shifts VT of device
  • Depends on
  • Channel Length, Time, Temp, drain voltage

11
Flash Memory Erasing
  • Use Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling to pull electrons
    off of floating gate to the source
  • Depends on
  • Oxide thickness, applied voltage
  • Need to worry about breakdown of the
    source/substrate junction
  • Limits Scaling!

12
Program, Erase, Read
Source Control Gate (WL) Drain (BL)
Read GND Vcc Vread
Program GND Vpp Vdd
Erase Vpp GND Floating
Typical Values Vcc 5V Vpp 12V Vdd 5V Vread
1V
13
Programming Disturbs
  • Gate Disturbs Cells not selected with active WL
  • DC Erasing
  • If cell has charge store on it, electrons can
    tunnel from the FG to the Control Gate
  • DC Programming
  • If the cell has no charge on it, electrons can
    tunnel from the substrate to the FG

14
Programming Disturbs
  • Drain Disturbs
  • Electrons can tunnel from the FG to the drain
  • Holes generated by impact-ionization in substrate
    then injected into FG
  • Lowers the high VT value

15
Retention/Endurance
  • Retention Change in charge on FG
  • Intrinsic field-assisted electron emission,
    thermionic emission
  • Extrinsic Oxide defects, Ionic contamination
  • Endurance Change in threshold values based on
    number of cycles

16
Scaling
  • Issues with scaling
  • Decreasing L will increase performance but also
    increase number of disturbs
  • Physical voltage constraints
  • 3.2 eV energy barrier and 8-9MV/cm for FN
  • Oxide thickness limit

17
NOR vs NAND
  • NOR similar in structure to SRAM
  • NAND more comparable to Harddrives

18
From Micron NAND vs NOR Comparison
19
  • A 6V Embedded 90nm Silicon Nanocrystal
    Nonvolatile Memory
  • R. Muralidhar, R.F. Steimle, M. Sadd, R.Rao, C.T.
    Swift, E.J. Prinz, J. Yater, L. Grieve, K.
    Harber, B. Hradsky, S. Straub, B. Acred, W.
    Paulson, W. Chen, L. Parker, S.G.H. Anderson, M.
    Rossow, T. Merchant, M. Paransky, T. Huynh, D.
    Hadad, KO-Min Chang, and B.E. White Jr.

20
Motivation
  • Scaling of conventional floating gate memories is
    limited due to high voltages that are needed
  • Use of Silicon Nanocrystals has some benefits
    over floating gate
  • Immune to oxide defects during program/erase
  • Reduction of oxide thickness
  • Reduction of operating voltage

21
  • Replaces floating gate of traditional cell with
    discrete Nanocrystal particles
  • Produced using a conventional CMOS process flow
    with only 4 additional masks compared to logic

22
Current Characteristics
  • Two Bits/cell operation is possible with proper
    nanocyrstal isolation
  • Without needed isolation functions like a normal
    FG

23
Mask Adder
24
Endurance and Retention
25
  • Can be erased from the top oxide (between FG and
    control gate) or the bottom oxide (between
    nanocrystals and substrate)
  • Erasing through the top oxide produces lower VT

26
Cycling on VT
  • After cycling 1000 cycles Erase and Program VTs
    maintain tight distribution.

27
Summary
  • Produced in 90nm .25um technology
  • Operation voltages 6V
  • 90 yield on 4 MB array
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com