INDIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

INDIA

Description:

Competition in a large emerging economy ... Agreements permitted in law Agreements under IPR (not unreasonable restrictions like patent pooling, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: cutsinter6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INDIA


1
INDIA S NEW COMPETITION REGIMECompetition in
a large emerging economy
Bharath Jairaj Citizen consumer and civic Action
Group Chennai, India www.cag.org.in

2
Contents
  • Where are we today?
  • How did we get here?
  • MRTP Act, 1969
  • New Economic Policy 1991 Amendments to MRTP Act
  • Competition Act 2002
  • Competition Policy 2006-07?

3
Indias Competition Regime today
  • New Competition Law
  • The Competition Act , 2002
  • The Competition Commission of India (CCI)
  • The Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT)
  • New Competition Policy
  • Advisory Committee to prepare draft National
    Competition Policy (December 2005)
  • Working group on Competition Policy at the
    Planning Commission (for 11th Five Year Plan)

4
EVOLUTION- How We Got Here - 1
  • Constitution of India, Art. 39 (c) the
    operation of the economic system does not result
    in the concentration of wealth and means of
    production to the common detriment
  • 1947- 1969 Regimented and strict system of
    government controls
  • 1969 Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices
    Act (MRTP Act) legislated

5
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act ,
1969
  • OBJECTIVES
  • Prevention of concentration of economic power in
    a few hands
  • Control and regulation of monopolies in certain
    sectors
  • Prevention of unfair trade practices
  • Prevention of restrictive trade practices

6
THE MRTP COMMISSION
  • A Quasi-Judicial Authority (Chairman (SC/HC
    Judge) and 2-8 members)
  • Assisted by Dir Gen of Investigation
  • MRTPC vested with powers of a Civil Court cease
    and desist orders injunction award
    compensation, etc.
  • Can make recommendations to Central Government on
    functioning of enterprises, when such functioning
    was detrimental to public interest
  • Suo Moto action possible, though not used

7
EVOLUTION- How We Got Here - 2
  • 1991 Widespread economic reforms in India
    Aimed at Liberalisation, Privatisation and
    Globalisation
  • Changes felt necessary in MRTP Act
  • Concentration of economic power to the common
    detriment and control of monopolies
    de-emphasised
  • Pre-entry restrictions (prior approval of
    government), expanding existing undertaking,
    MAs, takeovers deleted from Act

8
EVOLUTION- How We Got Here - 3
  • 1999 Expert Group on interaction between Trade
    and Competition Policy recommended new
    competition law to promote fair competition and
    control (eliminate) anti-competitive practices
    in the market
  • 2000 GoI High Level Committee on Competition Law
    and Policy provided a draft Competition law.
  • 2002The Competition Act legislated

9
THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002What and how
  • WHAT?
  • Main Focus areas of the Act
  • Prohibition of Anti Competitive Agreements
  • Prohibition of Abuse of Dominance
  • Regulation of Combinations
  • Competition Advocacy
  • HOW?
  • Through establishment of a Competition Commission
    of India (CCI) and Competition Appellate Tribunal
    (CAT)

10
FOCUS AREAS OF 2002 ACT - 1
  • A. PROHIBITION OF ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS
  • All Anti-competitive agreements are void, i.e.,
    agreements which could restrict competition,
    vertical or horizontal
  • Rule of Reason to be applied for determining
    legality of an agreement
  • Certain agreements between same or similar
    enterprises regarding prices or quantities, on
    bidding, or to share or divide markets are per se
    illegal
  • Leniency provision for whistleblowers in a
    cartel (if disclosure is before prosecution)

11
FOCUS AREAS OF 2002 ACT - 1
  • EXCEPTIONS
  • Export cartels (problem is somewhere else!)
  • Agreements permitted in law
  • Agreements under IPR (not unreasonable
    restrictions like patent pooling, price-fixing
    etc.)
  • RULE OF REASON TO BE APPLIED (factors)
  • Creation of entry barriers
  • Driving existing competitors out of the market
  • Accrual of benefits to consumers
  • Improvements in goods and services
  • Increase in Technical development

12
FOCUS AREAS OF 2002 ACT - 2
  • B. PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION
  • Mere dominance is not an offence, abuse of
    dominance is prohibited
  • Important shift from size / structure to
    behaviour / conduct
  • Instances of unfair, discriminatory or predatory
    pricing restricting quantities, markets or
    technical development, etc. will qualify

13
FOCUS AREAS OF 2002 ACT - 3
  • C. REGULATION OF COMBINATIONS
  • Includes MAs, Amalgamations, Acquisitions of
    control - all above a certain high level
    threshold (Rs.1000 crore aggregate value of
    assets or Rs.3000 crore turnover of combining
    parties)
  • Thresholds deliberately high to allow small
    Indian companies to combine to become active
    international players
  • Combinations that cause or are likely to cause an
    adverse effect on competition are under focus
    (e.g., horizontal mergers between competitors
    vertical merger by dominant player with firm in
    adjacent market, etc.)
  • Pre-notification voluntary

14
FOCUS AREAS OF 2002 ACT - 4
  • D. COMPETITION ADVOCACY
  • CCI to create culture of competition
  • Empowered to participate in formulation of
    countrys economic policies
  • Create awareness and training on competition
    issues
  • Establishment of Competition Fund for above
  • Recently asked to develop Consultation Paper on
    National Competition Policy (to harmonise various
    government policies)

15
COMPETITION COMMISSIONOF INDIA (CCI)
  • Adjudicative wing distinct from Investigative and
    Prosecution wing
  • Allows appointment of economists, lawyers, other
    professionals as investigators (departure from
    practice of appointing retd. bureaucrats)
  • UTPs removed from the purview of Act and all
    pending cases transferred to the Consumer
    Protection Act, 1986 (CPA)
  • Phased introduction of Act competition advocacy
    (Y1) Anti-Competitive Practices and Abuse of
    Dominance (Y2) Combinations (Y3)

16
COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (CAT)
  • Established after intervention by Supreme Court
    of India to retain judicial powers within the
    judicial system
  • CAT to hear and dispose appeals against any
    direction issued or decision made or order passed
    by CCI

17
EVOLUTION- How We Got Here - 4
  • 2004 UPA government elected despite India
    Shining belief
  • NCMP commits to greater effort towards increasing
    competition and a competitive environment broad
    basing development
  • 2005 GoI asks CCI to develop consultation paper
    on National Competition Policy
  • 2005 CCI establishes Advisory Committee to
    develop draft National Competition Policy
  • 2006 Planning Commission establishes Working
    Group on Competition Policy (for 11th Plan
    2007-12)

18
Competition in India the road map
  • Shift from size / structure focus to conduct
  • Shift from discouraging dominance to
    discouraging abuse of dominance
  • Includes combinations (previously ignored)
  • Includes strong component on competition
    advocacy
  • Replaces Rule of Law approach with Rule of
    Reason approach
  • New Competition law to deliver above
  • Decision to locate Competition law within broader
    Competition Policy that harmonises various
    policies

19
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com