EDGE II TRADE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

EDGE II TRADE

Description:

A 3,000-kilometer Bolivia-to-Brazil natural gas pipeline that is one of the ... BOLIVIA ... revealed that it was in discussions to invest $2-3bn in Bolivia. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: webCe
Category:
Tags: edge | trade | bolivia

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EDGE II TRADE


1
EDGE II- TRADE ENVIRONMENT
Portland State University
Winter 2007
ENRON FAILURE NATIONS CONTROL OVER ENERGY
RESOURCES
VIKRAM DHARANIPATHI
2
(No Transcript)
3
ENRON
  • Enron Corporation was an American energy company
    based in Houston, Texas.
  • Enron employed around 21,000 people and was one
    of the world's leading electricity, natural gas,
    pulp and paper, and communications companies,
    with claimed revenues of 111 billion in 2000.
  • Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative
    Company" for 6 consecutive years.
  • It was formed in 1985 when Houston Natural Gas
    merged with InterNorth.
  • The rise and fall of Enron is an important,
    complex story. In its early days Enron did the
    right things for the right reason and garnered
    substantial credibility.
  • Later successful operations were replaced with
    the illusion of successful operations. In the
    last phases Enron milked its credibility to
    sustain operations through loans
  • After several years of international and domestic
    expansion involving complicated deals and
    contracts, Enron was billions of dollars into
    debt.
  • All of this debt was concealed from shareholders
    through partnerships with other companies,
    fraudulent accounting, and illegal loans.

4
Big names in ENRON scandal
  • Kenneth Lay was the CEO and chairman of Enron
    from 1986 until his resignation on January 23,
    2002.

Was a naval officer in the Pentagon before
becoming an aide to a federal government
regulator for the natural gas
Became undersecretary for the Department of the
Interior before he returned to the
business world as an executive at Florida Gas
By the time of the Reagan administration, when
energy was deregulated, Lay
was already an energy
company executive and he took advantage of the
new climate by merging Houston Natural Gas Co.
with Nebraska-based Inter-North to form Enron in
1985 Was mentioned as a possible candidate for Pr
esident Bush's Treasury Secretary along with J.P.
Morgan Co. head Douglas A. Warner
Dumped large amounts of his Enron stock in
September and October of 2001 as its price fell,
while encouraging employees to buy more stock,
telling them the company would rebound and
liquidated more than 300 million in Enron stock
from 1989 to 2001, mostly in stock options.
5
  • Thomas E. White a former US Army officer served
    as senior executive
  • for ENRON before being nominated as United
    States Secretary of the Army
  • by U.S. President George W. Bush.
  • White entered the private sector as Vice-Chairman
    of Enron Energy Services (E.E.S.),
  • a subsidiary of the Enron Corporation
    responsible for providing energy outsource
  • Solutions.
  • He was responsible for the Enron Engineering and
    Construction Company, which
  • managed an extensive construction portfolio with
    domestic and international projects.
  • Also served as a member of Enron's Executive
    Committee and was Chairman and
  • Chief Executive Officer for Enron Operations
    Corporation
  • As reported in the Washington Post in late
    October 2001, White made numerous
  • phone calls to Enron executives including Vice
    President Jude Rolfes, CFO Jeff
  • Skilling and CEO Ken Lay . Shortly after the
    calls were made, White unloaded
  • 200,000 Enron shares for 12 million

6
  • Rebecca Mark-Jusbasche joined Enron Corp. in
    1982, became executive
  • vice president of Enron Power Corp. in 1986,
    chairman and CEO of Enron
  • Development Corp. in 1991, chairman and CEO of
    Enron International in 1996
  • and vice chairman of Enron Corp. in 1998.
  • She was named to Fortune's "50 Most Powerful
    Women in American Business" in 1998 and 1999 and
    Independent Energy Executive of the Year in
    1994.
  • While head of Enron Development and Enron
    International, Mark made several deals
  • like the 95 million for a 50 share of a
    barge-mounted power plant off Puerto
  • Plata on the north coast of the Dominican
    Republic and 3 billion Dabhol Power
  • Plant in India which turned out to be expensive
    failures.
  • She allegedly bagged nearly 80 million for her
    1.4 million shares

7
  • Partnerships that allowed Enron to hide debt
  • RADR a group of entities secretly funded by
    Enron that purchased electricity-generating
    windmills from Enron, then later sold them back
    with some of the profits going to key Enron
    officials and their families.
  • CHEWCO a company formed by executives of Enron
    in order to buy out the shares of California
    Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) in
    a joint venture investment partnership known as
    JEDI. Chewco bought out CalPERS interest in order
    to retain JEDIs off-balance-sheet status.
    However, Chewco did not meet the requirements for
    accounting rules and claimed profits that it was
    not entitled to. In addition, when Enron bought
    out Chewcos interest, Chewcos price was driven
    up, reaping huge benefits for the original
    investors (Enron execs).
  • SOUTHAMPTON Enron bought the shares of
    National Westminster Bank (NatWest) in a limited
    partnership with Credit Suisse First Boston.
    Enron paid 20 million, but only 1 million went
    to NatWest. The remainder of the money went to
    several executives and their families, as well as
    to three NatWest employees who were in on the
    deal.

8
Other significant personalities in the ENRON
scandal
  • Former President Bill Clinton helped Ken Lay get
    a 3 billion power plant project in India for
    Enron. Four days before the deal went through,
    Enron gave 100,000 to the Democratic party.
  • President George W. Bush lied when he said that
    he first got to know Ken Lay in 1994, and
  • that Ken Lay was a supporter of his opponent,
    Ann Richards. Lay first started contributing to
  • GW's career back in 1978, and in fact gave GW
    three times as much money in 1994 as he did
  • Ann Richards.
  • Vice- President Dick Cheney met six times with
    Enron executives while writing up this
  • nation's energy policy which benefited Enron 17
    ways, and then refused to tell Congress
  • anything about those meetings. Cheney also met
    with Ken Lay during the California energy
  • crisis. The day after the meeting, Cheney said
    the Bush administration would not support
  • price caps on energy in California, a move that
    cost Californians and made Enron billions.
  • Enron was a large campaign contributor to Texas
    Senator Phil Gramm. In 1992, his wife,
  • Wendy, was the chair of the federal Commodity
    Futures Trading Commission. She moved to
  • exempt Enron's energy-swap operation from
    government oversight, then days later resigned
  • and took a job with Enron on its audit committee

9
  • Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, later
    named Andersen, was once
  • one of the Big Five accounting firms, performing
    auditing, tax, and consulting
  • services for large corporations.
  • In 2002 the firm voluntarily surrendered its
    licenses to practice as Certified Public
  • Accountants in the U.S. pending the result of
    prosecution by the Department of Justice
  • over the firm's handling of the auditing of
    Enron
  • Nancy Temple (Andersen Legal Dept.) and David
    Duncan (Lead Partner for the Enron
  • account) were cited as the responsible managers
    in this scandal as they had given the
  • order to shred relevant documents
  • Enron paid this accounting firm with a troubled
    past 1 million a week to keep their
  • books. As soon as the accounting firm found out
    there would be an investigation of
  • Enron, they destroyed thousands of documents.

10
ENRON International
  • Enron had billions of dollars in assets all over
    the world, and was quickly approaching a monopoly
    position in the energy industries in many of
    those countries. Just a few examples include
  • A power plant in Panama which is the largest
    thermal power plant in Central America
  • Two power plants in Guatemala, one of which
    supplies 35 of the electric energy used by that
    country
  • A power plant in Puerto Rico that supplies 20 of
    the island's consumption
  • 100 of Jamaica's industrial gas business
  • A 357-mile natural gas transmission line in
    Colombia
  • Promigas, Colombia's premier natural gas pipeline
    operator
  • Natural gas supply systems in Brazil that supply
    over 21 of Brazil's consumption and
  • A 3,000-kilometer Bolivia-to-Brazil natural gas
    pipeline that is one of the largest gas projects
    ever undertaken in South America.

11
  • ENRON in INDIA
  • In 1992, the government of India, under pressure
    from the International Monetary Fund, adopted a
    program of deregulation and privatization,
    including opening up the country's power and
    electricity sector to foreign investment.
  • Enron, along with General Electric and Bechtel,
    two other huge multinational corporations,
    quickly signed an agreement with India's
    Maharashtra state government to build the Dabhol
    Power Project.
  • If the project had been completed as originally
    envisioned, it would have been the largest
    independent natural gas-based private power
    project in the world.
  • According to a 1993 study by the CEA, "The
    minimum amount MSEB were to required to pay for
    the proposed project was 1.3 billion per year,
    or approximately 26 billion over the life of the
    20-year contract. The government would pay out
    over 20 years, over nine times what Enron would
    pay in.
  • In 1995, the Indian government's own report on
    the project found that secret or off-the-record
    negotiations occurred special favors and
    concessions were granted to Enron the expected
    rates for electricity were too high significant
    environmental issues existed.
  • The report concluded that the project should be
    terminated, and the project was in fact halted.
    But Enron sued for recovery of 600 million it
    had already spent. Then, a few months later, in
    1996, a "renegotiated" project was
    announced-which was hardly any better.

12
(No Transcript)
13
  • AES Corporation AES (NYSE) is a Fortune 1000
    company headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.
    that generates and distributes electrical power.
  • It was founded on January 28, 1981 by Roger Sant
    from the US Federal Energy Administration and
    Dennis Bakke from the US Office of Management and
    Budget.
  • It is one of the world's leading power
    companies, generating and distributing electric
    power to 26 countries and has more than 30,000
    employees and boasts a market capitalization of
    about 14 billion.
  • AES allegedly conspired with several other
    electricity companies to cause a shortage of
    power during the California power crisis of 2000,
    thus driving up the price of electricity and
    driving up profits.
  • After the fall of the ENRON empire many
    economists believed AES to be the next ENRON. In
    March 2001 Enron's shares in Lagos power plant,
    Nigeria were sold to AES after government accused
    Enron of secrecy and bad faith in contractual
    obligations.

14
  • In the mid-1990s AES won the 530 million
    Bujagali dam project contract from the Ugandan
    government.
  • There was no competitive bidding process and the
    agreement between the two parties remained
    secret. It was a considered as a sweetheart deal
    for AES and a bad deal for the Ugandan
    government.
  • AES maintained that Bujagali Dam would help pull
    Uganda out of poverty, but in reality it is a
    costly white elephant that would increase the
    nation's debt load, and produce electricity that
    Ugandans could afford.

15
  • In December 2001, AES Nile Power received final
    approval to begin construction of a 530 million,
    200 megawatt hydroelectric facility.
  • Supporters of the dam said Only about five
    percent of Uganda's population now receives
    electricity, and the Bujagali project was to
    expand that group to about 15 percent of the
    population and attract industry to one of the
    world's poorest nations.
  • The deal started unraveling in June 2002, when
    the Inspection Panel, the World Bank's
    independent investigative unit, found that the
    Bujagali project violated five operational
    policies of the Bank and then Ugandan High Court
    forced the government of to disclose its terms.
  • A week later an independent review of the Power
    Purchase Agreement between AES and the Ugandan
    government, conducted by the Prayas Energy Group,
    concluded that dam was fundamentally
    misconceived.
  • It was also concluded that The Power Purchase
    Agreement of the project is not in line with
    international standards, and entails massive
    extra cost for Uganda. The World Bank has given
    poor advice to the Ugandan government, and has
    misled the public about the cost of the project.

16
  • The review determined that the agreement would
    make the Ugandan people pay 20-40 million extra
    per year compared to similar hydroelectric
    projects in other parts of the world.
  • IRN, which has been campaigning against the dam
    since 1999, said that the livelihoods of about
    6,800 people would be affected and the project
    would submerge productive agricultural land on
    the river's banks as well as islands sheltering a
    diverse population of animals and plants.
  • The project would drown Bujagali Falls, a
    spectacular series of cascading rapids which
    Ugandans consider a national treasure.
  • In 2003 AES said its is pulling out of the 530
    million, 200 megawatt hydroelectric facility for
    economic reasons and explained that the project
    has experienced construction delays and will
    produce less profit for the company with a
    greater degree of risk than originally forecast.
  • The Justice Department alleged that persons
    and/or entities involved with the project have
    made or have agreed to make improper payments in
    violation of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices
    Act.

17
NATIONALISATION OF RESOURCES
18
VENEZUELA
  • As the price of oil and other energy inputs has
    risen, countries have attempted to capture a
    larger share of the profits, often through
    nationalization of energy resources.
  • After renationalisation of its natural resources
    by revolutinary President Hugo Chavez Sixteen
    companies - including Chevron and Shell - did
    agree to new terms giving state oil company PDVSA
    at least a 60 percent state stake
  • Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) is the
    Venezuelan state-owned petroleum company. It has
    activities in exploration, production, refining
    and exporting oil, as well as exploration and
    production of natural gas. PDVSA dominates the
    oil industry of Venezuela, the world's fifth
    largest oil exporter.
  • In November 2005, PDVSA and its subsidiary in the
    U.S., Citgo, announced an agreement with
    Massachusetts to provide heating oil to low
    income families in Boston at a discount of 40
    below market price.
  • Similar agreements were later set up with other
    states and cities in the US Northeast including
    New York's Bronx, Maine, Rhode Island,
    Pennsylvania, Vermont and Delaware. Under the
    program, Citgo offered a total of around 50
    million gallons of heating oil at below market
    prices, equivalent to a discount of between 60
    and 80 cents a gallon.

19
  • In Feb 2007 Venezuelan investors were cheered by
    the government's deal to buyout the country's top
    electricity company from U.S.-based AES Corp.,
    lifting hopes that President Hugo Chavez's
    government may fairly compensate other companies
    it nationalizes.

Chavez triggered a sell-off in local stocks
when he announced the nationalization of
Electricidad de Caracas, or EDC, and other
companies as part of his plans to bring key
industries under state control.
The government on signed an agreement with A
ES to purchase its 82-percent stake in
EDC for
US739.3 million (569.3 million), a deal
analysts said appeared to fairly compensate AES
shareholders. Electricidad de Caracas has
been privately owned since its founding in 1885.
U.S.-based AES, bought a majority stake of
Electricidad de Caracas in a hostile takeover in
2000.
20
BOLIVIA
  • Though rich in mineral and energy resources,
    Bolivia is one of South America's poorest
    countries. Wealthy urban elites, who are mostly
    of Spanish ancestry, have traditionally dominated
    political and economic life, whereas most
    Bolivians are low-income subsistence farmers,
    miners, small traders or artisans.
  • The country has the second-largest reserves of
    natural gas in South America. In May 2006
    President Morales delighted his supporters but
    sent shockwaves through the energy world when he
    put the energy industry under state control.
  • Foreign energy firms were given six months to
    sell at least 51 of their holding to the state
    and negotiate new contracts or leave the country.
    Bolivia's 48 trillion cubic feet of natural gas
    are the second largest reserves in South America
    after Venezuela's.
  • Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales de Bolivia
    (YPFB) a state-owned petrol company of Bolivia
    was originally created in the 1930s. During the
    presidency of Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, YPFB was
    privatized along with numerous other state-run
    businesses.
  • Since the election of leftist Evo Morales, YPFB
    has been re-founded with the goal of using
    revenues from extraction of petroleum and natural
    gas to generate government funds and support
    social programs. In June, Gazprom revealed that
    it was in discussions to invest 2-3bn in Bolivia.

21
UNITED LATIN AMERICA
  • In early March, officials from Argentina, Brazil
    and Venezuela met to build perhaps the most
    ambitious energy project in Latin American
    history the Gasoducto del Sur, a 5000 mile
    natural gas pipeline that would stretch from
    Venezuela, through the Amazon rainforest, and
    down to the southern tip of Argentina.
  • The objective, according to the countries
    involved, is to ensure regional energy and
    economic security, while providing an outlet for
    Venezuelan natural gas.
  • Venezuela would benefit from greatly expanded
    markets for its natural gas. Argentina, a
    longtime gas producer, recently has had to reduce
    exports to meet rapidly increasing domestic
    demand. Brazil already depends on gas imports,
    largely from Bolivia, and is predicted to triple
    its consumption by the end of the decade.
  • President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela has labeled
    the proposal a 5,000-mile symbol of diminishing
    U.S. influence in Latin America. Enthusiastic
    support for the project from regional
    heavyweights, including Brazil and Argentina, has
    prompted others to describe the project as the
    first true joint venture of a political coalition
    determined to forge a new South American identity.

22
MEXICO OIL INDUSTRY
  • Mexico's oil industry is, in large part, a direct
    reflection of the country's economic well-being.
    As those who have been following global oil
    output are aware, production in Mexico has
    started to wane, and just might decline very
    rapidly.
  • Since the Mexican federal budget depends very
    heavily on oil revenues, the country may be faced
    with some tough times ahead, leading to increased
    pressures among its citizens to migrate north
    into the U.S.
  • While the government of Mexico claims it has over
    100 gigabarrels of oil, as of January, 2006, the
    prestigious Oil and Gas Journal estimated its
    proven reserves at only 12.9 gigabarrels.
  • The reason for the discrepancy is that, while the
    oil may exist in theory, in practice, politics
    prevents it from being developed.
  • The constitution of Mexico gives the state oil
    company, PEMEX, a monopoly over oil production,
    and the Mexican government treats Pemex as a
    major source of revenue, taking 60 of its
    revenues in taxes. As a result, Pemex has
    insufficient capital to develop the resources on
    its own, and cannot take on foreign partners to
    supply money and technology it lacks.

23
RUSSIA GAZPROM
24
  • Traditionally, Saudi Arabia has been regarded as
    the worlds undisputed primary source of oil and
    Russia has had to settle for second place. But in
    recent years Russia has re-nationalized and
    modernized much of its industry and that policy
    now appears to be paying off.
  • OPEC statistics show that in the period since
    2002 Russian companies have surpassed the Saudis
    as the worlds biggest oil producers on an
    on-and-off basis. The latest figures, however,
    have been hailed in Russia as evidence that such
    periodic production spikes are no one-offs and
    that Moscow really does have a right to lay claim
    to the number one spot.
  • According to OPEC, in June 2006 Russia extracted
    9.236 million barrels of oil, which is 46,000
    barrels more than Saudi Arabia. The statistics
    also showed that Russian production in the first
    half of this year increased to 235.8 million
    tons, a year-on-year improvement of 2.3
    percent.
  • There are fears that Russia is becoming too
    addicted to what politicians call the oil
    needle, and is doing too little to develop
    future revenue streams. Money from oil and gas
    accounts for 52.2 percent of all revenues to the
    state treasury and more than 35 percent of
    Russias exports.

25
  • Gazprom is the largest Russian company and the
    biggest extractor of natural gas in the world.
    With sales of US 31 billion in 2004, it accounts
    for about 93 of Russian natural gas production
    and with reserves of 28,800 km³, it controls 16
    of the world's gas reserves.
  • Apart from its gas reserves and the world's
    longest pipeline network with 150,000 km, it also
    controls assets in banking, insurance, media,
    construction and agriculture.
  • Gazprom provides 25 of all Russian tax revenues
    (averaging over US 4 billion annually between
    1993-2003) and accounts for 8 of the nations
    gross domestic product.
  • In 1997, Gazprom entered the Financial Times
    listing of the worlds top 100 companies by
    market capitalisation. Gazproms operations range
    from exploration through to processing,
    transportation and marketing. It supplies gas to
    virtually every region of Russia and exports to
    more than 25 European countries
  • Recently Gazprom announced that quarterly sales
    grew to 19.5 billion (second quarter of 2006),
    while quarterly net income reached 5.2 billion
    (second quarter of 2006)

26
  • Gazprom was foiled both in its attempt to acquire
    Rosneft, and its earlier attempt to buy the core
    asset of Yukos, when Yukos filed for bankruptcy
    in Houston. Fearing that it would fall foul of US
    law, Gazprom backed away from buying Yukos' main
    asset when the Russian government auctioned it in
    December 2004, leaving the more gung-ho Rosneft
    to buy it.
  • Yukos was one of the world's largest non-state
    oil companies, producing 20 of Russian oilabout
    2 of world production. Its assets were acquired
    in controversial circumstances from the Russian
    Government during the privatization process of
    the early 1990s.
  • On October 31, 2003, shortly after the arrest of
    the company's CEO, the Russian government froze
    ownership of 44 of the company's shares. The
    reason given was to prevent a group of
    shareholders led by Khodorkovsky from selling a
    large stake of the company to the US oil firm
    Exxon.
  • On 15th December 2005, based on a bank deposit of
    4M and its American CEO's Houston home, Yukos
    filed for bankruptcy protection in the United
    States, estimating its assets at 12.3 billion
    and its debts at 30.8 billion, including
    "alleged taxes owed to the Russian government".
  • Rosneft is a Russian integrated oil company.
    Although the company is an open joint stock
    company, according to its website, it seems to be
    completely owned by the Russian Federation, as
    represented by the Federal Property Management
    Agency.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com