Title: Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform
1Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform
- Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D.
- Dalton Tomlin Chair in Medical Ethics and Health
Policy - Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Houston, Texas
2Healthcare System or Gemish?
- A system is a clear, consistent, coherent,
centrally led and managed service or production
process - We do not have a healthcare system in the United
States - We have a healthcare gemish
- Private and public providers and payers secular
and sectarian providers federal and state
regulation - There are systems within the gemish VHA, Medical
Corps of armed services, Indian Health Service,
Hospital Districts in Texas - No one individual is in charge no CEO of US
healthcare - Healthcare professionals and organizational
leaders have always been in charge of patient
care and will still be under heathcare reform
3Professional Integrity
- Lead change the way it always occurs in our
democracy, from below - On the basis of professional integrity, a
professional virtue that governs in all
healthcare settings, systems and gemishes alike - Professional integrity
- Practice medicine, conduct research, and teach to
standards of intellectual and moral excellence - Intellectual excellence Submit all clinical
judgment, decision making, behavior, and
organizational policies and practices to the
discipline of evidence-based reasoning - Moral excellence Commit to the protection and
promotion of the patients health-related
interests as ones primary concern and
motivation, keeping individual and guild
self-interest systematically secondary - Gregory J 1772 Percival T 1803
- Healthcare professionals have an obligation,
based on professional integrity, to provide
quality healthcare
4Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
- Poor quality healthcare Unmanaged and therefore
uncontrolled variation in the processes of
patient care, resulting in (a) unmanaged and
therefore preventable mortality, morbidity, lost
functional status, and unnecessary pain,
distress, and suffering and (b) unmanaged costs - Provision of poor quality healthcare is
inconsistent with professional integrity - Intellectual excellence is violated by
non-deliberative clinical judgment and practice
that results in unmanaged variation - Moral excellence is violated by (a) preventable
mortality, morbidity, lost functional status, and
unnecessary pain, distress, and suffering and (b)
professionally irresponsible use of resources - Provision of poor quality healthcare is
economically wasteful, which is socially
irresponsible
5Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
- Quality healthcare Responsibly manage variation
in the processes of patient care, aiming to
improve outcomes - Identify components of the process of patient
care - Identify components that do not affect outcome
and eliminate them - Incrementally improve components that do affect
outcome, alert to risk of making things worse,
especially in complex processes of patient care - Patients preferences will be (steeply)
discounted - Quality healthcare is primarily a
beneficence-based, not autonomy-based concept
6Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
- Result of integrity-based improvement of patient
care The healthiest possible patient - Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention
- The healthiest possible patient is the least
expensive patient - Integrity-based improvement of patient care is
the means to responsibly manage the cost of
healthcare - Keep the horse (quality) in front of the cart
(cost)
7Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
- Improved quality of patient care will prevent
unacceptable opportunity costs - An unacceptable opportunity cost occurs when
clinicians use a clinically non-beneficial
resource for a patient and that use blocks access
to the resource for another patient who could
clinically benefit from the use of that resource - A major problem in responsible use of critical
care beds, e.g., patient with multi-organ system
failure on full code status
8Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
- Improved quality of care will also prevent
rationing - Rationing Denial of access to process of patient
care that is reliably expected, i.e., supported
in evidence-based reasoning, to be clinically
beneficial - Rationing is not permissible in integrity-based
clinical practice and organizational policy - Denying access to clinical management that does
not meet modicum of benefit test is not
rationing - Doing less than has been done in the past is not
rationing - Incentivizing use of less expensive but
equivalently effective clinical management is not
rationing - Healthcare professionals and organizational
leaders should openly refuse to cooperate with
organizational or health policies that result in
rationing, because rationing is destructive of
professional integrity and therefore destructive
of organizational culture of professional
integrity
9Response to Era of Accountable Care Organizations
- Accountable care organizations (ACOs)
- ACOs are best understood as affiliations of
health care providers that are held jointly
accountable for achieving improvements in the
quality of care and reductions in spending. - Greaney TL 2011
10Response to Era of Accountable Care Organizations
- Creating ACOs will not eliminate the healthcare
gemish - Physicians, other healthcare professionals, and
healthcare organizations already have ethical
obligation, originating in the eighteenth
century, that should guide the development and
leadership of ACOs To become and remain
accountable for the quality of patient care - John Gregory (1724-1773) called for
accountability of physicians to scientifically
sophisticated laypersons for the quality of
patient care - Gregory J 1772
- Thomas Percival (1740-1804) called for
accountability of physicians and surgeons to each
other for the quality of patient care - Percival T 1803
- Percival also called for leadership of healthcare
organizations to be accountable to the ethics of
clinical practice, with professional
responsibility disciplining economic concerns of
healthcare organizations - ACOs should be based on these long-established,
ethically justified forms of accountability
11References
- Greaney TL. Accountable care organizations the
fork in the road. New Engl J Med 2011 Jan
6364(1)e1. Epub 2010 Dec 22. - Gregory J. Lectures on the Duties and
Qualifications of a Physician. London W.
Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. In McCullough LB,
ed. John Gregorys Writings on Medical Ethics and
Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998 161-248. - Percival T. Medical Ethics, or a Code of
Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the
Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons.
London Johnson Bickerstaff, 1803.
12Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform
- Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D.
- Dalton Tomlin Chair in Medical Ethics and Health
Policy - Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Houston, Texas