Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform

Description:

Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D. Dalton Tomlin Chair in Medical Ethics and Health Policy Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:7
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: FSS53

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform


1
Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform
  • Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D.
  • Dalton Tomlin Chair in Medical Ethics and Health
    Policy
  • Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Houston, Texas

2
Healthcare System or Gemish?
  • A system is a clear, consistent, coherent,
    centrally led and managed service or production
    process
  • We do not have a healthcare system in the United
    States
  • We have a healthcare gemish
  • Private and public providers and payers secular
    and sectarian providers federal and state
    regulation
  • There are systems within the gemish VHA, Medical
    Corps of armed services, Indian Health Service,
    Hospital Districts in Texas
  • No one individual is in charge no CEO of US
    healthcare
  • Healthcare professionals and organizational
    leaders have always been in charge of patient
    care and will still be under heathcare reform

3
Professional Integrity
  • Lead change the way it always occurs in our
    democracy, from below
  • On the basis of professional integrity, a
    professional virtue that governs in all
    healthcare settings, systems and gemishes alike
  • Professional integrity
  • Practice medicine, conduct research, and teach to
    standards of intellectual and moral excellence
  • Intellectual excellence Submit all clinical
    judgment, decision making, behavior, and
    organizational policies and practices to the
    discipline of evidence-based reasoning
  • Moral excellence Commit to the protection and
    promotion of the patients health-related
    interests as ones primary concern and
    motivation, keeping individual and guild
    self-interest systematically secondary
  • Gregory J 1772 Percival T 1803
  • Healthcare professionals have an obligation,
    based on professional integrity, to provide
    quality healthcare

4
Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
  • Poor quality healthcare Unmanaged and therefore
    uncontrolled variation in the processes of
    patient care, resulting in (a) unmanaged and
    therefore preventable mortality, morbidity, lost
    functional status, and unnecessary pain,
    distress, and suffering and (b) unmanaged costs
  • Provision of poor quality healthcare is
    inconsistent with professional integrity
  • Intellectual excellence is violated by
    non-deliberative clinical judgment and practice
    that results in unmanaged variation
  • Moral excellence is violated by (a) preventable
    mortality, morbidity, lost functional status, and
    unnecessary pain, distress, and suffering and (b)
    professionally irresponsible use of resources
  • Provision of poor quality healthcare is
    economically wasteful, which is socially
    irresponsible

5
Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
  • Quality healthcare Responsibly manage variation
    in the processes of patient care, aiming to
    improve outcomes
  • Identify components of the process of patient
    care
  • Identify components that do not affect outcome
    and eliminate them
  • Incrementally improve components that do affect
    outcome, alert to risk of making things worse,
    especially in complex processes of patient care
  • Patients preferences will be (steeply)
    discounted
  • Quality healthcare is primarily a
    beneficence-based, not autonomy-based concept

6
Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
  • Result of integrity-based improvement of patient
    care The healthiest possible patient
  • Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention
  • The healthiest possible patient is the least
    expensive patient
  • Integrity-based improvement of patient care is
    the means to responsibly manage the cost of
    healthcare
  • Keep the horse (quality) in front of the cart
    (cost)

7
Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
  • Improved quality of patient care will prevent
    unacceptable opportunity costs
  • An unacceptable opportunity cost occurs when
    clinicians use a clinically non-beneficial
    resource for a patient and that use blocks access
    to the resource for another patient who could
    clinically benefit from the use of that resource
  • A major problem in responsible use of critical
    care beds, e.g., patient with multi-organ system
    failure on full code status

8
Integrity-Based Improvement of Patient Care
  • Improved quality of care will also prevent
    rationing
  • Rationing Denial of access to process of patient
    care that is reliably expected, i.e., supported
    in evidence-based reasoning, to be clinically
    beneficial
  • Rationing is not permissible in integrity-based
    clinical practice and organizational policy
  • Denying access to clinical management that does
    not meet modicum of benefit test is not
    rationing
  • Doing less than has been done in the past is not
    rationing
  • Incentivizing use of less expensive but
    equivalently effective clinical management is not
    rationing
  • Healthcare professionals and organizational
    leaders should openly refuse to cooperate with
    organizational or health policies that result in
    rationing, because rationing is destructive of
    professional integrity and therefore destructive
    of organizational culture of professional
    integrity

9
Response to Era of Accountable Care Organizations
  • Accountable care organizations (ACOs)
  • ACOs are best understood as affiliations of
    health care providers that are held jointly
    accountable for achieving improvements in the
    quality of care and reductions in spending.
  • Greaney TL 2011

10
Response to Era of Accountable Care Organizations
  • Creating ACOs will not eliminate the healthcare
    gemish
  • Physicians, other healthcare professionals, and
    healthcare organizations already have ethical
    obligation, originating in the eighteenth
    century, that should guide the development and
    leadership of ACOs To become and remain
    accountable for the quality of patient care
  • John Gregory (1724-1773) called for
    accountability of physicians to scientifically
    sophisticated laypersons for the quality of
    patient care
  • Gregory J 1772
  • Thomas Percival (1740-1804) called for
    accountability of physicians and surgeons to each
    other for the quality of patient care
  • Percival T 1803
  • Percival also called for leadership of healthcare
    organizations to be accountable to the ethics of
    clinical practice, with professional
    responsibility disciplining economic concerns of
    healthcare organizations
  • ACOs should be based on these long-established,
    ethically justified forms of accountability

11
References
  • Greaney TL. Accountable care organizations the
    fork in the road. New Engl J Med 2011 Jan
    6364(1)e1. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
  • Gregory J. Lectures on the Duties and
    Qualifications of a Physician. London W.
    Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. In McCullough LB,
    ed. John Gregorys Writings on Medical Ethics and
    Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, Netherlands
    Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998 161-248.
  • Percival T. Medical Ethics, or a Code of
    Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the
    Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons.
    London Johnson Bickerstaff, 1803.

12
Ethical Challenges of Healthcare Reform
  • Laurence B. McCullough, Ph.D.
  • Dalton Tomlin Chair in Medical Ethics and Health
    Policy
  • Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Houston, Texas
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)