Wellesley Speech - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Wellesley Speech

Description:

– PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sarah46
Category:
Tags: speech | wellesley

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wellesley Speech


1
Wellesley Speech DebateWorkshops
  • Parli Basics
  • Forming a Case
  • Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities
  • Leader of Opposition
  • Prime Minister
  • Members of Gov Opp
  • Style Tips

2
Forming a Case the Prime Minister Speeches
  • A Wednesday Workshop brought to you by the
    SpeechDebate Society

3
The Speeches
4
The Constructive
  • You will be presented with links, which you will
    then use to form a case statement (you will have
    10 minutes before your round to prepare, but its
    best to come to a tournament with at least 3 case
    ideas).
  • Establish the issues and direction for the debate
    and state a clear case statement (one sentence)
    that does not violate any of the rules.
  • Offer any further explanation or case background
  • The rules do not allow points of Information
    during your first or last minute, but the
    Opposition may ask points in the beginning to
    clarify the statement
  • Present a case consisting of arguments which
    support the case statement these 3-5 points
    should support your case statement, not just be
    related to the topic
  • (some credit to apdaweb.org)

5
The Rebuttal
  • Respond to any new MO arguments (dont spend too
    much time on this, max 2 minutes)
  • Crystallize the round into clear Government
    voting issues. The speech serves to frame the
    debate from the Government's point of view. The
    PM should explain each of the reasons why the
    Government has won the round and why these
    reasons outweigh the arguments the government
  • Point out holes in the flow- dropped arguments
    and explain their impact (ask the judge to count
    these dropped arguments against the Opposition)
  • No new arguments, only new examples
  • (some credit to apdaweb.org)

6
Constructing a Case
  • Creating fun and debatable cases can be
    difficult, so many debaters think of cases in
    advance. Although people think of ideas in
    advance, debaters should not research or
    over-prepare.
  • A case should be linked to the resolution, but
    as there are loose links that you can connect
    to anything, its not something to worry about
  • Your case should consist of the statement and 3-5
    supporting arguments
  • There are three requirements for case
    construction
  • Must not be status quo
  • Must not be tight or tautological
  • Must not use specific knowledge

7
Technicalities to Avoid
  • Specific Knowledge- cases which are based on very
    specialized information, generally, if you cant
    find out about it by reading the NY Times, its
    too specific
  • Tight Cases- cases which the opposition does not
    feel they are able to argue the opposition side
    of fairly.
  • Tautologies- a case or statement that is a
    defined truth -- while not necessarily true on
    face, the Government uses its right to define
    terms to set up the round in such a way that they
    cannot lose. Sometimes two definitions which are
    perfectly reasonable on their own can combine to
    form a tautology.
  • Example if the Government defines the judge as
    a devout Catholic priest and argues that he/she
    ought to refuse a marriage proposal, they have
    created a tautology -- no Catholic priest who
    believes in his faith would ever be married.
  • Truism- a self-evident truth.
  • Example Racism is bad.

8
The man
Damn. He is hot!
9
Travel Through Time Space
  • Time-space means that the Government team places
    the judge in the role of a particular person or
    decision making body at a particular time in
    history in a particular place or position. The
    judge must then decide the round based
  • Example "You are Bill Clinton in 1991, do not
    seek the Presidential nomination"
  • Note that the government does not have to
    specify each parameter or person, time and place.
    If these factors are not specified, assume the
    reasonable or average circumstance.
  • The Opposition should always have the
    opportunity to ask the Government exactly who,
    when and where a particular case is set. To
    introduce a time-space case, the Prime Minister
    should specify that the case is time-space and
    then clearly tell the judge "You are ____. The
    time is ____.
  • Time-space cases are subject to all of the rules
    for regular cases, including tightness and
    specific knowledge. Two extra rules must be
    considered in a time-space situation. First,
    events that have not happened yet or facts that
    are not yet true in the specified time period may
    not be used in a historical case. The second
    extra rule deals with the nature of making the
    judge a particular person or group. People are
    not the same and do not view arguments the same
    way. Adolf Hitler and Ghandi have very different
    views on arguments about war, race and religion.
    The psychology of the judges persona should be
    considered when judging the round or making
    effective arguments.

10
Opp-Choice? Wtf?
  • In an Opp-Choice round, the Government will
    present a case and then allow the Opposition to
    choose which side they will argue
  • Example Wellesley should or should not have an
    Alcohol Policy that ruins everyones social life
    the Opposition will choose if they wish to argue
    should or should not
  • Why would anyone do this?
  • It makes everyone look good wow, so smart, she
    can debate both sides of this case!
  • You may not really care about which side you want
    to argue, presenting your case as Opp-Choice is a
    way to get someone else to make the decision for
    you
  • Its fun!

11
Tips and Helpful Hints
  • Using buzzwords to refer to your case arguments
    is useful, but make sure you clearly explain your
    arguments
  • Case ideas can come from anywhere-- a paper from
    a class, a news article, a piece of legislation,
    even a TV show-- try not to make the case too
    specific, focus more on ethical or moral
    decisions
  • Check out the case ideas sub-conference in the
    Speech and Debate FirstClass conference
  • End with We beg/are proud to propose

12
Thats all folks!
  • For more details, check out the Parli Guide at
    www.apdaweb.org

I killed the President of Paraguay with a
forkhow have you been?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com