HPSC1008 Introduction to Science Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

HPSC1008 Introduction to Science Communication

Description:

Bond Villains. The Helpless Scientist. Inventions go out of control ... (from an analysis of over 900 horror movies in UK screened between 1931 - 1984) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: simon9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HPSC1008 Introduction to Science Communication


1
HPSC1008 Introduction to Science Communication
  • Lecture Six
  • Science in Fiction
  • Monday 10th November 2008

2
Science fiction or fiction about science?
  • Two ways of thinking about science and fiction
  • Fiction about science
  • Recognisable scientific contexts
  • Science fiction
  • Extrapolates from the known to explore the
    unknowns

3
Science fiction as popularisation
  • Neither form much studied as a means of science
    communication
  • Science fiction tends to be studied for what it
    says about society, not what it says about
    science
  • Sci fi often ignored by studies of popularisation
    because it is fiction therefore does not equal
    science
  • When it is noticed it is usually described in
    terms of its factual shortcomings
  • Or that it promotes false ideas about
    science/promotes unorthodox science

4
Scientists and science fiction
  • Unwritten rules of popularisation say that
    scientists must act to improve the image of
    science
  • If scientists want to be critical of science
    often do it in science fiction
  • Leo Szilard - critical of nuclear weapons
  • Fred Hoyle - critical of way science is run, and
    advanced certain unorthodox theories in his
    fiction (life from space)
  • Science fiction provides a degree of latitude for
    representations of science and society?

5
Science fiction - some definitions
  • Hard science fiction prides itself on being very
    accurate, but many different ideas about what
    science fiction is, or does
  • Robert Heinlein
  • ... realistic speculation about possible future
    events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of
    the real world, past and present, and on a
    thorough understanding of the nature and
    significance of the scientific method.
  • Arthur C. Clarke not prediction, but what if?
  • Alvin Toffler (futurist) sci fi is
  • a kind of sociology of the future a
    mind-stretching force for the creation of the
    habit of anticipation.
  • Sam Moskowitz (editor) science fiction eases
    the willing suspense of disbelief
  • H.G. Wells task of sci fi was to domesticate
    the impossible hypothesis

6
Early science fiction
  • Science in literature goes back as far as science
  • Has tended to be critical of science
  • Public sphere being used as a watchdog
  • When all is well no need to comment
  • Provided a sense of the relationship between
    science and society at the time of writing
  • E.g. Early Royal Society and BAAS mocked in
    Dickens (Mudfog Papers) and Gullivers Travels
  • and about our expectations/concerns for the
    future at the time of writing
  • New ideas explored. E.g. cloning, nuclear physics

7
Mary Shelleys Frankenstein (1818)
  • Classic example of early science fiction
  • About a scientist who cuts himself off from
    society
  • Abandons feelings and relationships
  • Will achieve his science whatever the costs
  • Classic playing God cautionary tale
  • Become a recurring theme and explanatory myth for
    new science and technology
  • See Turney, J. (1998) Frankensteins Footsteps

8
Representations of scientists in fiction
  • Haynes has identified 7 recurring representations
    of scientists within science fiction literature
    and film
  • What we call the stereotype
  • Just because it is a stereotype doesnt mean it
    doesnt tell us something.
  • Often see combinations of several.
  • See Rosslyn Haynes, 2003, From Alchemy to
    Artificial Intelligence Stereotypes of the
    Scientist in Western Literature Public
    Understanding of Science

9
The Evil Alchemist
  • Messes with nature for own gain, invents monsters
  • E.g. Dr Frankenstein, Dr Faustus, Dr Jekyll

10
The Noble Scientist
  • The Hero or Saviour
  • Often restores chaos to equilibrium
  • Has the scientific knowledge and skills to stop
    disaster

11
The Foolish Scientist
  • The scientist who is obsessed with trivia or
    gimmicks,
  • Or the absent minded genius
  • A very common stereotype

12
The inhuman researcher
  • Knowledge before values
  • Divorced from the social, emotional, and cultural
    norms
  • Again Dr Frankenstein

13
The Adventurer Scientist
  • E.g. Spacemen
  • Indiana Jones
  • Jules Vernes Captain Nemo
  • Star Treks Spock

14
The Mad, Bad and Dangerous Scientist
  • Common after WWII
  • Idea that a scientist could do a lot of damage,
    endanger the world
  • E.g. Atomic warfare
  • E.g. Dr Strangelove
  • Bond Villains

15
The Helpless Scientist
  • Inventions go out of control
  • Unleashes something by accident
  • E.g. nutty professor
  • Flubber

16
What are stereotypes for?
  • Haynes argues
  • Serve as a cultural shorthand
  • We dont take literally, but we collectively
    recognise them
  • Are part of the continuing folklore
  • Appear simple but represent complex ideas,
    feelings concerns etc
  • Very consistent historically
  • Also very difficult to contradict, extract or
    uproot
  • What is it about fiction that means it relies on
    these?

17
Fringe (2008)
18
Silverstones Narrative Frameworks
  • Mythic Narrative
  • Stories
  • Feelings
  • Metaphor
  • Images
  • Symbols
  • Cultural resonances
  • Dramatisation, entertainment, power, fantasy
  • MASS MEDIA
  • e.g. film, fiction
  • Mimetic Narrative
  • Content
  • Truths
  • Representations of fact
  • Words
  • Information
  • Argument
  • Literalness
  • Clarity
  • SPECIALISED
  • COMMUNICATION
  • e.g. science communication

19
Science in Film
  • Edison Studios made silent Frankenstein film in
    1910
  • James Whales Frankenstein, 1931
  • Spent 250,000
  • Made 12m
  • Showed the commercial appeal of horror to mass
    audiences
  • Example of film as a cultural amplifier
  • Middle class audience of the novel replaced by
    mass audience
  • Films need to speak in terms anyone/everyone can
    relate to

20
The standard (mythic) horror narrative
  • Start with a nice ordinary situation
  • Instability introduced
  • Instability removed
  • Stability restored
  • (from an analysis of over 900 horror movies in
    UK screened between 1931 - 1984)
  • Classic theme Scientist or scientific knowledge
    he has is cause of the instability

21
Science in Film II
  • Early twentieth century the mad german scientist
    very common
  • In pre-war films the scientist was the cause of
    the instability, due to a moral failing, had
    abdicated his humanity
  • Doctors only type of scientist who was still
    seen as moral
  • Fed into debate about socialised medicine in US
  • Post-war, the scientist seen outside of the lab,
    working for government
  • Where was the place of the scientist after the
    war?

22
The scientist as outsider
  • Often depiction of scientist displayed social
    tensions over role in society at time
  • Dresses differently, acts differently
  • Different social norms
  • Like any outsider figure
  • Scapegoat for social ills
  • Figure of fun
  • Possibly saviour
  • Main message - scientists are different

23
Sci fi films as indicators of current concerns
24
The 1950s
  • Invasion narrative, or unwitting disaster
  • Side effects of science
  • E.g. The Fly (1958)
  • New variation of the Frankenstein myth
  • Radiation causes problems now
  • Technology causes the disaster

25
Concerns about new technologies in film
Spider-man The Movie (2002) Bite of a genetically
modified spider
Amazing Spider-Man (1962) Bite of a radioactive
spider
26
The 1960s onwards
  • Since 1960s science less prominent as basis for
    horror in films
  • More about supernatural threats
  • Can often see the historical phases of technology
    reflected in these
  • More science fiction films about different
    technologies in their own right

27
The rise of the machinesfor better and worse?
28
1990s and the birth of the internet
a new kind of Frankensteins Monster?
29
The 1990s and the new genetics
Concerns over playing god?
30
Jurassic Park and PUS
  • Scientists were rather annoyed by Jurassic Park
  • Said it was overdramatic, violent, made science
    look scary
  • Science was inaccurate
  • Sound familiar?
  • Crichtons response Its only a movie!
  • Its there to entertain, why should science be
    accurate, its science fiction.
  • So should science on film be accurate?
  • As a medium, is more mythic than mimetic
  • Deals in stereotypes, cultural shorthands, not
    just about science, but about everything
  • If you want the facts.go read the book?

31
Jurassic Park (1993)
  • Author Michael Crichton
  • provide a serious warning about the dangers of
    commercialising molecular biology
  • the most stunning ethical event in the history
    of science
  • Same old narrative though
  • Updated commentary from mathematician about the
    unpredicability of messing with nature

32
Representations of science in other popular media
The comic bookvery similar narratives and
representations
33
Research Task - Week 6
  • Review of a feature film you have seen recently
  • Not just tell me the story
  • Think about
  • The narrative of science
  • How is the scientist portrayed? (Think Haynes)
  • Can we say anything about what might have been
    going on in society at the point it was made?
  • can set up a viewing maybe if you want?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com