Digital Cities and Regional Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Digital Cities and Regional Networks

Description:

Fibre Optics this is where the real opportunity ... Copper Cable traditional telco deployment and useful for the mass market ... There will be the knockers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: peter133
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Digital Cities and Regional Networks


1
Digital Cities and Regional Networks
  • Technologies, Risk and Return on Investment

Tony van Horik, MD, AAS (NZ)
2
Technologies
  • Fibre Optics this is where the real opportunity
    lies for Municipal Networks provides endless
    capacity
  • Copper Cable traditional telco deployment and
    useful for the mass market provides moderate
    capacity and still developing
  • Wireless (CDMA, 802.11,WiMAX) good option for new
    carriers for lower cost entry where there is no
    access to cable systems provides limited
    capacity
  • Satellite more expense for the end user but is
    available anywhere and doesnt require the
    establishment of expensive cabling systems
    (prices are dropping).

3
Why should Local Govt Invest?
  • Facilitate the spawning of new social and
    commercial initiatives (e.g. collaborative
    administration across the region, image sharing
    for healthcare, security cameras etc )
  • Enhances productivity and opportunities for
    existing industry
  • You are in the box seat to leverage off community
    owned resources and infrastructure
  • Carriers are reluctant to provide low cost, high
    bandwidth services

4
Leverage off existing infrastructure is critical
  • Without leverage projects are even less viable
    and no advantage gained over a normal carrier
  • Existing assets such as unused ducting and pipes,
    overhead cabling etc should be used.
  • Co-ordination of civil works activities such as
    road construction and water pipe laying used to
    lay common ducting systems
  • Use of Municipal buildings to house equipment
  • All infrastructure providers should be invited to
    participate

5
Carriers Reluctant to Provide
Why?
  • Are driven by short term return on investment and
    are currently risk averse
  • They are commercial companies driven by
    shareholders and cannot bank social and
    commercial benefits for the end user - only
    direct service revenues count toward service
    viability and their ROI
  • The margins on infrastructure are generally lower
    than on end user services carried by that
    infrastructure therefore why give it away to
    your competition

6
We must break the stalemate
How?
  • By a collaborative approach for the most
    efficient use of exiting infrastructure (NZ isnt
    big enough to have under utilised high cost
    assets)
  • Those receiving the benefits, either directly or
    indirectly, should be encourage to contribute and
    provided the vehicle with which this can occur
  • Making it easier not harder for carriers to
    be successful in areas of high risk investments

7
Quantifying the Return
A Suggested Process
  • Identify the key Regional tenants (initially
    Municipals, Universities, Schools, and Hospitals
    (MUSH)) for which Open Access broadband is a
    potential enabler for new business activities)
  • Qualify this potential by approaching key people
  • Aggregate the demand potential - this is the
    baseline
  • Assess the potential for regional growth and
    categorise as benefits
  • Red Benefits - these deliver hard tangible
    outcomes measured in Dollars (i.e. Cost Savings)
  • Orange Benefits intangible gains readily
    converted into Dollars (i.e. productivity gains)
  • Green Benefits not readily convertible to
    Dollars but a benefit nevertheless (i.e. social
    inclusion, innovative business opportunities,
    regional leadership)
  • The total return is the sum of the baseline
    revenue plus the benefits

8
Evaluation of Risks ?
Two parts to assessment
  • Assess the Risk / return profile of creating a
    Open Access Broadband Network? AND equally
  • The risk / return profile of doing nothing?

9
What are the Risks
  • Technology failure low. Use robust public
    network grade technology
  • Business failure high. No one will get rich in
    selling high capacity bandwidth. Set the business
    up for longer term success.
  • Lack of, or exit of anchor tenants. Ensure
    services and price match their expectations
    (including service level expectations)
  • Competitor reaction ( even though their prices
    may be higher, telcos can still invest more and
    provide higher value and quality services)
  • Political criticism answerable to rate payers
    and Government. There will be the knockers
  • Project failure through lack of capability sound
    partners required which understand technical,
    commercial and operational requirements of this
    business

10
Risk Mitigation
Some Recommendations
  • Build upon existing initiatives
  • Use the leverage of being a Local Authority
  • (i.e. lay ducts when roads are opened)
  • Identify and partner with quality providers/
    suppliers
  • Structure the network legal entity carefully
  • Adopt industry best practices installation,
    operational
  • Apply a consistent solution - dont build network
    islands
  • Assess the market needs (demand) accurately
    develop the need with anchor tenants
  • Create a five year business model (always
    consider the ongoing costs, exit strategy etc )

11
Reflection
  • This is about getting cheaper, faster broadband
    now.
  • If we hadnt got involved in power, water, and
    gas (and telecommunications) 100 years ago it
    wouldnt be there now
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com