Title: Tax Research Presentation
1Tax Research Presentation
- Gail Richmond, February 2007
2Questions About Tax Research
- Who Does It?
- Tax professionals
- Others
- What Do They Seek?
- AUTHORITY
- When Do They Look?
- Before transaction
- During transaction
- After transaction
- Where Do They Look?
- Print sources
- Microforms
- Electronic sources
- Why Do They Look?
- Planning
- Litigation
- General information
- How Do they Cite What they Find?
3Documents Reviewed
- CCA
- 200034029
- 200431012
- What do these CCAs have in common?
- What else should we ask about CCAs?
4CCA 200034029 Holding
- For taxable years after the year of the
kidnapping, although the issue is not free from
doubt, we do not think that the parents meet the
support test of section 152(a), even if the
parents continue to maintain a room for the child
and continue to expend funds searching for the
child. We do not think that under these
circumstances, these expenses constitute support.
Cf. Otmishi v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1980-472. In
Otmishi, the court stated that the taxpayer did
not provide any support for his child in the year
in issue, although he expended amounts to locate
his child who had been taken by the childs
mother.
5CCA 200431012 Holding
- You have requested our views regarding the tax
consequences of grant payments made under the
Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA), the
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM), and the
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) that are
used to elevate structures located on flood-prone
properties owned by individuals and businesses.
The programs are designed to mitigate the adverse
effects of future disasters. We conclude that the
foundation elevations provided to property owners
under all three programs are includible in the
property owners gross income under 61 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
6CCA Questions
- What is a CCA?
- Where can we find it?
- What gives the IRS authority to issue it?
- Who determines if the IRS is correct?
7Sources of Law
- PRIMARY
- Legislative
- Executive/Administrative
- Judicial
- SECONDARY
- Commentary
8Legislative
Statutes and treaties have legislative
historiescommittee reports, hearings, floor
debate, etc.
9When Is Constitution Relevant?
- Did Congress have authority for legislation?
- Did administrative agency interpret statute in a
way that comports with constitution?
The Constitution is not relevant to simple
questions of statutory interpretation.
10Statutes
- Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.)
- Title 26 U.S.C.--Divided into subtitles,
chapters, subchapters, parts, subparts, sections,
subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs,
sentences. - Other Titles of U.S.C.--ERISA rules in Title 42
- Uncodified itemssection 530, other
11Statutes 152
- Title 26 Internal Revenue
- Subtitle A Income Taxes
- Chapter 1Normal Taxes and Surtaxes
- Subchapter B Computation of Taxable Income
- Part V Deductions for Personal Exemptions
- Subpart (none)
Cite as 26 U.S.C. 152 or as I.R.C. 152.
12Statutes Dependents
- How did we find these sections?
- Table of contentsprint or electronic
- Indexprint or electronic
- Word searchelectronic only
- What do we do after we find them?
Read the statute Read an explanation
13Statutes Dependents
- Section 152section number
- Has several relevant subsections dont confuse
section with subsections - Subsections we isolate
- 152(a)
- 152(c)
- 152(f)
- We would look for other sections if we cared
about items such as dependent care credit
14Statutes Dependents 152(a)
- (a) In general. For purposes of this title, the
term dependent means - (1) a qualifying child, or
- (2) a qualifying relative
-
15 152(c) Qualifying child.
- For purposes of this section
- (1) In general. The term "qualifying child"
means, with respect to any taxpayer for any
taxable year, an individual - (A) who bears a relationship to the taxpayer
described in paragraph (2), - (B) who has the same principal place of abode
as the taxpayer for more than one-half of such
taxable year,
16 152(f) Other definitions and rules--
(6) Treatment of missing children. (A) In
general. Solely for the purposes referred to in
subparagraph (B), a child of the taxpayer (i)
who is presumed by law enforcement authorities to
have been kidnapped by someone who is not a
member of the family of such child or the
taxpayer, and (ii) who had, for the taxable year
in which the kidnapping occurred, the same
principal place of abode as the taxpayer for more
than one-half of the portion of such year before
the date of the kidnapping, shall be treated as
meeting the requirement of subsection (c)(1)(B)
with respect to a taxpayer for all taxable years
ending during the period that the child is
kidnapped.
17Pub. L. No. 106-554, App. G, 306(a)Community
Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000
- SEC. 306. TREATMENT OF MISSING CHILDREN WITH
RESPECT TO CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS. - (a) IN GENERAL.--Subsection (c) of section 151
(relating to additional exemption for dependents)
is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph - "(6) TREATMENT OF MISSING CHILDREN.--"(A) IN
GENERAL.--Solely for the purposes referred to in
subparagraph (B), a child of the taxpayer--"(i)
who is presumed by law enforcement authorities to
have been kidnapped by someone who is not a
member of the family of such child or the
taxpayer, and"(ii) who was (without regard to
this paragraph) the dependent of the taxpayer for
the portion of the taxable year before the date
of the kidnapping,shall be treated as a
dependent of the taxpayer for all taxable years
ending during the period that the child is
kidnapped."(B) PURPOSES.--Subparagraph (A) shall
apply solely for purposes of determining--"(i)
the deduction under this section,"(ii) the
credit under section 24 (relating to child tax
credit), and"(iii) whether an individual is a
surviving spouse or a head of a household (such
terms are defined in section 2)."(C) COMPARABLE
TREATMENT FOR EARNED INCOME CREDIT.--For purposes
of section 32, an individual--"(i) who is
presumed by law enforcement authorities to have
been kidnapped by someone who is not a member of
the family of such individual or the taxpayer,
and"(ii) who had, for the taxable year in which
the kidnapping occurred, the same principal place
of abode as the taxpayer for more than one-half
of the portion of such year before the date of
the kidnapping,shall be treated as meeting the
requirement of section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii) with
respect to a taxpayer for all taxable years
ending during the period that the individual is
kidnapped."(D) TERMINATION OF TREATMENT.--Subpara
graphs (A) and (C) shall cease to apply as of the
first taxable year of the taxpayer beginning
after the calendar year in which there is a
determination that the child is dead (or, if
earlier, in which the child would have attained
age 18).". - (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.--The amendment made by this
section shall apply to taxable years ending after
the date of the enactment of this Act.
18Statutes Past and Pending
- Current law is not necessarily the only law
- When was the child kidnapped?
- If in a prior year, was law different then?
- If worried about a future year
- Is any statutory change pending?
19Administrative/Executive
Authority
Why do we care what they say?
20Code Section 7805
- (a) Authorization
- Except where such authority is expressly given by
this title to any person other than an officer or
employee of the Treasury Department, the
Secretary shall prescribe all needful rules and
regulations for the enforcement of this title,
including all rules and regulations as may be
necessary by reason of any alteration of law in
relation to internal revenue.
General grant of authority interpretive
21Section 108 Income from Discharge of Indebtedness
- (c) Treatment of discharge of qualified real
property business indebtedness - (5) Regulations--The Secretary shall issue such
regulations as are necessary to carry out this
subsection, including regulations preventing the
abuse of this subsection through
cross-collateralization or other means.
Specific grant of authority legislative
22Regulations
- Treasury Regulations
- Title 26, Code of Federal Regulations for tax
(other C.F.R. for ERISA, etc.) - Divided into one chapter, followed by
subchapters, parts, subparts (but not always),
sections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs,
and other subdivisions.
23Regulations Types
- Final issued by Treasury Decision (T.D.) after
notice comment - Temp. issued by T.D. before notice/comment
- Prop. issued by Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
before notice/comment - In Progress announced in Semiannual Agenda of
Regs (Fed. Reg.) in Priority Guidance Plan
http//www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/2006-2007pgp.pdf
24Regulations
- Numbering System
- Divided into segments
- Treas. Reg. 1.61-4
- Temp. Treas. Reg. 1.71-1T
- Prop. Treas. Reg. 1.74-1
- Abbreviation indicates type (as does T)
- Number before decimal indicates part of
regulations (part 1 is Income Tax) - Number right after decimal indicates Code
- Final number indicates which regulation for that
Code
25Regulations
- Locating regulationssummary
- Looseleaf services (often right after Code )
- Check for Proposed Regulations some services
shelve them separately because they are not in
C.F.R. - C.F.R. (online and in print)
- Updated only once per year updating services not
as good as looseleaf services - Federal Register (online is easiest to use)
- Semiannual Agenda in Fed. Reg. online
26Treas. Reg. 1.151-2 Additional exemptions for
dependents. T.D. 6231, 4/25/57, amend T.D. 7114,
5/17/71.
- Caution The Treasury has not yet amended Reg
1.151-2 to reflect changes made by 108-311, P.L.
106-554, P.L. 104-188, P.L. 103-66, P.L. 101-508,
P.L. 100-647, P.L. 99-514, P.L. 98-369, P.L.
97-34, P.L. 95-600. - (a) Section 151(e) allows to a taxpayer an
exemption for each dependent (as defined in
section 152) whose gross income (as defined in
section 61) for the calendar year in which the
taxable year of the taxpayer begins is less than
the amount provided in section 151(e)(1)(A)
applicable to the taxable year of the taxpayer,
or who is a child of the taxpayer and who
Does this tell you anything useful?
27Rulings Officially Published
- Revenue Rulings and Revenue Procedures
- Provide guidance before regs issued or in lieu of
regs - Published in weekly Internal Revenue Bulletin
(I.R.B.) - No notice and comment requirements
- Numbered by Year (Rev. Rul. 2007-1 Rev. Proc.
2007-1) - Number doesnt indicate Code section
- Must indicate Rev. Rul. or Rev. Proc. because
duplicate numbering system - Several items updated at least annually
- Inflation adjustments, ruling request procedures
- I.R.B. also contains Notices and Announcements
28Rulings Private
- Letter Rulings (PLR) and Technical Advice
Memoranda (TAM) - Binding only with respect to recipient taxpayer
- IRS makes available because of Freedom of
Information Act but not in I.R.B. - Numbered by Year (PLR 200504022)
- Number doesnt indicate Code section
- Common rather than duplicative numbering system
- PLR requested before transaction TAM during
audit of transaction.
29Chief Counsel Advice 6110(i)(1)
- (1) Chief Counsel Advice defined.
- (A) In general. For purposes of this section, the
term "Chief Counsel advice" means written advice
or instruction, under whatever name or
designation, prepared by any national office
component of the Office of Chief Counsel which - (i) is issued to field or service center
employees of the Service or regional or district
employees of the Office of Chief Counsel and - (ii) conveys
- (I) any legal interpretation of a revenue
provision - (II) any Internal Revenue Service or Office of
Chief Counsel position or policy concerning a
revenue provision or - (III) any legal interpretation of State law,
foreign law, or other Federal law relating to the
assessment or collection of any liability under a
revenue provision. - (B) Revenue provision defined. For purposes of
subparagraph (A), the term "revenue provision"
means any existing or former internal revenue
law, regulation, revenue ruling, revenue
procedure, other published or unpublished
guidance, or tax treaty, either in general or as
applied to specific taxpayers or groups of
specific taxpayers. - (2) Additional documents treated as Chief
Counsel advice. - The Secretary may by regulation provide that
this section shall apply to any advice or
instruction prepared and issued by the Office of
Chief Counsel which is not described in paragraph
(1) .
30Locating IRS Guidance
- Looseleaf service annotations
- Online search by Code/Regs section or words
- Lexis and Westlaw have tax-specific libraries
- CCH RIA have online tax services BNA and Tax
Analysts are also tax-specific - IRS website
- www.irs.gov
31IRS Website
32IRS Website Search Function
33Westlaw Partial List of IRS Documents
34Judicial Sources
- Who decides if administrative Interpretation is
correct? - Congress could change by statute
- Court could reject administrative interpretation
- So must check for court decisions
35Court Structure Trial Appellate
IRS acquiescence, non-acq., AOD also relevant
36Trial Courts
- Tax Court (one judge, no jury, judge comes to
town) (can litigate without paying tax in
advance) full court may review and issue
concurrences/dissents - District Court (one judge, may have jury)
- Bankruptcy Court (one judge, no jury)
- Court of Federal Claims (one judge, no jury
usually sits in DC) (used to avoid bad precedent
in circuit of residence)
37Tax Court
- Opinions
- Regular (published by court in T.C.)
- Memorandum (published commercially as T.C.M. or
T.C. Memo) - Small Case (T.C. Summary). Decisions cant be
appealed and are not precedent. - All types on Tax Court website but not as
retrospective as Lexis or Westlaw.
http//www.ustaxcourt.gov (Regular
Memo,9/25/95- Summary,1/1/01-)
38Appellate Courts
- Bankruptcy Court ? District court or circuit
B.A.P. (sometimes direct to Circuit court) - District Court? Circuit court for residence
- Tax Court ?Circuit court for residence
- Court of Federal Claims ?Federal Circuit
- Circuit courts ?Supreme Court (few cases rarely
based on const. issues, so Congress can
overrule by amending statute)
39Precedent
- All courts follow S. Ct decisions. Tax Ct and
Dist. Ct follow decisions of circuit that will
hear the appeal - Tax Ct--different results possible if different
circuit courts - Ct of Fed. Claims follows decisions of Fed.
Circ. taxpayers can sue here to avoid
unfavorable precedent in home circuit
40Locating Opinions
- Looseleaf services
- Annotations
- Links to full text in online version
- Online searches by Code/Regs section or words in
looseleaf or at court websites - Individual courts have limited retrospective
coverage - Online searches in Lexis, Westlaw, CCH, RIA,
etc. services (online more current than CD-ROM)
41Citators
- Print Shepards Shepards Federal Tax (covers
Tax Court better than regular Shepards) RIA
Citator CCH Citator - RIA and CCH are case-name-based
- RIA and Shepards use symbols for outcome and
syllabus number - Only Shepards covers statutes and regulations
- Online ?easier to use and more current
(Shepards, KeyCite, RIA, CCH)
42Looseleaf Services print/electronic
- Looseleaf servicesweekly updating annotations
for finding authority full text of many items.
RIA USTR CCH SFTR Mertens, Law of Federal
Income Taxation Tax Management Portfolios - Some arranged by Code others by topic
- Cross-references page, , or
43Articles Indices
- Periodicals and IndexesCCH Federal Tax Articles
WGL Index to Federal Tax Articles (both print
only) - Lexis and Westlaw cover articles online
- Current Law Index (Legal Resource Index) doesnt
go back as far as Index to Legal Periodicals - Tax Notes (major publication) isnt indexed by
ILP - HeinOnline
44Hints
- Use proper citation format in transmitting
results - Helps reviewer find cited items
- Avoids confusion
- U.S.T.C. ? T.C.
- PLR, TAM, and many CCA documents share numbering
system, but only PLR TAM are substantial
authority for avoiding certain penalties
45Hints
- Erroneous referencesnever refer to the
Helvering case. He was the Commissioner. - Note the taxpayers first name as well as last
it may come in handy if youve made an error on
the case citation - For bankruptcy cases, note the trustees name
some services cite by bankrupt and others by
trustee - If using a looseleaf service, indicate whether
reference is to a page, , or
46Hints
- Dont assume an IRS acq. means they wont
litigate. It may be an acq. in result only but
not in reasoning. - Dont confuse enactment, effective, and sunset
dates - Check coverage dates and updating frequency
before beginning research - Electronicmay not be retrospective enough
- CD/DVDupdated less frequently than online or
print services
47Hints
- Dont assume definitions used elsewhere translate
into tax definitions - Section 71(b) defines alimony without regard to
what divorce court calls a payment - Al-Murshidi v. Commr, T.C. Summary Opinion
2001-185. Doctor called the surgery cosmetic
judge allowed deduction.
48Useful Sites
- IRS www.irs.gov
- Treasury (tax policy) http//www.ustreas.gov/
- House Ways Means http//waysandmeans.house.gov/
- Senate Finance http//finance.senate.gov/
- Joint Committee on Taxation http//www.house.gov/j
ct/ - Tax Court http//www.ustaxcourt.gov/