Impact of trail network on landscape - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Impact of trail network on landscape

Description:

Vrchlab , Czech Republic. GIS Laboratory, Institute for Environmental Studies ... Praha, Czech Republic. Krkono e - outstanding nature ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: navce9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Impact of trail network on landscape


1
Impact of trail network on landscape
  • MSc. Ondrej Vítek
  • Impact of road and tourist trail network on
    alpine and subalpine landscape in the Krkonoe
    Mts. - GPS measurements and GIS evaluation

GIS Laboratory, Institute for Environmental
Studies Charles University, Faculty of Science P
raha, Czech Republic The Krkonoe Mts. National
Park Administration Vrchlabí, Czech Republic
2
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

3
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

4
  • Krkonoe - outstanding nature
  • visible problem - road effect expansion
    invasion
  • indicators individuals vs. communities
  • area of interest
  • targets

Find out the extent of non-natural growths
Find out main reasons for distribution/extinction
Propose improving activities
5
KRKONOE MTS.
  • National park (1963)
  • Krkonoe/Karkonosze Biosphere reserve (1992)
  • Weak subalpine nature vs. tourism
  • grassland, peat-bogs, corries, Swiss Mountain
    Pine stands,
  • trails roads, chalets, viewpoints, tourists, ...

6
natural state
naturally occuring species (no influence)
7
expansion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
8
expansion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
9
expansion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
10
expansion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
11
expansion
f
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
12
natural state
naturally occuring species (no influence)
13
invasion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
invading species
14
invasion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
invading species
15
invasion
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
invading species
16
invasion
f
stable species expanding species (positive influe
nce of trail network) disappearing species (negat
ive influence of trail network)
invading species
17
Indicators individuals vs. communities
  • expansion invasion - pictures of individuals
  • summarising research - mapping of communities
    (all or only several types)

18
Area of interest
  • Krkonoe Mts. - high tourism exploatation and
    outstanding nature
  • alpine nature - little visible influence on
    vegetation
  • mountain veg. belt - giant impact of forestry
  • subalpine communities - effect of trails best
    visible

19
Area of interest II
  • 6.8 km2 on Czech side until 1999
  • ca 10 km2 on both Czech and Polish sides since
    1999

20
  • Krkonoe - outstanding nature
  • visible problem - road effect expansion
    invasion
  • indicators individuals vs. communities
  • area of interest
  • targets

Find out the extent of non-natural growths
Find out main reasons for distribution/extinction
Propose improving activities
21
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

22
  • target 1 Find out the extent of non-natural
    growths
  • GPS - position info (database)
  • GIS - maintenance and evaluation of data

23
  • target 2 Find out main reasons for
    distribution/extinction
  • GIS - combination of GPS data (e.g. average width
    of TMV vs. trail stabilising material)
  • other sampling methods (counting tourists,
    botany, water, soil etc.)

24
  • target 3 Propose improving activities
  • complex analysis of all data, field observations
    and experience

25
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

26
TRIMBLE data dictionary (.ddf)
  • community
  • according to dominant (menu)
  • Senecio hercynicus
  • Rumex alpinus
  • Cirsium heterophyllum
  • Calamagrostis villosa
  • Deschampsia cespitosa
  • ruderal comm. around chalets
  • trampled grass
  • veg. covering
  • other comm. (text) - different type or
    co-dominants

27
TRIMBLE data dictionary (.ddf)
  • trail
  • according to restrictions (menu)
  • open
  • closed
  • according to stabilising material (menu)
  • asphalt
  • dolomite
  • melaphyre
  • dolomite/melaphyre mix.
  • autochthonous stab.
  • non-stabilised
  • according to seasonality (menu)
  • summer
  • winter
  • full-year

28
TRIMBLE data dictionary (.ddf)
  • individual species (menu)
  • sampling point (number)
  • viewpoint (text)
  • drainage (menu)
  • phytosociological relevé (number)
  • bunker
  • crossroad sign (text number)
  • frontier stone (text)
  • anthropogenous relief shapes (menu number)

29
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

30
Definition of borders
  • trails
  • vegetation types

31
Difference between area/line/point
  • species occurrence (area/point)
  • how many idividuals are 1 point?
  • roads/trails/paths (area/line)
  • community (area/0) - comm. width

32
PDOP
  • max. 6 ? accuracy - 40 cm
  • max. ? ? inaccuracy max. 40 cm
  • periods of PDOP 6
  • distance to the reference station (150 km)

33
other problems of field measurement
  • stormy weather
  • swinging of antenna while walking
  • inquisitive tourists

34
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

35
ArcView, ARC/INFO
  • under construction
  • precision checked with othophotos and digitalised
    maps
  • GIS database - sums of area, length (total or by
    categories)

36
average width of TMV
37
trails according to tourist load
38
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

39
  • oldest trail map from 16th century
  • new roads bunkers before II.ww
  • trail density 4.5 km/km2
  • trails 1 of the area (71 trails stabilised
    with allochthonous mat.)
  • summer use 19 km (on 6.8 km2 area)
  • winter use 15.5 km
  • max. tourists 700 in ave. day

40
  • area of TMV 3 of AOI
  • absolutely dominating Senecio hercynicus
    (expanding species)
  • bioindicator of worst stands Rumex alpinus
  • ave. TMV width along asph. r. 32 m
  • non-stabilised trails no TMV

41
dolomite (limestone) Ca2
road
42
  • WHAT - introduction
  • HOW - methods
  • WHICH - overview of collected data
  • WHY - problems of measurement
  • HOW - GIS evaluation
  • WHAT - some interesting results

43
Ondrej Vítek
  • ovitek_at_natur.cuni.cz
  • www.labgis.natur.cuni.cz
  • - our GIS laboratory _at_ FSc, ChU, Praha
  • www.krnap.cz
  • - The Krkonoe Mts. NP Administration, Vrchlabí
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com