Title: EC Competition Law
1EC Competition Law
2EC Competition Law Its Base in the EU Treaty
- Article 2 establishing a common market
- Article 3(g) a system ensuring that
competition in the internal market is not
distorted - Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 and Merger Regulation
3Two Fundamental Points
- EC Competition law has an ordoliberal foundation
historically rather than a consumer welfare
approach - EC competition law is not completely autonomous
from other Treaty policies - E.g. A. 157(3) industrial policy
- Art 6 EC Environment
4Why have a Government Policy to keep Markets
Competitive?
- There is a paradox that to get the benefits of a
competitive market, a market characterised by
undistorted competition, it is necessary for
Governments to establish limits to legitimate
commercial competition competition on the
merits - Markets that are unregulated tend towards cartels
and monopolies
5Competition Policy and Markets
- The purpose of EC competition law is to keep
markets effectively or workably competitive. In
legal terms undistorted This requires that
competition authorities attempt to keep markets
open to new competitors as well as offering some
basic protections to existing competitors. - Undistorted competition is meant to protect
consumers from exploitation by cartels as well as
exclusionary conduct by large firms. - It presses firms to behave more efficiently.
6Effective Competition and Efficiencies
- Allocative efficiencies
-
- Productive efficiencies
- Innovative efficiencies?
7How does EC Competition Law Promote Effective
Competition?
- EC Competition law uses three basic tools
-
- a law vs abuse of dominant market power (Article
82) - a law vs cartels and other restrictive agreements
(Article 81) - and a merger control policy
8The General Norms of EC Competition Law
- Article 82 prohibits abusive conduct by
dominant firms - Article 81 prohibits agreements which restrict
competition agreements between competitors such
as cartels and patent pools and agreements which
are vertical such as distribution agreements and
IPR licences. - Merger Policy - only allows mergers which do not
substantially impede competition differentiates
between mergers between competitors BMG/Sony and
vertical mergers AOL/Time Warner
9Competition Tools Focus on the Extremes of
Commercial Conduct
- Art 82 Abuses of dominance. Achieving dominance
by lawful means is acceptable - Art 81 Agreements must appreciably restrict
competition. Many restrictions necessary to
business are not caught. - Mergers only mergers that substantially impede
competition are prohibited - These leave wide margins to legitimate competition
10The Structural Basis to EC Competition Law
- Underlying EC competition law are two principles
- (1) certain market structures (market shares)
influence the conduct of competitors and the
performance of the market as a whole, i.e. the
structure/conduct/performance paradigm (Harvard)
- (2) structural analysis must be complemented by
an analysis of the process (actual behaviour) in
the particular market. (The Chicago School)
11Market Structures
- Perfect competition
- Imperfect competition including non collusive
oligopoly - Oligopoly which is collusive
- Monopoly
12Examples
- High market shares do not automatically equate to
high market power. Actual competition, potential
competition and barriers to entry a reality
check. - Oligoply. A concentrated market with few
players. Is there actual competition or tacit
coodination? E.g. roaming charges for mobile
phones - The process of competition on a market must be
investigated and analysed, not assumed.
13Article 82
- The prohibition of abusive conduct by dominant
firms
14Article 82 Abusive Conduct
- Prohibits conduct on the part of one or more
undertakings which amounts to abuse of a dominant
position in any market in the Common Market. - Examples of abuse are
- Unfair pricing excessive or predatory pricing
- Refusals to give access, to supply, to licence
IPRs or to give access to proprietary interface
codes. - Discriminatory pricing or dealing margin
squeeze - Tie-ins and exclusive contracts
15Article 82 What are the preconditions of its
prohibition?
- The firm must be found to be dominant in a
particular market. Once a firm achieves
dominance, it is given by law a special
responsibility not to further weaken competition
by engaging in abusive conduct - Achieving dominance itself is not unlawful. A
firm can grow to dominance by lawful competition.
Remaining dominant is not unlawful. Dominant
firms may still compete on the merits but they
must not use their dominance to compete
abusively examples predatory pricing (AKZO)and
exclusive contracts (Deutsche Telecoms)
16Article 82 The Concept of Abuse
- Article 82 has embraced a theory of economic
justice to limit the misuse of power by the
powerful, e.g. to strike a particular balance
between MNCs and SMEs. - It protects the consumer by protecting existing
competitors from abusive expulsion and new
entrants in a market from abusive exclusion. - The issue under current review is to what extent
the competition authorities should have to prove
not only a course of conduct which is abusive in
form but also conduct which has actual adverse
effects on consumer welfare
17Article 82 Its three Main Constituent Elements
-
- (1) A concept of relevant market
- (2) A concept of dominance
- (3) A concept of commercial conduct which is an
abuse of that dominance
18(1)Defining a Relevant Market
- Choose the product of the target firm
- Ask what are its functions and are there there
are any substitutes? - Example handsets like iPods-iTunes
- Any substitutes? Mobile telephones?
- Geographic market.
19Hilti An Example
Staple Gun
Cartridges
Nails
Or PAFS
20One or Two Markets?
- Products in systems
- Consumables? Copiers printers
- Spare parts and maintenance?
- Operating systems and applications?
- Aftermarkets
- Telecoms wholesale and resale
21Defining Dominance
- Position of Economic Strength
- Enabling the prevention of competition
- Power to behave independently
- Single Dominance and Collective Dominance
- Market Shares
- Barriers to entry
- See Section 4 of Discussion Paper
22(2) Defining a Dominant Position
- (1) Ordinary dominance considerable market power
but competitors exist in market - (2) Exceptional dominance (super dominance or
essential facility dominance) - (i) economic monopoly, i.e i.e. no alternative
technologies or products in market and - (ii) the product or technology is an
indispensable input or infrastructure to another
product in an after-market.
23MNC
SME
Commercial Solvents
Zoya
Raw Materials
Pharmaceutical Products
24Defining Abuse
- Unfair pricing excessive or predatory pricing
- Refusals to supply, to licence IPRs or to give
access to interface protocols to the prejudice
of consumers. - Discriminatory pricing or dealing discounts and
margin squeeze - Tie-ins and exclusive contracts
- But presupposes that firms are dominant!
25Exploitive Abuses
- Excessive Prices
- Limiting Markets
- Tie-ins
26Exclusionary Abuses
- Conduct that eliminates competition
- Continental Can
- Commercial Solvents
- Conduct that further weakens competition by using
methods different from normal competition and has
the effect of hindering existing competition or
growth of that competition. - Hoffman La Roche para 91
- Commission Discussion Paper section 5