EC Competition Law

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

EC Competition Law

Description:

... IPRs or to give access to proprietary interface codes. ... Example : handsets like iPods-iTunes. Any substitutes? Mobile telephones? Geographic market. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: san48

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EC Competition Law


1
EC Competition Law
  • An Introduction

2
EC Competition Law Its Base in the EU Treaty
  • Article 2 establishing a common market
  • Article 3(g) a system ensuring that
    competition in the internal market is not
    distorted
  • Articles 81, 82, 86 and 87 and Merger Regulation

3
Two Fundamental Points
  • EC Competition law has an ordoliberal foundation
    historically rather than a consumer welfare
    approach
  • EC competition law is not completely autonomous
    from other Treaty policies
  • E.g. A. 157(3) industrial policy
  • Art 6 EC Environment

4
Why have a Government Policy to keep Markets
Competitive?
  • There is a paradox that to get the benefits of a
    competitive market, a market characterised by
    undistorted competition, it is necessary for
    Governments to establish limits to legitimate
    commercial competition competition on the
    merits
  • Markets that are unregulated tend towards cartels
    and monopolies

5
Competition Policy and Markets
  • The purpose of EC competition law is to keep
    markets effectively or workably competitive. In
    legal terms undistorted This requires that
    competition authorities attempt to keep markets
    open to new competitors as well as offering some
    basic protections to existing competitors.
  • Undistorted competition is meant to protect
    consumers from exploitation by cartels as well as
    exclusionary conduct by large firms.
  • It presses firms to behave more efficiently.

6
Effective Competition and Efficiencies
  • Allocative efficiencies
  • Productive efficiencies
  • Innovative efficiencies?

7
How does EC Competition Law Promote Effective
Competition?
  • EC Competition law uses three basic tools
  • a law vs abuse of dominant market power (Article
    82)
  • a law vs cartels and other restrictive agreements
    (Article 81)
  • and a merger control policy

8
The General Norms of EC Competition Law
  • Article 82 prohibits abusive conduct by
    dominant firms
  • Article 81 prohibits agreements which restrict
    competition agreements between competitors such
    as cartels and patent pools and agreements which
    are vertical such as distribution agreements and
    IPR licences.
  • Merger Policy - only allows mergers which do not
    substantially impede competition differentiates
    between mergers between competitors BMG/Sony and
    vertical mergers AOL/Time Warner

9
Competition Tools Focus on the Extremes of
Commercial Conduct
  • Art 82 Abuses of dominance. Achieving dominance
    by lawful means is acceptable
  • Art 81 Agreements must appreciably restrict
    competition. Many restrictions necessary to
    business are not caught.
  • Mergers only mergers that substantially impede
    competition are prohibited
  • These leave wide margins to legitimate competition

10
The Structural Basis to EC Competition Law
  • Underlying EC competition law are two principles
  • (1) certain market structures (market shares)
    influence the conduct of competitors and the
    performance of the market as a whole, i.e. the
    structure/conduct/performance paradigm (Harvard)
  • (2) structural analysis must be complemented by
    an analysis of the process (actual behaviour) in
    the particular market. (The Chicago School)

11
Market Structures
  • Perfect competition
  • Imperfect competition including non collusive
    oligopoly
  • Oligopoly which is collusive
  • Monopoly

12
Examples
  • High market shares do not automatically equate to
    high market power. Actual competition, potential
    competition and barriers to entry a reality
    check.
  • Oligoply. A concentrated market with few
    players. Is there actual competition or tacit
    coodination? E.g. roaming charges for mobile
    phones
  • The process of competition on a market must be
    investigated and analysed, not assumed.

13
Article 82
  • The prohibition of abusive conduct by dominant
    firms

14
Article 82 Abusive Conduct
  • Prohibits conduct on the part of one or more
    undertakings which amounts to abuse of a dominant
    position in any market in the Common Market.
  • Examples of abuse are
  • Unfair pricing excessive or predatory pricing
  • Refusals to give access, to supply, to licence
    IPRs or to give access to proprietary interface
    codes.
  • Discriminatory pricing or dealing margin
    squeeze
  • Tie-ins and exclusive contracts

15
Article 82 What are the preconditions of its
prohibition?
  • The firm must be found to be dominant in a
    particular market. Once a firm achieves
    dominance, it is given by law a special
    responsibility not to further weaken competition
    by engaging in abusive conduct
  • Achieving dominance itself is not unlawful. A
    firm can grow to dominance by lawful competition.
    Remaining dominant is not unlawful. Dominant
    firms may still compete on the merits but they
    must not use their dominance to compete
    abusively examples predatory pricing (AKZO)and
    exclusive contracts (Deutsche Telecoms)

16
Article 82 The Concept of Abuse
  • Article 82 has embraced a theory of economic
    justice to limit the misuse of power by the
    powerful, e.g. to strike a particular balance
    between MNCs and SMEs.
  • It protects the consumer by protecting existing
    competitors from abusive expulsion and new
    entrants in a market from abusive exclusion.
  • The issue under current review is to what extent
    the competition authorities should have to prove
    not only a course of conduct which is abusive in
    form but also conduct which has actual adverse
    effects on consumer welfare

17
Article 82 Its three Main Constituent Elements
  • (1) A concept of relevant market
  • (2) A concept of dominance
  • (3) A concept of commercial conduct which is an
    abuse of that dominance

18
(1)Defining a Relevant Market
  • Choose the product of the target firm
  • Ask what are its functions and are there there
    are any substitutes?
  • Example handsets like iPods-iTunes
  • Any substitutes? Mobile telephones?
  • Geographic market.

19
Hilti An Example
Staple Gun
Cartridges
Nails
Or PAFS
20
One or Two Markets?
  • Products in systems
  • Consumables? Copiers printers
  • Spare parts and maintenance?
  • Operating systems and applications?
  • Aftermarkets
  • Telecoms wholesale and resale

21
Defining Dominance
  • Position of Economic Strength
  • Enabling the prevention of competition
  • Power to behave independently
  • Single Dominance and Collective Dominance
  • Market Shares
  • Barriers to entry
  • See Section 4 of Discussion Paper

22
(2) Defining a Dominant Position
  • (1) Ordinary dominance considerable market power
    but competitors exist in market
  • (2) Exceptional dominance (super dominance or
    essential facility dominance)
  • (i) economic monopoly, i.e i.e. no alternative
    technologies or products in market and
  • (ii) the product or technology is an
    indispensable input or infrastructure to another
    product in an after-market.

23
MNC
SME
Commercial Solvents
Zoya
Raw Materials
Pharmaceutical Products
24
Defining Abuse
  • Unfair pricing excessive or predatory pricing
  • Refusals to supply, to licence IPRs or to give
    access to interface protocols to the prejudice
    of consumers.
  • Discriminatory pricing or dealing discounts and
    margin squeeze
  • Tie-ins and exclusive contracts
  • But presupposes that firms are dominant!

25
Exploitive Abuses
  • Excessive Prices
  • Limiting Markets
  • Tie-ins

26
Exclusionary Abuses
  • Conduct that eliminates competition
  • Continental Can
  • Commercial Solvents
  • Conduct that further weakens competition by using
    methods different from normal competition and has
    the effect of hindering existing competition or
    growth of that competition.
  • Hoffman La Roche para 91
  • Commission Discussion Paper section 5
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)