WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK

Description:

WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK? Singapore. March 27, 2006. William J. Honan. Holland & Knight LLP. TRENDS IN NEW YORK ... RIDER CLAUSE 94 'SCM Mexico' S.M.A. 3885 (2005) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:258
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: Law136
Category:
Tags: new | what | york | knight | rider

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK


1
WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK?
  • Singapore
  • March 27, 2006
  • William J. Honan
  • Holland Knight LLP

2
TRENDS IN NEW YORK
  • 1. A few years ago, there were hardly any
    time charters being done. Rates were low and
    owners were disinclined to offer vessels for long
    terms at those low rates.

3
  • 2. The forms haven't changed very much. For
    example, ASBATANKVOY dates back to 1977 and its
    predecessor Essovoy dates back to 1969, the year
    I started practicing law. At some point,
    disputed issues have to diminish.

4
  • 3. Traders and other charterers have adopted
    special provisions which have been refined to
    reduce the risk of exposure and dispute.

5
  • 4. Judges and arbitrators have shown a greater
    willingness to exercise their discretion in an
    effort to reach a just result.

6
S.M.A. RULE 30
  • The Panel, in its award, shall grant any
    remedy or relief which it deems just and
    equitable. . . .

7
ARBITRATORS POWER
  • 1. Arbitrators, in many ways, have more power
    than courts of law.
  • 2. Arbitrators have the power to fashion
    innovative remedies to resolve complex problems.

8
ARBITRATORS DISCRETION IS BROAD AND DEEP
  • 1. Require Security for Claim.
  • 2. Dismiss Claim That Lacks Merit.
  • 3. Require Adequate Assurance.
  • 4. Impose Conditions re Ongoing Performance.
  • 5. Order Specific Performance.
  • 6. Provide Injunctive Relief.
  • 7. Provide an Expedited Award.
  • 8. Award Legal Fees and Costs.

9
MARITIME CLAIM SECURITIZATION
  • 1. Arbitrators
  • Arbitrators have the power to require the
    defendant to post security in advance of the
    hearing(s) on the merits under circumstances
    they, in their discretion, deem just.

10
PRACTICE TIPS
  • A claimant in arbitration is more likely to
    obtain an arbitration panels order requiring the
    other side to post security if
  • 1. The claim appears likely to succeed.
  • 2. The claim is for an improper deduction or
    withholding of funds due to the claimant.
  • 3. The defendant is not doing business in the
    U.S. and may be able to avoid paying an adverse
    award.
  • 4. There are other circumstances that lead the
    arbitrators to believe that the defendant may not
    pay, e.g., a poor credit history or a pool of
    funds which may be disbursed to the defendant.

11
  • 2. U.S. Federal Courts
  • Under the Supplemental Rules to the
    F.R.C.P., a federal court, at the request of a
    claimant, has the power, without prior notice to
    the debtor, to cause a vessel, monies or other of
    the debtors assets to be seized and held pending
    a resolution of the underlying disputes.

12
RULE C ARREST
  • Need only a common law, statutory or
    contractual maritime lien

13
RULE B ATTACHMENT
  • Two Requirements
  • a) Plaintiff (i.e., the claimant) must have a
    maritime claim and
  • b) Defendant (i.e., the debtor) must not be
    found within the district.

14
RULE B FUNCTION
  • a) To secure the plaintiffs claim and
  • b) To obtain jurisdiction over the defendant.

15
PREREQUISITES
  • a) Is it a maritime claim?
  • b) Can the defendant be found in the federal
    court district?
  • c) Is the asset owned by the debtor?

16
RULE E POST-ATTACHMENT/ARREST HEARING
  • After the attachment or arrest, the defendant
    has the right to a prompt hearing
  • At the prompt hearing the plaintiff shall be
    required to show why the arrest or attachment
    should not be vacated . . . .

17
WINTER STORM SHIPPING LTD. V. TPI, 301 F.3d 263
(2nd Cir. 2002)
  • Electronic funds transfers, in the hands of an
    intermediary bank, are subject to attachment.

18
SEAPLUS LINE CO. LTD. V. BULKHANDLING HANDYMAX
AS, 2006 AMC 82 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
  • . . . Seaplus bears the burden of
    demonstrating, by a preponderance of the
    evidence, that the attachment is necessary to
    effectuate one of the two purposes of
    Supplemental Rule B
  • 1) Is it necessary to obtain jurisdiction over
    Bulkhandling?
  • 2) Is it necessary to receive any award
    Seaplus may obtain in the Hong Kong arbitration?

19
PRACTICE TIP
  • If you have a significant claim under a dollar
    denominated maritime contract and you desire
    security, you may wish to seek to attach assets
    owed by the other party to the contract even
    though the contract in question provides for
    arbitration elsewhere.

20
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING
  • a) You can commence a law suit in the U.S. to
    attach (or arrest) the defendants assets without
    waiving your right to arbitrate in accordance
    with the charter party arbitration provision.

21
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING (continued)
  • b) A foreign claimant can attach the property
    of a foreign defendant even if there is no
    connection with the U.S. except defendants
    asset(s) are located there.

22
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING (continued)
  • c) The funds or other assets that are attached
    need not be related to the transaction in which
    the breach occurred.

23
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING (continued)
  • d) You can seize the other partys assets
    without any prior notice.

24
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING (continued)
  • e) The court, in dealing with the attachment,
    almost never considers the merits of the
    underlying claim.

25
SIX ASPECTS WORTH REMEMBERING (continued)
  • f) Usually, no bond is necessary to obtain the
    attachment.

26
  • TIME BAR CLAUSES

27
6 OF COGSA, 46 U.S.C. 1303
  • In any event the carrier and the ship shall be
    discharged from all liability in respect of loss
    or damage unless suit is brought within one year
    after delivery of the goods or the date when the
    goods should have been delivered . . . .

28
SCANPORTS 1990
  • 20. Demurrage Claims. Charterer shall be
    discharged and released from all liability in
    respect of any claim for demurrage owner may have
    under this charter party unless a written invoice
    for the claimed demurrage and copies of ETA
    notices sent in compliance with voyage orders,
    notices of readiness at each port, pumping logs,
    and port logs/statements of fact for each port as
    well as all other supporting documents have been
    received by charterer within ninety (90) days
    after completion of discharge of the cargo
    covered buy this charter party or after other
    termination of the voyage, whichever first
    occurs. . . .

29
BPVOY 4
  • 20.2 Any other claim against charterers for any
    and all other amounts which are alleged to be for
    charterers' account under this charter shall be
    extinguished, and charterers shall be discharged
    from all liability whatsoever in respect thereof,
    unless such claim is presented to charterers,
    together with full supporting documentation
    substantiating each and every constituent part of
    the claim, within one hundred and eighty (180)
    days of the completion of discharge of the cargo
    carried hereunder.

30
PRACTICE TIPS
1. If the Owner a) seek to eliminate
altogether b) make the clauses mutually
applicable c) provide as long a period as
possible d) provide training to the persons
handling claims 2. If the Charter a) include
all claims not just demurrage and detention b)
draft the clause so as to avoid obvious loopholes
31
  • BACK-LOADING CLAUSES

32
EXXON MOBILVOY 2000
  • 19. BACK LOADING. Charterer shall have the
    option of loading Vessel with a part cargo at any
    discharging port or place to which Vessel may
    have been ordered,. . . . Owner shall discharge
    such part cargo at any other discharging port(s)
    or place(s) previously nominated, provided such
    port(s) or place(s) lie within the rotation of
    the discharging ports or places previously
    nominated. If this option is exercised,
    additional time consumed awaiting berth and/or
    cargo and/or tank preparation and/or loading and
    discharging such part cargo shall count as
    laytime or, if Vessel is on demurrage, as time on
    demurrage. . . .

33
SHELLVOY 5
  • Back Loading
  • 38. Charterers may order the vessel to load a
    part cargo at any nominated discharging port, and
    to discharge such part cargo at a port(s) to be
    nominated by Charterers within the range
    specified in Part I(E) and within the rotation of
    the discharging ports previously nominated,
    provided that such part cargo is of the
    description specified in Part I(F) and that the
    master in his absolute discretion determines that
    this cargo can be loaded, segregated and
    discharged without risk of contamination by, or
    of, any other cargo remaining on board.
  • Charterers shall pay a lump sum freight in
    respect of such part cargo calculated at the
    demurrage rate specified in Part I(J) on any
    additional time used by the vessel as a result of
    loading, carrying or discharging such part cargo.

34
27. KOCH DISCHARGE/RELOAD
  • 27.1 Charterer has the option to discharge all
    or part cargo at one safe port or lighterage
    location and reload same or different cargo in
    same or different port or place for final
    discharge on the same voyage within agreed ranges
    as specified in Part I of this Charter Party.

35
PRACTICE TIPS
  • If Owner
  • Exclude if possible
  • Make sure the new discharge port is in the same
    rotation
  • Make sure WS is the applicable freight
  • Insert deadline for exercise of charterers
    right to reload
  • If Charterer
  • Include if possible
  • Draft as widely as possible (see Koch clause)
  • Use demurrage rate as the measure of
    compensation

36
  • ARREST OFF-HIRE CLAUSE

37
RIDER CLAUSE 94
  • SCM Mexico S.M.A. 3885 (2005)
  • Should the vessel be delayed, detained or
    arrested during the currency of this charter at
    the suit of any party having or purporting to
    have a claim against or any interest in the
    vessel, Master, crew or owners, hire under this
    charter party shall not be payable in respect of
    any period during which the vessel is not at
    charterers full disposal and the consequential
    time and expenses resulting from same which the
    charterers incur are to be for owners account.

38
CAPTURE, SEIZURE, ARREST CLAUSE
  • The Doric Pride 2006 All ER(D) 173
  • Should the vessel be captured or seized or
    detained or arrested by any authority or by any
    legal process . . . the payment of hire shall be
    suspended until the time of her release, . . . ,
    unless such capture or seizure or detention or
    arrest is occasioned by any personal act or
    omission or default of the charterers or their
    agents or by reason of cargo carried or calling
    port of trading under this charter.

39
  • DEADFREIGHT OFFSETS

40
(2006) LLOYDS MARITIME NEWS LETTER 685 (Feb.
23, 2006)
  • Arbitrators Checklist
  • 1. Charterer is to pay full dead freight.
  • 2. Laytime is calculated on bill of lading
    cargo.
  • 3. A separate laytime calculation is performed
    for bill of lading cargo plus deadfreight.
  • 4. Owner is to concede any benefits.
  • 5. Charterer is to concede any benefits.
  • 6. A deadfreight balance is produced and
    incorporated into the final freight account.

41
OWNERS BENEFITS
  • 1. Savings in Time
  • - demurrage rate
  • - market rate
  • 2. Bunkers
  • - bunkers in port
  • 3. Port Charges

42
WHAT IS NEW IN NEW YORK?
  • Singapore
  • March 27, 2006
  • William J. Honan
  • Holland Knight LLP
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com