Title: Merger of Mass Turnpike and Mass Highways
1Merger of Mass Turnpike and Mass Highways
2Assessment process for considering a merger
between the Mass Turnpike and Mass Highways
Quantify on-going operating savings
Identify one-time revenues liberated by merger
Assess budgetary and debt service implications
- Do functional duplications exist within both
organizations? - Are MassHighway operations more efficient than
Turnpike operations? - Can equipment and facilities be be shared?
- Can restricted reserves be liberated?
- Can outstanding debt be refinanced?
- Can redundant land and facilities be sold?
- Is it prudent for the Commonwealth to absorb 2.5
billion in existing Turnpike debt?
3The Turnpike generates a loss from its core
operations, thereby requiring the on-going use of
one-timers to meet its obligations
4The Turnpike is an expensive road to run
Interstate lane miles and Western Turnpike
All state lane miles
Interstate lane miles
5yet, the Turnpike is not a better road
Centerline miles of Interstate Highway
Source Pavement Management Data report 2001-02.
6Specific MTA and MHD operating costs have been
reviewed
Overhead
Executive, planning, development, HQ supplies
general expense, custodial, HQ utilities
CFO, budget, audit (non-toll), purchasing,
insurance admin, cash mgt., credit union mgt.
Civil rights, personnel admin, employ. relations,
benefits, training, workers comp admin, pension
admin, payroll, occupational safety, T-passes,
credit union
IT services, information systems, computer aided
design
Community relations, advertising, tourism and
marketing, community services, patron services,
Legal
OM
Field engineering, engineering services,
communications, environment engineering, highway
engineering, research and materials, construction
engineering, right of way
Field personnel and OT, facilities mgt., highway
operations, maintenance admin., district
utilities, fleet mgt. and maintenance, service
area maintenance, signage, carpentry, striping,
litter, landscaping, machine shop
Excluded Costs
Toll collection, toll equipment, toll audit, toll
training and logistics, ETC enforcement
Public safety administration, police patrol,
special details
All CA/T related costs, tunnel utilities, tunnel
maintenance, Route 3 north project
Parking operations
All snow and ice operations
7Scale drives significant overhead productivity
advantages at MHD
Turnpike
Mass Highways
Overhead cost per lane-mile
Lane-miles per FTE
MHDI-state
MHD
8Administrative productivity (detail)
Turnpike
Mass Highways
Total FTE
169
257
9Benchmarking toll productivity highlights
inefficiency
Required toll collector FTEs
MTA FTE reductions
3.3 FTEs per 16 hour lane and 4.96 per 24 hour
lane fully loaded employee cost of 70.7K 7.5
working hours per day, 5 weeks annual vacation.
Assumptions
10Savings are generated by eliminating duplicate
overhead, not by lower the quality of the road
1M
11Other sources of value
- Closure and sale of overlapping facilities and
depots
- Equipment and machine shop sharing
12Up to 300M in funds could be liberated by a
merger of the Turnpike and Mass Highways
13Summary
Merger Rationale
Financial Distress
20M Annual Savings
Insufficient Accountability
- Cash flow negative
- Non-strategic, short-term decision making to
address financial problems - Risky financial transactions
- Disposition of critical infrastructure assets
- Ratings downgrades
- Eliminating duplicate overhead
- HR, finance, Admin, legal
- Toll collection optimization
- Staffing levels
- Complete the transition to electronic collection
- Increasing facility and equipment utilization
- Critical transportation assets are not controlled
by the Commonwealth - Capital spending and asset management is outside
of Commonwealth control - The state needs to control transportation
infrastructure - Surface artery park restoration is too important
to be built and run by an independent authority