Title: Presentation:The Operational Testing Of The CPC ACF-50
1This presentation has been cleared for unlimited
distribution by the Public Affairs Office
Security Office at the Naval Air Depot North
Island.
TRI-SERVICE CORROSION CONFERENCE San Antonio,
Texas / 14-18 January 2002
The Operational Testing Of The CPC ACF-50 On The
US Navys S-3B Viking Fleet
Speaker Edwin G. Mullin F/A-18 Structures Fleet
Support Team 4.1.6.0.0 F/A-18FST.3 Naval Air
Depot North Island COMM 619/545-0745 FAX
619/545-5160 DSN 735-0745 MullinEG_at_navair.navy.mi
l
2The Problem
- More Maintenance Man-hours are expended on
Corrosion Control than any other maintenance task
in Naval Aviation today. - Any products and/or maintenance actions that can
reduce the expenditure of excessive Maintenance
Man-hours must be aggressively pursued. - This brief addresses Operational Testing of the
CPC ACF-50 On The US Navy's S-3B Viking Fleet.
3Discussion
- Viking Mission
- Naval Aviations Operational Environment
- Initial Prototyping of ACF-50 in 1996/1997 and
the Results of that Effort - Expanded Prototyping of ACF-50 at
SEACONTROLWINGLANT and SEACONTROLWINGPAC - Documenting and Tracking Results
- Lessons Learned
- RCM Logic Recommendations
- Questions
4S-3B VIKING IS A MULTIPLE MISSION PLATFORM
- As a Shooter and surveillance aircraft
5Naval Aviations Operational Environment!
6Operational Testing of ACF-50on VQ-5 ES-3A BUNO
158862
- ASPA Inspection - July 1996
- ASPA Team
- Inspection Results
- ACF-50 Application
- ES-3A Operations over the Next 12 Months
7The operational testing of the CPC ACF-50 on VQ-5
ES-3A BUNO 158862 - cont
- T/M/S -
- S-3B in Lead
- ES-3A in Trail
- First use of ACF-50 on an ES-3A
8Operational Testing of ACF-50on VQ-5 ES-3A BUNO
158862
- Second ASPA Inspection using Same Team - June
1997 - Results revealed a 47 REDUCTION in corrosion
discrepancies - S-3 Maintenance Engineering Report MER NR.
002-97, MIL-C-81309, CORROSION PREVENTIVE
COMPOUNDS CPC, WATER DISPLACING, ULTRA THIN
FILM, ACF-50, released under DTG NAVAVNDEPOT
NORTH ISLAND R140908Z AUG 97. - NAWC Letter 4123 Ser 434100A/4065 of 13 Nov 97
- Aging Aircraft Program AAP, Affordable
Readiness Initiatives ARI Aircraft Equipment
Reliability and Maintainability Improvement
Program AERMIP
9Expanded Prototype Efforts - Sea Control Wings,
Atlantic and Pacific
- ACF-50 Application
- Fogged 16 S-3B Aircraft, 8 on each Coast
- 13 Non-Fogged Control Aircraft
- Corrosion Baseline Reporting
- Fogging was performed the week of 5 Jun 2000 at
NAS Jacksonville, VS-24 VS-30 and the week of 2
Oct 2000 at NAS North Island, VS-29 VS-33 - All Fogging was accomplished by O-Level
Maintenance Personnel - Technical Representation
- Lear Chemical Pacific Corrosion Control
- S3FST, RM Engineer
- 308 Day Corrosion Inspection Results Tracking
Reporting, plus NALDA Equipment Condition
Analysis ECA
10Corrosion Verification via Borescope
- Probe / Camera / Light Unit
11Photographic Documentation of Current Condition
- AFT STB AVIONICS BAY
- Peeling Paint
- TRAILING EDGE,
- STAB WING
- Corrosion
12Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging of the Inner Wing
13Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging the Aft Port
- Cargo Bay
- Fogging Inside the Engine
- Nose Cowl
14Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging the Trailing Edge Flap Well
- Fogging STAB Horizontal Stab
15Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging OWP Lower Spoiler Well
- Fogging into Wing Root Drain Holes
16Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging Horizontal Stab
- Using 8 FT. Wand
- Fogging Horizontal Stab
- Using 8 FT. Wand
17Fleet Operational Application / Fogging
- Fogging Port MLG Wheel Well
- Fogging Inside Nose Radome
18Information onACF-50 Prototype Effort
- Current Status
- Application Lessons Learned
- Effectiveness of Application
- Tooling
- Pressure Settings
19ACF-50 Pump System Tooling Lessons Learned
- Length of hoses - Dolly -vs- Cart - Quick
Disconnects - Wands
20Fogging Lessons LearnedFrom S-3B BUNO 158871
Horizontal Stabilizer
21CORROSION INSPECTION RESULTS
- Specific data is available in paper.
- Impact of ACF-50 on the Internal -vs.- External
Airframe Structural Boundaries - s are Sum of all Corrosion ECA-Malfunction
Code 170 of entire aircraft structure and
systems -vs.- s of Fogged Area Only - - Fogged WINGLANT S-3Bs had 31.6 less corrosion
then Non-Fogged S-3Bs - - Fogged WINGPAC S-3Bs had 37.5 less corrosion
then Non-Fogged S-3Bs
22Reliability Centered MaintenanceLogic
Recommendations
- Reliability Centered Maintenance RCM Logic
- Is there a return on our investment?
- Have we increased or decreased the
Organizational Level Maintenance Workload
Corrosion Control MMHRS? - Have other levels of Maintenance Intermediate
and/or Depot been impacted? - What impacts have been made on material
requirements and cost? - Based on our Fleet Support Team analysis RMs
recommendation is that the use of the CPC ACF-50
be incorporated into the S-3Bs regular
Maintenance Plan at the earliest possible date.
23ACF-50 Is Not a Silver Bullet. However, It Is a
Very Useful and Productive Tool That Enhances the
Ability of Our White Hats to Maintain Our Fleet
Assets at an Acceptable Operational Level!
A VS Maintenance Control Chief
24Speaker Edwin G. Mullin F/A-18 Structures Fleet
Support Team 4.1.6.0.0 F/A-18FST.3 Naval Air
Depot North Island COMM 619/545-0745 FAX
619/545-5160 DSN 735-0745 MullinEG_at_navair.navy.mi
l
QUESTIONS?
TRI-SERVICE CORROSION CONFERENCE San Antonio,
Texas / 14-18 January 2002
25Reassignment From The S-3B RM Fleet Support
Team To The F/A-18 Structures Fleet Support Team
Current Contact Information Edwin G.
Mullin F/A-18 Structures Fleet Support Team
4.1.6.0.0 F/A-18FST.3 Naval Air Depot North
Island COMM 619/545-0745 FAX
619/545-5160 DSN 735-0745 MullinEG_at_navair.navy.mi
l