M

About This Presentation
Title:

M

Description:

M&A Deal Structuring Process: Payment & Legal Considerations Learning Objectives Primary Learning Objective: To provide students with a knowledge of the M&A deal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:7
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Dona137

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: M


1
MA Deal Structuring Process Payment Legal
Considerations
2
If you cant convince them, confuse them.

Harry S.
Truman
3
Cross-Border Transactions
4
Learning Objectives
  • Primary Learning Objective To provide students
    with a knowledge of the MA deal structuring
    process
  • Secondary Learning Objectives To enable students
    to understand
  • the primary components of the process,
  • payment considerations, and
  • legal considerations.

5
Deal Structuring Process
  • Deal structuring involves identifying
  • The primary goals of the parties involved in the
    transaction
  • Alternatives to achieve these goals and
  • How to share risks.
  • The appropriate deal structure is that which
  • Satisfies as many of the primary objectives of
    the parties involved as necessary to reach
    agreement
  • Subject to an acceptable level of risk
  • Questions 1. What are common high priority needs
    of public company
  • shareholders?
    Private/family owned firm shareholders?
  • 2. How would you determine the
    highest priority needs of the
  • parties involved?

6
Major Components of Deal Structuring Process
  1. Acquisition vehicle
  2. Post-closing organization
  3. Form of payment
  4. Form of acquisition
  5. Legal form of selling entity
  6. Accounting Considerations
  7. Tax considerations

7
Factors Affecting Alternative Forms of Legal
Entities
  • Control by owners
  • Management autonomy
  • Continuity of ownership
  • Duration or life of entity
  • Ease of transferring ownership
  • Limitation on ownership liability
  • Ease of raising capital
  • Tax Status
  • Question Of these factors, which do you believe
    is often the most important? Explain your answer.

8
Acquisition Vehicle
Acquirers Objective (s) Potential Organization
Maximizing control Facilitating postclosing integration Corporate (C or S) or divisional structure
Minimizing or sharing risk Partnership/joint venture Holding company
Gaining control while limiting investment Holding company
Transferring ownership interest to employees Employee stock ownership plan
9
Post-Closing Organization
Acquirers Objective (s) Potential Organization
Integrate target immediately Centralize control in parent Facilitate future funding Corporate or divisional structure
Implement earn-out Preserve targets culture Exit business in 5-7 years Assume minority position Holding company
Minimize risk Minimize taxes Pass through losses Partnerships Limited liability companies
10
Discussion Questions
  1. What is an acquisition vehicle? What are some of
    the reasons an acquirer may choose a particular
    form of acquisition vehicle?
  2. What is a post-closing organization? What are
    some of the reasons an acquirer may choose a
    particular form of post-closing organization?

11
Form of Payment
  • Cash (Simple but creates immediate seller tax
    liability)
  • Non-cash forms of payment
  • Common equity (Possible EPS dilution but defers
    tax liability)
  • Preferred equity (Lower shareholder risk in
    liquidation)
  • Convertible preferred stock (Incl. attributes of
    common pref.)
  • Debt (secured and unsecured) (Lower risk in
    liquidation)
  • Real property (May be tax advantaged through 1031
    exchange)
  • Some combination (Meets needs of multiple
    constituencies)
  • Closing the gap on price and risk mitigation
  • Balance sheet adjustments (Ignores off-balance
    sheet value)
  • Earn-outs or contingent payments (May shift risk
    to seller)
  • Rights, royalties, and fees (May create
    competitor seller tax liability)
  • Collar arrangements (Often used when acquirers
    share price has a history of volatility)

12
Collar Arrangements Based on a Floating Share
Exchange Ratio (SER) to Protect Target
Shareholders1,2
  • Objective To guarantee an offer price per share
    (OPPS) within a range for target firm
    shareholders.
  • Offer Price Per Share Share Exchange Ratio
    (SER) x Acquirers Share Price (ASP)
  • Offer Price Per Target Share x
    Acquirers Share Price

  • Acquirers Share Price
  • Collar Arrangement Defines the maximum and
    minimum price range within which the OPPS varies.
  • SER x ASP (lower limit) Offer Price
    Per Share SER x ASP (upper limit)
  • Example A target agrees to a 50 purchase price
    based on a share exchange ratio of 1.25 acquirer
    shares for each target share. The value of the
    each acquirer share at the time of the agreement
    is 40 per share. The target shareholder is
    guaranteed to receive 50 per share as long as
    the acquirers share price stays within a range
    of 35 to 45 per share. The share exchange ratio
    floats within the 35 to 45 range in order to
    maintain the 50 purchase price.
  • (50/35) x 35
    (50/40) x 40 (50/45) x 45
  • 1.4286 x 35
    1.25 x 40 1.1111 x 45
  • 1For a floating share exchange ratio, the dollar
    offer price per share is fixed and the number of
    shares exchanged varies with the value of the
    acquirers share price. Acquirer share price
    changes require re-estimating the share exchange
    ratio. Floating exchange ratios are used most
    often when the acquirers share price is
    volatile. Fixed share exchange ratios are more
    common since they involve both firms share
    prices and allow both parties to share in the
    risk or benefit of fluctuating share prices.
  • 2SER generally calculated based on the 10 to 20
    trading day period ending 5 days prior to
    closing. The 5-day period prior to closing
    provides time to calculate the appropriate
    acquirer share price and incorporate into legal
    documents.

13
Case Study Alternative Collar Arrangements Based
on Fixed Value and Fixed Share Exchange Ratios
  • On 9/5/2009, Flextronics agreed to acquire IDW in
    a stock- for-stock merger with an aggregate value
    of approximately 300 million. The share exchange
    ratio used at closing was calculated using the
    Flextronics average daily closing share price for
    the 20 trading days ending on the fifth trading
    day immediately preceding the closing.
    Transaction terms identified the following three
    collars
  • 1. Fixed Value Agreement (SER floats) Offer
    price was calculated using an exchange ratio
    floating inside a 10 collar above and below a
    Flextronics share price of 11.73 and a fixed
    purchase price of 6.55 per share for each share
    of IDW common stock. The range in which the
    exchange ratio floats can be expressed as
    followsa
  • 6.55/10.55 x 10.55 6.55/11.73 x 11.73
    6.55 /12.90 x 12.90
  • .6209 x 10.55
    .5584 x 11.73 .5078
    x 12.90
  • .6209 shares of Flextronics stock issued
    for each IDW share (i.e., 6.55/10.55) if
    Flextronics declines by up to 10
  • .5078 shares of Flextronics stock issued
    for each IDW share (i.e., 6.55 /12.90) if
    Flextronics increases by up to 10
  • 2. Fixed Share Exchange Agreement (SER fixed)
    Offer price calculated using a fixed exchange
    ratio inside a collar 11 and 15 above and below
    11.73 resulting in a floating purchase price if
    the average Flextronics' stock price increases or
    decreases between 11 and 15 from 11.73 per
    share. (See the next slide.)
  • 3. The target, IDW, has the right to terminate
    the agreement if Flextronics' share price falls
    more than 15 below 11.73. If Flextronics' share
    price increases more than 15 above 11.73, the
    exchange ratio floats based on a fixed purchase
    price of 6.85 per share.b (See the next slide.)
  • aThe share exchange ratio varies within a range
    of plus or minus 10 of the Flextronics 11.73
    share price.
  • bIDW is protected against a potential free fall
    in Flextronics share price, while the purchase
    price paid by Flextronics is capped at 6.85.

14
Multiple Price Collars Around Acquirer
Flextronics Share Price to Introduce Some
Predictability
Price Increase Above Acquirer Share Price of
11.73
Fixed Share Exchange Agreement Allows Purchase
Price to Change Within a Range1
Fixed Value Agreement Allows Floating Share
Exchange Ratio to Hold Purchase Price Constant2
Price Decrease Below Acquirer Share Price of
11.73
1Fixed share exchange agreement represents range
in which acquirer and target shareholders share
risk of fluctuations in acquirer share price.
2Fixed value agreement represents range in which
the target shareholders are protected from
fluctuations in the acquirers share price.
15
Flextronics-IDW Share Exchange Using Fixed Value
(SER Floats) and Fixed Share Exchange Agreements
Offer Price Offer Price
Chg.1. (6.55/11.73) x 11.73 6.55 Chg.1 (6.55/11.73) x 11.73 6.55
Floating SER 1 (6.55/11.85) x 11.85 6.55 lt1gt (6.55/11.61) x 11.61 6.55
2 (6.55/11.96) x 11.96 6.55 lt2gt (6.55/11.50) x 11.50 6.55
3 (6.55/12.08) x 12.08 6.55 lt3gt (6.55/11.38) x 11.38 6.55
4 (6.55/12.20) x 12.20 6.55 lt4gt (6.55/11.26) x 11.26 6.55
5 (6.55/12.32) x 12.32 6.55 lt5gt (6.55/11.14) x 11.14 6.55
6 (6.55/12.43) x 12.43 6.55 lt6gt (6.55/11.03) x 11.03 6.55
7 (6.55/12.55) x 12.55 6.55 lt7gt (6.55/10.91) x 10.91 6.55
8 (6.55/12.67) x 12.67 6.55 lt8gt (6.55/10.79) x 10.79 6.55
9 (6.55/12.79) x 12.79 6.55 lt9gt (6.55/10.67) x 10.67 6.55
10 (6.55/12.90) x 12.90 6.55 lt10gt (6.55/10.56) x 10.56 6.55
Fixed SER 11 (6.55/12.90) x 13.02 6.61 lt11gt (6.55/10.56) x 10.44 6.48
12 (6.55/12.90) x 13.14 6.67 lt12gt (6.55/10.56) x 10.32 6.40
13 (6.55/12.90) x 13.25 6.73 lt13gt (6.55/10.56) x 10.21 6.33
14 (6.55/12.90) x 13.37 6.79 lt14gt (6.55/10.56) x 10.09 6.26
15 (6.55/12.90) x 13.49 6.85 lt15gt (6.55/10.56) x 9.97 6.18
gt15 SER floats based on fixed 6.85 offer SER floats based on fixed 6.85 offer gtlt15gt IDW may terminate agreement IDW may terminate agreement
1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73 1Percent change in Flextronics share price. A3.ll changes in the offer price based on percent change from 11.73
16
Form of Acquisition (Means of Transferring
Ownership) Governed by State Statutes
  • Statutory one-stage (compulsory) merger or
    consolidation
  • Stock swap statutory merger by majority vote of
    both firms shareholders
  • Cash out statutory merger (form of payment
    something other than common stock)
  • Asset acquisitions (buying target assets)
  • Stock for assets
  • Cash for assets
  • Stock acquisitions (buying target stock via
    tender offer)
  • Stock for stock
  • Cash for stock
  • Special applications of basic structures
  • 2-stage stock acquisitions (Obtain control
    implement backend merger)
  • Triangular acquisitions
  • Leveraged buyouts
  • Single firm recapitalizations
  • Key Point Each form represents an alternative
    means of transferring
  • ownership.

17
Statutory One-Stage Mergers and Consolidations
  • Stock swap statutory merger Two legally separate
    and roughly comparable in size firms merge with
    only one surviving. Shareholders of target
    (selling) firm receive voting shares in the
    surviving firm in exchange for their shares.
  • Cash-out statutory merger Selling firm
    shareholders receive cash, non-voting preferred
    or common shares, or debt issued by the
    purchasing company.
  • Procedure for statutory mergers Assume Firm B is
    merged into Firm A with Firm A surviving
  • Firm A absorbs Firm Bs assets and liabilities as
    a matter of law.
  • Boards of directors of both firms must approve
    merger agreement
  • Shareholders of both firms must then approve the
    merger agreement, usually by a majority of
    outstanding shares. Dissenting shareholders must
    sell their shares.
  • Voting rule exceptions Parent firm shareholder
    votes not required when
  • Acquiring firm shareholders cannot vote unless
    their ownership in the acquiring firm is diluted
    by more than one-sixth or 16.67, i.e., Firm A
    shareholders must own at least 83.33 of the
    firms voting shares following closing. (Small
    scale merger exception)1
  • Parent firm holds over 90 of a subsidiarys
    stock. (Parent-sub merger exception also called
    a short-form merger)
  • Certain holding company structures are created
    (Holding company exception) .
  • Advantages/disadvantages All target assets and
    liabilities (known/unknown) transfer to acquirer
    as a matter of law, flexible payment terms, and
    no minority shareholders or transfer taxes but
    responsible for all liabilities and subject to
    shareholder approval.

1This effectively limits the acquirer to issuing
no more than 20 of its total shares outstanding.
For example, if the acquirer has 80 million
shares outstanding and issues 16 million new
shares (.2 x 80), its current shareholders are
not diluted by more than one-sixth, since 16/(16
80) equals one-sixth or 16.67. More than 16
million new shares would violate the small merger
exception.
18
Asset Aquisitions1
  • Cash for assets acquisition Acquiring firm pays
    cash for target firms assets, accepting some,
    all, or none of targets liabilities.
  • If substantially all of its assets are acquired,
    target firm dissolves after paying off any
    liabilities not assumed by acquirer and
    distributing any remaining assets and cash to its
    shareholders2
  • Shareholders do not vote but are cashed out
  • Stock for assets acquisition Acquirer issues
    shares for targets assets, accepting some, all,
    or none of targets liabilities.
  • If acquirer buys all of targets assets and
    assumes all of its liabilities, the acquisition
    is equivalent to a merger.
  • Listing requirements on major stock exchanges
    require acquiring firm shareholders to approve
    such acquisitions if the issuance of new shares
    is more than 20 of the firms outstanding shares
  • Targets shareholders must approve the
    transaction if substantially all of its assets
    are to be sold
  • Advantages/disadvantages Allows acquirer to
    select only certain target assets and
    liabilities asset write-up no minority
    shareholders but lose tax attributes and assets
    not specified in contract and incur transfer
    taxes
  • 1In acquisitions, acquiring firms usually larger
    than target firms.
  • 2Usually, acquirer purchases 80 or more of the
    fair market value of the targets operating
    assets and may assume some or all of the targets
    liabilities. In some cases, courts have ruled
    that acquirer is responsible for target
    liabilities as effectively liquidating or merging
    with the target.

19
Stock Acquisitions
  • Cash for stock acquisitions Acquirer buys
    targets stock with cash directly from targets
    shareholders and operates target as a wholly- or
    partially-owned (if lt 100 of target shares
    acquired) subsidiary
  • Stock for stock acquisitions Acquirer buys
    targets stock directly from targets
    shareholders, generally operating target in a
    parent/subsidiary structure
  • Advantages/disadvantages Eliminates need for
    target shareholder vote (buying from target
    shareholders) tax attributes, licenses, and
    contracts transfer to acquirer and may insulate
    parent from subsidiary creditors but responsible
    for all liabilities and have minority
    shareholders

20
Special Applications of Basic Structures
  • Two stage stock transactions
  • First stage Acquirer buys target stock via a
    tender offer to gain controlling interest and
    owns target as a partially owned subsidiary
  • Second stage (backend merger) Acquirer merges a
    partially owned subsidiary into a wholly owned
    subsidiary giving minority shareholders cash or
    debt for their cancelled shares. Also known as a
    freeze out or squeeze out.
  • Advantages/disadvantages Very popular as
    acquirers gain control more rapidly than if they
    attempted a one-step statutory merger which
    requires boards and shareholders to approve
    merger agreement but may require substantial
    premium to gain initial control.
  • Triangular acquisitions Acquirer creates wholly
    owned sub which merges with target, with either
    the target or the sub surviving
  • Advantages Avoids acquirer shareholder vote as
    parent sole owner of sub and limits parent
    exposure to target liabilities however, acquirer
    shareholder vote may be required in some states
    if new stock issued dilutes current shareholders
    by more than one-sixth

21
Special Applications of Basic Structures Contd
  • Leveraged buyout (LBO) LBO sponsor (a limited
    partnership) creates shell corporation funded
    with sponsor equity.
  • Stage 1 Shell corporation raises cash by
    borrowing from banks and selling debt to
    institutional investors
  • Stage 2 Shell buys 50.1 of target stock,
    squeezing out minority shareholders with a back
    end merger in which remaining shareholders
    receive debt or preferred stock.
  • Single firm recapitalization Enables firm to
    squeeze out minority shareholders.
  • Firm with minority shareholders creates a
    wholly-owned shell and merges itself into the
    shell through a statutory merger.
  • All stock in the original firm is cancelled with
    the majority shareholders in the original firm
    receiving stock in the surviving firm and
    minority shareholders receiving cash or debt.

22
Discussion Questions
  1. What is the difference between the form of
    payment and form of acquisition?
  2. What factors influence the determination of form
    of payment?
  3. What factors influence the form of acquisition?

23
Determining Purchase Price and Control Premium
The NBC Universal (NBCU) Case
  • Comcast and General Electric (GE) announced on
    12/2/09 that they had agreed to form a JV that
    will be 51 owned by Comcast, with the remainder
    owned by GE.
  • GE was to contribute NBC Universal (NBCU) valued
    at 30 billion and Comcast was to contribute TV
    networks valued at 7.25 billion.
  • Comcast also was to pay GE 6.5 billion in cash.
    In addition, NBCU was to borrow 9.1 billion and
    distribute the cash to GE.

24
NBC Universal (NBCU) JV Valuation, Purchase Price
Determination, and Resulting Control Premium
NBC Universal Joint Venture Valuation1 37.25 billion
Comcast Purchase Price for 51 of NBC Universal JV Cash from Comcast paid to GE Cash proceeds paid to GE from NBCU borrowings2 Contributed assets (Comcast network) Total 6.50 9.10 7.25 22.85 billion
GE Purchase Price for 49 of NBC Universal JV Contributed assets (NBC Universal) Cash from Comcast Paid to GE Cash proceeds paid to GE from NBCU borrowings Total 30.00 (6.50) (9.10) 14.40 billion
Implied Control / Purchase Price Premium ()3 Implied Minority/Liquidity Discount ()4 20.3 (21.1)
1Equals the sum of NBCU (30 billion) plus the
fair market value of contributed Comcast
properties (7.25 billion) and assumes no
incremental value due to synergy. These values
were agreed to during negotiation. 2The 9.1
billion borrowed by NBCU and paid to GE will be
carried on the consolidated books of Comcast,
since it has the controlling interest in the JV.
In theory, it reduces Comcasts borrowing
capacity by that amount and should be viewed as a
portion of the purchase price. In practice, it
may reduce borrowing capacity by less if lenders
view the JV cash flow as sufficient to satisfy
debt service requirements. 3The control premium
represents the excess of the purchase price paid
over the book value of the net acquired assets
and is calculated as follows 22.85 / (.51 x
37.25 -1. 4The minority/liquidity discount
represents the excess of the fair market value of
the net acquired assets over the purchase price
and is calculated as follows 14.40/(.49 x
37.25) -1.
25
Discussion Questions
  1. Suppose two firms, each of which was generating
    operating losses, wanted to create a joint
    venture. The potential partners believed that
    significant operating synergies could be created
    by combining the two businesses resulting in a
    marked improvement in operating performance. How
    should the ownership distribution of the JV be
    determined?
  2. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of your
    answer to question one.
  3. Should the majority owner always be the one
    managing the daily operations of the business?
    Why? Why not?

26
Things to Remember
  • Deal structuring addresses identifying and
    satisfying as many of the primary objectives of
    the parties involved and determining how risk
    will be shared.
  • Deal structuring consists of determining the
    acquisition vehicle, post-closing organization,
    the form of payment, the form of acquisition,
    legal form of selling entity, and accounting and
    tax considerations.
  • Choices made in one area of the deal are likely
    to impact other aspects of the transaction.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)