Title: Smoking Cessation Programs in Addiction Treatment Centers: An Organizational Analysis
1Smoking Cessation Programs in Addiction
Treatment CentersAn Organizational Analysis
- Hannah K. Knudsen, Ph.D.
- Lori J. Ducharme, Ph.D.
- Paul M. Roman, Ph.D.
2Nicotine DependenceA Co-Occurring Condition in
Substance Abuse Treatment
- Rates of cigarette smoking among individuals
seeking substance abuse treatment far exceed the
general population - General public 22.5
- Treatment-seeking gt 70
- Treatment-seekers who smoke are at greater risk
of negative health consequences due to greater
cigarette consumption per day - Tobacco-related illnesses are a major factor in
the increased likelihood of premature death among
individuals treated for substance use disorders
3Smoking Cessation Programs in Substance Abuse
Treatment
- Traditionally, smoking cessation has been viewed
as outside the purview of treatment providers - Fears of increased risk of treatment dropout
relapse - Recent research indicates such fears may be
unfounded - Smoking cessation does not worsen SUD treatment
outcomes - It may improve outcomes reduce the risk of
relapse - Clinical practice guideline issued by the Public
Health Service advocates the delivery of smoking
cessation services during treatment
4Availability of Smoking Cessation Programs
- The assumption remains that specialty SUD
treatment programs do not offer smoking cessation - This claim is difficult to test because of
absence of national data - SAMHSAs N-SSATS survey of treatment providers
does not collect this information - Even less is known about whether centers that
offer smoking cessation are relying on
psycho-social techniques or have integrated
medications into these programs
5Research Questions
- To what extent have community-based addiction
treatment programs adopted smoking cessation (SC)
programs? - What organizational characteristics are
associated with the presence of SC programs? - To what extent do SC programs include the use of
SC medications?
6Methods
- Data from the National Treatment Center Study
- Community-based addiction treatment centers
- Must offer a minimum of outpatient care (as
defined by ASAM) - Two nationally representative samples
- Publicly funded centers (n 363) gt 50 of
revenues from government block grants/contracts - Response rate 80
- Privately funded centers (n 401) lt50 of
revenues from government block grants/contracts - Response rate 88
- Data collected via face-to-face interviews with
administrators and/or clinical directors - Complete data from n 704
7Measures Smoking Cessation Programming
- Availability of SC Programs
- 1 yes, 0 no
- Adoption of SC Medications by SC Programs
- Nicotine replacement therapy (patch, gum)
- Bupropion-SR (i.e. Zyban)
8Measures Organizational Characteristics
- Center type
- Government-owned
- Publicly funded non-profit
- For-profit
- Privately funded non-profit (reference category)
- Organizational affiliation
- Hospital-based
- Community mental health center
- Freestanding (reference category)
- Size natural log-transformed number of employees
- Age natural log-transformed years
- Accreditation center is accredited by JCAHO or
CARF
9Measures Staffing Services
- Physician Services
- Physicians on staff
- Physicians on contract
- No access to physicians (reference category)
- Levels of care
- Inpatient/Residential-only
- Outpatient-only (reference category)
- Mixed levels of care
- 12-Step Treatment Model 1 yes, 0 no
- Use of the ASAM PPC 1 yes, 0 no
- Use of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) 1
yes, 0 no
10Availability of Smoking Cessation Programs
11Results Availability of SC Programs
- The majority of addiction treatment centers do
not have SC programs - About 32.2 have SC programs
12SC Programs by Center Type
- There was significant variation in availability
of SC programs by center type (c2 8.82, plt.05) - Government-owned centers significantly more
likely to offer smoking cessation programs than - Publicly funded non-profit centers (O.R. .58,
plt.05) - For-profit centers (O.R. .42, plt.01)
13Logistic Regression of Availability of Smoking
Cessation Programs
- Logistic regression used to estimate the
likelihood of SC programs by - Center type
- Organizational characteristics
- Staffing and services
- Center type differences persist after controlling
for other organization-level measures - SC programs less likely in publicly funded
non-profits (vs. government-owned, O.R. .59,
plt.05) - SC programs less likely in for-profits (vs.
government-owned, O.R. .48, plt.05)
14The Use of Standardized Criteria and Smoking
Cessation Programs
- Centers that have adopted the ASAM-PPC were
significantly more likely to offer smoking
cessation, net of the other variables - O.R. 1.69, plt.01
- Centers that use the Addiction Severity Index
(ASI) were more likely to offer smoking cessation - O.R. 1.58, plt.05
15Other Predictors of Smoking Cessation
Programming
- Organizational affiliation was associated with
the availability of SC programs - Compared to freestanding programs, centers
affiliated with community mental health centers
were less likely to offer SC programs (O.R.
.38, plt.05) - No difference between freestanding and
hospital-based centers - There was a trend (plt.10) for larger centers
being more likely to offer smoking cessation
programs
16Organization-Level Measures NOT Associated with
SC Program Availability
- Center age
- Access to physicians
- Center accreditation by JCAHO or CARF
- Levels of care
- 12-Step treatment philosophy
17Adoption of Medications in Smoking Cessation
Programs
18Medications in Smoking Cessation Programs
- Among centers with smoking cessation programs,
there may be variability in the adoption of
medications - Nicotine replacement therapies have the advantage
of being OTC - Bupropion-SR (Zyban) by prescription
- Little is known about whether these programs have
integrated medications into their smoking
cessation treatment protocols
19Adoption of SC Medications (n 222 centers
offering smoking cessation programs)
20Medications by Center Type
- Compared to privately funded non-profits
- Government-owned SC programs are less likely to
have adopted bupropion nicotine gum - Publicly funded non-profits SC programs were less
likely to have adopted all three medications - For-profit SC programs were less likely to have
adopted nicotine gum
21Adoption of Any Medicationsby Center Type
- The only significant difference is between
privately funded non-profits and publicly funded
non-profits
22Multivariate Model of Medication Adoption
- Same set of independent variables as model of SC
programs - Logistic regression of any adoption
- The difference between public and private
non-profits is no longer significant once other
variables are controlled - Other significant variables
- Access to physicians on staff (O.R. 2.89,
plt.05) or physicians on contract (O.R. 2.52,
plt.05) - Inpatient/residential-only SC programs were more
likely to have adopted medications than
outpatient-only programs (O.R. 4.44, plt.01)
23Summary
- About one-third of substance abuse treatment
centers offer smoking cessation programs - Of these centers with SC programs, the majority
(65.5) have adopted some type of SC-related
medications - There is variation in adoption rates of specific
SC-related medications, with nicotine patch
adoption being the most widely adopted
24Summary (continued)
- Smoking cessation programs were more common in
centers that - Use the ASAM-PPC
- Use the ASI
- Although levels of care were not associated with
the probability of SC program availability,
inpatient/residential-only centers were more
likely to use medications within their SC
programs than outpatient-only centers - Physician resources were not associated the SC
program availability, but were associated with
medication adoption within those programs
25Future Research Directions
- Additional data collection on the implementation
of the PHS clinical practice guideline for
smoking cessation - Assessment of smoking status at intake
- Brief interventions
- Counseling approaches to smoking cessation
- Use of pharmacotherapies
- Data collected at the center-level and from
individual counselors
26- The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of
research funding from the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (R01-DA-14482 and R01-DA-13110). - This presentation and other reports from the
National Treatment Center Study are available at
http//www.uga.edu/ntcs