Aristotle Nichomachean Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Aristotle Nichomachean Ethics

Description:

Eudaimonia is a familiar and ordinary expression in Greek not a technical term. Eudaimonia does not denote a feeling or state of mind, but rather an (objective) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: staf2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aristotle Nichomachean Ethics


1
Aristotle Nichomachean Ethics Lecture 5 On
Happiness. Nichomachus Aristotles son
Ethics stems from Gk ethos a) character in
relation to individuals b) custom in relation
to societies/city states Ethics ? moral theory
Ethics Treatise on Character N.B. Dont
confuse this with modern (Kantian) coneptions
deontological conceptions of morality
2
  • 2. Overview of the Argument
  • 2.1 Opening Question What is the Good?
    Book1.Chapters1-2.
  • Opening Answers
  • a) That at which every activity aims (an end).
  • b) These can be products/works (erga)
  • or activities (energeiai)
  • 2.2 The Hierarchy of Goods
  • What is the Highest Good?
  • The highest good is the good which is
  • i) desired for itself and
  • ii) not desired for any further/higher good
  • iii) the good for which all other goods are
    desired.
  • The hierarchy of goods at the apex of which is

3
  • There is a hierarchy of goods at the apex of
    which is what is good in itself (or the most
    perfect good, or the most final good, or the most
    self-sufficient good.)
  • But is this
  • A B C
  • M N O
  • X Y z
  • Or
  • A
  • M N
  • X Y Z
  • Are the most perfect/final/self-sufficient goods
    many or one?
  • If they are one, can this good really be
    theoretical contemplation?

4
  • The Hierarchy of Ends
  • Book 1 Chapter 2.
  • Aristotle claims that there is a hierarchy of
    ends that is isomorphic with the hierarchy of
    goods. So
  • Horsemanship exists for the sake of
  • Warfare and Generalship (1094a12)
  • Which exists for the sake of peace!
  • N.B. Political science the science of the
    things of the polis is the most magesterial
    superordinate science.
  • Hence the end of political science will include
    the ends of other sciences within it and so the
    end of the science of politics will be the good
    of man. For though admittedly the good is the
    same for a city as for an individual, still the
    good of the city is apparently a greater and more
    complete/final good to acquire and preserve. For
    while it is satisfactory to acquire and preserve
    the good even for an individual, it is finer and
    more divien to acquire and preserve it for a
    people and for cities. And so, since our
    investigation aims at these goods for an
    individual ad a city, it is a sort of political
    science. (1094b6-12)

5
  • Overview of NE
  • Initial Answer.
  • The highest Good is Happiness.
  • What is happiness?
  • Book 1 chapters 3-6
  • Ruling Out Answers given by Common Opinion.
  • Happiness is not the life of gratification and
    pleasure. (1095b15)
  • Happiness is not the accumulation of money and
    wealth. (1096a6)
  • Happiness is not (just) the life of honour .
    (1095 a22)
  • Happiness is not the life of virtue considered as
    a capacity/potential. (1096a1)

6
  • N.B. virtue arete excellence
  • There are not just moral excellencies or virtues.
  • The word arete has a perfectly normal non-moral
    meaning.
  • A knife has a virtue when it performs its
    function cutting well, i.e. when it is sharp
    and the right size for the purpose.
  • Final Answer
  • The human good (happiness) is (1098a9)
  • an activity of the soul in accordance with
    reason psyches energeia kata logon
  • or better
  • The human good turns out to be activity
    (energeia) of soul (psyches) expressing virtue
    (kat areten), and if there turns out to be more
    than one virtue, in accordance with the best and
    most perfect. (1098a16-18).
  • Question What is the best and most final
    virtue?
  • Can it be the theoretical virtue of conemplation
    or is it the practical ethical virtues?

7
  • For the sake of
  • A. Merely Instrumental Goods
  • Some goods exist entirely for the sake of other
    goods.
  • A pen exists for the sake of writing, a flute
    for the sake of music.
  • Pens and flutes are instrumentally good, good
    only insofar as they are means for bringing about
    other goods.
  • B. Intrinsic and Instrumental Goods
  • Some goods have intrinsic value. It is good to
    go for a walk. But one can go for a walk in order
    to stay fit. So one and the same activity can be
    an instrumental and intrinsic good.
  • C. Intrinsic Non-instrumental Goods
  • The highest good exists for the sake of no other
    good, and is the good for the sake of which all
    other goods are pursued.

8
  • A B C
  • Teleios teleioteros teleiotatos.
  • Complete, more complete, most complete.
  • Final, more final most final.
  • Perfect, more perfect, most perfect.
  • What kind of a relation is the for the sake of
    relation?
  • A exists for the sake of B when you only do A in
    order to bring about B.
  • B exists for the sake of C, because one does B in
    order to bring about C, even though one can also
    do B for its own sake.
  • This is an hierarchy it is not symmettrical.
  • If A exists for the sake of B, then B does not
    exist for the sake of A.

9
  • The for the sake of relationship is partly a
    causal chain of means and ends.
  • The hierarchy of for the sake of relations
    bewteen ends implies a kind of chain of value and
    a set of norms for regulating our activities.
  • Medicine is an activity performed for the sake
    of health. So good health provides the norms that
    regulate medical practice.

10
  • Happiness eudaimonia
  • Well-being.
  • Human flourishing.
  • Being blessed by the Gods.
  • Children and animals cannot be eudaimon.
  • Eudaimonia is a familiar and ordinary expression
    in Greek not a technical term.
  • Eudaimonia does not denote a feeling or state of
    mind, but rather an (objective) property of a
    (complete, human) life.
  • Eudaimonia can be achieved normally, only when
    certain threshold conditions are met.
  • Those who say that the victim on the rack or the
    man who falls into great nisfortunes is happy if
    he is good, are, whether they mean to or not,
    talking nonsense. VII 13 1153b19-20

11
  • The function argument in 1 vii.
  • 1. If human beings have a function/work, it will
    be the highest good.
  • Every human activity has a function.
  • Every ergon work is performed well(or badly) in
    accordance with its spefic excellences/virtues.
  • Human being share their biological, and sensory
    functions with animals.
  • Only the function of reason and soul do they not
    share with animals.
  • The function of the human being must be its life
    activity expressing reason in accordance with
    virtue (its specific excellences).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com