Political Science 5 Lecture 3, 232004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Political Science 5 Lecture 3, 232004

Description:

Hypothesis: a person who favors national health insurance is more likely to have ... good cook book, a good operational definition can be followed by any other chef. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: thadko4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Political Science 5 Lecture 3, 232004


1
Political Science 5Lecture 3, 2/3/2004
  • 1. Homework 1 due next Tuesday!
  • 2. Read Chapter 3 and article for Thursday
  • 3. Office Hours
  • 4. Hypothesis Examples now on Website

2
Review antecedent and intervening variables
  • Hypothesis a person who favors national health
    insurance is more likely to have voted for
    Clinton in 1992.
  • What is the independent variable?
  • What is the dependent variable?
  • What could be an antecedent variable?
  • What could be an intervening variable?
  • What could be a that drove or resulted from this
    research?

3
One more example(to make sure we really got it)
  • Hypothesis the number of years of formal
    education had by a voter will affect that voters
    propensity to vote
  • Dependent variable? Independent variable?
  • Intervening variables
  • Formal education causes a sense of civic duty
  • Formal education lets one understand the issues
  • Use arrow diagram to tell causal story

4
A Note on Causality
  • If we say that something (X) is the cause of
    something else (Y), we are making three claims
  • X and Y covary. A change in one variable is
    associated with a change in the other.
  • A change in X precedes the change in Y.
  • The covariation between X and Y is not spurrious
    (not due to a change in some other variable) and
    not just a coincidence.

5
What is a concept?
  • A concept is an abstraction based on
    characteristics of perceived reality.
  • Concepts should be accurate, precise, and
    informative.
  • In fact, a scientific discipline maintains its
    identity because different researchers within it
    share a concern for the same concepts.
  • How is this different from a variable?

6
(No Transcript)
7
What is the difference between a concept and a
variable?
8
What is the difference between a concept and a
variable?
  • A variable is a measured concept.
  • From the text how can the concept of political
    participation become a variable?
  • There can be more than one variable for a single
    concept.
  • VARIATION refers to differences within a set of
    measurements of a variable.

9
Measurement I. Knowing a Good Measure When You
See It.
  • Conceptual and operational definitions of a
    variable
  • An example voter turnout in the U.S.
  • Measurement error and validity

10
Conceptual Definitions
  • A conceptual definition of a variable states
    precisely what you mean when you use a particular
    term.
  • A society that supports democracy is one that
    emphasizes tolerance, trust, political activism,
    and Post-Materialist values, not just one that
    pays lip service to the ideals of democracy. --
    Inglehart

11
Conceptual Definitions
  • A good conceptual definition
  • Looks at how other scholars have defined a term,
    and goes with the consensus unless there is a
    good reason to deviate.
  • Allows you to test the theory that you want to
    test.
  • Is not circular (for example, does not say that
    support for democracy is when the public voices
    support for democratic values)

12
Operational Definitions
  • An operational definition of a variable is a
    complete recipe for going out into the world and
    measuring a variable.
  • It helps us make the leap from our subjective
    impressions to an objective measure.
  • Like a recipe in any good cook book, a good
    operational definition can be followed by any
    other chef.

13
Operational Definitions
  • To measure support for democracy, Inglehart
    uses the World Values/ European Values Survey
    from 1995-97 and 1999-2001 and looks at average
    levels of agreement with nine statements such as
  • Is it good to have a strong leader who does not
    have to bother with parliament and elections?

14
Voter Turnout in the U.S.The Traditional Measure
  • Conceptual Turnout is the percentage of those
    who can vote who actually do.
  • The traditional operational definition is
  • Where Voting Age Population (VAP) includes
    noncitizens and convicted felons, but not
    citizens living overseas.

15
Voter Turnout in the U.S.The Traditional Measure
16
Voter Turnout in the U.S.The McDonald Popkin
Measure
  • Conceptual Turnout is the percentage of those
    who can vote who actually do.
  • Where Voting Eligible Population is purged of
    noncitizens and convicted felons but includes
    citizens living overseas.

17
Voter Turnout in the U.S.The McDonald Popkin
Measure
18
Measurement Validity
  • Measurement Validity is highest when the gap
    between your conceptual definition and your
    operational definition is smallest.
  • Validity means the extent to which a measurement
    procedure measures what it is intended to measure

19
Measurement Reliability
  • Reliability means the extent to which a
    measurement procedure consistently measures
    whatever it is supposed to measures

20
Example
  • Hypothesis courses taught by political
    scientists are more worthwhile than those taught
    by psychologists.
  • You and a friend enroll in poli sci and psych
    courses, respectively
  • After two weeks, turns out that your poli sci
    course is dreadful
  • Does this disprove the hypothesis?
  • What if the person teaching your course was not a
    political scientist after all?
  • Measurement was inaccurate, so the comparison you
    made with your friend is irrelevant to the
    hypothesis

21
How to test for Reliability
  • Test for same results on repeated trials
  • E.g. count ballots several times, ask other
    people to count them
  • Get several people to read articles (if testing
    orientation of a newspaper)
  • Problem something may be wrong
  • Use two different measures of the same concept
  • See if you get similar results
  • Two different questions about liberalism

22
How to test for validity
  • Again correspondence between measure and the
    concept it is thought to measure
  • Hypothesis the larger a citys police force is,
    the less crime the city will have.
  • Use police data on crime. (invalid?)
  • Hypothesis the more productive a scholar a
    faculty member is, the better teacher they are.
  • Use student evaluations. (invalid?)

23
How to test for validity
  • Face validity
  • IQ tests Measuring intelligence and exposure to
    middle class white culture? Not valid. Matter
    of judgment.
  • Content validity
  • Determine the full domain or meaning of a
    particular concept
  • Construct validity
  • GRE example

24
One more example
  • From an actual survey
  • Please look at this page and tell me the letter
    of the income group that includes all the members
    of your family living here in 2002 before taxes.
    This should include salaries, wages, pensions,
    dividends, interest, and all other income.

25
Inglehart article Group Activity
  • Answer the following questions
  • What is the hypothesis?
  • What is the dependent variable?
  • Conceptual definition and operational definitions
  • What is the independent variable?
  • Conceptual and operational definitions
  • What is the causal story?
  • Are issues of validity or reliability mentioned?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com