Preparing and Certifying All Teachers for Integrated Classrooms in Connecticut

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Preparing and Certifying All Teachers for Integrated Classrooms in Connecticut

Description:

NCLB and IDEA defines who can teach special education students in core subjects ... Area Permits 495 issued in special education second highest behind math ... –

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: georg183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preparing and Certifying All Teachers for Integrated Classrooms in Connecticut


1
Connecticut Department of Education
  • Preparing and Certifying All Teachers for
    Integrated Classrooms in Connecticut

Georgette NemrBureau of Preparation,
Certification, Support and AssessmentBureau of
Special Education
2
The Big Picture National and State Context
  • NCLB and IDEA defines who can teach special
    education students in core subjects
  • IDEA now encourages Response to Intervention
    model
  • PJ settlement agreement to support inclusion
  • Achievement gap
  • Disproportionate representation by race and
    ethnicity of special education students
  • Shortage of special education teachers

3
State of the State Educator Statistics
  • 50,800 Certified Staff in Public Schools (all
    areas)
  • 5500 (11) Serving in special education roles
  • 2001-2005, Special Educators Certified
  • In-state prepared at 5 institutions 811
  • Out-of-state prepared 925
  • 2000-05 Shortage Area Permits 495 issued in
    special educationsecond highest behind math
  • Annually certify 1600 (34) educators from
    out-of-state in all areas

4
State of the State Learner Statistics
  • 577,000 K-12 Students in 169 School Districts
  • 11.9 require special education services
  • 61 (47,476) of students with disabilities spend
    80 or more of their time in the general
    education classroom
  • 4.9 (28,000) ELL students in 138 different
    languages (after 3 years must be integrated into
    regular classrooms)
  • Grade 3 and 8 CMT performance BELOW proficient
  • 47 - 71 of special education students
  • 44 - 75 of ELL students
  • 36 - 47 of Black students
  • 37 - 59 of Hispanic students

5
What is the proposal for General Educator
Preparation?
  • Enhance preparation and certification
    requirements for ECE, Elementary, Middle,
    Secondary to focus on the diverse needs of
    students
  • Developmental needs and characteristics of the
    diversity of students in classrooms today
  • Assessment of and for learning to inform
    instructional design
  • Curriculum and methods differentiated
    instruction, accommodations and modifications,
    ELL, early intervention strategies, positive
    behavior support
  • Education mandates and due process
  • Collaboration and teaming

6
What is the proposal for Special Educator
Preparation?
  • Elevate to advanced/graduate level only, with
    prerequisite 3 years teaching experience and
    certificate in general education (Elem, MS, HS)
  • More rigorous training in
  • Advanced Curriculum Development, Differentiation
    of Instruction, Intervention and Remediation
  • Eligibility Determination
  • Consultation/Case Management
  • Intensive Special Needs

7
Roles and Assignments under Proposal
Elementary Teacher
Can teach in Elementary Resource Room
Can teach 3rd Grade
Can teach any student core subjects and provide
interventions
  • Special Educator PK-12
  • Can serve in Reg Ed or Spec Ed
  • Coordinate diagnostics, case management and IEP
    Process

PD Training to be offered in strategies for
teaching intensive needs students.
8
Benefits of New Model
  • Alleviates label of your -vs- our students
  • More broadly trained general education teachers,
    to support all students (RtI)
  • More flexibility to hire and assign teachers for
    general education or resource room
  • Special educators qualified to provide primary
    instruction in core academic subjects, coordinate
    diagnostics, case management, and consultative
    support to general ed teachers

9
Challenges
  • Ensuring quality and continuum of services for
    students, during and after transition
  • Time, funding and commitment to quality, ongoing
    professional development
  • Need more research on teacher education
  • Higher education collaboration and acceptance of
    new preparation competencies including more field
    experiences and application of skills
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com