Title: DREAM NO SMALL DREAMS:
1DREAM NO SMALL DREAMS Governance-based strategic
planning for housing in London
2Judith Allen Department of Urban Development and
Regeneration University of Westminster,
London j.a.allen_at_wmin.ac.uk
3(No Transcript)
4- Overview
- Housing in London
- Cascade and integrate planning system
- Key themes in the London Housing Strategy
- Conclusions
5OVERVIEW
6Globalisation fuels a polarising labour market,
which in turn fuels rapidly rising housing prices.
7Londons income structure is strongly polarised
compared to the national income structure.
8But, high house prices have an effect on the
income of all groups in London.
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11- National political effect London is different
- Pressure to download the problem
- London is the only region which has a directly
elected regional government.
12HOUSING IN LONDON
13Housing tenure in London and England, 2006
14Spatial distribution of tenures, 2001 Owner
occupation is concentrated around the edges,
social renting in the central and eastern areas,
and private renting in central and western areas
15Spatial distribution of social groups, 2001 The
rich live in a wedge to the southwest. Middle
groups live around the edges, especially in the
south and east. Poorer groups mainly live in the
east
16The socio-spatial pattern also creates national
political problems Middle income groups include
most key public sector workers. Wages pressure vs
national economic policy.
17Poverty is concentrated in an L-shape, starting
in the centre and expanding north and east
18Three different measures of affordability all
show that west London is expensive and east
London is more accessible
19Median house prices per borough range from
464,000 to 1,536,000.
20The amount of housing in the social rented sector
is decreasing.
21Access to social renting has also decreased.
22Approximately 60 of all new private sector
development is for private renting, using
Buy-to-Let mortgages.
23CASCADE AND INTEGRATE THE NATIONAL PLANNING
SYSTEM FOR SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
24(No Transcript)
25The national spatial planning framework for
housing
26- The London Plan The spatial development
framework for London - supports globalisation
- high density, with early provision of social,
educational, infrastructural and transport
elements - supply side facilitating development (site
assembly, labour market) - east not west
27Sub-regional and supra-regional planning
28THE LONDON HOUSING STRATEGY
29The Mayor has no direct powers of implementation.
In planning, these rest with the London
Boroughs, whose local development frameworks must
fit within the London Plan.
- The London Housing Strategy can be seen as both
- A part of the cascade-and-integrate system of
planning, technicist and concerned with targets,
or - A part of governance, a way of achieving local
government objectives without direct powers, by
mobilising a range of other actors, including the
London Boroughs and private developers, political
and about mobilisation, and aligning their actions
30- The Mayors powers
- to determine the strategic spatial development
framework - to advise on the allocation of public sector
capital funding to housing associations for
social housing - to determine the targets for the proportion of
affordable housing within any private sector
development - to support major development projects through
the London Development Agency - to use investment in public transport
infrastructure to promote a specific pattern for
future land development
31Key themes in the London Housing Strategy
Globalisation Governance Going for it
32Globalisation . . .
Good housing is a means to a broader social end,
an important component of well designed places
for living, integrated with other land uses,
public services and public transport. Derives
from an analysis of how globalisation both powers
processes of social polarisation and provides the
resources for redistribution to improve the
position of the poor. The housing strategy is not
a stand-alone strategy. Responding to
globalisation implies integrating strategies for
economic development, spatial development
strategy and housing.
33Governance . . . actors
All new housing provision will be by private
developers or by housing associations. The issue
is how to support and shape their actions. The
shift from west to east, the Thames Gateway and
the Olympics development, are key parts of a
strategy to make cheap land and large sites
available while insisting on integrated
development.
34Governance . . . actors
Implementation at London-wide level can draw on
the actions of the entire GLA Group The Greater
London Authority, Transport for London,
Metropolitan Police Authority, London Development
Agency, London Fire and Emergency Planning
Authority. The London Housing Board (within the
Mayors Office) reaches out to private developers
and housing associations. GLA responsibilities
also include Culture, environment and health
35Governance . . . actors
- Implementation at London Borough level is more
complex - 32 London Boroughs are directly elected (plus
City of London) - Responsible for direct delivery of most
services - Community Plans (cascade-and-integrate),
strategic competence and localised governance
networks (Local Area Agreements and Local Public
Service Boards) - Plethora of networks puts a premium on
political leadership
36Go for it Cascade-and-integrate?
Housing Corporation sub-regions
London Plan sub-regions
37Go for it Cascade-and-integrate?
Borough strategic plans for housing? Competence
to deliver housing management? Conflict between
operational responsibility and strategic planning
capability?
38Go for it . . . Key London-wide actions
Align public sector services and infrastructure
provision with private sector development. Shift
to the east means that large brown and green
field sites are available. 50 affordable housing
target in the London Plan. Inventing a new form
of tenure (intermediate tenures) and new forms of
localised (neighbourhood/community) management of
space.
39CONCLUSIONS 1 THE LONDON HOUSING STRATEGY
40- The London Housing Strategy
- A dramatic vision
- Large strategic actions
- Creates the governance structure to achieve the
vision - Very long run and very flexible implementation
- Small number of key targets to support an
agreed strategy
41- Globalisation both produces polarisation and
creates the resources to do something about it - The current tenure structure supports
polarisation - Governance is about building solid but fluid
networks which can respond to change - Technicist planning is about fixing the
details, chasing the dream of comprehensiveness
and stability
42CONCLUSIONS 2 TERRITORIALISATION,
DE-TERRITORIALISATION, RE-TERRITORIALISATION
43YOU CANT MAKE AN OMELETTE WITHOUT BREAKING EGGS.
- Two planning systems operating side by side
- cascade-and-integrate
- strategic vision planning
44- Cascade-and-integrate
- Political effects centralisation of control,
citizen-as-consumer - Technically, requires reasonably stable
territorialisation to be successful - Problematises governance relationships
- Undermines strategic vision capabilities
45- Strategic vision planning
- multi-scalar, plans for London only
comprehensible in relation to other spatial
scales (national to neighbourhood) - globalisation a metaphor for multi-scalar?
- folded and fluid joined up in unpredictable
and changing ways - process of de- and re-territorialisation
implies strategic visions for multi-project
planning?
46THANK YOU FOR LISTENING