Identifying, assessing and understanding neglect

1 / 133
About This Presentation
Title:

Identifying, assessing and understanding neglect

Description:

Identifying, assessing and understanding neglect Patrick Ayre Department of Applied Social Studies University of Bedfordshire Park Square, Luton – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Identifying, assessing and understanding neglect


1
Identifying, assessing and understanding neglect
  • Patrick Ayre
  • Department of Applied Social Studies
  • University of Bedfordshire
  • Park Square, Luton
  • email pga_at_patrickayre.co.uk
  • web http//patrickayre.co.uk

2
  • NEGLECT
  • Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a
    childs basic physical and/or psychological
    needs, likely to result in the serious impairment
    of the childs health or development. Neglect may
    occur during pregnancy as a result of maternal
    substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect
    may involve a parent or carer failing to
  • provide adequate food, clothing and shelter
  • protect from physical and emotional harm or
    danger
  • ensure adequate supervision
  • ensure access to medical care or treatment.
  • It may also include neglect of, or
    unresponsiveness to, a childs basic emotional
    needs.

3
  • NEGLECT
  • Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a
    childs basic physical and/or psychological
    needs, likely to result in the serious impairment
    of the childs health or development. Neglect may
    occur during pregnancy as a result of maternal
    substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect
    may involve a parent or carer failing to
  • provide adequate food, clothing and shelter
  • protect from physical and emotional harm or
    danger
  • ensure adequate supervision
  • ensure access to medical care or treatment.
  • It may also include neglect of, or
    unresponsiveness to, a childs basic emotional
    needs.

4
  • NEGLECT
  • Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a
    childs basic physical and/or psychological
    needs, likely to result in the serious impairment
    of the childs health or development. Neglect may
    occur during pregnancy as a result of maternal
    substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect
    may involve a parent or carer failing to
  • provide adequate food, clothing and shelter
  • protect from physical and emotional harm or
    danger
  • ensure adequate supervision
  • ensure access to medical care or treatment.
  • It may also include neglect of, or
    unresponsiveness to, a childs basic emotional
    needs.

5
  • NEGLECT
  • Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a
    childs basic physical and/or psychological
    needs, likely to result in the serious impairment
    of the childs health or development. Neglect may
    occur during pregnancy as a result of maternal
    substance abuse. Once a child is born, neglect
    may involve a parent or carer failing to
  • provide adequate food, clothing and shelter
  • protect from physical and emotional harm or
    danger
  • ensure adequate supervision
  • ensure access to medical care or treatment.
  • It may also include neglect of, or
    unresponsiveness to, a childs basic emotional
    needs.

6
  • NEGLECT
  • Parents who neglect their children basically just
    dont know any better because of their own poor
    upbringings. If we send them to a family centre
    for Parental Skills training, all will be well.

7
  • NEGLECT
  • Parents who neglect their children basically just
    dont know any better because of their own poor
    upbringings. If we send them to a family centre
    for Parental Skills training, all will be well.
  • IF ONLY!!....

8
  • NEGLECT
  • So neglected children who come into care may be a
    bit thin, a bit dirty, badly in need of seeing a
    doctor or dentist, maybe a bit wild.
  • But we can place them with foster carers for a
    bit of looking after, a bit of TLC, a bit of
    structure and everything will be fine. The
    children will absolutely love it and will
    immediately start to thrive. Simple really!

9
  • NEGLECT
  • So neglected children who come into care may be a
    bit thin, a bit dirty, badly in need of seeing a
    doctor or dentist, maybe a bit wild.
  • But we can place them with foster carers for a
    bit of looking after, a bit of TLC, a bit of
    structure and everything will be fine. The
    children will absolutely love it and will
    immediately start to thrive. Simple really!
  • IF ONLY!!....

10
Brain development
  • At birth our brains are only 25 developed
  • By age 3, a childs brain has reached almost 90
    of its adult size and has accpmplished 80 of its
    total development.
  • The growth in each region of the brain largely
    depends on receiving stimulation.
  • This stimulation provides the foundation for
    learning.

11
Experience Affects the Structure of the Brain
  • Brain development is activity-dependent
  • Every experience excites some neural circuits and
    leaves others alone
  • Neural circuits used over and over strengthen,
    those that are not used are dropped resulting in
    pruning

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Poor integration of hemispheres and
underdevelopment of the orbitofrontal cortex
  • Difficulty regulating emotion,
  • Lack of cause-effect thinking,
  • Inability to recognize emotions in others,
  • Inability to articulate own emotions,
  • Incoherent sense of self and autobiographical
    history
  • Lack of conscience.

16
Other physiological issues
  • Serotonin emotional stability and feeling good
  • Malnutrition cognitive and motor delays,
    anxiety, depression, social problems, and
    attention problems
  • Myelination
  • Sensitive periods (infancy attachment)

17
Emotional development
  • Sensitive period for emotional development up to
    18 months
  • Shaped primarily by the way in which the prime
    carer interacts with the child
  • Emotional deficits harder to overcome once the
    sensitive window has passed.
  • How often do we intervene assertively at this
    point?

18
Building a child
  • Building a child is like building a house, each
    new level built on the one below. If the lower
    levels are unsound, no amount of tinkering with
    the upper floors will make it stable.

19
Checkpoint 1 timing intervention
  • If we wait until we can see the evidence of
    neglect in a childs behaviour, it may be too
    late to put it right completely.

20
Neglect
  • Behavioural
  • Constant hunger
  • Constant tiredness
  • Frequent lateness or non-attendance at school
  • Destructive tendencies

21
Neglect
  • Low self-esteem
  • Neurotic behaviour
  • No social relationships
  • Running away
  • Compulsive stealing or scavenging

22
Neglect
  • Physical
  • Poor personal hygiene
  • Poor state of clothing
  • Emaciation, pot belly, short stature
  • Poor skin and hair tone
  • Untreated medical problems

23
Significant harm
  • Harm is defined by Children Act 1989
  • ill-treatment (including sexual abuse and, by
    implication, physical abuse)
  • impairment of health (physical or mental) or
    development (physical, intellectual, emotional,
    social or behavioural)

24
The child's basic needs
  • basic physical care
  • affection
  • security
  • stimulation of innate potential
  • guidance and control
  • responsibility
  • independence

25
Why do parents neglect?
  • We need to understand the interaction between
  • 3 Ns Nurture, Nature, Now
  • Circumstantial factors and fundamental factors

26
Why do parents neglect?
  • Circumstantial
  • Poverty
  • Particular relationships
  • Lack of skill/knowledge
  • Temporary illness
  • Lack of support
  • Environmental factors
  • Fundamental
  • Lack of parenting capacity
  • Deep seated attitudinal/behavioural/
    psychological problems
  • Long term health issues
  • Entrenched problematical drug /alcohol use

27
Forms of neglect
  • Howe identifies 4 types of neglect
  • Emotional neglect
  • Disorganised neglect
  • Depressed or passive neglect
  • Severe deprivation
  • Each is associated with different effects and
    implications for intervention
  • (Howe, D (2005) Child Abuse and Neglect,
    Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan)

28
Emotional neglect
  • Sins of commission and omission
  • Closure and flight avoid contact, ignore
    advice, miss appointments, deride professionals,
    children unavailable
  • However, may seek help with a child who needs to
    be cured
  • Intervention often delayed
  • Associated with avoidant/defended patterns of
    attachment

29
Emotional neglect parents
  • Cant cope with childrens demands
    avoid/disengage from child in need dismissive or
    punitive response
  • Children provided for materially but there is a
    failure to connect emotionally
  • More rules everyone has a role and knows what to
    do.
  • Parents may feel awkward tense when alone with
    their children.

30
Emotional neglect children
  • When attachment behaviour rejected
  • Learns that caregivers physical and emotional
    availability is reduced when emotional demands
    are made
  • Caregiver most available when child is showing
    positive affect, being self-sufficient,
    undemanding and compliant
  • Reverse roles, false brightness to care for/
    reassure parent.

31
Emotional neglect children
  • Frightened, unhappy, anxious, low self-esteem
  • Withdrawn, isolated, fear intimacy and dependence
  • Precocious, streetwise, self-reliant

32
Emotional neglect children
  • May show compliance to dominant caregivers but
    anger and aggression in situations where they
    feel more dominant.
  • May learn that power and aggression are how
    relationships work and you get your needs met
  • Behaviour increasingly anti-social and
    oppositional
  • Brain development affected difficulties in
    processing and regulating emotional arousal

33
Disorganised neglect
  • Classic problem families
  • Thick case files
  • Can annoy and frustrate but endear and amuse
  • Chaos and disruption
  • Reasoning minimised, affect is dominant
  • Feelings drive behaviour and social interaction
  • Worker may feel agenda co-opted by familys
    immediate needs

34
Disorganised neglect carers
  • Feelings of being undervalued or emotionally
    deprived in childhood so need to be centre of
    attention/affection
  • Demanding and dependant with respect to
    professionals
  • May be regarded as overwhelmed but amenable to
    services
  • Crisis is a necessary not a contingent state
  • Associated with ambivalent/coercive patterns of
    attachment

35
Disorganised neglect carers
  • Cope with babies (babies need them) but then
  • Parental responses to children
  • unpredictable and insensitive (though not
    necessarily hostile or rejecting).
  • driven by how the parent is feeling, not the
    needs of the child
  • Lack of attunement and synchronicity

36
Disorganised neglect children
  • Anxious and demanding
  • Infants fractious, fretful, clinging, hard to
    soothe
  • Young children attention seeking exaggerated
    affect poor confidence and concentration
    jealous show off go to far
  • Teens immature, impulsive need to be noticed
    leads to trouble at school and in community
  • Neglectful parents feel angry and helpless
    reject the child to grandparents, care or gangs

37
Depressed neglect
  • Classic neglect
  • Material and emotional poverty
  • Homes and children dirty and smelly
  • Urine soaked matresses, dog faeces, filthy
    plates, rags at the windows
  • A sense of hopelessness and despair (can be
    reflected in workers)

38
Depressed neglect carers
  • Often severely abused/neglected own parents
    depressed or sexually or physically abusive
  • May seem unmotivated, mild learning disability
  • Learned helplessness in response to demands of
    family life
  • Stubborn negativism passive-aggressive
  • Have given up both thinking and feeling

39
Depressed neglect carers
  • Listless and unresponsive to childrens needs and
    demands, limited interaction
  • Lack of pleasure or anger in dealings with
    children and professionals
  • No smacks, no shouting, no deliberate harm but no
    hugs, no warmth, no emotional involvement
  • No structure poor supervision, care and food

40
Depressed neglect children
  • Younger the child, more debilitating the effects
  • Lack interaction with parents required for mental
    and emotional development
  • Infant Incurious and unresponsive moan and
    whimper but dont cry or laugh
  • At school isolated, aimless, lacking in
    concentration, drive, confidence and self-esteem
    but do not show anti-social behaviour

41
Depressed neglect case management
  • These families need
  • Long term involvement
  • Supportive approach
  • Responsiveness to familys signals and needs
  • BUT these need to be balanced with a recognition
    of the childrens needs. (How long is too long?
    How much is too much?)

42
Depressed neglect infants and children
  • Must experience responsive and stimulating
    environments that also provide human comfort for
    a few hours each day.
  • The longer the child is exposed to helplessness,
    the more intense and longer the intervention
    needed to remedy the situation.

43
Depressed neglect parents
  • Must learn appropriate ways to show their
    feelings
  • Practice smiling, laughing, soothing
  • May be mechanical at first
  • Genuine feelings will emerge with repetition
  • As parents learn to show their feelings, the
    childs responsiveness will increase virtuous
    spiral

44
Severe deprivation
  • Eastern European orphanages, parents with serious
    issues of depression, learning disabilities, drug
    addiction, care system at its worst
  • Children left in cot or serial caregiving
  • Combination of severe neglect and absence of
    selective attachment child is essentially alone

45
Severe deprivation children
  • Infants lack pre-attachment behaviours of
    smiling, crying, eye contact
  • Children impulsivity, hyperactivity, attention
    deficits, cognitive impairment and developmental
    delay, aggressive and coercive behaviour, eating
    problems, poor relationships
  • Inhibited withdrawn passive, rarely smile,
    autistic-type behaviour and self-soothing
  • Disinhibited attention-seeking, clingy,
    over-friendly relationships shallow, lack
    reciprocity

46
Checkpoint 2 case management
  • How should we manage cases of
  • Emotional Neglect
  • Disorganised neglect
  • Depressed neglect
  • Severe deprivation

47
Emotional neglect case management
  • Help parents to learn to use others for support.
  • Teach parents to engage emotionally with their
    children.
  • Must be highly structured as neither parent or
    child know how to interact normally
    spontaneously.
  • Fear of affect need clear rules roles

48
Disorganised neglect case management
  • Logic would argue for warding off crises for a
    while so that families can be taught to organise
    their lives, but
  • Family may want to have needs met, but cannot
    delay gratification or trust logic and planning
  • Without intense demands associated with crises,
    have no way of being important to others
  • Will CREATE new crises.

49
Disorganised neglect case management
  • Feelings must be addressed
  • Need a structured, predictable environment with
    no surprises where
  • There are rewards for clear, direct, and
    undistorted communication of feelings and
    accurate cognitive information about future
    outcomes
  • Family can learn the value of compromise
  • Teach parents how to use cognitive information to
    regulate feelings (without denying them)

50
Depressed neglect case management
  • Involves much more than teaching appropriate
    parenting
  • All family members must learn that their
    behaviour has predictable and meaningful
    consequences
  • Teach that it helps to share feelings with
    empathetic others.

51
Depressed neglect case management
  • Our standard approaches dont work
  • Threats / punitive approaches particularly
    ineffective
  • Parents dont believe they can change so dont
    even try.
  • Even most reasonable pressure results in
    shutting down / blocking out all info.
  • Parent education may be ineffective because
    judgment impaired and gains not transferable.

52
Severe deprivation case management
  • Highly unlikely to be in the childs best
    interests to remain in the environment which
    caused the harm
  • It is probable that the child and new carers will
    require substantial therapeutic and emotional
    support
  • Significant challenges often persist despite a
    move to a caring and predictable environment.

53
Capturing chronic abuse
  • Judging the quality of care is an essential
    component of any assessment but how well do we do
    it?
  • Judgements subjective and prone to bias
  • Intangible Difficult to capture and compare
  • High threshold for recognition
  • Neglect is a pattern not an event

54
Capturing chronic abuse
  • Judging the quality of care is an essential
    component of any assessment but how well do we do
    it?
  • Judgements subjective and prone to bias
  • Intangible Difficult to capture and compare
  • High threshold for recognition
  • Neglect is a pattern not an event

55
Our image of assessment
56
The reality of assessment?
57
Capturing chronic abuse
  • Judging the quality of care is an essential
    component of any assessment but how well do we do
    it?
  • Judgements subjective and prone to bias
  • Intangible Difficult to capture and compare
  • High threshold for recognition
  • Neglect is a pattern not an event

58
The pattern of neglect atypical
59
The pattern of neglect
60
The pattern of neglect
61
The pattern of neglect
62
The pattern of neglect
63
Cumulativeness
64
Failure of cumulativeness
65
Whats the problem?
  • Chronic abuse and the principle of cumulativeness
  • Files very long and badly structured
  • Patterns missed and chronic abuse overlooked
  • The problem of proportionality
  • Acclimatisation (case, agency and geographical)

66
Checkpoint 3 Acclimatisation
  • Do you ever encounter acclimatisation?
  • What do you do about it?

67
The assessment of neglect
  • An approach based on the Graded Care Profile by
    Dr OP Shrivastava
  • GCP provides
  • Framework for making assessment
  • Baseline measurement
  • An element of objectivity
  • Judgement about care
  • Reliable standardised evidence

68
GCP users
  • Health visitors
  • School nurses
  • Social workers
  • Family centre workers
  • Education welfare workers

69
GCP uses
  • Pre-referral assessments
  • Snapshot assessments
  • Contribution to CAF assessments
  • Contribution to Core Assessment (parenting
    capacity)
  • Self-assessment (parents and carers)
  • Young persons assessment of parenting
  • Tool for setting goals and assessing progress
  • Tool to facilitate discussion

70
Domains of Care
Stimulation Approval Disapproval Acceptance
Sensitivity Responsivity Reciprocity Overtures
Self actualisation
Esteem
Love and belongingness
Present absent
Safety
Physical needs
Nutrition. Housing, Clothing, Hygiene Health
Maslow, A. 1954
71
What to observe
Nutrition Housing Clothing Hygiene Health
Quality, Quantity, Preparation, Organisation,
A. PHYSICAL B. SAFETY C. LOVE D. ESTEEM
72
Grades of Care
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Level of care All childs needs met Essential needs fully met Some essential needs met Most essential needs unmet Essential needs entirely unmet/hostile
Commitment to care Child first Child priority Child/carer at par Child second Child not considered
Quality of care Best Adequate Equivocal Poor Worst
73
Example AREA C LOVE
Sub-areas 1 2 3 4 5
1. Carer
A Sensitivity Anticipates or picks up very subtle signals- verbal or nonverbal expression or mood. Comprehends clear signals distinct verbal or clear nonverbal expression. Not sensitive enough stimuli and signals have to be intense to make an impact e.g. cry. Quite insensitive needs repeated or prolonged intense signals. Insensitive to even sustained intense signals or aversive.
B Response Synchronisation Timing Responses well synchronised with signals or even before in anticipation Responses mostly synchronised except when occupied by essential chores. Not synchronised for own recreational engagement synchronised if fully unoccupied or child in distress. Even when child in distress responses delayed. No responses unless a clear mishap for fear of incrimination.
C Reciprocation (quality) Responses complementary to the signal. Both emotionally and materially, can get over stressed by distress signals from child. Warm. Material responses (treats etc.) lacking, but emotional responses warm and reassuring. Emotional reciprocation warm if in good mood (not burdened by strictly personal problem), otherwise flat. Emotional reciprocation brisk, flat and functional, annoyance if child in moderate distress but attentive if in severe distress. Aversive/punitive even if child in distress, acts after a serious mishap mainly to avoid incrimination, any warmth/remorse deceptive.
74
Sub-Area Scores Scores Scores Scores Scores Area Score Comments
(A) Physical 1. NUTRITION 1 2 3 4 5
(A) Physical 2. HOUSING 1 2 3 4 5
(A) Physical 3. CLOTHING 1 2 3 4 5
(A) Physical 4. HYGIENE 1 2 3 4 5
(A) Physical 5. HEALTH 1 2 3 4 5
(B) Safety 1. IN CARERS PRESENCE 1 2 3 4 5
(B) Safety 2. IN CARERS ABSENCE 1 2 3 4 5
(C) Love 1. CARER 1 2 3 4 5
(C) Love 2. MUTUAL ENGAGEMENT 1 2 3 4 5
(D) Esteem 1. STIMULATION 1 2 3 4 5
(D) Esteem 2. APPROVAL 1 2 3 4 5
(D) Esteem 3. DISAPPROVAL 1 2 3 4 5
(D) Esteem 4. ACCEPTANCE 1 2 3 4 5
75
Targeting Items of Care
Targeted Areas Current Score Target Score Timescale Reviewed Score
1
2
3
4
5
76
Making an assessment
  • Guidance provided (follow up scores of 4 or 5)
  • Evaluates strengths as well as weaknesses
  • Allows progress to be assessed
  • A relatively objective measure
  • Allows help to be targeted where needed

77
Making an assessment
  • Common language, common reference
  • Objective measure child focussed
  • Effective tool to promote partnership assessments
    and planning with parents
  • User friendly
  • Comprehensively covers all areas of care
  • Child and carer specific

78
  Scale for Assessing Neglectful Parenting
(Northamptonshire)
  • 179 individual questions under the following
    headings
  • Food and Eating Habits
  • Health and Hygiene
  • Warmth/Clothing
  • Safety and Supervision
  • Emotional Needs
  • Cognitive Development
  • Educational Needs

79
  Example questions (Health and Hygiene)
21 The home lacks showering or bathing facilities
which work, and are available for maintaining
personal hygiene   22 The bath and basin are
dirty, or inaccessible 23 The family lacks a
toilet which works   24The toilet is regularly
left dirty or stained 25 Toddlers potties are
left unemptied containing urine and faeces   26
The kitchen is dirty (eg cooker ingrained with
old food, grime on walls, floor, kitchen
utensils, sink)
80
  Making an assessment
  • Each statement scored 1, 2 or 3 according to how
    true it is.
  • Blank spaces for Summary, Conclusions and Action
    Plan
  • Lengthy and comprehensive list of relevant
    factors
  • No guidance on making overall judgments
  • Statements all identify weaknesses
  • Allocation of questions to headings a little
    eccentric at times

81
Putting it all togetherThe chain of reasoning
  • Facts
  • ?
  • Analysis/summary
  • ?
  • Conclusions/recommendations/action

82
The chain of recording
  • What happened/what you saw
  • ?
  • What this means
  • ?
  • What you did/what should be done (and why, if
    this is not clear from the above)

83
The chain of recording
  • But how do you know which facts?
  • Must be informed by a basic risk assessment
    (would not always be spelled out on paper)

84
Risk assessment
  • The dangers involved (that is the feared
    outcomes)
  • The hazards and strengths of the situation (that
    is the factors making it more or less likely that
    the dangers will realised)
  • The probability of a dangerous outcome in this
    case (bearing in mind the strengths and hazards)
  • The further information required to enable this
    to be judged accurately and
  • The methods by which the likelihood of the feared
    outcomes could be diminished or removed.

85
Bias and Balance
  • Include information favourable to the other
    side as well as that favourable to yours
  • It is your job to make judgements but
  • avoid empty evaluative words like inappropriate,
    worrying, inadequate
  • Give evidence for descriptive words like cold,
    dirty and untidy
  • Beware the danger of facts

86
Bias and Balance
  • Born in 1942, he was sentenced to 5 years
    imprisonment at the age of 25. After 5
    unsuccessful fights, he gave up his attempt to
    make a career in boxing in 1981 and has since had
    no other regular employment

87
Lies, damned lies and killer bread
  • Research on bread indicates that
  • More than 98 percent of convicted felons are
    bread users.
  • Half of all children who grow up in
    bread-consuming households score below average on
    standardized tests.
  • More than 90 percent of violent crimes are
    committed within 24 hours of eating bread.
  • Primitive tribal societies that have no bread
    exhibit a low incidence of cancer, Alzheimer's,
    Parkinson's disease, and osteoporosis.
  • In the 18th century, when much more bread was
    eaten, the average life expectancy was less than
    50 years infant mortality rates were
    unacceptably high many women died in childbirth
    and diseases such as typhoid, yellow fever, and
    influenza were common.

88
Incomplete or out of date
89
(No Transcript)
90
Can you trust a snapshot?
91
Assessment Pitfalls
  • Parents behaviour, whether co-operative or
    uncooperative, often misinterpreted
  • Information from family friends and neighbours
    undervalued
  • Coping with aggressive or frightening families
  • Failure to give sufficient weight to relevant
    case history Start again syndrome
  • Not enough attention is paid to what children
    say, how they look and how they behave
    maintenance of a wholly child-centred approach

92
A child centred approach
  • The purpose of assessment is to understand what
    it is like to be that child (and what it will be
    like in the future if nothing changes)

93
Information handling pitfalls
  • Picking out the important from a mass of data
  • Facts recorded faithfully but not always
    critically appraised
  • Too trusting/insufficiently critical
  • Decoyed by another problem
  • False certainty undue faith in a known fact
  • Discarding information which does not fit the
    model we have formed
  • Department of Health (1991) Child abuse A study
    of inquiry reports, 1980-1989, HMSO, London

94
Assessment pitfalls
  • Rule of optimism
  • Natural love
  • Cultural relativism
  • Too much
  • not enough
  • Adult services and childrens services
    (hand-in-hand or hand-to-hand?)

95
Childrens services and adult services
  • Working on the same case but not working jointly
  • Mutual incomprehension and misunderstanding
  • False expectations and assumptions
  • Abdicating responsibility
  • Need for interpreters

96
Information handling pitfalls
  • Keeping your head down
  • Hesitancy to challenge other professionals or the
    conventional wisdom
  • Tendency to move from facts to actions without
    showing your working

97
Challenge your dodgy thinking
  • I am only a and he is a, so I had better keep
    my opinion to myself.
  • I am obviously in a minority, so I had better
    keep my opinion to myself.
  • We need to maintain harmonious relations, so I
    had better keep my opinion to myself.

98
But what is analysis?
  • You have gathered lots of information but now
    what?
  • All you need to do is ask yourself my favourite
    question
  • So what?
  • You have collected all this data, but what does
    this mean, for the service user, for the family
    and for my setting?

99
Conclusions and recommendations
  • Summarise the main issues and the conclusions to
    be drawn from them. (The facts do not necessarily
    speak for themselves it is your job to speak for
    them.)
  • Define objectives as well as actions
  • Draw conclusions from the facts and
    recommendations from the conclusions
  • Explain how you arrived at your conclusions (Have
    you demonstrated the factual/theoretical basis
    for each?)
  • Consider and discuss alternative possibilities

100
Conclusions and recommendations
  • In drawing conclusions be aware of the extent and
    limitations of your own expertise.
  • Conclusions may be supported by research (Dont
    go outside expertise be careful with new or
    controversial theories be aware of counter
    arguments)
  • Your recommendation should usually be specific
    (not either/or)
  • Remember conclusions may be attacked in only two
    ways
  • founded on incorrect information
  • based on incorrect principles of social work

101
Conclusions and recommendations
  • Problems
  • Unsupported assertions or judgements
  • Inability or unwillingness to analyse and draw
    conclusions
  • Failure to answer the key question So what?

102
Reaching a decision
  • Often a decision is made first and the thinking
    done later (Thiele, 2006)
  • As humans, we resort to simplifications, short
    cuts and quick fixes!
  • We reframe, interpret selectively and
    reinterpret.
  • We deny, discount and minimise
  • We exaggerate information especially if vivid,
    unusual, recent or emotionally laden and
  • We avoid, forget and lose information

103
Good Assessments
  • Are clear about the purpose, legal status and
    potential outcomes
  • Are based on a clear theoretical framework
  • Are clear about context and value base
  • Are collaborative and promote accessibility for
    service users
  • Are based on multiple sources of information
  • Value the expertise and understanding service
    users bring to their situation
  • Are clear about missing information

104
Good Assessments
  • Identify themes and patterns about needs, risks,
    protective factors and strengths
  • Generate and test different ways of understanding
    the situation
  • Give meaning to themes, using knowledge based on
    experience/research
  • Lead to an evidence-based conclusion
  • Use supervision to assist reflection, hypotheses
    and objectivity
  • Are able to record and explain outcomes
  • Are reviewed, updated amended in light of new
    information

105
Spotting the bad onesOrganisational Clues
  • Mythology exists about the family this family
    is/always/behaves like
  • Negative stereotypes about other agencies exist
    so their information is discounted
  • Sudden changes about view of risk not explained
  • Sudden changes of plan not rationally explained

106
Worker clues
  • Gut feelings says something is wrong
  • Worker does not ask difficult questions
  • Analysis does not account for facts/history
  • Proposed plan does not address issues raised in
    assessment
  • Practitioner is working much harder than the
    parents to explain significant concerns
  • The childs story is missing

107
Inter-Agency Clues
  • Agencies have conflicting views of the
    family/risk
  • Agencies have strong views but offer
    ambiguous/limited evidence
  • Some agencies unwilling to share information
  • Pressure to agree suppresses permission to
    question / inter-agency acclimatisation

108
Family Clues
  • Parental intentions not supported by actions
  • Parental optimism involves denial of difficulties
  • Children's accounts conflict with parents
  • Parents talk about their child is
    contradictory/lacks coherence
  • Co-operation is only on the parents terms

109
Checkpoint 4 So what?
  • We have spent some time considering how to
    recognise and respond to neglect.
  • What does this mean for us? What are the
    implications for local services? What, if
    anything, will be different?

110
A final thought
  • We are guilty of many errors and many faults
    but the worst of our crimes is abandoning our
    children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many
    of the things we need can wait. The child cannot.
    Right now is the time his bones are being formed,
    his blood is being made, and his senses are being
    developed. To him we cannot answer 'Tomorrow.'
    His name is 'Today.'
  • Gabriela Mistral (Chilean poet, 1889-1957)

111
Bonus material
112
Working with resistance
  • In many cases parents were hostile to helping
    agencies and workers were often frightened to
    visit family homes. These circumstances could
    have a paralysing effect on practitioners,
    hampering their ability to reflect, make
    judgments, act clearly, and to follow through
    with referrals, assessments or plans. Apparent or
    disguised cooperation from parents often
    prevented or delayed understanding of the
    severity of harm to the child and cases drifted.
    Where parents made it difficult for professionals
    to see children or engineered the focus away from
    allegations of harm, children went unseen and
    unheard.
  • Families tended to be ambivalent or hostile
    towards helping agencies, and staff were often
    fearful of violent and hostile men. Although
    parents tended to avoid agencies, agencies also
    avoided or rebuffed parents by offering a
    succession of workers, closing the case, losing
    files or key information, by re-assessing ,
    referring on, or through initiating and then
    dropping court proceedings.
  • Brandon, M, and others (2008) Analysing child
    deaths and serious injury through abuse and
    neglect what can we learn? London Department
    for Children, Schools and Families

113
Engagement
  • Engagement is the basic task of a child and
    families worker but can never be taken for
    granted and must always be worked for

114
Context
  • Involuntary work may be characterised by
  • Guardedness or reluctance to share information
  • Avoidance and a desire to leave the relationship
  • Strong negative feelings such as anxiety, anger,
    suspicion, guilt or despair.

115
Context
  • We need to accept that
  • The best we may be able to achieve is honesty
    rather than positive feelings and a high degree
    of mutuality
  • Conflict and disagreement are not something to be
    avoided, but are realities that must be explored
    and understood.

116
How might resistance show itself?
  • By only being prepared to consider 'safe' or low
    priority areas for discussion.
  • By not turning up for appointments
  • By being overly co-operative with professionals.
  • By being verbally/and or physically aggressive.
  • By minimising the issues.
  • (Egan, 1994)

117
Potential parental responses
  • Genuine commitment
  • Compliance / approval seeking
  • Tokenism
  • Dissent / avoidance
  • (Horwath and Morrison, 2000)

118
Identifying resistance 4 categories
  • Hostile resistance anger threats, intimidation,
    shouting
  • Passive aggressive surface compliance covers
    partly concealed antagonism and anger
  • Passive hopeless Tearfulness and despair about
    change
  • Challenging Cure me if you can!

119
Strategies for enhancing engagement
  • Before you start, check your mindset (your own
    biases and assumptions)
  • Have realistic expectations
  • It is reasonable that involuntary clients resent
    being forced to participate
  • Because they are forced to participate,
    hostility, silence and non-compliance are common
    responses that do not reflect my skills as a
    worker
  • Due to the barriers created by the practice
    situation, clients may have little opportunity to
    discover if they like me
  • Lack of client co-operation is due to the
    practice situation, not to my specific actions
    and activities
  • (Ivanoff et al, 1994 )

120
During initial contacts
  • Adopt a non-defensive stance
  • Be clear, honest and direct and acknowledge the
    involuntary nature of the relationship
  • Clarify roles and expectations, including what is
    required of the client
  • Explain consequences of non-compliance and the
    advantages of compliance
  • (Ivanoff et al, 1994 )

121
Try to
  • Invite participation
  • Understand how the client sees the problem as
    well as how we see it
  • Understand what the client wants, as well as what
    we want
  • (Ivanoff et al, 1994 )

122
What might we be doing to make it worse?
  • Becoming impatient and hostile
  • Doing nothing, hoping the resistance will go away
  • Lowering expectations
  • Blaming the family member
  • Allowing the family member to control the
    assessment inappropriately
  • Failing to acknowledge our fear

123
What might we be doing to make it worse?
  • Becoming unrealistic
  • Believing that family members must like and trust
    us before assessment can proceed.
  • Ignoring the enforcing role of some aspects of
    child protection work and hence refusing to place
    any demands on family members.
  • (Egan, 1994)

124
Avoid
  • Expressions of over-concern
  • Moralising
  • Criticising the client
  • Making false promises
  • Displaying impatience

125
Productive approaches
  • Give practical, emotional support - especially by
    being available, predictable and consistent
  • See some resistance and reluctance as normal
  • Explore our own resistance to change and by
    examining the quality of our own interventions
    and communication style
  • (Egan, 1994)

126
Productive approaches
  • Helping family members to identify incentives for
    moving beyond resistance
  • Tapping the potential of other people who are
    respected as partners by the family member
  • Understanding that reluctance and resistance may
    be avoidance or a signal that we are not doing
    our job very well
  • (Egan, 1994)

127
Confrontation
  • In child welfare services, the Childrens Service
    Worker must be a skilled confronter.
    Confrontation is, basically, facing the client
    with the facts in the situation and with the
    probable consequences of behaviours
  • (Texas Department of Human Resources)

128
A scale for assessing motivation
  • Shows concern and has realistic confidence.
  • Shows concern, but lacks confidence.
  • Seems concerned, but impulsive or careless
  • Indifferent or apathetic about problems
  • Rejection of parental role.

129
Shows concern and has realistic confidence.
  • Parent is concerned about childrens welfare
    wants to meet their physical, social, and
    emotional needs to the extent he/she understands
    them.
  • Parent is determined to act in best interests of
    children
  • Has realistic confidence that he/she can overcome
    problems and is willing to ask for help when
    needed
  • Is prepared to make sacrifices for children.

130
Shows concern, but lacks confidence
  • Parent is concerned about childrens welfare and
    wants to meet their needs, but lacks confidence
    that problems can be overcome
  • May be unwilling for some reason to ask for help
    when needed. Feels unsure of own abilities or is
    embarrassed
  • But uses good judgement whenever he/she takes
    some action to solve problems.

131
Seems concerned, but impulsive or careless
  • Parent seems concerned about childrens welfare
    and claims he/she wants to meet their needs, but
    has problems with carelessness, mistakes and
    accidents. Professed concern is often not
    translated into effective action.
  • May be disorganised, not take enough time, or
    pays insufficient attention may misread
    signals from children may exercise poor
    judgement.
  • Does not seem to intentionally violate proper
    parental role shows remorse.

132
Indifferent or apathetic about problems
  • Parent is not concerned enough about childrens
    needs to resist temptations, eg competing
    demands on time and money. This leads to one or
    more of the childrens needs not being met.
  • Parent does not have the right priorities when
    it comes to child care may take a cavalier or
    indifferent attitude. There may be a lack of
    interest in the children and in their welfare and
    development.
  • Parent does not actively reject the parental role.

133
Rejection of parental role
  • Parent actively rejects parental role, taking a
    hostile attitude toward child care
    responsibilities.
  • Believes that child care is an imposition, and
    may ask to be relieved of that responsibility.
    May take the attitude that it isnt his or her
    job.
  • May seek to give up the responsibility for
    children
  • (Magura et al,1987)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)