Title: Ch 17 Culture and Personality
14 17 07
- Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- 1. Cultural Universals and Differences
- 2. Markus Kitayama (1991) Model
- 3. Suh Self-Consistency
2Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Some Cultural Universals
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- Higher status person is Dr. blank or Mr. So
and so - Lower status person is Jack or Bob
- 5.
3Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- What About Sex Roles?
- Margaret Mead (1935)
- Documented particular culture in which women were
more dominant - Today
4Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Men active, aggressive, conceited, loud,
pleasure-seeking, reckless, tough - Women affectionate, dependent, emotional,
fearful, modest, patient, prudish, timid, warm
5Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Williams Best (1990)
- Both men and women are viewed favorably as well
as disfavorably - However, in terms of different attributes
- Such sex differences have some support (Ch 16)
6Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Ekman (1973)
- Set of emotional facial expressions
- Traveled to Fore foragers of New Guinea
- No exposure to Western culture
- Also Japan, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, USA
- Happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise
7Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Ekman (1973) your child has died, etc.
- Lazarus (1991) studies of blind children
- Thus, emotion expression
8Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Interpersonal circumplex
- Why?
- We dont know for sure
- But knowing dominance and warmth of others is
presumably a universal benefit
9Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Is personality a Western thing?
- In describing the spontaneous self (TST)
- In evaluating the behaviors of others (e.g.,
Miller, 1984) - Recent research has evaluated this
10Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Is personality a Western thing?
- No
- Big 5 factor structure replicates in France,
Holland, Philippines, Sino-Tibetan,
Hamito-Semitic, Malayo-Polynesian cultures, so on
11Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Cultural diffs in traits
- Stereotypes or reality?
12Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- McCrae et al. (2005)
- 80 colleagues
- 51 cultures
- 12,156 participants
- Big 5 inventory
13Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Cultural universals
- Cultural differences
- Also pronounced, however..
14Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Americans oysters
- French snails, frog legs
- Zulus locusts
- Chinese snakes
- Jale, New Guinea people
15Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Middle Eastern men kiss each other on the cheek
- Germans do not visit Herr Professor during
office hours - Iranians do not eat French Fries with their hands
- Japanese have many customs that Americans frankly
do poorly with
16Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Norms
- However, aware when go to other cultures
- Scotland fork stays in left hand
- Americans cut, drop knife, then pick up fork
with right hand - Other examples of being fish out of water?
17Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- Very loose with time
- Often late
- Very tight with time
- Perceived as obsessive by southern Europeans
18Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- With strangers, larger
- With intimates, smaller
- Those near equator prefer less space
- Northern Europeans want more space
19Ch 17 Culture and Personality
- India 84
- United States 47
- Germany 9
- Iceland 3
20Chapter 17 Culture and Personality
- Brahmins not OK
- Americans OK
- Brahmins OK
- Americans not OK
- Brahmins not OK
- Americans not OK
- What is considered acceptable varies by culture
21Short film clip
- Cultural differences
- Are they chaotic and random?
- Or can we understand them more systematically?
- Recent work contrasts
- Americans, Europeans
- Vs. Japanese, Korean, Chinese, African, Indian
- Loosely Western versus Eastern
- And self-concept differences
- Film fact sheet
22Cultural Differences
- Markus Kitayama (1991) model
- Very influential
- Cultures differ in self-concept
23Cultural Differences
- Markus Kitayama (1991) model
- American, European
- Self exists apart from others
father
mother
self
girlfriend
friend
24Cultural Differences
- Markus Kitayama (1991) model
- Asian, Indian, African
- Self overlaps with others
father
mother
self
girlfriend
friend
25Cultural Differences
- Consequences for cognition
- (1)
- Self varies across contexts (or not)
- Contradictions allowed (or not)
- Me as friend caring, submissive
- Me as boss hard-assed, uncaring
26Cultural Differences
- Consequences for cognition
- (2)
- Independent
- Behaviors attributed to traits (e.g., he is a
jerk) - Interdependent
- Behaviors attributed to situation (e.g., he must
be in a hurry)
27Cultural Differences
- (1)
- - ego focused anger, pride
- Own needs wants
- Independent self, Western self
- - other focused sympathy, shame, caring
- Others needs wants
- Interdependent, Eastern self
28Cultural Differences
- Consequences for emotion
- (2)
- amae need to be at anothers indulgence
- oime feeling of indebtedness
29Cultural Differences
- Consequences for emotion
- (3)
- Yes
- Internal attributes (feelings) seen as authentic
reflection of self - No
- Feelings seen as selfish, disruptive, primitive
- (4)
- Japan less intense feelings, expressions
- China, Ghana emotions seen as body problems not
social ones
30Cultural Differences
- Consequences for motivation
- (1)
- - deference need to defer, follow
- - similance need to emulate
- abasement need for self-deprecation
31Cultural Differences
- Consequences for motivation
- (2)
- Japan - no desire to view self gt other
- - the nail that stands out gets pounded
- (3)
- Western - yes
- - success me failure situation
- Eastern - no
- - success not me failure me
32Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- Western conception of mental health
- Self-actualization
- Self as guidance, meaning
- Others just screw you up
33Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- Eastern conception of mental health
34Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- Importance of self-consistency in West
- People seek, trust feedback that confirms self
concept - Maintaining coherent self-view an important
motive - More inconsistency across roles
- more depression, neuroticism
35Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- Less cognitive dissonance arising from behavior
that violates ones prior attitudes - Less critical of public behavior that mismatches
private - Americans would call this hypocrisy
36Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- A tree changes colors, loses leaves, etc.
- It is still the same tree
- Thus, acting differently in different situations
is natural
37Culture and Self-Consistency
- Personal Pentagram
- self interacting with different people
- Romantic partner, parents, same-sex friend,
stranger, teacher/professor - How characteristic of you is each trait?
- Talkative (T), serious (S), nervous (N),
intellectual (I), cheerful (C) - Rank from 1 most characteristic to 5 least
- Connect each trait across contexts
38Culture and Self-Consistency (Suh, 2002)
- Extent to which equally talkative across
situations - Extent to which equally serious across situations
- traited in this sense
- Always the same regardless of who Im interacting
with
39Ch 16 Culture and Personality
- Self is always the same
- Self changes
- Koreans pentagrams less ordered (more variation)
- Consistency more predictive of happiness for ___