Title: The ScholarActivist Nexus : a Case Study of the Thai Media Policy
1The Scholar-Activist Nexus a Case Study of the
Thai Media Policy
2Outline
- The role of scholar-activist nexus in the Thai
media reform movement - Campaigning and lobbying for structural reform of
radio frequencies - New social movement that sparked the
constitutional debate on radio frequency and that
finally led to the promulgation of Article 40 in
the 1997 Constitution - Monitoring the course of the reform and
self-martyring - the Campaign for Popular Media Reform (CPMR)
- Advocacy through research, public education, and
networking - Thai MPAC, MPC
3New Social Movement
- Coup detat 1991 gt Black May 1992
- Political Reform Media Reform
- 1997 Peoples Constitution
4Radio ownership structure
- Radio
- Name of orgs No of radio stations
- Public Relations Department (PRD) 145
- Army 128
- Navy 21
- Air Force 36
- Police 44
- MCOT 62
- House of Parliament 16
- Others 71
- Total 523
-
5Television ownership structure
- Name of orgs No. of TV stations PRD 9
- Army 2
- MCOT 5
- Ministry of 1
- PMs Office
6Constitutional Debate
- Public VS National resources
- The term public implies that the owner of the
radio frequency and the spectrum are the general
public or the people who are the highest
sovereign of a democratic nation-state. - On the contrary, the term national in the Thai
authoritarian context implies the sovereignty of
the state over the people.
7Counter Reform
- The military viewed radio frequencies as a
national resource that implied the exclusive
rights of ownership and management by the state
and its security agencies.
8Article 40
- The radio frequencies for radio and television
transmission, and in radio communications are
national resources to be used for public
interests - An independent state regulatory agency must be
set up to supervise the assignment and licensing
of frequencies for radio and television
broadcasting and for telecommunications
stipulated in clause one of this article - The objectives of clause two must take into
consideration the highest public intersts at the
national and local levels, in the area of
education, culture, security and public safety
and other public benefits, including free and
fair competition.
9Media Reform Movement
- The scholar/activist reformers were also able to
push for the inclusion of four important points
in the organic law of article 40 the Frequency
Allocation, National Broadcasting Commission,
National Telecommunications Commission Act 2000
10Media Reform Movement
- The four points include
- Two independent regulatory bodies for
broadcasting and telecommunications - Three classifications of broadcast services
- Public/state service
- Private/commercial service
- Community service
- 20 of radio frequencies be allocated to the
peoples sector community radio and TV - The democratic participation of related sectors
in the selection of NBC candidates
11Proposed vision of the National Broadcasting
Commission (NBC)
- Deregulation gt Open structure
- Reregulation gt Ownership reform
- Democratization of
- Broadcast Media Structure
12The Campaign for the Popular Media Reform (CPMR)
- The CPMR was originally known as the working
group to follow the implementation of Article 40.
- CPMRs founding members came from key staff of
the Thai Volunteers Foundation, a famous civil
liberty NGO, and a group of progressive minded
media scholars, led by Professor Ubonrat
Siriyuvasak of Chulalngkorn University.
13Uncovering discrepancy in the NBC selection
process
- During the selection process of the National
Broadcasting Commission (NBC), following the
enactment of the Frequency Allocation Act, a CPMR
member detected conflicts of interest between
members of the NBC Selection Committee and the
applicants. The case was brought to the
Administrative Court which finally ruled the
selection process as unlawful and stalled the
final step of the process.
14The NBC that is not to be.
- Both rounds of NBC selection process, in 2001 and
2004 failed due to conflicts of interest between
selection committee and final candidates. - The post-coup government (September 2006
February 2008) stalled the third round of
selection while the junta-appointed legislature
wrote a new constitution which in effect merged
broadcast and telecommunications regulator into
one single entity.
15Article 47 of the 2007 Constitution
- There shall be an independent regulatory body
having the duty to distribute the frequencies
under paragraph one and supervise radio or
television broadcasting and telecommunication
business, ensure free and fair competition, and
encourage the public to participate in management
of public communication facilities.
16Self-martyring Shin Corporation V. Thai Post and
Supinya Klangnarong
Secretary-general of the Campaign for Popular
Media Reform (CPMR) Supinya Klangnarong and The
Thai Post newspaper were sued for defamation by
Shin Corporation for the comment Supinya
allegedly made about the conflict of interest
between Shin Corporation and the Thaksin-led
government. Supinya was acquitted in March 2006,
but after international spotlights were cast on
the issue as an exemplary case of the chilling
effect.
17Emerging scholar/activist nexus in Thailand
- Thai Media Policy Advocacy Center (Thai MPAC)
- Media Policy Center (MPC)
- Freedom Against Censorship Thailand (FACT)
18Thai Media Policy Advocacy Center (Thai MPAC)
- Thai MPAC was founded in 2006 as a collaboration
between Faculty of Communication Arts,
Chulalongkorn University and Internews Network,
an international NGO that has worked in more than
70 countries around the world to improve access
to information and to promote open communications
policies.
19About Thai-MPAC
- Thai MPAC activities include
- Public information
- Advocacy
- Research
- Conferences and Seminars
20Thai MPACs activities
- Thai MPAC has a website (www.thaimpac.net) that
will disseminate current news and information on
relevant issues. Original news and articles by
Thai MPACs contributors will be published on the
website and available for download. Thai MPACs
contributing writers are media law specialists,
academics and journalists who are knowledgeable
in such areas as policy formulation and advocacy,
broadcast and telecommunications laws and
regulation, and freedom of the press.
21(No Transcript)
22Thai-MPAC conferences and seminars
- At least one international conference and four
national seminars have been organized by Thai
MPAC in the past two years on these issues - Internet freedom
- Convergence and communications regulation
- New media laws and implications on freedom of
expression - The implementation of the new computer crime bill
on cyber-dissidence - Community radio and regulatory challenges
23Freedom Against Censorship Thailand (FACT)
- Founded by a former English literature scholar
from Thammasart University - Became a sister NGO of CPMR
- Advocates against all forms of censorship but
with a main focus on Internet censorship - Activities range from campaigning, protesting,
petitions, to lawsuits
24(No Transcript)
25The End